• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
You are here: Home / Blog

Blog

Carnivore Diet

Is the Carnivore Diet for Athletes?

Blog| ByMatt Cooper

Carnivore Diet

Nutrition is a race best run as a marathon, not a sprint. And the carnivore diet is all right for an on-ramp, but not as the highway home.

If you’ve followed me for a while, you know I’m not a fan of extreme diets. That said, why then do we see so many people from all walks of life doing well on the carnivore diet—improving body composition and reporting better mood, more energy, and better digestion—if it’s also not a good diet to follow long term? Does this mean carnivore eating is a suitable diet strategy for athletes (or people in general)?

Here, I’m going to answer that with my two cents and make the case that the carnivore diet could be followed short term as a potential way to silence autoimmune issues…but it shouldn’t be followed long term. It’s also not the only path to the potential “solutions” it is correlated with.

**Abbreviated takeaways are available in the final section and you can find my comprehensive guide here.

Why Is the Carnivore Diet Problematic for Athletes Long-Term?

Although some of these health and performance issues symptomatic of a long-term carnivore diet can show up sooner in some athletes than others, here’s what tends to happen at some point or another. 

Zero (or Minimal) Carbs

The carnivore diet contains zero carbohydrates. To thrive and function optimally (not just survive), carbs are essential—whether you’re an athlete or not.

Totally eliminating carbs can also impair your ability to metabolize as much glucose as before. This is the opposite of what we want for health and performance. Even carnivore and ketogenic diet followers readily admit this.

Totally eliminating carbs can also impair your ability to metabolize as much glucose as before. This is the opposite of what we want for health and performance, says @rewirehp. Share on X

Carbs are:

  • The primary fuel for fast-twitch muscle fibers. This matches the observed reality, wherein low-carb endurance athletes tend to be minimally explosive. To be fair, this is multifactorial, as there are multiple inputs at play here that can affect muscle fiber dynamics, including how one trains. It’s also fair to mention that fast-twitch muscle fibers aren’t the only thing that makes one fast. Sensory mechanics, fascial connectivity, and other factors contribute. That said, in my nearly 20 years in nutrition, I’ve yet to see one explosive athlete who’s done low carb for a protracted time.
  • Needed to convert T4 to T3 in thyroid hormone manufacture (more on hormones later). They’re also essential for creating CO2 during the metabolic process.
  • Systemically protective in the face of stresses from our environment in general, as well as for recovery from training and playing. Carbs are energy, and energy is our adaptation currency.

By eliminating/mitigating carbs (a readily available energy source), your body has to “mine” for energy from fat. This is not only energetically/metabolically inefficient for needing ready-made energy (e.g., to fuel short, athletic bursts), but it also coincides with the excessive release of stress hormones like adrenaline, norepinephrine, glucagon, and cortisol. This is one reason diets like keto and carnivore can seem like they improve energy in the short term, though this is actually fool’s gold.

Low in CO2

Forget the mainstream narrative about carbon being bad for a moment and open yourself to some nuance…CO2 is one of the primary factors responsible for us becoming more biologically complex individuals. The CO2 manufactured from carbs is a vital anti-stress, systemically nourishing nutrient.

CO2 is critical for endurance capacity and oxygenation of tissues (including working tissues during performance) via the Bohr effect. Sure, low-carb approaches can appear to work for survival-type training (e.g., hiking, obstacle course racing, etc.) because there isn’t a shot clock on energy efficiency. In repeat-burst sports like basketball, football, combat sports, and more, there is a repeat demand for an immediately available energy source.

Carb-rich diets will do this, but carb-scarce diets will not. In some of the survival-type environments I mentioned, it can appear to the individual that it’s sufficient because there’s a less limiting time stamp on the time it takes to complete the task. There’s far less urgency. The sport is less reactive in nature. Thus, it can seem (between the stress hormones and increased fat oxidation-derived energy) like the energy supply is adequate (never mind the potential survival state it’s creating under the hood).

Sports like basketball place sports car-type demands on athletes, while endurance sports place more Prius-type demands. In one case, it’s about keeping a good pace and turning on the jets regularly as need be. In the other, it’s about simply moving forward. Hare and tortoise.

Carbs are also important for vasodilation and protect against damage to proteins. They’re simply critical for maintaining/stabilizing cellular structure. “Energy and structure are interdependent at every level,” as Dr. Ray Peat would say—and in this instance, he’s right.

No Fiber

The diet has minimal/zero fiber. Although some fibers are indigestible, inflammatory, and problematic, no fiber/bitters can…

  • Lead to poor gut motility (reduced bile flow, reduced frequency of bowel movements).
  • Mean you’re not taking advantage of potential detoxification mechanisms (e.g., estrogen detox).
  • Help optimize digestion when you eat the right kinds (e.g., raw carrots, bamboo shoots, white button mushrooms), even though it’s not essential. In turn, this has a positive effect on neurological function, including perception and feeling (quality of life), as well as athletic performance.

Lacking in Some Micronutrients

The carnivore diet lacks nutrient robustness, some of which can (and can’t) be supplemented effectively. Carnivore can result in nutrient deficiencies, chief among them being mineral and electrolyte balance. Even the most devout carnies concede this through a need to over-supplement electrolytes.

Electrolytes are foundational for cellular processes underpinning general health, as well as muscle actions. Electrolytes also help motor neuron communication; instead of thinking of electrolytes as simply cramp stoppers, we should think of them as physiological prerequisites to neuromuscular activity and brain health, among many, many other things.

Although it is very true that plant-based eaters are highly susceptible to bone breaks, a lack of dietary calcium in meat-eaters is a possibility, too, says @rewirehp. Share on X

Though not as bad as plant-based, the carnivore diet also lacks calcium. Speaking of electrolytes, calcium is difficult to get through food if you don’t consume dairy or ground eggshell powder. Most calcium supplements aren’t effective, either. If your calcium levels aren’t sufficient to support the abundant amount of phosphorus you’ll get through meat, cellular metabolism will suffer.

Although it is very true that plant-based eaters are highly susceptible to bone breaks, a lack of dietary calcium (through the false notion that dairy is inherently bad for us) in meat-eaters is a possibility, too. When I see bad bone break injuries—like the ones that happened to Paul George, Gordon Hayward, Chris Weidman, and Anderson Silva—calcium intake would be one of the first questions I’d be asking to better identify what seeded the situation.

Unless accounted for, you’ll also be deficient in collagen. If no collagen, gelatin, or bone broth is included, you’ll operate on a collagen deficiency. This means amino acids will be unbalanced in favor of amino acids tryptophan, histidine, methionine, and cystine. This may not be an issue in the short term, but this can be inflammatory and metabolically problematic in the long term.

Many athletes eating a major excess of muscle meats tend to be susceptible to various types of fatigue, which health researcher Gary Millet once categorized as “adrenal fatigue.” Collagen is also something of a fertilizer for our connective tissues, be it gut lining, hair, skin, nails, or tendons. This is a big reason why I recommend all my athletes get a sufficient amount—it’s a nutritional way to support durability on the court.

Unless modified to include some fruit, you’ll be at a deficit for vitamin C: a critical antioxidant that is immunosupportive, increases collagen synthesis (important for athletes using collagen for injury prevention and metabolism), and promotes cardiovascular health, iron absorption, and other antioxidant functions.

It’s important to remember that being low in a nutrient (or even at the recommended daily allowance, in some cases) is not the same as having optimal nutrient levels.

What Benefits Does Carnivore Seem to Have Up Front?

So, if carnivore is bad over the long term, why do people seem to report improvements in body composition, digestion, cognitive function, inflammation, and autoimmune-type symptoms? How does one explain these results?

In general, I believe most of the benefits come from cutting out dozens of inflammatory nutrients and ingredients not meant for human consumption, as well as inflammatory fibers.

Another mechanism of action is increasing nutrient content (not ideal nutrient content, mind you, but a relative increase). The carnivore diet can layer in more vitamins found only in animal products: retinol, creatine, K2-MK4, vitamin A, taurine, heme-iron, etc. This will create a highly pronounced positive effect in those coming from the plant-based or low-protein diet side of things. Simply reversing a protein deficiency can cause a significant improvement in health and subjective quality of life.

An extension of increasing relative nutrient content is increasing protein content. This also can mean improving the protein:energy ratio (P:E ratio), as coined by nutritionist Ted Naiman. I have plenty of differences with Naiman’s thoughts on the applied diet side of things, but he is right in that those with larger body composition renovation goals may need to improve their ratio of protein to both carbs and fat (energy). This is because protein isn’t so much an energy source but should be viewed more as a “free macronutrient” (to a point, as excess isn’t healthy) in that it takes more energy to fully absorb it than it contains, calorically. Those eating well beyond their caloric needs in energy often see a benefit because of this.

Additionally, carnivore can be beneficial in the form of diet-induced thermogenesis from digesting said higher protein content. This also means potentially improving energy balance (caloric intake) overall. More protein means more satiety, which means a reduced likelihood of overeating.

Circling back to nutrient inclusion, often, opening people to the benefit of ruminant organ meat superfoods (liver, heart) they weren’t intaking previously boosts the above micronutrients and more. Carnivore eating is inclusive of organ meats.

More Gut Rest, Less Inflammation

This warrants more elaboration. The nature of carnivore translates to more gut rest—meaning the carnivore diet acts as something of a fasting mimetic by being a low-residue diet. This means most of the food is digested in the small intestine quite quickly.

The increased energy, cognitive fitness, and symptom suppression can also result from a combo of having fewer energy-stealing, brain fog-promoting inflammatory agents and upregulated production of adrenal stress hormones like cortisol.

Aspects of Dr. Steven Gundry’s work can be pulled from here to help us understand the underlying why’s: namely, plant defense chemicals, bacterial endotoxin, and excessive and/or semi-indigestible fibers.

Many health and performance issues start in the gut. Resolving gut insults and rehabilitation from gut injury is a priority for athletes, says @rewirehp. Share on X

Plant defense chemicals and “anti-nutrients” are compounds that plants use to defend themselves. Even to the uninitiated, this should make intuitive sense. We’ve all heard that plants may be poisonous to prevent animals from eating them. Think of this as a less dramatic version of that. While many fruit-bearing plants with seeds like strawberries prefer that we eat them because it helps proliferate the species when they come out the other end, there’s no biological advantage in being eaten for many plants. Thus, poisons (both high-level and low) and indigestibility are their inherent defense mechanisms.

Plant toxins include lectins, tannins, oxalates, goitrogens, trypsin inhibitors, and self-made pesticides. These can prevent the absorption of what nutrients a plant may contain, disrupt the hormonal profile of the consumer, inhibit the release of digestive enzymes and stomach acid, and even cause organ failure or death in extreme cases. Plant toxins can sometimes be produced or upregulated in response to stressful growing conditions; in turn, these plants can even communicate to neighboring ones to do the same.

Both animals and humans have built-in evolutionary adaptations that help keep us safe from these plant insults.

Ruminants like cows actually have a quad-series stomach complete with bacteria-filled rumen that helps them neutralize and break down plant toxins. We humans don’t have this built-in machinery. We have an acidic, bacteria-free stomach like dogs, cats, or vultures. When ruminants are left to their own devices and roam freely, they actually rely on their senses to avoid consuming an excess of plant toxins. However, if hypothetically caged with limited food options, they will override these instincts and consume what’s available.

Cows tend to find those plants poisonous to them unpalatable and unappetizing. They won’t usually eat them unless their feed is contaminated with them or they don’t have other food options. As health researcher Kaya of Fundamental Nourishment points out, some of the best plant toxin neutralizers are sheep, and even they aren’t bulletproof. They can experience thyroid dysfunction, congenital hypothyroidism, thyroid goiters, stillbirth, and even death from simply overconsuming kale.

In fact, research has shown thyroid enlargement (goiter) in lambs fed an excess of kale compared to pasture-raised lambs that were left to choose what they ate—one example of seemingly innocuous plant toxins disrupting hormone function and overall health. Not identical in humans, but surprisingly similar health consequences.

These goitrogens can disrupt our thyroid function by inhibiting iodine utilization, which diminishes the production of thyroid hormone T4 and its conversion into the active thyroid hormone T3. They also can hyper-elevate the pituitary hormone T.S.H. (thyroid stimulating hormone), which is associated with systemic inflammation at too high a clip. Although other plant toxins can disrupt the thyroid, goitrogens like kale, broccoli, cauliflower, rutabaga, cassava root, and turnip are the worst offenders (goitrogen). Other plant toxins can, however, be a stick in the bike spokes to liver function—the chief conversion site of T4 to T3. 

Humans have the same palatability instincts. Well-cooked kale tastes better than raw. Peeled carrots taste better than unpeeled ones. Cooking mitigates many plant toxins, as does removing the peel, where many of these toxins are concentrated.

Oddly enough, momma may not have known best when she force-fed some of these vegetables to us as kids. Kids are generally more oriented toward their instincts and have not yet been trained to follow what they “ought to do” food-wise, yet. It turns out we may not need to suck it up, nor are we worthy of ridicule for being weak-willed. This is our instincts guiding us in many cases.

Just because some plants contain nutrients, it doesn’t mean we’re able to absorb them. There’s a big difference between nutrient presence and bioavailability, says @rewirehp. Share on X

It’s also important to remember that just because some of these plants contain nutrients, it doesn’t mean we’re able to absorb them. There’s a big difference between nutrient presence and bioavailability. There may not be much use in selecting certain plants or grains based on nutrient contents if you can’t utilize them.

This slots into our digestion—absorption—utilization nutrition model quite well. If you can digest something, you can absorb it. If you can absorb it, your body can utilize it as it was meant to. Nutritionist Ronnie Smith of Energy Concepts originally conceived this nutritional model. (Ronnie also took a bioenergetic view of health and performance.)

Removal of these digestive and neuroimmune insults results in a drastic upfront minimization of gut injury for most. A reduction in them (and the other listed digestive insults) is responsible for a good amount of the benefits, including visual body composition changes. Some of those results stem from not having as much gut inflammation, water retention, and bloating.

We’re essentially providing a pruning effect on unwanted bacterial overgrowth (in some cases), bacterial endotoxin, and more—not unlike how environmentalists intentionally introduce certain animals to get rid of invasive species to balance out ecological systems. And this isn’t purely an analogy—your gut literally is an ecological system.

Because we know the gut and brain are linked via the gut-brain axis, a bidirectional link between the central and enteric nervous systems, this means emotional and cognitive centers of the brain are linked with peripheral gastrointestinal function.

It’s not a stretch to say that we can presuppose this not only applies to neuropsychiatric conditions like mood but also has implications with the neurological efficiency required for high-level performance. Your physiology doesn’t work in silos but as one coordinated unit—just like your movements.

While many will scoff and say, “look at high-level athletes who eat crap, like D.K. Metcalf,” the reality is that some elite-level athletes have the superpower of being able to overcome bad environmental inputs compared to you and me.

For the overwhelming majority of us who need to put in work to be great? Good luck, if that’s your approach.

Reduction of Bacterial Endotoxin

Speaking of, another thing that makes carnivore highly effective up front is the diet’s ability to prune away at bacterial endotoxin efficiently. Not unlike the gut irritants I mentioned, bacterial endotoxins are a key driver of gut (and neuroimmune) issues that have many downstream health and performance implications.

Hormonal Relief

The short-term benefits of the carnivore diet can come from “addressing” some of the above gut issues, which in turn relieve some hormonal issues that present with most modern diets. Additionally, this can help reduce serotonin (a neurohormone) that limits metabolic function. This means braking ATP production, which in turn downregulates us into more of a “hibernating” state. As a reminder, you need energy to adapt to the stressors of playing and training, as well as modern life.

Another underlying mechanism is cortisol and stress hormones that kick in as a result of sticking more to the right side of the Krebs cycle and biasing mostly fat oxidation (mobilizing dietary and body fat into energy instead). This is because the body doesn’t have an immediately available energy source (carbs). When the body goes to “mine” its own energy, it releases stress hormones such as cortisol and glucagon.

The ‘high’ many people report is essentially because they’re running on stress hormones—not because they’ve unlocked a higher level of cognitive fitness, says @rewirehp. Share on X

Short-term, cortisol (the “stress hormone”) can be anti-inflammatory as a stress response, but prolonged, perpetual release in excess is harmful and will suppress your metabolism. If protracted, it can also contribute to degenerative states (as one of many factors). This “high” many people report is essentially because they’re running on stress hormones—not because they’ve unlocked a higher level of cognitive fitness. Generally, this also can disrupt sleep cycles (an area where athletes are already working against the odds when they’re traveling on road trips).

However, hormones are yet another net negative. On top of chronic upregulation of stress hormones, the carnivore (and keto) diet can dunk on your hormones by increasing SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin), lowering GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone), and lowering T3, as we mentioned before.

Once again, we’re playing the carnivore chorus. The central theme is that being ahead in the first quarter ain’t the same thing as winning the game. A short-term stepping stone isn’t the same thing as a long-term solution.

“Action Items” and Considerations for Integration

Although there are more layers to this, I hope this section gives you a solid understanding of why carnivore can be a great shortcut but not a complete dietary template. What can carnivore eating teach us? What nuggets can we potentially fold into our own regimen? Whether it’s something to do or not to do, I believe we can learn some things from the carnivore diet.

The reality is that people get results up front with the carnivore diet because it gets most people eating more protein (and most aren’t eating enough). Most need to eat more protein, but keep in mind some athletes and gym goers may have overeaten protein to a detriment.

It’s been responsible for many learning the benefits of organ meats—and that’s a good thing. Ruminant organ meats are nutrient powerhouses. Regularly include these. Once per week should be solid for most, though certain high-stress situations such as the energy demands of professional-level athletics may call for more.

Ruminant organ meats are nutrient powerhouses. Regularly include them—once per week should be solid for most, says @rewirehp. Share on X

It improves the protein:energy ratio by having people consume less energy in the form of carbs/fat while upping protein, which is thermogenic. It cuts out dozens of processed ingredients, stabilizers, and inflammatory ingredients not meant for human consumption, and it also cuts down on inflammatory fibers found in certain plants.

It’s helped usher in the correct notion that saturated fats and cholesterol foods aren’t evil—quite the opposite. These are like fertilizer for protective, anti-stress, steroid hormone manufacture. It’s the so-called “heart-healthy polyunsaturated fatty acids” (especially industrial seed oils) that are to be avoided. Unfortunately, many pro sports franchises’ chefs cook with these oils. This is one of many examples that gets overlooked by training staff—what good is the latest force plate technology if athletes are being fed slow-acting poisons? I’m all for a lot of sports science technological innovations, but worrying about data without fixing the fundamentals is like majoring in the minors.

It helps us rethink mainstream vegetable integrations. Lettuce, most salads, highly cruciferous vegetables, and leafy greens are to be minimized, for the most part. Vegetables like raw carrots, white button mushrooms, and bamboo shoots are to be emphasized. That said, carbs and quality vegetables aren’t evil just because certain junk food carbohydrates are bad for our health.

Most of the benefits come from improved gut health, as carnivore is a low-residue, high gut motility diet. (That’s just a nerdy way to say it mimics fasting by digesting food in the small intestine immediately.) Many health and performance issues start in the gut. Resolving gut insults and rehabilitation from gut injury is a priority for athletes.

The bigger picture here is that carnivore is a low-energy diet (both in a macro and micro sense) as well as an inducer of systemic stress that—if prolonged—resembles survival states. It’s a black-and-white approach that makes some improvements that get attributed to the broad brushstroke of meat only. The key to remember here is that symptom suppression is not the same thing as addressing the root cause, and THIS is why it can be a dangerous mirage. In reality, you could accomplish the same benefits and more with a chisel instead of a sledgehammer (small tweaks versus a giant extreme, sweeping change).

There could be a gut-reset benefit to following the carnivore diet for a couple of weeks at a time, but if you decide to do this, be sure to include some digestion-friendly fiber in the form of raw carrots, white button mushrooms, bamboo shoots, etc. as well as not give up sugar from the small amounts of carbs you allot yourself during this time. This means still including fruit, fruit juice, raw honey, and milk (not just a carb, but mostly carb-dense in terms of macro spread).

Truth is, it’s another example of a sledgehammer diet. By that, I mean you take one giant hammer swing and eliminate a food group, key nutrient, etc., and then decide that all the benefits you’re getting come from cutting out something like carbs, meat, etc. when in reality it created a ripple effect of a lot of smaller changes under the hood, physiologically speaking (both good and bad). Was it really the meat or carbs, or was it a combo of all the small things under the hood that changed as a downstream consequence?

That’s why all these extreme diets don’t work well in the long run. Better to use a chisel and find what works for you over time: how much to eat, dialing in your grams of protein/carb/fat macronutrients, identifying what nutrients you need more of, and testing what’s causing inflammation rather than doing an extreme sledgehammer diet.

Athletes considering a temporary carnivore approach should only do so for two weeks during a time when they’re not playing, says @rewirehp. Share on X

Even if you use carnivore as a reset, don’t mistake the current on-ramp for the long-term highway. Athletes considering a temporary carnivore approach should only do so for two weeks during a time when they’re not playing. This likely means early off-season for pro athletes. Everyday individuals should take a deload from training.

The bottom line with carnivore is it can be a useful ultra-short-term tool as an elimination diet to identify food sensitivities and stabilize your gut situation in dire situations. Beyond that, you’re better off as the tortoise than the hare in this race.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Vibration Roller

Vibration Therapy for Athlete Performance: What’s All the Buzz About?

Blog| ByJim Wittstrom

Vibration Roller

Ask any athlete who takes their sport seriously, and they’ll tell you they’re always looking for ways to optimize their training and recovery. Ask any injured athlete if they’d like to find a way to speed up their rehabilitation, and you’ll get a resounding “Yes!”

As such, it’s not uncommon these days to see athletes sitting or standing on vibrating platforms, rolling their muscles on portable vibrating devices, or even wearing vibration gadgets. The rationale can range from enhancing muscle performance before an activity to preventing injury and accelerating recovery.

But can exposing the body to vibrations actually make any sort of difference to the body, be it for performance or recovery? It turns out that science has found some surprising details on this modality.

So, if you’re curious about the details and scientific findings of vibration therapy, this article will walk you through a general background of what it consists of and what the scientific literature has found for its impact on human physiology and athletic performance.

Let the good vibes begin.

The Premise and Mechanisms of Vibration Therapy

The premise behind vibration therapy is rooted in its ability to change or improve various aspects of physiologic function within the body, particularly for neuromuscular function (the functioning of nerves and their associated skeletal muscles).

When applied directly or indirectly, vibrational stimulation can favorably influence the neuromuscular functioning of an athlete’s body. Share on X

As such, when applied directly or indirectly (defined later in this article), vibrational stimulation can favorably influence the neuromuscular functioning of an athlete’s body.

Travel Roller
Image 1. Athletes can utilize vibration therapy devices for numerous reasons and in numerous ways. Using a vibrating travel roller to roll the muscles of the thigh is one such example.

One can really get down into the scientific weeds with how and why these responses are elicited; however, that is not the intent of this article. Instead, I’ll provide a general overview, best practices, and practical considerations for incorporating this modality into any aspect of your athletic endeavors.

There is a lot to unpack here, so let’s start with the basics and then progress into some specifics.

It’s worth mentioning that percussion therapy (such as handheld massage guns) is not vibration-based. It can deliver similar local effects but is technically not the same as vibration therapy. Share on X

Special note: It’s worth mentioning that percussion therapy (such as handheld massage guns) is not vibration-based. It can deliver similar local effects but is technically not the same as vibration therapy. Keep this in mind as you read the article.

Physiologic Effects of Vibration Therapy

There are several ways in which vibrations influence and affect various tissues of the body. We have yet to fully understand all of the mechanisms behind their actions, but there is a fair amount we do understand and strong theories for the rest.

In a nutshell: Vibrational stimuli act as a signaling mechanism that can excite and enhance various aspects of the neuromuscular system, either for improving physical performance or accelerating physical recovery and injury rehabilitation. Ultimately, it is believed that musculoskeletal structures respond to vibrational stimuli to modulate the muscle’s tone in a way that allows them to accommodate the vibrational waves they’re experiencing.1

The specifics of how either of these outcomes is achieved depend upon manipulating the vibration parameters that comprise vibrational therapy (which this article will discuss later).

Neurological mechanisms: Many of the effects elicited by vibrational therapy arise from influencing the nervous system. The hardcore details of how these effects are achieved are mainly outside the scope of this article; however, a basic understanding is necessary for anyone interested in adopting and utilizing vibration therapy, particularly coaches and rehabilitation professionals.

Vibrations, which are small oscillations, provide mechanical stimulation to specific sensory receptors within the skin, muscles, and tendons.

It’s largely believed that exposure to vibrations triggers a neurogenic reflex that, when combined with other muscular responses, activates a reflex known as the tonic vibration reflex.2–4 In short, this occurs from the vibrations activating muscle spindles (a type of intrafusal muscle fiber within the skeletal muscle), which, in this application, are responsible for producing an involuntary increase in force output of the muscle itself (occurring via alpha motor neurons).

If that sounds rather technical, don’t sweat it: Essentially, it just means that the result of a muscle’s exposure to the right type (and amount) of vibration is an increase in motor unit firing rate, coordination within the muscle, and increased central motor command.4 As mentioned earlier, the extent to which these changes can occur is believed to vary based on the individual vibration parameters utilized.

Additional Mechanisms

Whether for improved performance or accelerated recovery following injury or exercise, vibration therapy can achieve a few other noteworthy effects (which occur either indirectly through neurological means or separately altogether). These mechanisms lead to outcomes that include:

  • Increases in intramuscular temperature via the circulatory system.5
  • Increased metabolic rate within the activated muscles.6
  • Reduction in myofascial and musculoskeletal pain.7
  • Improved proprioception and kinesthetic awareness.8

Parameters for Vibration Therapy

Four parameters can be manipulated when delivering vibration therapy. These parameters are:9

  • Frequency (refers to the number of oscillations per second, measured in Hz)
  • Displacement (refers to the size of the oscillation, measured in millimeters)
  • Amplitude (determines the magnitude of vibration, measured in m/s2)
  • Duration (the time spent delivering the vibrations, measured in minutes or seconds)
Four parameters can be manipulated when delivering vibration therapy: frequency, displacement, amplitude, and duration. Each is likely to play a significant role in the effects achieved. Share on X

Each parameter is likely to play a significant role in the effects achieved. However, as you’ll soon see, it’s not overly clear which combination of parameters yields the most effective intended outcomes. (The best practices section of this article will help point you in the right direction.)

Types of Vibrational Therapy

There are two ways vibrational therapy can produce its effects within the body. They are classified into two distinct categories, with one being whole-body vibration and the other being local vibration.

If you decide to read any vibration therapy research within the scientific community, you’ll want to be aware of which type of vibration is studied, as some studies examine the effects of whole-body vibration, while others look at the effects of local vibration.

A quick note: While it’s believed that the mechanisms of action between whole-body and local vibration are the same or very similar, it’s possible that how they achieve their respective effects could be somewhat different depending on the specific effect they produce.10

1. Whole-Body Vibration

Whole-body vibration refers to delivering the effects of vibrational stimuli throughout the entire body. This type of vibrational therapy is often referred to as indirect vibrational therapy since its effects extend beyond the regions of the body that are in direct contact with the vibrational device (typically a vibrating platform).

This intervention method has been studied more than local vibration and can yield effects reaching beyond the local body part in contact with the vibrating device. Of note, these whole-body effects include:

  • Increases in serum concentration of growth hormone and testosterone.11,12
  • Decreases in serum concentration of cortisol.11,12
  • Enhancement of anabolic gene expression in tendons.13 

2. Local Vibration

Venom Go Vibration
Image 2. Wearable vibration devices are a form of local vibration therapy that offers unique advantages.

Local vibration refers to vibration being delivered directly to a specific body part. For this reason, it’s often referred to as direct vibrational therapy.

Local vibration refers to vibration being delivered directly to a specific body part. For this reason, it’s often referred to as direct vibrational therapy. Share on X

Local vibration has been shown to produce favorable outcomes for different aspects of performance and rehabilitation; however, local vibration therapy has been studied far less extensively than whole-body vibration.2

Common local vibration devices available to athletes and coaches include:

  • Vibrating travel rollers
  • Vibrating massage balls
  • Wearable vibrational garments or patches

Vibration Therapy for Improved Performance

Multiple performance avenues have been studied and analyzed for improving athletic and physical performance via vibration therapy. Below are some of the findings for more common realms of enhancing athletic performance.

Scientific Findings for Muscle Performance Characteristics
Studies examining various characteristics of muscle contraction and function (ballistic contraction, resistance to fatigue, maximal force output, etc.) when exposed to either type of vibration tend to be favorable and statistically significant, but not all studies produce these findings. Notably, these differences in outcome effectiveness are likely due to the study design and the vibration parameters utilized for a study’s protocol.3

The takeaway: Most studies examining the improvement of muscle performance have utilized local vibration (though plenty have used full-body vibration). Of these studies, those that found favorable improvements in muscle performance utilized frequencies ranging between 20 Hz and 60 Hz with oscillation amplitude from 1–2 mm. Shorter session durations (1–5 minutes) are most often used.

Scientific Findings for Improving Proprioception
Regaining proprioception (the brain’s ability to determine the position of joints and limbs accurately) is highly important with injury rehabilitation, as it’s often impaired after injury. This is particularly true with ankle rehabilitation.

The takeaway: Some studies have examined the ability of direct vibration therapy to enhance proprioception, but there is little solid data to go on at this time. It has been examined in elderly and young populations, and it shows promise, but the scientific consensus at this point in time is that more research needs to be done.4

Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation
Numerous studies involving whole-body vibration have found favorable effects on improving the flexibility and perceived stiffness of muscles. Less literature is available for when using direct vibration therapy, though some emerging evidence has found that utilizing a Swissring® at 20 Hz with amplitudes ranging from 1–6 mm and applied to various regions in two-minute durations has produced notable improvements in ankle and hamstring mobility—two body parts that are of particular interest (and importance) to velocity-based athletes.14 It stands to reason that other direct vibrational devices could produce similar effects when using identical or similar parameters.

The takeaway: Ideal parameter settings when using indirect vibration therapy to improve muscle and joint flexibility aren’t as clearly established when compared to direct means, but they likely involve parameters similar to those used for direct vibration. This typically involves a longer duration of vibration exposure (greater than 10 minutes) with higher frequencies, but there is no clear consensus within the scientific literature.

Scientific Findings for Bone Mineral Density
Bone mineral density is perhaps the most well-studied feature of vibration therapy. Most scientific articles have examined its effects using the whole body method, with favorable improvements in various bone characteristics that reflect improved bone health.

The primary mechanism behind its action is believed to be through improving bone circulation, which helps increase the overall nutritional supply to the bone tissue.15,16 Additionally, it has been shown to improve various aspects of osteogenic differentiation while reducing osteoclast formation.17,18

The takeaway: The vast majority of studies examining vibration therapy’s effects on bone mineral density have utilized a vibration frequency from 30–50 Hz with session duration varying between 10 and 20 minutes and session frequency varying between daily and thrice weekly. These studies ranged from 11 to 80 weeks, with most being approximately 20 weeks in length.

Vibration Therapy for Exercise Recovery

Peanut on Calf
Image 3. Vibration therapy for injury recovery and improved athletic performance show promising results within the scientific literature.

In the world of athletic performance, coaches often tell their athletes: train hard and recover harder. It makes perfect sense; you don’t actually become stronger within the gym or on the track—you merely use those facilities to elicit a stimulus that triggers desired physical adaptations. Those adaptations occur as your body recovers from the stressors it was exposed to within the workout or training session.

It makes sense that any modality that helps enhance the efficacy of the body’s recovery process can lead to improved physical performance. Share on X

So, it makes sense that any modality that helps enhance the efficacy of the body’s recovery process can lead to improved physical performance; the quicker and more complete an athlete’s recovery can be, the quicker they can induce another training stimulus to trigger further bodily adaptations.

Additionally, an athlete who has experienced a more complete recovery before their next training session will likely experience a better training session (maintain ideal training intensity, hit prescribed training loads, etc.), which will foster a better physical stimulus.

What follows are the scientific findings and indications for using vibrational therapy to improve muscular recovery induced by physical training.

Scientific Findings for Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS)
For those unfamiliar with this terminology, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is the phenomenon in which muscles become notably sore, stiff, or even painful anywhere from 24–72 hours after an intense bout of exercise or physical activity.

The ability to reduce or even prevent DOMS in athletes has massive implications for coaches, rehabilitation professionals, and athletes themselves, as minimizing muscle soreness and maximizing post-exercise recovery can reduce an athlete’s downtime and allow for greater training frequency. As such, vibration therapy has received considerable attention for its purported effects to help reduce the intensity and duration of DOMS symptoms.

Here’s the take-home information for some studies that have elicited DOMS through different training regimens and the positive effects vibration therapy had on the respective muscles:

    • Recent research has shown that a vibration frequency of 80 Hz was ideal for reducing sensations of pain from delayed onset muscle soreness.19

 

    • Other research has shown that exposure to local vibration therapy at 50 Hz to the quadriceps before a series of eccentric exercises significantly reduced pain perception elicited by DOMS.20

 

  • Another study involving whole-body vibration therapy at 40 Hz found significant decreases in calf and gluteal soreness experienced by recreational runners who performed a bout of downhill treadmill running when compared to their control group.21

The takeaway: Utilizing vibration therapy for DOMS tends to produce favorable results and may be most beneficial with frequencies ranging from 40–80 Hz. Most studies finding favorable outcomes utilize a session duration of 1–10 minutes with direct vibration.

Utilizing vibration therapy for delayed onset muscle soreness tends to produce favorable results. Share on X

Optimal Parameters and Best Practices

Like any other training or recovery modality, the more finely tuned the parameters are, the greater the positive effect or outcome. It’s like taking a picture: the more in-focus and clear the image, the more obvious it becomes. A slightly out-of-focus image is still better than nothing, but it’s nowhere near as ideal as one that’s tack-sharp.

Vibration therapy is the same: the more you can fine-tune the parameters, the more evident the results will be. But…this is where vibration therapy sort of becomes the Wild West. We know the individual parameters that can be manipulated with vibrational therapy, and we know that collectively they can work to produce statistically significant results for various aspects of muscle performance and recovery—we’re just not sure which combination of parameters leads to the best results, or which parameters have the biggest effects (the ones that would therefore be the most critical to get right).

Various studies that have found statistically significant favorable effects for muscle performance, neurological functioning, and even pain reduction have generally utilized different parameters. To complicate matters a bit more, these parameters often differ quite substantially.

Nonetheless, the good news here is that various positive physiological effects have been produced with different parameters, so it may be a case of “close is good enough” until further studies help us understand the “perfect” set of parameters for a specific performance-based or therapeutic outcome.

While the individual effects of each parameter remain somewhat unknown based on the intended session outcome, the following parameters can serve as a general guideline when opting for incorporating vibrational therapy and should be kept in mind by athletes and coaches looking to incorporate its use:

    • For pain reduction, both direct (local) and indirect (whole-body) vibrational therapy have been shown to be effective. Most studies showing positive effects have utilized longer session lengths (25–45 minutes) with frequencies typically higher (ranging from 20 to 200 Hz) than for performance-based intervention.

 

    • For improving muscle force output and performance, a frequency of 30–50 Hz is likely most optimal, as this is the same frequency at which motor units discharge within the body when volitionally contracting.

 

    • For reducing muscle soreness (particularly with DOMS), positive effects have been found with durations ranging from one minute to 30 minutes; however, most studies have utilized either one minute or 10 minutes. As such, any duration of time between these can likely be considered. It has been reported that 80 Hz is the optimal frequency for reducing pain thresholds with DOMS.

 

    • Amplitude, if selectable, should be kept between 1 mm and 4 mm, as this is the range utilized in most studies looking at various performance parameters.

 

  • Shorter session applications (<5 minutes) tend to produce improvements in muscle performance, while longer sessions (>10 minutes) tend to produce inhibitory effects on muscle characteristics. However, conflicting findings exist and may be due to the other vibration parameters used.

Practical Considerations

Scientific results mean very little if they’re in no way practical or transferable to the real-world scenarios of the athlete or coach. With vibration therapy, there are a few practical considerations that coaches and athletes will need to consider, be it for either performance or recovery benefits.

On the whole, vibration therapy lends itself quite nicely to the practical aspects of athletic performance. Share on X

Thankfully, on the whole, vibration therapy lends itself quite nicely to the practical aspects of athletic performance. Still, what follows are two considerations worth keeping in mind.

Consideration 1: Ease of Implementation

Travel Roller Triceps
Image 4. Local vibration therapy devices offer unique advantages over whole-body vibration devices when it comes to cost, portability, and versatility.

While whole-body vibration has shown to be rather effective for performance-based and recovery-based interventions, it won’t be practical for most coaches, athletes, or teams. Not every facility has access to a whole-body vibration unit, and even if they do… they’re not easily portable. There’s no lugging these things onto the track or the team bus.

Direct vibration therapy, while not studied quite as much, wins the practicality battle in a landslide. Vibrating rollers, vibrating massage balls, etc., are relatively inexpensive and can easily be tossed in a training bag. Additionally, multiple athletes can implement vibration therapy in the gym simultaneously (team warm-up, cool down, etc.) and at home if they have their own devices.

It’s unknown if direct vibration therapy can elicit the same systemic effects as whole-body vibration (the theory is that it likely doesn’t), but the benefits of direct vibration therapy for pain reduction, improvements in muscular blood flow, etc., are noteworthy enough to warrant its use.

Consideration 2: Experimenting with Parameters
As mentioned earlier, optimizing parameters for vibrational therapy can likely lead to enhanced physiologic outcomes; however, many vibrational devices on the market (particularly portable, direct vibration devices, such as vibrating rollers and vibrating massage balls) do not allow for changing frequency, displacement, or amplitude.

Some devices, however, do allow for varying levels of vibrational intensity (low, medium, or high settings), which may have predetermined parameter characteristics at each level.

As such, for many devices, the athlete or coach should be aware that time spent utilizing the device will be the most controllable variable. This can be thought of as the dose-response for the effects of vibration therapy, and it may just be that each athlete will need to determine what an ideal dose-response will be for their unique needs.

As a result, athletes looking to incorporate it into their training or recovery would be wise to experiment with this intervention at times that are not critical or detrimental to their training or recovery until they feel confident knowing how their body will respond.

Final Thoughts

There’s still a bit more to figure out with the fine details of ensuring we’re getting the most out of vibration therapy. However, there’s certainly enough scientific evidence to warrant its use for various applications, especially since it’s deemed to be a safe intervention with a very low risk of adverse effects.4 It’s likely a case of each athlete taking the time needed to become familiar with the intervention and how it’s tolerated to ensure success with its use.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

References

1. Musumeci G. “The use of vibration as physical exercise and therapy.” Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2017;2(2):17.

2. Cerciello S, Rossi S, Visonà E, Corona K, and Oliva F. “Clinical applications of vibration therapy in orthopaedic practice.” Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. 2016;6(1):147.

3. Germann D, El Bouse A, Jordan Shnier NA, and Kazemi M. “Effects of local vibration therapy on various performance parameters: A narrative literature review.” The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2018;62(3):170.

4. Cochrane DJ. “Good vibrations?–The use of vibration therapy for exercise recovery, injury prevention and rehabilitation.” Physical Therapy Reviews. 2011;16(6):438–454.

5. Cochrane DJ, Stannard SR, Sargeant AJ, and Rittweger J. “The rate of muscle temperature increase during acute whole-body exercise.” European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2008;103(4):441–448.

6. Couto BP, Silva HR, da Silveira Neves SR, Ramos MG, Szmuchrowski LA, and Barbosa MP. “Acute effects of resistance training with local vibration.” International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;34(9):814–819.

7. Lundeberg T. “The pain suppressive effect of vibratory stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as compared to aspirin.” Brain Research. 1984;294(2):201–209.

8. Lee CL, Chu IH, Lyu BJ, Chang WD, and Chang NJ. “Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and balance in young adults.” Journal of Sports Science. 2018;36(22):2575–2582.

9. Rauch F, Sievanen H, Boone S, et al. “Reporting whole-body vibration intervention studies: Recommendations of the International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions.” Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. 2010;10(3):193–198.

10. Pamukoff DN, Ryan ED, and Blackburn JT. “The acute effects of local muscle vibration frequency on peak torque, rate of torque development, and EMG activity.” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2014;24(6):888–894.

11. Bosco C, Iacovelli J, Tsarpela O, et al. “Hormonal responses to whole-body vibration in men.” European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2000;81(6):449–454.

12. Iodice P, Bellomo RG, Gialluca G, Fanò G, and Saggini R. “Acute and cumulative effects of focused high-frequency vibrations on the endocrine system and muscle strength.” European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2011;111(6):897–904.

13. Keller BV, David ML, Thompson WR, Dahners LE, and Weinhold PS. “Varying whole body vibration amplitude differentially affects tendon and ligament structural and material properties.” Journal of Biomechanics. 2013;46(9):1496–1500.

14. Peer KS, Barkley JE, and Knapp DM. “The acute effects of local vibration therapy on ankle sprain and hamstring strain injuries.” The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2009;37(4):31–38.

15. Torvinen S, Kannus P, SievaÈnen H, et al. “Effect of a vibration exposure on muscular performance and body balance. Randomized cross-over study.” Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2002;22(2):145–152.

16. Ward K, Alsop C, Caulton J, Rubin C, Adams J, and Mughal Z. “Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions.” Journal of Bone Mineral Research. 2004;19(3):360–369.

17. Pre D, Ceccarelli G, Gastaldi G, et al. “The differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) into osteoblasts is promoted by low amplitude, high frequency vibration treatment.” Bone. 2011;49(2):295–303.

18. Kulkarni RN, Voglewede PA, and Liu D. “Mechanical vibration inhibits osteoclast formation by reducing DC-STAMP receptor expression in osteoclast precursor cells.” Bone. 2013;57(2):493–498.

19. Weerakkody NS, Percival P, Hickey MW, et al. “Effects of local pressure and vibration on muscle pain from eccentric exercise and hypertonic saline.” Pain. 2003;105(3):425–435.

20. Bakhtiary AH, Safavi-Farokhi Z, and Aminian-Far A. “Influence of vibration on delayed onset of muscle soreness following eccentric exercise.” British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;41(3):145–148.

21. Broadbent S, Rousseau JJ, Thorp RM, Choate SL, Jackson FS, and Rowlands DS. “Vibration therapy reduces plasma IL6 and muscle soreness after downhill running.” British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010;44(12):888–894.

Ozark High School

Facility Finders: Ozark High School (Ozark, MO)

Blog| ByJohn Delf-Montgomery

Ozark High School

Welcome to a new year and a new episode of Facility Finders! In this one, we follow the renovation at another incredible high school committed to offering a first-class facility: Ozark High School in Ozark, Missouri, run by Head Strength and Conditioning Coach Corey Roy.


Video 1. Virtual tour of Ozark High School’s newly renovated weight room.

Design

What I love most about many renovation-type projects is how the coach can really put their personal touch on the space based on their philosophy and the overall floor plan. This project started with Coach Roy reaching out to the booster club and athletic department to see if this was something they saw as worth the investment. After those conversations, they gave him the green light to remake the space he envisioned for his athletes and his training program.

What I love most about many renovation-type projects is how the coach can really put their personal touch on the space based on their philosophy and the overall floor plan, says @johndelf99. Share on X
Customized Bench
Image 1. A customized weight bench at Ozark High.

What ultimately came to fruition was a weight room offering the ability to train a large number of athletes with easy sight lines. Each rack has a uniform look, so athletes don’t have to run all over the place to find and use what they need. Here are the coach’s words when I asked him for his thoughts on the design process:

“When it comes to designing a room or looking at new equipment, I feel the first thing a coach should do is know what they want out of their room,” Coach Roy said. “Decide what is important and what are your non-negotiables.”

Logos Slogans
Image 2. Part of the graphic package and visual look at Ozark High School.

I really love the initiative from Coach Roy to instill pride via the signage in the weight room. The graphics on the walls and entrance go a long way toward making a simple space something very elegant without having to spend a bunch of money. His goal was to make the space somewhere the athletes wanted to be and also highlight the teams that won regional and state championships.

The graphics on the walls and entrance go a long way toward making a simple space something very elegant without having to spend a bunch of money, says @johndelf99. Share on X
Powerlift Rogue
Image 3. Equipment from Powerlift and Rogue that was purchased at Ozark H.S.

Purchasing

As a coach, I love hearing from other coaches when they buy equipment to learn WHY they choose the companies they use:

  • Was it the price?
  • Is it a popular brand?
  • Did they have a cool connection?

Coach Roy wanted to have a product that would stand up to the wear and tear of continuous and long-term use at his school and a company with the good customer service quality that he got from Powerlift during this project. This process is extra hard at times because you have to get everything you want under a particular budget but still get quality—having a company like Powerlift to make that process easier for Coach Roy was invaluable.

“Our area contact has been so good to work with and made this process very simple,” Coach Roy said when I asked him more about Powerlift. “They care about the customer and always make it right. The product speaks for itself, but the people make it what it is.”

Along with Powerlift, Coach Roy bought auxiliary equipment from companies like Rogue and Perform Better, including training boxes, medicine balls, and hurdles. These are pieces of equipment that Ozark athletes will use every day, so they bought these pieces from reputable companies that will be available for them in case the equipment breaks and needs replacing.

Racked equipment
Image 4. This view showcases the plethora of equipment at Ozark H.S

Specialty Equipment

Some of the specialty pieces that Ozark has include:

  • Glute ham machines.
  • Chains for bars or sprinting.
  • Hex bars for the racks.

Combined with proper coaching, these are all pieces that can help improve the overall training QUALITY at Ozark High. Chains are a great tool for accommodating resistance as well as for sprinting. The glute ham machines can be used for back extension, Nordic hamstring curls, and reverse hyper-extensions—which are critical for the posterior chain and a primary focus for the athletes trained by Coach Roy.

Offices Storage
Image 5. The storage room and offices available at Ozark High.

Some things that are not typically “special equipment” in the weight room are the coaches’ office and proper storage. The worst thing a weight room can have is clutter—and a stressed strength coach! Gear all over the ground and not properly stored in closets or on shelves can ruin flow in the weight room and make it harder to keep clean.

A dedicated office for the strength coach seems very elementary but is often missed. This is a place where coaches can decompress from training, meet with athletes when they need a place to come and vent in a safe place, or hold discussions with other coaches about training during their seasons/off-seasons.

When it comes to facility design and renovation, a dedicated office for the strength coach seems very elementary but is often missed, says @johndelf99. Share on X
Customized Racks
Image 6. More customization on the equipment for Ozark H.S.

Takeaways from Coach Roy

Renovations enable schools to improve and invest in their athletes without asking for hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations and space to build new construction. Coach Roy, who is finishing his second year at Ozark and has more than 20 years in education, used his experience to meet with the athletics staff and booster club to advocate for his athletes about the need for the upgrade, and they agreed. Sometimes, the hardest part is asking for help and then allowing that help actually to come—we tend to try and do everything on our own to show how good we are.

Finally, branding is obviously what many schools try and capitalize on, but the PRIDE aspect that Coach Roy focused on was successful because it added more drive for athletes to continue to win. Those triumphs will give them the opportunity to be in the weight room forever as part of the images and graphics on the walls and doors.

Thank you again for taking the time to allow me to check out your awesome facility, Coach Roy!

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Foam Roll Recovery

The Post-Workout Recovery Handbook

Blog| ByAlex Chrysovergis

Foam Roll Recovery

It is no secret that post-workout recovery is one of the hottest topics in the fitness world. Whether for a professional athlete or your average gym bro, a demanding training session always leaves everyone looking for the fastest way to restore energy, reduce muscle soreness, and feel better overall in order to get back at it in full swing. There are also plenty of myths—and truths—surrounding the subject. So let’s untangle the thread, spotlight the truths, and dispel some of the myths once and for all.

What ensues is a list of the most prominent recovery techniques out there. By the end of it, you will have a clear understanding of which work, which may possibly work, and which don’t. You will also be able to assess and experiment with the ones that suit your training and lifestyle best.

1. Refueling

After an intense workout, your muscles are left fatigued and your energy reserves depleted. Without the appropriate nourishment, they will be unable to recharge, rebuild, and regain their capacity to perform optimally. In this sense, proper nutritional support is one of the cornerstones of your ability to recover. Do not neglect it.

Without the appropriate nourishment, your muscles will be unable to recharge, rebuild, and regain their capacity to perform optimally. Share on X

You probably already know that every meal you consume should contain quality protein, carbs, and vegetables/fruits. But if you truly want to maximize your recuperation, here’s some strategies to consider:

  • Start your carbohydrate intake as soon as you finish your training. Aim for a meal/snack that contains about 1 gram of carbs per kilogram of bodyweight.
  • Keep providing your body with meals or drinks that contain carbs for the next three to four hours, again aiming for 1-1.5 grams per kilogram of bodyweight, per hour. The more draining your session was, the more carbs you should get.
  • Then resume your normal eating habits, as per your daily goals and requirements.

Quick Tip: A common favorite post-workout fruit is the banana, which is fine but not the best—the pineapple is. Its glycemic index is 66, meaning that it releases glycogen fast enough to replenish your storage tanks, but not so fast as to cause an insulin spike. It contains only a small percentage of fructose, which is ideal because on one hand the muscles don’t seem to absorb it optimally, and on the other, you actually do need a small amount in order to replenish your liver’s glycogen stores. This, in turn, helps maintain your metabolism in high activity levels.

Pineapples contain bromelain as well, which is not only a great natural anti-inflammatory, but also helps to better absorb the protein you ingest along with the rest of your meal. Last but not least, it contains plenty of vitamin C, which keeps cortisol—the stress hormone—in check, allowing you to recover even faster.

2. Sleep

Sleep is definitely the most underrated recovery tool, but in reality it’s the foundation of an athlete’s wellbeing. Sleep deprivation has been shown time and time again to inhibit performance, mood state, metabolism, and immune and cognitive function. People will spend hundreds of dollars on massage guns (more on those later), but rob themselves of a good night’s sleep and, curiously enough, take pride in their ability to function through sleeplessness.

Sleep is definitely the most underrated recovery tool, but in reality it’s the foundation of an athlete’s wellbeing. Share on X

And don’t start with the “I don’t have time, I’m too busy” nonsense. We’re all busy and we all get the same 24 hours. Building your life around your health is a matter of priorities, not time. Here’s how to make the most out of your sleep, not only in terms of quantity, but also quality:

  • Establish a consistent sleeping pattern. The average sleeping cycle (light sleep—deep sleep—REM) lasts about 2.5 hours, and it’s recommended that you go through three full cycles. So aim for at least 7.5 hours of pure, uninterrupted sleep. Try to fall asleep within 30 minutes of hitting the bed.
  • Create a non-stimulating, pre-bed ritual. Try to limit electronic device usage up to 30 minutes before bed. If you must use one, enable nighttime mode, which restricts the excitatory blue light emitted from the screen. Yeah, sure, once in a while we all like to watch a movie; if possible, choose fiction. It requires less brain engagement and it’s perfect for zoning out.
  • Limit caffeine after noon. Caffeine can be very beneficial overall, but its half‑life (the time it takes to discard half of the quantity consumed) is around five to six hours. So cut off your intake in the afternoon. That way most of it will have been filtered out of your system at bed time.
  • Avoid afternoon/power naps. Although it can give you a good temporary boost if you really need one, nothing can substitute a good, continuous night’s sleep. Try to save all of it for when it matters.
  • Keep your bedroom quiet, dark, and cool. According to doctors, the most comfortable sleep occurs in pitch black, when the temperature is maintained around 65 °F/ 18 °C. This may slightly vary from person to person, but it’s a great starting point.

3. Massage

There are conflicting opinions regarding massage therapy and whether or not it actually helps sore muscles heal faster.

So, is it beneficial?

Yes and no. Here’s why.

Modern research provides inadequate evidence supporting the use of massage for muscular rehabilitation. It does, however, support it for positive psychological effects, so in a sense it is advantageous for systemic recovery. In other words, even though there’s no proven physiological mechanism behind it, it helps you put performance anxiety to the side and feel a sense of calm, which is still a measurable, favorable outcome.

Modern research provides inadequate evidence supporting the use of massage for muscular rehabilitation. It does, however, support it for positive psychological effects, so in a sense it is advantageous for systemic recovery. Share on X

The problem arises when it is sold by professionals as a miracle cure that fixes everything. It does not. Nevertheless, most elite athletes use it as a means to feel rejuvenated, and so should you if it temporarily numbs your aches and enhances your mood.

For the reasons described above, in my opinion massage guns are greatly overrated and overpriced. If you really like using one, then go ahead—but try not to invest a lot of money on it. Remember, you’re buying a tool that just helps you unwind. It is not required, and it does not speed up muscle restoration by any stretch of the imagination.

4. Hydrotherapy

Hydrotherapy is yet another controversial issue. Many people do not believe in it while others swear by it. When it comes to water immersion, you’ve got three choices: cold water, hot water, or contrast therapy.

Cold Water Immersion (CWI) 

Ice baths involve full-body immersion in water temperatures ranging between 40 °F / 5 °C and 68 °F / 20 °C, continuously or intermittently, for about 15 to 20 minutes. They have been shown to have both pros and cons. The theory behind them is that they constrict blood vessels and flush waste products like lactic acid. They are also believed to reduce swelling and tissue breakdown and offer temporary pain relief.

According to recent research, however, they hinder muscle growth, which is detrimental to bodybuilders and athletes looking to increase their size and strength. Moreover, some studies showcase that fewer white blood cells gather in the affected areas, which translates to a significant delay in healing. What this means for you is that you could probably use CWI to take the pain away and create a temporary perception of faster healing during a competition, but not on an everyday basis where you’re prioritizing muscle mass and/or strength gains.

Ice baths hinder muscle growth, which is detrimental to bodybuilders and athletes looking to increase their size and strength. Share on X

Hot Water Immersion (HWI)

HWI is usually done in one constant immersion for a maximum of 20 minutes with the water temperature above 96 °F / 36 °C. But this is by no means a strict, established protocol since minimal research has been conducted on the use of HWI. It is thought to improve circulation, thus enabling the blood to transfer vital nutrients to the cells, therefore quickening the recovery process. As with all concepts based on a hypothesis, take it with a grain of salt. If it makes you feel better, do it.

What’s important is that even if it does not help much with recovery, it does not seem to hinder it either. Take care not to use this method when soft tissue injuries are present because the increased blood flow can aggravate swelling and inflammation. It is also not recommended for when you’re still in a hyperthermic post-exercise state, since you are in danger of prolonging high body temperatures and thermoregulatory stress.

Contrast Water Therapy (CWT) 

Some scientific reviews and meta-analyses suggest that CWT can be beneficial when compared to passive recovery. Alternating between high and low temperatures causes vasodilation and vasoconstriction, which supposedly gets rid of the lactic acid and drives nutrients into the muscle. As stated before, though, submerging yourself in cold water may reduce the body’s ability to grow muscle tissue.

Some scientific reviews and meta-analyses suggest that contrast water therapy can be beneficial when compared to passive recovery. Share on X

So, if you have to perform CWT during a muscle-building phase, you would do best to leave it for the day after a hard training session. This way you give your body enough time to fight the inflammation and reconstruct on its own, reaping the benefits of the consequential adaptations.

My protocol of choice is cold water immersion (about 45 °F / 7 °C) for one minute, immediately followed by hot water immersion (equal to or above 96 °F / 36 °C) for two to three minutes. Continue at this pace for a maximum of 20 minutes, up to twice per week.

5. Active Recovery

Quite frankly, in my experience this is one of the best ways to recover as fast as possible. Plus, it’s scientifically proven. More and more studies suggest that participating in light physical activity facilitates the removal of metabolic waste and rushes nourishing factors into the aching muscles by improving circulation.

So instead of waiting it out, find something you enjoy and get moving. Go for a lazy stroll in the park, ride your bicycle, play a sport, take a swim, or get in a yoga session. Keep the intensity low (less than 70% of your maximum effort) and just get in motion. Your body will thank you sooner than later.

6. Compression

This refers to the usage of compression garments that apply pressure to your body while you’re wearing them. They are thought to aid with soreness/DOMS, boost athletic performance when worn during training, and improve the perception of comfort. Research has provided contradictory results. In some cases, there has been no evidence of faster recuperation, whereas in others a small acceleration of the process has been reported.

At this point, I feel that this method comes down to personal preference. The best way to find out if it works for you is to experiment with it. Quality compression clothing should feel like a second skin, making you forget that you’re wearing it. Try it on post-workout and on the following day, and see if it makes you feel better.

7. Self-Myofascial Release & Foam Rolling

Self-myofascial release (SMR)—not to be confused with massage therapy—uses tools like foam rollers and lacrosse balls to apply constant pressure on the fascia in order to loosen it. Fascia is the connective tissue surrounding your muscles. When it gets stiff, which habitually happens after a tough workout, your mobility decreases. So it makes sense to treat it.

SMR has analgesic properties, and in some cases has also been observed to decrease soreness by supposedly actively pumping out lymphatic pooling. What’s more, when SMR is used after the training session, it does not appear to have any negative repercussions on performance. A couple of studies are showing a negligible increase, too. I’d suggest trying it out after your workout if you have the time. At the very least, it could simply make you feel better, which is still a win in my books.

8. Static Stretching

Let’s put this long-lasting myth to the grave once and for all. Static stretching will not speed up healing, nor will it help with soreness, and this statement is backed by all the latest research. On the other hand, data neither supports nor contradicts its post-workout utilization, in the sense that it does not seem to have any negative effects on performance.

So, even though it is a questionable rehabilitation method, if it is a cool-down ritual you enjoy, have at it. Just make sure to manage your expectations recovery-wise.

Static stretching will not speed up healing, nor will it help with soreness, and this statement is backed by all the latest research. Share on X

Bottom Line

Recovery is of paramount importance as far as performance is concerned. The younger you are, the more you can get away without it. But the more experienced and/or older you get, the more you need to focus on it. It is at this time that your body processes and adapts to the stimulus that was forced upon it.

Change your mindset. Instead of looking at your day off as unproductive time, realize that it’s actually the most beneficial part of your efforts. This is when growth happens. If you are a natural lifter, you have to remember: work hard, rest even harder. Embrace your recovery, tend to it, and watch your gains skyrocket.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


High Pulls

The New Science of High Pulls: The Pros and Cons of these Popular Explosive Exercises

Blog| ByKim Goss

High Pulls

“Do you lift weights to get strong, or do you get strong to lift weights?

That is the question strength coaches should ask when deciding whether or not to include high pulls in their program. Another way to phrase it is, “Am I using high pulls to help my athletes get better at the clean, or am I using high pulls in place of the clean?”

To ensure we’re on the same page, a high pull begins with the barbell on the floor, as with a clean or power clean. You stand up quickly, fully extend your legs, rise on the balls of your feet as you shrug your shoulders, and follow through with your arms. Done! You don’t turn over your wrists and catch the weight—just let it drop. Oh, and weightlifters call these exercises pulls, not high pulls.

Many strength coaches have their athletes perform pulls rather than the snatch, the clean, or their power versions. Sometimes, it’s not by choice—often, these coaches don’t know how to teach the full lifts, don’t have enough staff to teach them (at Brown, a handful of coaches work with 1,200 athletes in 36 varsity and 12 club sports!), or don’t have the facilities and equipment (good barbells, bumper plates, platforms) to perform them safely.

Beyond those formidable challenges, there are many other reasons strength coaches have their athletes perform pulls.

Lead Photo by Vivian Podhaiski, LiftingLife.com photos

The Case for Pulls

This discussion relates to coaching for non-weightlifters. That is, using the Olympic lifts or their components to improve sports performance. I’ll explain why this distinction is essential in the final section.

What attracts many sprint coaches to pulls is that they improve explosiveness. More specifically, the ability to initiate force (such as with a sprint start) and apply force into the ground (to increase stride length).

What attracts many sprint coaches to pulls is that they improve explosiveness. More specifically, the ability to initiate force and apply force into the ground. Share on X
Maddie Frey Brown
Image 1. Pulls improve an athlete’s ability to initiate and apply force into the ground, critical components in sprinting. Shown is Brown University’s Maddie Frey, school record holder in the 200m. (Photo by Karim Ghonem, hair and makeup by Day Shimmer Spa.)

With that background, here are 11 reasons why many strength coaches and sports coaches like pulls:

1. Helps Teach the Olympic Lifts

The Olympic lifts are complex movements. Many coaches believe it’s best to break down the lifts into parts when working with beginners. To teach the power clean, a coach may start by having their athletes perform a pull from the mid-thigh, then with the bar at knee height, and finally from the floor. When the pull from the floor is mastered, they add the catch to complete a power clean or descend into a full squat to perform a full clean.

2. Strengthens the Posterior Chain

If you want to excel in weightlifting exercises, you have to be strong from the start. Flexing the spine as you separate the bar from the platform is harsh on the lower back. Also, lifting your hips too soon due to relative weakness in the posterior chain muscles is inefficient, causing the bar to slow down and often to drift forward, away from an optimal movement pattern.

Pulls target the initial lift off the floor, strengthening the lower back, hamstrings, and glutes. For athletes especially weak off the floor, coaches might prescribe a form of “stutter reps,” which involve pausing at a specific point(s) of a lift. For example, the athlete would pull the bar to just below the knees, pause for 2–3 seconds, then complete the pull. (Yes, a Romanian deadlift will work these muscles, but it’s not mechanically specific to the pull in weightlifting and has limited value since it’s a partial-range exercise.)

Lifting Form
Image 2. The lifter on the left shows a neutral spine position considered optimal during pulls. Although the lifter on the right, Bulgaria’s Yordan Mitkov, won Olympic gold in 1976, his unorthodox technique is not recommended. (Left photo by Linda Brothers, LiftingLife.com; right photo by Bruce Klemens)

3. Strengthens the Neck and Traps

Pulls strengthen the trapezius (the diamond-shaped muscle on the upper back) and the neck, significantly reducing the risk of concussions. Because the training of weightlifters is focused on developing relative strength (except for the super heavyweights), it’s often difficult to distinguish weightlifters from other athletes just by looking at them. The exception would be the neck and trapezius, which are usually well-developed.

It’s often difficult to distinguish weightlifters from other athletes just by looking at them. The exception would be the neck and trapezius, which are usually well-developed. Share on X
Overhead Lift
Image 3. Weightlifting develops strength in the upper and lower back muscles. On the left is Russia’s Anatoly Pisarenko, weighing 271 pounds. Pisarenko clean and jerked a world-record 584 and reportedly cleaned 617. On the right is Blagoy Blagoev, weighing 198 pounds. Blagoev snatched a world-record 430 pounds and clean and jerked 503. (Photos by Bruce Klemens.)

4. Places Minimal Stress on Wrists

Many sports coaches are afraid of having their athletes catch cleans or snatches. They have reason for concern. If a golfer or baseball player injures their wrists, competing in or even practicing their sport may not be possible. So, “no” to cleans and snatches, but “yes” to so-called “functional” rubber band exercises.

After five decades in the sport, I can say this fear of injury is unfounded…that is, if the coach knows how to teach the lifts and quality equipment is available. (This is one of my pet peeves. Many strength coaches will spend tens of thousands of dollars for resistance-training machines that isolate a single muscle but will only purchase cheap barbells of the quality you would find at a discount department store.)

After five decades in the sport, I can say this fear of injury is unfounded…that is, if the coach knows how to teach the lifts, and quality equipment is available. Share on X

5. Motivates Athletes

Many athletes don’t like being in the weight room and quickly get bored, despite being allowed to blast their soulless music. (Seriously, haven’t any of these young people heard of Boz Scaggs or that band Paul McCartney was in before Wings?) Adding pulls provides variety to a workout that makes the weight room more tolerable for non-weightlifters.

Adding pulls increases the number of personal records athletes can make because they will be performing more exercises. Setting personal records is important in training youth—they want a payoff with personal records as often as possible. One reason for the popularity of the Bigger Faster Stronger workout program in high schools for nearly five decades is that it’s designed with enough variety that athletes can easily break a dozen personal records every week.

6. Increases Repetition Pool

Canadian strength coach Charles R. Poliquin believed that the repetition was the foundation of any strength training program. He said the other loading parameters, including sets and rest periods, were influenced by how many reps should be performed.

With the Olympic lifts and the power versions, the number of reps that can be performed with optimal technique is much lower than pulls—weightlifters often joke that anything more than two reps in a weightlifting exercise is considered cardio! Whereas performing three reps or more in a snatch or clean is a challenge that dramatically reduces the amount of weight lifted, pulls can be performed for much higher reps with heavy weights to develop other strength qualities, including hypertrophy.

7. Increases Training Volume

Pulls involve a lot of muscle mass, so they take the place of several exercises. Rather than performing a deadlift, upright row, shoulder shrug, and calf raise, just do pulls. Pulls also require fewer warm-up sets than the full variations of the lifts because they are less complex. If pressed for time, pulls are an excellent alternative.

Pulls involve a lot of muscle mass, so they take the place of several exercises. Rather than performing a deadlift, upright row, shoulder shrug, and calf raise, just do pulls. Share on X

My weightlifting coach was Jim Schmitz, a three-time coach for the U.S. Olympic team. He coached the first American to Olympic press 500 pounds, the first to snatch 400, and the first to clean and jerk 500. All his athletes trained only three times a week for about 90–120 minutes. That’s it! Just my opinion, but I believe the pulls Schmitz included in his program significantly increased the training volume to produce positive hormonal adaptations that stimulated strength gains.

Lifting Technique Illustration
Image 4. Pulls take the place of several exercises, enabling athletes pressed for time to get more work done in less time.(Photo by Joseph McCray, LiftingLife.com. Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, Hexfit.com)

8. Enhances the Quality of In-Season Training

Time is a luxury that athletes don’t have during a season. With games scheduled every week, sports coaches may only allow their athletes to be in the weight room for 30 minutes twice a week. However, with some sports, the athletes are so beat up after a game that it may be a struggle to perform the full Olympic lifts. After a game, football players and others in contact sports are often so beat up that they have little interest in catching a barbell on their shoulders or even lifting their arms overhead.

These athletes could perform higher-repetition pulls while they heal. These exercises will maintain (or even increase) their pulling strength so they can quickly get back into full or power versions of the Olympic lifts. Pulls will also give their coaches an indication of their conditioning, according to one recent research paper.

That paper, a German study published in 2021, examined the association between snatch pulls and one-repetition maxes in snatches. Ignoring the Sheldon Cooper Big Bang Theory notations, the researchers said their study “provides a new approach to estimate 1RM snatch performance in elite weightlifters using the snatch pull FvR2.” Most importantly, “The results demonstrate that the snatchth-model accurately predicts 1RM snatch performance.”

9. Ramps Up Detrained Athletes

Deconditioning is a problem with high school and college athletes. They have long breaks during the summer (three months) and winter (one month), and injured athletes often are away from the weight room. These athletes can ease into heavy training with pulls during the initial training sessions and get their form back for the explosive lifts.

10. Matches an Athlete’s Strength Curve

Strength coaches use chains and bands to alter the resistance curves of exercises to match an athlete’s strength curve. With pulls, the barbell reacts to an athlete’s increased force production by accelerating. (FYI: Performing pulls with bands is a bad idea since the tension increases dramatically at the top of the lift, increasing the risk of the athlete losing their grip and possibly injuring themself.)

11. Works Around Injuries

Many injuries will prevent athletes from performing power cleans, power snatches, or the full lifts. However, because there is no catch and the pulls can be performed from various heights, injured athletes can often perform pulls to maintain or even increase their strength. This advantage applies to upper-body and lower-body injuries. Consider knee injuries such as tendinitis.

As the athlete receives treatment for this condition, they might be able to perform pulls—just releasing the bar at the top (as long as you use bumpers). What about the power variations of the lifts? They’re generally not a good idea. A power clean or power snatch ends with a catch position that puts a large amount of stress on the knees, especially the ACL. Further, it’s not a quarter squat where an athlete eases into the position, but a rapidly moving barbell they must catch with an abrupt stop.

The Pull Experience

Most athletes will only perform the clean pull, the first component of a power clean or full clean. Let’s look at a few other variations.

The two basic types of pulls are clean pulls and snatch pulls. The difference between the clean pull and a snatch pull is that the snatch pull uses a wider grip, the same grip you would use if performing a power snatch or full snatch.

Pulls can be broken down further, including those from the knee and mid-thigh. The athlete can take the barbell from the ground to a deadlift position and lower the bar to where they want to start, take the barbell off power rack supports and lower the bar into position, or perform them from blocks. Performing pulls from blocks gives athletes more time to ensure they are in the optimal pulling position. On the other end of the pulling spectrum are pulls performed standing on a low platform (bumper plates are often used), increasing the work of the quads at the start; these are usually called pulls from a deficit.

One problem with partial-range pulls is that athletes tend to extend their shoulders too far over the bar and heave it into a large arc. Not only is this technique mechanically different from the Olympic lifts, but it creates a much slower movement that (to quote Coach Poliquin) “can be timed with a calendar!”

Powerlifters
Image 5. Pulls from various heights are popular among strength coaches and weightlifters. In the left photo, pulling from blocks, is Belgium’s Serge Reding, the first weightlifter to snatch 400 pounds and whose powerful legs enabled him to full squat 880 pounds for five reps. In the right photo, pulling from a bench, is Pisarenko. (Bruce Klemens photo)

Other variations of pulls include East German pulls and flat-footed pulls. With flat-footed pulls, the idea is not to come up on your heels to increase the work of the upper body—even lifting your toes and pushing your heels into the floor at the finish to keep you grounded. As for East German pulls, I first learned about them in the ’70s, but they have become so popular with Chinese lifters that most lifters refer to them as Panda pulls. The difference is that the lifter drops down at the top of the pull so that the bar is level with the throat. The idea is to better simulate the movement under the bar during a full lift.

Why is this important? At the top of a pull, the quadriceps relax. In contrast, when a weightlifter moves under the bar during a full lift, there is still some tension in these muscles. According to weightlifting sports scientist Andrew “Bud” Charniga, this tension protects the knee joint in the bottom position. “When you extend too long in the snatch or a clean, the quadriceps relax at the top of the movement. When you drop into the bottom position, there is not enough time for these muscles to significantly contract again to protect your knees. In my experience, this is one reason you see a lot more U.S. lifters wearing knee wraps, at least compared to the Europeans.”

The idea of the East German pull is to maintain that slight overlap of the quadriceps (agonist muscles contracting to extend the knee) and hamstrings (antagonist muscles to flex the knee). Two takeaways are to keep the volume of pulls low to avoid reinforcing an inferior movement pattern and perform them after the full weightlifting movements.

High Pulls
Image 6. Variations of pulls include flat-footed pulls on the left and East German pulls on the right. On the left is Georgian weightlifter Lasha Talakhadze, the absolute world record holder with official best results of 496 pounds in the snatch and 588 in the clean and jerk (and 595 in training). (Left photo by Viviana Podhaiski, LiftingLife.com; right photo by Ryan Paiva, LiftingLife.com.)

Consider that when you shorten the range of motion, you also reduce the time the muscles are under tension. If your goal is muscular hypertrophy, particularly in the trapezius, you’ll need to perform higher repetitions when performing a pull from the mid-thigh or knee level. Using several of the variations discussed, here is how you could adjust the sets and reps to produce the same amount of time under tension:

    Clean pull from deficit, 5 x 2

    Clean pull from floor, 5 x 3

    Clean pull from knee, 4 x 4

    Clean pull from mid-thigh, 3 x 5

One issue with partial pulls is that you reduce the contribution of other muscles to power. Share on X

One issue with partial pulls is that you reduce the contribution of other muscles to power. For example, at the start of the pull, the soleus (lower calf muscle) helps to pull the shin back, thus assisting the quadriceps in straightening the knee. Notes Charniga, “Contraction of soleus pulls the shin backward, assisting the straightening of the knee and even hip, because shin bones are interconnected to thigh bones and hip by means of the knee joint. Consequently, when this muscle straightens the shin, thigh and hip are accelerated into extension; because, ankle, thigh and hip are interconnected by couplings.”

Form Lift Technique
Image 7. Although machines can isolate the soleus, they work synergistically with the quads with knee extension at the start of the pull. Shown is 2012 Olympic champion Om Yun-Chol of North Korea, the fourth lifter to hoist 3x bodyweight in the clean and jerk. His best result is a world-record 365 pounds at 121 pounds bodyweight. (Photo by Tim Scott, LiftingLife.com. Drawing by Sylvain Lemaire, Hexfit.com)

Yes, an athlete can place the bar in the crease of their hips and kick up a considerable amount of weight, but that doesn’t mean their muscles are producing massive amounts of power. Which reminds me of a funny story.

In my early coaching years, I trained in a gym with various Iron Game athletes. One day I was working with a talented 14-year-old female weightlifter who could clean and jerk 154 pounds at a bodyweight of 120. Her superpower was that she had leverages (short back/long arms) that made her remarkably good at shoulder shrugs.

At the end of one workout, two bodybuilders (wearing colorful do-rags and clown pants) were showing off doing mid-thigh shoulder shrugs with 315 pounds, taking the bar off of blocks. After each set, they celebrated as if they had just won the Olympics. My athlete had enough of their tomfoolery—she walked over to where they were training and asked them if she could jump in for a set. They grinned, said, “sure!” and sat back and waited for the accident to happen. Instead, she added 10 pounds to each side and cranked out 10 reps. My career as a coach was complete!

Getting back on point, another challenge with pulls is that athletes tend to lift with less intent than with a full or power version of the snatch or clean because there is no catch. A velocity-based training unit can provide immediate feedback to motivate the lifter to pull harder. At Coach Schmitz’s gym, we had access to an adjustable crane-shaped post with a piece of metal dangling from the top of it. During a pull, the end of the barbell would tap the tin to provide us with feedback about the bar’s pulling height. However, a VBT unit can give the athlete immediate feedback on how much effort they put into each rep.

Now we come to a significant point of controversy in weightlifting: Many coaches see limited value in pulls, and some see no value in them whatsoever.

The Pull Problem

In 1977, a paper was published by three notable weightlifting scientists called “The Training Weights in the Snatch Pull.” The researchers said that weights over 110% had “a different rhythm than in the snatch.” More specifically, the mechanics of a pull are different than what occurs in a full lift and can thus create a negative transfer to weightlifting performance.

One difference is that the ankles will not flex as much (causing the heels to rise) with pulls, reducing the contribution of the elastic properties of the connective tissues, thus reducing power. Also, because the athlete is not moving under the bar, the bar tends to shift forward at the top, away from the body’s center of mass (COM), where maximum power can be produced.

To work around this issue, the researchers recommended to “strictly control the number of lifts with weights over 90% of the maximum snatch, especially in the competition periods.” In his classic 1974 textbook, The Training of the Weightlifter, sports scientist Robert A. Roman said super-maximal weights (above 100%) could be performed if they were partial pulls, such as from the mid-thigh.

Bar path
Image 8. The illustration at left shows that pulls have a different barbell path than the full lifts. The photo on the right shows that the ankle tends to flex more with full lifts, increasing the involvement of the elastic properties of the foot to produce power. (Illustration from Robert A. Roman, “1974 Weightlifting Yearbook”, translated by Bud Charniga. Right photo by Tim Scott, LiftingLife.com.)

In the “no value whatsoever” corner was Ivan Abadjiev, the former head coach of the Bulgarian National Weightlifting Team. Under Abadjiev’s direction, Bulgarians won Olympic gold 12 times and 54 World Championships. These results are remarkable because the Bulgarians had a small athletic budget, and their talent pool was limited to a population of fewer than seven million people.

Abadjiev believed that pulls were worthless for his elite weightlifters, and the best way to make weightlifters stronger for the lifts was to perform more lifts. (Again, “lift weights to get strong.”) This sport-specific approach necessitated using relatively low rep sets to focus only on the fastest muscle fibers and avoid developing excessive muscle mass. How many sets?

Abadjiev
Image 9. Ivan Abadjiev’s athletes won 12 Olympic gold medals. He believed in a sports-specific approach to weightlifting that didn’t lend itself to building large amounts of muscle mass. On the left is Abadjiev with 3x Olympic gold medalist Naim Süleymanoğlu, and on the right is Bulgaria’s “Muscleless Wonder” Plamen Asparukhov, who snatched 396 and clean and jerked 496 at a weight of 220 pounds. (Bruce Klemens photos)

Consider that Abadjiev would have his lifter train five times a day, 5–6 days a week. Snatches, clean and jerks, and squats—that’s pretty much it! After he won his third Olympic gold in 1988, I interviewed Abadjiev’s greatest student, Naim “The Pocket Hercules” Süleymanoğlu. He told me he no longer did back squats because they were “not specific.” At 132 pounds bodyweight, Süleymanoğlu established himself as the greatest pound-for-pound weightlifter in history by snatching 336 pounds and clean and jerking 418. Success leaves clues!

When Abadjiev visited our gym a dozen years ago, I had the opportunity to interview him and watch him coach one of his athletes. Besides dispelling the nonsense that his elite athletes were performing so-called “Bulgarian split squats” and step-ups, he told me he had dropped back squats from his program, only performing front squats. And pulls? Don’t be silly!

One issue with pulls is that the lifter uses their arms to lift the bar higher rather than pull their body under, thus reducing power production. Share on X

One issue with pulls is that the lifter uses their arms to lift the bar higher rather than pull their body under, thus reducing power production. With the full lifts, as the lifter pulls themselves under the bar, the barbell will continue its upward trajectory because the lifter actively applies force to the bar with their arms, even if their feet are not in contact with the floor. Further, sequence photos of weightlifters show that the athlete’s feet do not have to be in contact with the floor to apply force onto the bar—thus, at least in weightlifting, you can “fire a cannon out of a canoe.”

Barbell Flex
Image 10. These photos from Bruce Klemens were graphically altered to highlight the flex of the barbell. Note that in the first photo, the ends of the barbell are lower than the center. In the following two pictures, the ends are higher than the center because the lifter uses his arms and upper body muscles to apply vertical force to the bar, even when his feet are off the floor. The lifter is 3x Olympic champion Kakhi Kakhiashvili, who represented Georgia and later Greece.

An issue with pulls that finish with an arm bend is that they require the bar to move ahead of the body’s center of mass, whereas the optimal technique keeps the bar more in line with the COM. For this reason, many coaches do not have their lifters follow through with the arms.


Video 1. A video showing the progression of the pulling technique of Christian, one of the author’s athletes. It begins with a screen capture from before working with the author, where he starts pulling the bar straight up rather than toward his center of mass. His first training session follows it, then two lifts from one of his early meets. Eventually, Christian broke the New England record in the snatch and the clean and jerk.

The dominant Chinese lifters indeed do pulls. The argument is that their training volume in pulls is relatively small and will not adversely affect their technique—just like a professional tennis player won’t lose their serve if they play an occasional game of racquetball. Also, consider that in a country of more than 1.4 billion people, their talent pool is such that they have the luxury of making mistakes.

The jury is still out on pulls for weightlifters, as there are Olympic champions and world record holders who have used them and those who have not. It appears that advanced lifters who perform a high volume of Olympic lifts could do pulls with submaximal weights or partial pulls with super-maximal weights without adversely affecting their technique. If training time is limited, it’s probably best to avoid pulls and focus on the full movements.

Should you include pulls in your program? While the jury is still out for weightlifters, there are pros for other athletes. Consider the arguments presented here and make the best decision for you and your athletes.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


References

Charniga, Andrew, Jr., A Demasculinization of Strength, June 8, 2020: pp 65–70. www.sportivnypress.com

Charniga, Andrew, Jr., “The Foot, the Ankle Joint and An Asian Pull.” January 21, 2016. www.sportivnypress.com

Charniga, Andrew, Jr., Personal communication. February 2008.

Frolov VI, Efimov NM, and Vanagas MP. “The Training Weights in the Snatch Pull.” Tyazhelaya Atletika, Fizkultura I Sport Publishers, Moscow, 1977:65–67. Translated by Andrew Charniga www.sportivnypress.com

Roman, Robert A., “The Training of the Weightlifter in the Biathlon,” Moscow, FIS, 1974. Translated by Andrew Charniga, Jr.

Roman, Robert A., 1974 Weightlifting Yearbook. Translated by Andrew Charniga.

Sandau I, Chaabene H, and Granacher U. “Predictive Validity of the Snatch Pull Force-Velocity Profile to Determine the Snatch One Repetition-Maximum in Male and Female Elite Weightlifters.” Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2021;6:35.

Hana Basic Sled

Training Sprinters for a Longer “In-Season” Period with John Nicolosi

Freelap Friday Five| ByJohn Nicolosi, ByDavid Maris

Hana Basic Sled

John Nicolosi is a sprints coach working with a private group based in Melbourne, Australia. He has a Bachelor of Physiotherapy from Melbourne University and has completed a Master of Exercise Science (Strength and Conditioning) to complement his coaching accreditations. Nicolosi currently runs a sports performance and injury clinic in Melbourne. His approach to sprint coaching is to optimize training around the individual profile of the athlete.

Freelap USA: You come from a medical background and run your own physiotherapy clinic. How much does this influence your coaching, and what are some ways that you feel this benefits you as a coach?

John Nicolosi: It has its advantages and disadvantages at times. It definitely allows me to appreciate my background understanding of anatomy and physiology and view performance from a different perspective. However, I have to be careful not to bias my observations based on this lens.

I have slowly shifted to having some of my colleagues work with the athletes I coach more and more as I try to remove bias from the way I view any injury issues that they have. When you spend as much time with your athletes as I do, your professional relationship changes; some separation is needed to not unduly influence how you view what is occurring with their injury or performance.

Your hope as a coach is always to get the most out of a training session by drawing on your clinical experience to identify whether you’re taking a reasonable risk with your decision-making. Share on X

This probably sounds like I am making it out to be a negative, which is hardly the case. The benefits are significant. Overall, this type of background creates confidence for the athletes since you can assess and modify things based on what you see and feel and then make changes to their performance or injury picture in real time. Your hope as a coach is always to try to get the most out of a training session by drawing on your clinical experience to identify whether you are taking a reasonable risk with your decision-making.

The other major area of benefit is that the profession comes with an understanding that you are required to be a lifelong learner. This seems to be a trait of most good coaches. It can be an issue at times, as we tend to like tinkering with things as we learn them, but overall, it is definitely a good thing.

Freelap USA: Hana Basic made the Olympics in 2021, which was probably something not many would have predicted prior to the Australian domestic season that year. Were you surprised at how well 2021 went for her? What are some of the things you feel were responsible for the progress she made from pre-COVID-19 to Tokyo?

John Nicolosi: It was a surprise, but not for the reasons that some would see externally. There was never any doubt in our belief that Hana could perform to that level, and throughout that season, it was obvious to us where she would end up. The surprising part was that Hana was able to make the necessary adjustments to her professionalism when it came to her involvement in the sport, and COVID-19 was a huge accelerator of this.

The removal of distractions and opportunities for external events meant that she was singly focused on her training, and she ultimately received the benefits. So, honestly, from my point of view, the vast majority of the credit for the performance must go to her commitment and willingness to make such changes during a period that none of us enjoyed.

Olympics
Image 1. John Nicolosi with Hana Basic and Kendra Hubbard.

As to what factors led to the biggest changes on the track, the main training adjustment we made during this period was the use of race model practice with much higher frequency than in previous years. I’m sure that appears obvious on the surface. However, as a coach, I became infatuated with the concept of practicing race execution with a high level of precision, and the more often you do so, the greater your ability to perform such an execution under increasing levels of pressure.

I became infatuated with the concept of practicing race execution with a high level of precision…increasing the ability to perform such an execution under increasing levels of pressure. Share on X

This concept tended to permeate nearly every repetition we completed in training to create the foundation of race performance. I am still navigating this concept, but I do feel that there is a clear connection between getting the alignment of the skill acquisition with environmental and psychological features to allow the athlete to become increasingly comfortable with creating a defined performance. Speaking with classical musicians, the ability to perform a piece of music requires a level of repetitive practice but also the exploration of the performance across many different environments and different states of emotional attachment.

The hardest part appears to be creating the mindset needed for each athlete to nail this performance consistently. They all vary so much as people; thus, to have them nail their performance, you may need different tools, cues, and techniques to find what works for each person. In a broad sense, they are biomechanically required to meet a certain level of output. How that person gets there and what emotional state will foster the greatest learning and/or execution not only varies but can change over time.

Freelap USA: The timing of the Australian season means that athletes who go on to compete in Europe and at global championships can end up being “in season” for more than eight months. Do you find this a challenge, and how do you go about preparing for it?

John Nicolosi: While my experiences are certainly much more limited compared to other coaches, I view this as an issue of the choice of periodization model and approach to specific training. I was fairly heavily influenced by adapting some of Bondarchuk’s approach to planning and programming—the use of development periods interspersed throughout elongated racing cycles has proved invaluable. As long as you are aware of what features or KPIs are central to your athletes’ best performances, you tend to be able to maintain or grow them throughout the season.

A concept employed by many coaches that has been valuable to me is using race selection throughout phases of the season to develop characteristics of the athletes’ performances that are important for their ultimate competitions. This is typically the case with using indoor racing earlier in the year for Northern Hemisphere athletes.

For many of my athletes, I would say I am less influenced by the commercial realities of racing to make a living, and thus, we can choose races for overall season development. This may involve using a relay, specific track location, or competition to create the features I am after.

For example, I often spend much of our domestic season seeking out state and regional competitions that offer multiple rounds. While these competitions are not always helpful for fast times or commercial opportunities, they provide the ability to build the athlete’s capability to back up rounds. And given that the sport is shifting to repechage rounds in major championships, this may become even more important going forward.

Freelap USA: Are there any technical skills that you feel most sprinters struggle with? What key movements do you focus on a lot, and how do you cue these?

John Nicolosi: It tends to depend on the background of the athlete you are working with. However, I would say that acceleration skills, at least in Australia, tend to be poorly developed from a technical standpoint. That being said, elite maximal velocity mechanics and especially effective transitioning are always a challenge for some to get an understanding of how to sustain postures and kinetic outputs across these phases of the race.

In regard to acceleration, the ability to position the torso, shin, ankle, and upper limbs in adequate positions and project with clear intent does not always come naturally to people. So, the need to reinforce this over and over is a focus for many athletes I work with. There appear to be two major aspects to this equation. The first is having the physical capacities to generate the power needed, and the second is knowing how—and probably more importantly, when—to use these physical capacities.

I would say that I use a constraints-based approach for the development of acceleration skills, with step markers and resisted running as the primary sensory cues for the athlete to use as feedback. This gives the athletes instant information to judge against and often creates the ability to self-evaluate, which is a great skill for the athletes to pick up quickly. Getting them to feel these things and how they can differ depending on their approach to that individual acceleration is always good to observe.

The use of external feedback gives athletes instant information to judge against and often creates the ability to self-evaluate—a great skill for athletes to pick up quickly, says @johnnicolosi. Share on X

Transitioning to top speed seems to be a major missing technical link for many athletes to be able to achieve their maximal velocity. Again, the use of external feedback from resisted sprints, external weighted clothing, and step markers appears to be helpful. In regard to cueing, Ryu Nagahara’s work has really helped the athletes understand that the shift from a desire to push horizontally to vertically happens in stages, and maintaining the horizontal pressure of ground contacts through this phase is extremely important if you want to hit your maximum capable velocity.

Freelap USA: Can you outline a typical “pre-season” training week for your sprinters?

John Nicolosi: It can vary depending on the person and the events they compete in, but as a general guide, it looks very similar to what many other sprint coaches do. As we get closer to the season, this often becomes very individualized and can vary from this quite a bit.

This is a guide for a short sprinter.

    Monday: Acceleration and lower body power gym

    Tuesday: Pool running and upper body power gym

    Wednesday: Maximal velocity running or development (in the pre-season, this is usually more technical than near maximal) and lower body power gym

    Thursday: Pool running and upper body strength gym

    Friday: Acceleration running/acceleration power development

    Saturday: Longer running—shifts from tempo repeats to speed endurance/special end across training cycles closer to the season; heavier lower body gym

    Sunday: Off

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Empty Seats

Outside of My Lane (Hiring Edition): 3 Ways You’re Sabotaging Your Department’s DEI Initiative

Blog| ByMissy Mitchell-McBeth

Empty Seats

A Forbes magazine article extolling the benefits of diversity opens with a question:

“Is there still anyone out there who doesn’t think that workplace diversity is a good thing?”

The implication is clear: Intentions are noble, but practices fall short. While this may be true in many cases, I would argue that there are absolutely people in hiring positions who don’t believe workplace diversity is a good thing. At least, not enough to overcome their affinity bias and do what is required to recruit and retain PIAs. (You—an AD, a head coach, or another individual who influences hiring decisions—might be asking yourself what a PIA is. We will get to that in a minute.)

First, let’s look at a few red-flag phrases that can unmask bigots during the hiring process:

“We need to hire the best candidate regardless of all that.”

“Do you want the job to fill a diversity quota or because of your work?”

“I succeeded despite (insert transient hardship) without anyone’s help; therefore, everyone else can and should too.”

“White privilege isn’t real.”

Sadly, these are actual statements I’ve heard or seen made in reference to DEI practices within the last year. If you’re reading this, and you’ve uttered these phrases, rather than getting angry and cursing my existence, take a moment to take an implicit bias assessment or two here, then read on.

As a starting point, I want you to understand that I’m not here to diminish the hardships you’ve faced. Life is hard for everyone, but this is a discussion about hiring practices, and the fact is that the deck is very often stacked against the Jamals and Jessicas in favor of the Johns. Further, this is not an attack on those with more privilege. Far from it. This is a call to action.

You might think, “this isn’t really my fight to fight.” But it is. It has to be.

PIAS CANNOT SOLVE THIS ISSUE WITHOUT HELP FROM THE MAJORITY. If we could, don’t you think we already would have done so?

Anyway, back to our acronym, PIA: Prove It Again. These are individuals who don’t benefit from the benefit of the doubt. Stereotyped as less competent, they are required to prove themselves time and again. PIA groups include people of color, people with disabilities, women, older individuals, LBGTQ+ individuals, individuals from different religious backgrounds, and class migrants (professionals from blue-collar backgrounds).

As a member of the majority, why exactly should you want to fill your department with PIAs? Why, other than just being a decent human being, should you care?

Because it is widely established that diverse organizations experience more success. Try to find a single piece of research that demonstrates the superiority of a homogeneous workplace. (Spoiler alert: you won’t.)

Diverse workplaces have the following advantages:

  • Diversity of thought.
  • Increased employee engagement.
  • Ability to attract and retain top talent.
  • Increased innovation.
  • Better understanding of customer base.
People tend to be a little less comfortable in diverse environments but more successful, (perhaps because) greater depth of thought is necessary to diverse workplaces, says @missEmitche11. Share on X

People tend to be a little less comfortable in diverse environments but more successful. Why the discomfort? Whether it’s the need to handle logistics or the demand to be purposeful in the identification and elimination of bias in our daily interactions, greater depth of thought is necessary to navigate diverse workplaces. Here’s a small example that is fairly common in athletics but often goes unnoticed by you, the well-intentioned and progressive hiring party:

You bravely go outside of your comfort zone and hire a female strength and conditioning coach. She is wildly qualified, and you recognize that she can improve the performance of your football program. All is well in the weight room, but game day cometh. Quick, grab that leftover men’s large Polo shirt and put it on her desk! That’s her size, right?

Your strength coach arrives at the game, knee-length shirt tucked into her shorts, only to be out of pocket the entire time. She can’t go into the team locker room or the coaches’ locker room, so she waits in the hallway or outside. To go to the bathroom, she has to exit the field, enter the stands, and use the general admission bathrooms. No big deal, right?! Wrong.

Having left the sidelines, she now gets to negotiate stadium re-entry with the older lady in the yellow vest who simply cannot believe that “Yes, she really is a coach for the team.” Finally, she is able to flag down a male assistant coach to vouch for her, and she stomps toward the sidelines, making sure to check her body language, facial expression, and overall affect so she isn’t accused of being “too emotional.” (Meanwhile, weeping, wailing, and the gnashing of teeth will ensue from the headset wearers anytime the yellow cloth hits the ground.)

She never mentions any of this to the head coach. Made to feel she should “be grateful to be a part” her entire career, she doesn’t want to bring it up because “he has enough on his plate.”

Employers of PIAs, the message is this: It is your responsibility to think through these types of scenarios or ask your PIA about some of these pain points. Find ways in which your employees might struggle to feel included and solve them. They may not feel comfortable asking for things since they’ve been marginalized their entire lives. In the initial phases, it will take additional effort on the part of the employer, but it will pay dividends in the end when you are able to retain a high-quality, diverse staff.

It’s your responsibility to find ways in which your employees might struggle to feel included and solve them, says @missEmitche11. Share on X

Seem like a lot of work? Success and winning usually are. They are also usually a product of challenging the status quo and embracing productive discomfort.*

As a coaching industry, we celebrate the concept of stepping outside of our comfort zone. Every sports movie, College Game Day feature, 30 for 30—they all feature protagonists overcoming adversity. We love these stories when they make headlines, but are we willing to live them? Are we actually willing to embrace productive discomfort, knowing it will likely increase the success of our organization?

Too often, the answer is no. We call up our friend because we can “trust” them. Because they share our belief system. Because the hire is comfortable.

But also, the hire is accessible. The number one excuse launched for not hiring a PIA?

“No one applied/we couldn’t find anyone.”

It’s truly the perfect crime. You post the job. You receive very few candidates who “check a box,” as some call it. You call up one of the 3–5 candidates you interviewed. You’re not 100% sure which one you’re calling because, when presented with a line-up, you would be hard-pressed to distinguish one candidate from the next. But you pat yourself on the back anyway, having “really made the best hire.”

In all seriousness (although, given the statistic that the NCAA strength and conditioning industry is 85% male and 77% white, the paragraph above is kinda serious), there is some truth to the above scenario. You may have difficulty finding a PIA to bring onto your staff. But if your attempt to do so has been passive (i.e., you opened the job, posted it, and waited on your friends to phone in their recommended doppelganger), the candidate pool isn’t the problem—you are the problem.

Let me tell you how to do better. I have been the recipient of others crashing into my S&C lane my entire career because they “went to CrossFit for a few months.” As such, despite never having hired a single person, I deem myself fully qualified to write this because I’ve seen people get hired.

So hit the brakes as I come barreling into your lane with three underlying issues/causes involved in your lack of a diverse candidate pool:

1. Everyone in Your Inner Circle Looks Like You

In preparing to write this piece, I consulted my friend Jeff Huebner, the Head Women’s Volleyball Coach at Texas Woman’s University. For context, TWU is the third most diverse school in the country and has the number one most diverse staff/student population in the state of Texas. Jeff is involved with the hiring process within the athletics department.

When asked what approach TWU takes to ensure a diverse candidate pool, without even a moment’s thought, Jeff stated that recruitment starts well before the job ever opens. What does that mean? Humor me and participate in a three-part exercise that I adapted from a colleague, Jeanne Rankin, Strength Coach at Coastal Carolina:

  1. You’re hiring a coach (you can pick the sport/support staff role). Take one minute to write down everyone you know personally who coaches in a similar role that might be a fit for the job. Not people you know of, people you know.
  2. Tally it up. How many of the people you wrote down fall into your demographic?
  3. Reflect.

As coaches, we need to do some introspection about how we set up our circle of friends and colleagues. Are we purposeful about seeking out backgrounds and perspectives different than our own? Or does our affinity bias lead us to collaborate only with others who “look like us?”

As coaches, we need to do some introspection about how we set up our circle of friends and colleagues. Are we purposeful about seeking out backgrounds and perspectives different than our own? Share on X

I believe the last two sentences in that paragraph are really important. Please don’t be that white person who thinks you’re woke because you “have Black friends” or the male who fancies himself an ally because “I’m a ‘girl Dad.’” As Jeff put it, “who do you share your knowledge with, and who do you get your knowledge from?”

Put another way, are you actively seeking to learn from the experiences and perspectives of the individuals you listed in the exercise above? Or are they just acquaintances who make you feel good? When an opportunity becomes available, are you equally likely to put a PIA in your circle up for it, or are you only putting PIAs up for positions you know are earmarked for a DEI initiative? As with most things in life, intent rules the day.

Finally, as a segue into the next reason your candidate pool may not be diverse: Do you actively advocate for PIA groups? Are people aware that you are an ally?

Once again, this is about intent. If your intent is to make yourself feel good or promote yourself, you’ve missed the altruism boat. However, if your intent is to effect positive change in our industry and our world? Perfect. Are you openly an ally because you want to provide a safe and supportive space for everyone, not just some? Amazing. You’re well on your way to overcoming the next challenge in the “we couldn’t find anyone” arena…

2. The Outside Perception of You and Your Organization Is Not One of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

People want to be where they feel a sense of belonging, where they can grow and develop, and where they have opportunities. If any of these items are missing, they will seek employment somewhere else.

A starting point for this is as follows: If you want to see more diversity in your organization, you need to promote diversity within your organization. As in: You are moving existing employees up in the ranks. To phrase it another way: If you want to have a candidate pool with different races/ethnicities, then your organization should promote individuals of different races/ethnicities to open leadership positions.

To have a candidate pool with different races/ethnicities, your organization needs to promote individuals of different races/ethnicities to open leadership positions, says @missEmitche11. Share on X

Sounds simple, right? It should be, but this is going to require work on your part as an employer. You’re going to have to…develop your staff. If done right, you will need to take an individualized approach to staff development versus assigning everyone 62 worthless online training modules “to be completed by October 1” but “okay, really guys, we’re serious—December 1.” (Shoutout to every public school district in America.)

This means having conversations with your employees and determining what continuing education or training opportunities will best complement their existing skill set and position them to move up the chain of command. Often, employees have identified opportunities they would like to explore; they just need the support and resources to do so. (As an aside, many professional organizations have awards and scholarships designated for PIAs, some of which go unclaimed because employers fail to educate themselves on these opportunities, and nominations are sparse.)

One note here: Staff growth and development should be a common practice impacting all employees. This is not an implication that Prove It Agains need help and mentorship while Benefit of the Doubters are innately prepared for the next step. The sentiment underlying that sentence is literally the basis for the glass ceiling and the one this article seeks to discredit.

A simple litmus test for adequate staff development is as follows: The next time a position opens up within your organization, ask yourself if any of your existing employees are qualified to take on that role. If not, why not?

Reality check: Sometimes, it’s not a great move to promote from within. The staff may legitimately not be ready. But if that’s always the case? Is that an issue with your employees, or did you fail to invest in the growth and development of those employees?

Everyone was a first-year something at one point, even the head football coach. Nobody knew what to do their first year, yet most figured it out. Your PIA employees have literally been figuring out how to navigate the icy waters of a life without privilege since birth. Conversely, many BOTDs have skated along the path of least resistance to take their seat at the table. Which individual is better prepared to take on adversity?

I’ll let you mull that one over.

In the meantime, let’s segue into that proverbial table. Your PIAs might have a seat at the table but still not feel a true sense of belonging. Remember, despite improved performance in diverse environments, we all are compelled to be around others who look, sound, feel, talk, and experience like we do. A seat at the table will rarely feel inclusive if that seat’s occupant is on an island.

To foster a sense of belonging, a widely accepted practice in DEI initiatives is employee resource groups, or ERGs. These are groups dedicated to the needs of people of less privileged identities to create a culture of belonging. But it really isn’t enough to just form these groups and say, “good luck!”

If you’re going to talk about it, be about it.

As the employer, offer to help. This means dedicating time and workspace during work hours for these groups to meet. Once these groups have started, check in! Ask the leaders of the group(s) what their needs are versus making them come to you with requests. These groups already feel underrepresented and may not feel comfortable approaching you, plus your active pursuit of ways to help demonstrates support.

Help may mean providing funding and allowing ERGs to host special events if desired, but let the ERG members plan it. Too often, events planned for ERGs fall short. I’ll give an example. I personally don’t need to sit in on a breakfast that talks about the challenges faced by women in sports. I live those challenges every day. I don’t need to sit in a room with peers and nod and “feel seen” as the speaker identifies problems in a male-dominated field but never presents a viable solution.

You know how we’re all supposed to be able to walk away from an event “with at least one thing?” That one thing shouldn’t have been shouting into an echo chamber for 50 minutes. While venting can be helpful at times, actionable strategies to solve problems or develop skills are generally more valuable in the growth process.

All this to say, support your ERGs, but give them autonomy.

Still not convinced that taking these measures to promote inclusion is important? In one of the highest consensus rates seen in a decade, Deloitte’s 2020 Global Human Capital Trends Report found that:

  • 93% of respondents agreed that a sense of belonging drives organizational performance.
93% of respondents agreed that a sense of belonging drives organizational performance. They didn’t say winning or making more money. They said a sense of belonging, says @missEmitche11. Share on X

They didn’t say winning or making more money. They said a sense of belonging. I can personally attest to leaving a position where I was made to feel like a guest of the team versus part of the team. Ironically, I had been with the program for five years, while the head coach, who openly referred to support staff members as “guests,” had only been on staff for six months. I digress. The point is, feeling like you belong is important to everyone.

By now, you’ve done deep soul-searching about expanding your network of friends and colleagues, and you’re putting an actionable plan in place to increase employee engagement and belonging. Top talent is undoubtedly lining up at your door, right? But what if, according to your job description, they aren’t qualified? Maybe, just maybe…

3. Your Entry Barriers Are…Stupid

A colleague of mine who is hands down one of the best strength and conditioning coaches in the country was once turned down for a position in a university’s strength and conditioning department because he didn’t have a master’s degree.

Okay, I get it; it’s an “institution of higher learning.” But is it really that hard to see from your HR high horse that this has absolutely zero to do with the listed job responsibilities? You just passed on one of the most talented coaches in the country for something that doesn’t even matter.

Unfortunately, irrelevant entry barriers aren’t an anomaly in athletic departments. I see them all the time at the high school level, where strength and conditioning coaches aren’t considered candidates for non-teaching S&C positions because they lack teaching certification.

Meaningless entry barriers eliminate good candidates before they even enter the hiring funnel.

Meaningless entry barriers eliminate good candidates before they even enter the hiring funnel, says @missEmitche11. Share on X

This may disparately affect those from less privileged backgrounds. There is some conjecture that PIAs are less likely to apply for positions where they don’t meet every listed requirement. In contrast, individuals with more privilege will apply even if they only meet a few requirements. Given that, I’d take a long, hard look at the job descriptions you’re posting if I were you and determine whether or not they are necessary for the role in question.

“Well, they should just go get that (insert inane “qualification”).”

Let’s go back to our “Benefit of the Doubt” crew. They are called that because even when they don’t meet a given qualification, they are often given the benefit of the doubt and hired anyway, while the PIA is turned down for lacking the same qualification. In other words, BOTDs are judged based on their potential, while PIAs are judged strictly on what they have accomplished.

Here are two simple workarounds:

  1. Remove useless “qualifications” from job descriptions/requirements.
  2. Give everyone a free pass on not meeting a certain requirement, or give no one a free pass.

Anecdotally, in talking to Jeff at TWU, he said they recently reviewed some of their job descriptions and decided to remove a master’s degree as a required qualification for an assistant coach. Their candidate pool became more diverse immediately—food for thought in today’s competitive hiring landscape.

Cultivate an Authentically Diverse Network

Many articles have been written about the benefits of diversity and ways to promote recruitment and retention in the workplace. I’ve included some of those practices in this article, but if you checked out for a bit, the take-home message is this:

Your network is your network. If that network is diverse, your hiring practices likely will be too. If not? You need to determine what’s preventing you from having a diverse network and fix it. Share on X

Your network is your network. If that network is diverse, your hiring practices likely will be as well. If not? You need to reflect and determine what it is that’s preventing you from having a diverse network and fix it.

Be the change, or something like that.

In my conversation with Jeff, he closed with this:

“TWU doesn’t talk about diversity as something to be accomplished. It’s a byproduct of doing the right things over a long period of time, and part of doing things the right way is having the most diverse perspectives and experiences. It’s not a box to be checked; it’s authentic.”

Don’t talk about it; be about it.

*Giving credit where credit is due, the phrase “productive discomfort” is the tagline of Coach Luiza Andrade, Jeff Huebner’s assistant coach at TWU. It was, however, too early in the storyline to introduce Luiza, Jeff, or TWU.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Favorite Workout

Your New Favorite Max-Speed Workout

Blog| ByTyler Germain

Favorite Workout

Looking back at some of the pieces I’ve written for this website, I noticed that I have a particular penchant for lengthy preambles. I’m not going to do that this time. And yes, I recognize that by mentioning my previous preambular pattern, I’ve created another preamble of sorts — BUT! — I contest it is not all that lengthy, and it is, therefore, okay. Let me begin.

Today, I will share a workout with you that I like quite a bit. Athletes I have coached also like this workout, and I think your athletes will like it, too. In fact, in the category of max-speed workouts, this might even become your favorite.

In the category of max-speed workouts, this one might become your favorite, says @TrackCoachTG. Share on X

Let me first clarify what I mean when I say “max-speed workout.” For the average high school athlete, max speed is often attained somewhere between 30 and 40 meters into an all-out sprint. Even the most elite sprinters in the world can only maintain maximum speed for a couple of seconds before deceleration begins. Therefore, an all-out sprint of up to around 60 meters is what I consider “max speed.” This allows athletes to get up to their top speed and remain in that speed window for about 20 or so meters without sprinting over the metaphorical hump and into deceleration territory. That means anything over 60 meters is no longer a max-speed workout for the majority of high school athletes.

In addition, running fast requires adequate rest. Track and field coaches have long subscribed to the rule of thumb that every 10 meters of maximal effort requires one minute of rest in order for similarly high outputs to be achieved on the next rep. In other words, if you’re not giving your athletes maximal rest, then you aren’t training their max speed.

Given those constraints, a max-speed workout is a workout that includes full-intensity sprints of between 40 and 60 meters completed with adequate rest in between to perform at full intensity again. You’ll probably do four to six reps in total. I think I see a pattern emerging. Forty to 60 meters. Four to six minutes of rest. Four to six total reps. In the famous words of Owen Wilson, “Wow.”

So? Here’s the Workout

I’m not sure what to call it, but it’s 4 x 60 meters. In spikes. On the track. Preferably on a warm and sunny day.

If you’re scratching your head right now, wondering, “what’s so great about that?” just hang in there with me for a minute. If you’re scratching your head for some other reason, consider switching to Head and Shoulders (note: I have no affiliation with Head and Shoulders or with Procter and Gamble).

Like many workouts, there is so much more than the sets, reps, or distances that make this one fun and effective. So, here’s where the real flavor starts to come in.

To run this workout, here’s what you will need:

  • Groups of five athletes with similar speed capabilities
  • A meter stick or tape measure
  • Chalk
  • At least two coaches—one at the start and one at the finish
  • Starting blocks
  • A clipboard, pen, and paper for scorekeeping
  • A prize

I like to start by hyping up the prize. Since I prefer to do this workout on a hot day, I like a big cooler full of ice, with one ice-cold Gatorade per group. Open the cooler and reveal the prizes. Let them emanate their icy aura. Hear the angels sing. Tell the athletes that whoever wins today’s workout in their group will get to sip the cool, sweet nectar. Be extra. Do the most. For even more drama, save this workout for the very end of the season when you may only have five sprinters left. A solitary Gatorade in a big cooler of ice creates a singular effect, indeed.

Take your five athletes and line them up at the starting line. We happen to have a mark for the 70-meter dash on our track. I also know that the final hurdle mark for the 300-meter hurdles is 10 meters from the finish line. My calculator tells me that 70 – 10 = 60, so we sprint from the 70-meter line to the final hurdle marks. If you don’t have a 70-meter mark, that’s okay. The distance from the 100-meter starting line to the third hurdle mark in the women’s 100-meter hurdles is 30 meters, which means… well, you get it. You don’t need to measure 60 meters. It’s already on your track.

So anyway, line ’em up. This is gonna be a race!

The first rep in the sequence is very basic. Treat this as much like a meet-day situation as possible. Call out the starting commands and have runners take their marks, set, and go. The athletes race for 60 meters, and a coach stands at the finish line to determine their finishing order, one through five. This coach holds a clipboard, which holds a sheet of paper on which the coach writes down the order in which the athletes finished. This matters a bunch because it impacts the next rep and the scoring system used to determine workout winners.

After at least six minutes have passed, we repeat this process. But runners are placed at an advantage or disadvantage, depending on where they finished on the previous rep. The runner who finished first will have the biggest disadvantage, and the one who finished last will have the biggest head start.

In other words, if you’re not giving your athletes maximal rest, then you aren’t training their max speed, says @TrackCoachTG. Share on X

Because you’re a plan-ahead’er, before having the athletes come out to the track, you will have used your meter stick and chalk to mark the aforementioned advantages and disadvantages. Lane three will belong to your winning runner, but they will line up 2 meters back from the start. Lane two will be your second-place runner, 1 meter back from the start. Lane four will belong to the third-place runner, lined up at the original starting line. Lane one will belong to the fourth-place runner, lined up 1 meter ahead of the original line. And lane five will belong to your fifth-place runner, lined up 2 meters ahead of the original line.

That means that this rep (and every rep that follows) is actually somewhere between 58 and 62 meters, depending on the athlete. Here’s a visual representation of what I mean.

Lanes Race

From this staggered position, you’ll have your group race again, tallying their finishing positions at the end of the race and once again re-seeding for the third rep. Rest, stagger, race, seed, and repeat until you’ve completed all four reps.

Determining the overall group winner comes down to who has accumulated the lowest total score over those four races. For example, for an athlete who finished first, third, second, and first, we would award scores of one, three, two, and one for a total score of seven. And as I discussed at the beginning of this rundown, the athlete with the lowest score is awarded the all-coveted Gatorade. Celebrate this and make a big deal about it. Allow playful trash talk, if that’s your thing, as long as it remains playful.

Although I have not had athletes do this, I suppose it’s possible that one of them might try to game the system, coasting to a third-place finish to get a head start in the next race based upon calculations they did in their head about the score they’ll need to be the overall winner. High schoolers, am I right? But here’s the thing: I would bet dollars to doughnuts that any attempt to do so would only end up harming, not helping, the athlete’s score.

The staggered races will finish very closely, in my experience, and while one kid is trying to coast to third, another is trying not to finish fourth. Or, let’s say one athlete really dogs one out for a fifth-place finish, banking on the head start being enough to earn a first on the next rep. That’s still six points over two reps, the equivalent of two third-place finishes. At the end of the day, the fastest kids who are the fiercest competitors on each rep will be the ones who are rewarded with sweet, sweet victory.

If there happens to be a tie score, you can pit those competitors against each other for any number of tie-breakers. You could have them line up and run one more rep with no stagger. You could put them into an isometric position and award the Gatorade to the last athlete standing. You could have them throw a medicine ball for distance. You could hold a rap battle. You could withhold the Gatorade entirely to teach them that there are winners and losers in life and that a tie is the same as a loss and then chug the Gatorade in their faces, laughing maniacally. (I’m kidding).

This workout is quick and fun, and I’d bet my brother’s pinky toe that it fosters incredibly high intent and a positively competitive spirit, says @TrackCoachTG. Share on X

All in all, this workout takes between 25 and 30 minutes to run, depending on how many groups you have and how much transition time you need between groups for athletes to set their blocks. It’s quick and fun, and I’d bet my brother’s pinky toe that this workout fosters incredibly high intent, a positively competitive spirit, and an interesting twist on the typical max-speed days that you’re probably already doing. Give it a try the next time you want to spice things up at practice. And if you think of a clever name for this thing, let me know.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Baseball readiness

Developing an Athlete Monitoring Program with Jump Data

Blog| ByBrett Platts

Baseball readiness

“Adapt or die.” – Billy Beane

Strength, power, and speed are essential qualities for an athlete; however, these qualities are quickly diminished if you can’t stay healthy. Fatigue can be described as a decrease in maximal force or power production in response to a contractile activity.1 Managing fatigue over the course of a season remains essential in order to maximize athlete adaptations and minimize potential overreaching.

The field of strength and conditioning utilizes more and more sports science technology every year; with that, there has never been a better time to adopt athlete monitoring protocols. Monitoring athletes can seem intimidating at first—however, as you learn more about the available methods, I am confident you will find what works best for you. As a former collegiate baseball player, I know how quickly the game can be taken away from an athlete. Throughout this article, I will detail my athlete monitoring protocols and the benefits I’ve seen over the course of a season.

Am I saying the use of monitoring protocols will result in zero injuries?

No, that’s not how competitive sports work. However, implementing protocols with the collaboration of all aspects of player development can help bring greater resilience to your athletes and help limit acute injuries.

Implementing protocols with the collaboration of all aspects of player development can help bring greater resilience to your athletes and help limit acute injuries, says @BrettPlatts. Share on X

What Is Athlete Monitoring?

Let’s start by diving into what athlete monitoring is—in its purest form, it’s the collection and analysis of data to ensure optimal player performance. As the sports science field continues to grow, so will the methods of monitoring an athlete’s workload. With the various techniques already available, including RPE, GPS, HRV, and questionnaires, there has never been a better time to start monitoring your athletes.

For the sake of this article, I will dive into my method of fatigue management, which relies heavily on utilizing countermovement jumps to monitor fatigue. Given that this is a reliable testing protocol with easy integration into day-to-day operations, I found it fitting to introduce CMJs to my players over the course of the season. For context, my population included academy players within the Chicago Cubs organization, with athletes ranging in age from 16–20 years old. These players are hardworking, passionate young men looking for the opportunity to move up the ranks and further their careers within the organization.

Over the course of this article, I will detail my experience and the benefits I’ve seen implementing specific protocols. As discussed, RPE, GPS, HRV, and questionnaires are excellent methods to use and perhaps more affordable for those who do not have access to force plates. By no means am I here to say what works best; I’m simply highlighting my preferred method of fatigue management through CMJs.

Key Contributions

First things first: be a coach. Provide heart and motivation for your athletes. Build upon the qualities of strength, power, and speed. These qualities make up an athlete’s ability to perform at an elite level.

Second, when entering the realm of sports science technology, create a road map; do not get lost in data collection. It can be easy to overwhelm yourself and collect mass amounts of data while losing the why factor. Analyzing is equally as important as collecting when it comes to comprehending the data received. Furthermore, the physiological and psychological aspects of an athlete’s performance are critical to consider—research has shown that the adaptative response of the autonomic nervous system through training and emotional stressors is directly associated with sport performance.2 To simplify: performance decreases when the athlete’s capacity is exceeded.

My past experiences have heavily shaped my approach to programming and athlete monitoring. As a former baseball player, I can relate to the thoughts many athletes have: “I don’t get tired” or “I’m not tired.” This is a typical psychological tactic many athletes and coaches preach.

In reality, fatigue is a natural occurrence, and it is meant to happen. Unfortunately, I’ve experienced the effects of fatigue. As a player, I remember creating improper mechanics with little-to-no body awareness during long bouts of practice. At the time, I thought nothing of it—just another typical day fighting through fatigue. Then my day and my career ended with a torn ACL and menisci. This dramatic event occurred while fielding a routine ground ball during baseball practice—this is a prime example of how quickly the game can be taken away from someone.

As a professional, this is why I preach athlete monitoring. We must continue to watch and monitor our athletes outside the weight room; having an understanding of their current day-to-day workload is essential before designing protocols. If you have the luxury of being in collegiate or professional sports, monitor practice and look for signs of fatigue—we know fatigue is correlated to an increased risk of an acute injury.3 

When creating athlete monitoring protocols, ask yourself the following questions:

  • What is the frequency and intensity of practices/games?
  • What are the athlete’s current recovery modalities?
  • Are they following a nutrition protocol?
  • Are they following a hydration protocol?
  • What are their sleep habits?

Doing the above will allow for a better understanding of what your athletes deal with on a daily basis.

Monitoring
Image 1. Me (right) and our athletic trainer (left) monitoring daily baseball activities.

Implementation

Culture is everything. As a strength and conditioning specialist, creating buy-in with all aspects of your organization is essential. This includes players, athletic trainers, coaches, medical staff, and even front office personnel. Communication is key—elaborate and discuss the why factors to all stakeholders in player development.

For players, tell them what you’re doing, explain the tests being done, and show them the metrics you’re looking for. To further increase their motivation, create a leaderboard: players love competition, which will only strengthen the culture within the weight room. You know you have buy-in when players constantly ask what their numbers are.

You know you have buy-in when players constantly ask what their numbers are, says @BrettPlatts. Share on X

For athlete monitoring to work, like-minded conversations must occur daily to ensure optimal player readiness. Building trusting relationships leads to overall player development. Once established, we can now create a longitudinal approach to athlete monitoring.

Utilization

Countermovement jumps are highly reliable movements with the ability to monitor fatigue. For those unfamiliar, the CMJ is a test on a set of force plates to measure an athlete’s lower body power output. Force plates are mechanical sensing systems designed to measure the ground reaction forces involved in human movements.4 The CMJ test consists of an athlete placing their hands on their hips, squatting to a selected depth, and then jumping as high as possible. These tests are performed three times while tracking three key metrics: peak power, depth, and RSI.

Force Plates
Figure 1. This graph displays the CMJ and each of its phases on a pair of force plates.

Peak power refers to the highest force and velocity produced by the lower limbs during the stretch-shortening cycle. Peak power remains a critical metric that plays a massive role in sport performance.5 Higher peak power correlates to increased athletic performance qualities, such as power output, acceleration, and sprint performance.

Monitoring depth within the CMJ is essential. Too little or too much depth can significantly alter your results. An athlete reaching less than 30 centimeters of depth will produce more power due to the limited range of motion. On the other hand, an athlete reaching depths greater than 45 centimeters will have a decrease in peak power. Consistency is critical; aim to hit 35–40 centimeters of depth with your athletes. Let athletes be athletes. Naturally, they should switch between 35  and 40 centimeters—have a watchful eye and cue as necessary for valid results.

CMJ Peak Power
Figure 2. This shows the direct correlation between peak power and depth.

RSI is our final metric, demonstrating an athlete’s ability to change from an eccentric to a concentric movement quickly and effectively. In other words, how fast can an athlete generate force? With the capability to track an athlete’s explosive capabilities through the SSC, we can confidently monitor their ability to generate power throughout the season.

RSI
Figure 3. A look at a player’s RSI metrics over the course of a baseball season.

How to Analyze the Data

Now that we have our metrics, we can dive into how to analyze the data received. Figure 4 shows one of my former players experiencing dips in peak power.

Peak Power
Figure 4. Dips in peak power experienced by a former player.

We approach this graph by determining negative trends and implementing specific protocols. As we can see, there are numerous trends in the athlete’s profile. Understand that there will be many highs and lows throughout the season; it’s essential to ensure depth is consistent when evaluating dips to identify outliers. Determining negative trends is vital to monitoring fatigue. Peak power allows us to see the product of force; measuring and tracking this quality over time will enable us to see both power and fatigue and their correlation to a long season.

Peak power allows us to see the product of force; measuring and tracking this quality over time will enable us to see both power and fatigue and their correlation to a long season, says @BrettPlatts. Share on X

Once we are aware of potential fatigue and poor performance indicators, discussions with athletic trainers are our primary resource. If this athlete has entered the training room, determine whether they are receiving treatment for an undisclosed injury. If not, we assume they are healthy with no areas of concern. Once our collaboration with the athletic training staff is established, we can discuss it with the team’s manager and coaches. Have they seen a decline in performance? Are they noticing fatigue? These conversations often bring light to the situation and show a reasonable cause for action. At this point, we can start the athlete on monitoring protocols.

Practices and games will differ per level; however, my experience working with professional baseball typically had the following layout.

  • Stretch
  • Throw
  • Defensive work
  • Hitting
  • Break
  • Game
  • Lift (3x/week)
Warmup
Coach Brett Platts leading a pregame baseball warmup.

With a detailed schedule, we can scale back on sport workload and high-performance workouts by detecting negative trends. My experience largely included making adjustments to early morning work—this means possible removal from hitting, throwing, defensive work, or even early work altogether. We may see our players stretch, complete a throwing program, and then complete treatment with our ATs. Their workout program is often adjusted by dialing back on volume while keeping a moderate to low intensity, depending on the athlete. Discussions around game removal remain our last resort when determining player readiness.

If protocols are implemented early, the removal from early work activities has been shown to rebound our athletes appropriately. When bucketing athletes into our monitoring protocols, it’s important to note the positive trend back up. Each athlete will recover differently; in my experience, three or more days of an increase in peak power can be an excellent example of increased player readiness.

Monitoring Is Easier Than You Think

The various methods of athlete monitoring protocols can all be practical. Your time, budget, and athletes’ availability will determine what works best for you. Discuss, integrate, and implement the protocols you deem essential. The field of strength and conditioning is meant to be experimental: review the research, ask questions, and integrate what you feel is best for your athletes.

The field of strength and conditioning is meant to be experimental: review the research, ask questions, and integrate what you feel is best for your athletes, says @BrettPlatts. Share on X

I monitored CMJ recordings, watched practice, watched games, took the initiative to understand their sleep schedule, and of course, encouraged proper nutrition. If the technology is available, a combination of peak power, RSI, and depth is fully capable of monitoring an athlete’s fatigue. By detecting negative trends, we can rebound players appropriately to ensure player readiness. I credit my success in developing strong, powerful athletes primarily to my coaching and collection of data, which ensures each player physically develops in line with their skills on the field.

Monitoring athletes can seem intimidating; however, I promise it’s easier than you think. We know that with fatigue, there is a greater risk of injury, so detecting and monitoring fatigue remains essential. Workload management is about data collection and interpretation. I am not pulling players from games; however, the long-term benefit of modifying day-to-day operations is huge when limiting acute injuries and furthering an athlete’s career.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


References

1. Wan J, Qin Z, Wang P, Sun Y, and Liu X. “Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment.” Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2017;49(10):e384. doi:10.1038/emm.2017.194

2. Aquino M, Petrizzo J, Otto RM, and Wygand J. “The Impact of Fatigue on Performance and Biomechanical Variables—A Narrative Review with Prospective Methodology.” Biomechanics. 2022;2(4):513–524. doi:10.3390/biomechanics2040040

3. Lazarus RS. “How emotions influence performance in competitive sports.” The Sport Psychologist. 2000;14:229–252. doi: 10.1123/tsp.14.3.229

4. Beckham G, Suchomel T, and Mizuguchi S. (PDF) “Force Plate Use in Performance Monitoring and Sport Science Testing.” ResearchGate. Published 10/1/22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269631495_Force_Plate_Use_in_Performance_Monitoring_and_Sport_Science_Testing

5. Cronin J and Sleivert G. “Challenges in Understanding the Influence of Maximal Power Training on Improving Athletic Performance.” Sports Medicine. 2005;35(3):213–234. doi:10.2165/00007256-200535030-00003

Bobsled

Programming Acceleration for the Sled and for the Track with Pat Saile

Freelap Friday Five| ByPat Saile, ByDavid Maris

Bobsled

Pat Saile is Switzerland’s national coach for track and field, coaching the men’s relay. He currently works with two German athletes and an Austrian sprinter and has had five athletes win medals at the Winter Olympics. Coach Saile previously studied sports science and worked in biomechanics with 3D motion capture. He then worked as a football and athletics coach before moving to Munich to work as a Bavaria country coach for bobsled and track and field.

Coach Saile has many coaching licenses and experience in different sports, such as disabled sports, football/soccer, CrossFit, weightlifting, etc.

Freelap USA: There have been several athletes who have competed at a high level in sprinting and bobsled, and this is your background also. What are some of the training methods that you have experienced in bobsled that influence your programming when coaching sprinters?

Pat Saile: I use the prowler and heavy sled like I use the bobsled, and I do this to get into angles and specific positions that I want to see in acceleration training. I also work relatively similarly in explosive strength development.

The hard part of bobsledding is getting the 100-kilogram-plus men to move explosively and quickly while still making them look smooth so they can sprint quickly. Share on X

The hard part of bobsledding is getting the 100-kilogram-plus men to move explosively and quickly while still making them look smooth so they can sprint quickly. They are sometimes as fast as the sprinters, up to 40 meters.

Pat Saile Bobsled

The bobsledders also have to run down in the dip to over 11 m/s before they jump in the sled. For example, if an athlete has problems with frontside mechanics in the pick-up phase, it makes methodical sense from time to time to let the athlete accelerate (while holding at the bars in front) on the curved treadmill. In this way, we often find good positions with younger athletes for the pick-up acceleration.

Freelap USA: Alex Burghardt competed in the 2022 Winter Olympics just 196 days after competing at the 2021 Summer Olympics, before being ready for the 2022 track and field season. How tough was this, and what challenges did you face when preparing her for this?

Pat Saile: Since I had already worked in bobsled and knew the specifics of the sport, it was clear to me that the project could be successful. Alexandra had already been asked several times if she would like to try to push a bobsled, and it is often the case in Germany that second-tier sprinters switch to bobsled if they have not been so successful in sprinting. However, she did not want that.

But after she ran 11.07 in the Olympic semifinals, she was okay with it, and I gave her the option to participate in the Winter Olympics six months after the Tokyo Olympics. She was a bit incredulous at first, but then she came in second—a hundredth behind—at the national push test in Oberhof one day before the ISTAF meeting in Berlin. Of course, we still had to train push-off technique in the track and field season before, but because of her longer contact times in the acceleration phase and her body weight of 73 kilograms, she was predestined for bobsled.

The problem for the track and field season was rather that we could not lay much foundation for the summer season during the bobsled season.

Then COVID-19, norovirus, and a minor injury were added in the summer build-up, and suddenly we had to run 200 meters in Munich for the National Federation. In addition, she had slight back problems in the summer season due to the strong G-forces in bobsledding.

We are now working through all this and looking forward to a season in 2023. All in all, those 1 1/2 years were very exhausting and energy-sapping.

Freelap USA: You share coaching responsibilities for Mujinga Kambundji with Florian Clivaz, and before that, with Adrian Rothenbühler. Can you explain how the coaching duties are split and what you have been working on with her? She has had a sensational career and won her first global title over 60 meters last year in Belgrade. Was there any indication in training that she would run that fast?

Pat Saile: That’s right, I try to help her main coaches with the technical stuff like running mechanics and acceleration and give them advice if needed. I am also present at every major international event and help with coaching.

Once a week, Mujinga comes to me in Zurich, and once a week, I go to her and her training group for coaching in Bern. The training plans are made by her home coach Florian (and earlier, that was done by Adrian). Mondays are sprint sessions with lots of warm-up and coordination drills beforehand.

Resisted Sprint

On Wednesdays, the focus is on acceleration. Here, we mainly work with the 1080 Sprint and try to find the angle-specific positions of the acceleration. Last season, Mujinga was internationally one of the strongest athletes in acceleration. This has also been shown during competitions in Eugene and Munich.

In Belgrade, she was only able to unpack this in the final. There, in the semifinals, we were still working on the initial movement out of the block. In the final, the warm-up was all about emotion, so I withdrew from coaching (Adrian did all the work) and maybe only gave 1–2 mini inputs.

In the technique training itself, we mainly work on generating more beautiful and economical step patterns.

In technique training itself, we mainly work on Mujinga generating more beautiful and economical step patterns. Share on X

It is very remarkable what she is able to achieve in competition and what it often looks like in training. Mujinga often does not reach the load peaks in training, which is why she is able to run overspeed in training more often than other athletes.

And, yes, her coach told me that she was able to run fast in Belgrade because he measured the times with the 1080 Sprint and checked if she still could run actively with that speed, so we knew what she was able to do.

Freelap USA: You have access to an indoor straightaway but not an indoor 200-meter track, and the Swiss winters can be harsh. To what extent does this influence your programming?

Pat Saile: It is currently -5 degrees Celsius with snow outside. Therefore, we must adjust to slower speeds for the longer runs and run fast indoors. This means that we run, for example, 200-meter programs with short pauses or second runs just to get “fit.”

It is very important to me that the athletes come out of a preparation period healthy and physically fit. However, I always try to run qualitatively fast once a week. I design different running programs indoors with ASSE and GSSE versions and try to trigger the important energy systems.

But I try not to let the athletes know that. I give the workouts themes like acceleration sprint or longer tempo. Just before the indoor season, we usually go to a warmer place like Tenerife and fine-tune with faster tempo runs and top speed running for the indoor season.

Freelap USA: One of the differences I have noticed between programming in the U.S. and programming in Europe is that American coaches are more likely to have a track session and a weight training session on the same day, whereas European coaches may have them on separate days. How do you approach this and why? Could you outline a weekly cycle of your training?

Pat Saile: I am well aware that the weekly structure of many American coaches is Monday and Tuesday running and weight room, Wednesday easy, and Thursday and Friday again running plus weight room.

For us, it often has a cultural background. We have many athletes who are non-professional athletes and still go to college or school or work on the side. Professionalization has only progressed significantly in Switzerland in recent years. That’s why we often don’t pack all the training content into one session; otherwise, we would be in the facility for far too long.

In addition, our athletes are often not used to running every day, and then they struggle and might get overuse injuries. Also, we often don’t have the opportunity to run on flat grass because good grass gets blocked off for football/soccer training or competition. That’s why we often do alternative programs on the bike, skip one running session, and do a longer weight session.

When we travel to warmer climates, we have a different rhythm and run more often. Since I am also trying to generate a higher level of stress tolerance with my group and would like to run more often, my rhythm in this preparation phase is as follows:

    Monday: Many technical drills/circuit/longer running

    Tuesday: Acceleration/1 x 300m/weight room

    Wednesday: Bike/core/active regeneration

    Thursday: Max V sprinting, sprint mechanics

    Friday: Weights/jumps

    Saturday: Sprint mechanics/longer running

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Youth Training

Out of My Lane: Youth Performance Training

Blog| ByJoey Guarascio

Youth Training

Most athletes have that story from their own childhood of encountering an opponent who had a specific push-up routine or did pull-ups. At the time, you were convinced those opponents had superpowers and a cheat code—they were far more mature and advanced for the level of competition because their guardians or crazy uncle had a calisthenics program from the ’70s they’d already been introduced to.

Why not have that advanced competitor be your son or daughter, but with a much more progressive and thorough plan for long-term development?

“Long-term development” has become a buzzword in recent years and, in many cases, has become controversial. Current research and progressive training models are washing away the old myths that kids shouldn’t train and that development comes exclusively from exposure to play and sports.

Research and progressive training models are washing away the old myths that kids shouldn’t train and development comes exclusively from exposure to play and sports, says @CoachJoeyG. Share on X

Kids don’t play anymore—it’s an epidemic that started with the emergence of video games. The days of staying out until the street lights come on are gone. I can’t tell you the last time I’ve seen a group of kids riding bikes or playing pickle in my neighborhood. Practitioners can’t keep claiming that the jungle gym will be enough to increase the movement toolbox, strength, and resiliency to overuse injuries because kids don’t go to the playground anymore. Video games and the AAU circuit have robbed kids of the self-exploration phase of movement development.

Introduction to training at a young age can not only immediately improve performance but also set that child up for long-term success. Every parent is convinced they are raising the next Lebron, Tiger, or Bryce Harper. It is perfectly normal, especially as a former athlete, to want your child to be special in whatever endeavor they decide to pursue.

Parents are tossing their children into Olympic-level training regimes in one sport, hoping to develop the next superstar. We see this with the early specialization that occurs in many youth sports. Sports such as basketball, baseball, and soccer have become year-long sports that afford no time off. The business side of youth sports wants to keep kids on AAU teams year round, paying for tournaments and special skill development coaches. Parents are discouraged from letting kids explore other sports or just playing with other kids in an unstructured venue for fear of them falling behind and not being the stud on the team.

Long-term development is not a topic being discussed in the bleachers of an 8U football game, and I speak from personal experience. Parents want to brag and live through the successes of their children. This isn’t an issue until it limits the child’s development and exposes them to potential injury from overuse. Because of this short-sighted view, kids aren’t developing the same movement toolbox. We are seeing movement limitations due to the absence of general movement prep or general strength training that kids used to get from playing at the park, doing general physical activities in PE, or playing multiple sports throughout the year.

Kids now go from the specialized skills trainer who only focuses on one sport to the couch to play video games to the field of play in the same sport year-round. There is no variation in movement, nor is there much general skill and strength development—injuries that used to occur in college are now found on the youth sports diamond or pitch.

Most parents are willing to sacrifice time and money to provide their children with more opportunities than they were afforded when they were young. One of the best parts about being a strength and conditioning coach is that I can provide a plan to develop my own children while also understanding their genetic limitations, as they are mine as well. Having both a young son and daughter who have gravitated toward sports has provided me with joy and a mission: to provide the appropriate environment for their athletic development without turning them away from the sports.

Training, no matter the level of the athlete, requires high levels of exertion that, for children, can be a turnoff if not introduced appropriately and reinforced with success. Young athletes can greatly benefit from training: increases in speed, power, strength, and, most importantly, basic body control can be gained in small time frames with simple modalities and exposures. General strength training and movement skill development will only set your child up for long-term success and mitigate several long-term injury issues.

In this article, I will detail how training youth:

  • Is backed by research.
  • Can be fun and competitive.
  • Can decrease injury rates.
  • Increases long-term performance.
  • Boosts confidence and body image.

Along with these benefits, I will also outline how I approach the programming and training of my children.


Video 1. General strength training and movement skill development will set young athletes up for long-term success and mitigate several long-term injury issues.

Breaking Old Urban Myths

Strength training will not stunt your child’s growth if loaded and introduced appropriately. I repeat: strength training will not stunt your child’s growth if loaded and introduced appropriately!

Strength training will not stunt your child’s growth if loaded and introduced appropriately, says @CoachJoeyG. Share on X

There is far more mechanical stress imposed on a child jumping off a swing set than one performing a set of squats with a load less than body weight. This idea that making a child stronger is harmful is not only absurd but very untrue. Parents don’t hesitate to sign up their children for football or watch their son pitch off a mound twice in a weekend but will debate over allowing their kids to participate in beginner weight training even though the two sports above are far more stressful and have a much higher risk of injury.

Katherine Stabenow Dahab stated in her research paper “Strength Training in Children and Adolescents” that: “Children can improve strength by 30% to 50% after just 8 to 12 weeks of a well-designed strength training program. Youth need to continue to train at least 2 times per week to maintain strength. The case reports of injuries related to strength training, including epiphyseal plate fractures and lower back injuries, are primarily attributed to the misuse of equipment, inappropriate weight, improper technique, or lack of qualified adult supervision.”

The key takeaway of this article is that, under proper guidance, kids can benefit tremendously from lifting. People get hurt when they misuse equipment or exhibit poor technique. Let’s place blame not on the tool but on the person using the tool or the person teaching someone to use the tool.



Videos 2 & 3. Under proper guidance, kids can benefit tremendously from lifting.

The Twitter community is quick to condemn a video of an 8-year-old squatting 45 pounds but will post a video of their kid checking another kid on the hockey rink or their kid’s highlights from the weekend basketball tournament where they played six games. It is our responsibility as S&C coaches with kids to break these myths. A simple Google search will provide a plethora of support for introducing kids to training.

Google Search
Figure 1. A simple Google search can provide more than enough information on the benefits of youth resistance training, as these three articles were the first to pop up in my search. We have to move away from the idea that youth training is dangerous and look at facts.

Start Slow: A-B-C’s of Movement

The biggest and most dangerous thing I see when people train youth athletes (or any athlete) is rushing and implementing advanced training methods far beyond the capabilities of the athlete being trained. I have seen kids go from learning a new movement pattern to immediately loading that same pattern within the same workout.

It’s the people trying to break records with kids or advance too fast who are contributing to this idea that lifting early is dangerous, says @CoachJoeyG. Share on X

It’s the people trying to break records with kids or advance too fast who are contributing to this idea that lifting early is dangerous. Putting two times body weight on a kid’s back for the sake of some youth record is insane and does not have the best interest of their development in mind. Anytime a load close to 1RM is prescribed, the risk of injury increases, no matter the age. The progression of load application and exercises should have logical steps and time frames.

Movments
Figure 2. Dan John’s model of movement prep is perfectly paired with program design for youth athletes. This plan covers all necessary movement patterns that are foundational for athletic success in the weight room.

Improving simple and commonly used movement patterns—such as squatting, hinging, pushing, and pulling—should be the mainstay in all athletic development. Improving bodyweight variations of these exercises should be the ground level of youth training. Add in a lunge or single-leg squat, and you set up that young athlete for success later in life.

    BW execution of movement pattern

    Increased volume of BW execution

    Added external load of movement pattern (minimal load)

    Increase volume of movement with minimal load

    Increase load of movement slightly

    Repeat the process over years

Squat Progression
Figure 3. A simple example of progressing an exercise from bodyweight to load over time. The progression is based on the athlete’s ability to maintain technique.

You can use the same approach for speed and movement skills on the field or court. Acceleration, deceleration, max velocity running, and change of direction are skills that must be taught before throwing the youth athlete into a full constraints-led approach. Coaches must give athletes the clues necessary to figure out the complex problems provided by sport.

Coaches are not meant to create robots but also must provide and guide athletes into a movement bandwidth that allows them to move faster, smoother, and with reduced risk of injury. Learning how to perform any of the mentioned skills better can prevent negative movement competencies and save time for coaches later on in the athlete’s life, which could lead to greater specific skill development and better players.

These early progression movements are like teaching children the alphabet. They have to understand the letters before they can form sentences, says @CoachJoeyG. Share on X

These early progression movements are like teaching children the alphabet. They have to understand the letters before they can form sentences. Coaches love to skip ahead since progressions and early movement training are boring, but in my experiences with youth athletes, consistency is the main contributor to success. Having some element of learning every day will advance the athletes significantly, giving those youth athletes who train a competitive advantage.

Guarascio Bodyweight
Figure 4. Here is an example of a BW complex I have used with several youth athletes that has helped cement foundational movement patterns and built general strength and body control.

Make It Fun

Gamifying any training—even at the college level—improves intent and engagement. We have to remember that these are kids, not mature professional athletes, so maintaining focus and effort will be connected to how fun the task is. Creating competition produces a higher level of focus. Creating prizes or awards for winners of the day gives the kids something to work for and brag about.

Common competitions could be push-up or pull contests. We have even used the best technique of the day award to emphasize safe, efficient lifting. We celebrate every achievement as well because training is hard, and a chest bump or high five goes a long way in increasing engagement. Remember, we are in the business of bringing people up; do not become negative with youth, as they are extremely sensitive to the energy of the coach.

Having the Edge

Youth resistance training not only better prepares children for competition but also sets them up for long-term success and a healthy lifestyle. Training, if progressed, can decrease injury rates in youth sports while providing a platform for future success. Training as a youth will increase the athlete’s confidence and positive body image.

You can’t flip a switch and turn into a champion, but you can develop habits and foundational movement and strength that could eventually turn you into an elite player, says @CoachJoeyG. Share on X

Parents—be smart and don’t rush the process of training. Teach children patience by progressing slowly and logically. You can’t flip a switch and turn into a champion, but you can develop habits and foundational movement and strength that could eventually turn you into an elite player. Resistance training youth athletes can turn your son or daughter into the superhero kid everyone wants to play like while setting up their long-term development, so they always have an edge on the competition.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Swim Taper

Taper Problems, Prime Solutions: How to Not Screw Up the Taper in the Weight Room

Blog| ByPete Arroyo

Swim Taper

About halfway into my training career, I came across the strange world (at least to me) of competitive swimming. For someone whose experience at the time revolved around the violent realms of football and wrestling, trying to understand the swimming world was literally and figuratively like learning a new language. Phrases like 59 high, 22 low, stroke pace, kick set, back half, fly day, and taper flew over my head like a street sign in a hurricane. I quickly knew I had to learn what this all meant if I was going to help these unique athletes flourish in the pool.

Within my first few seasons working with a high school team, we achieved some pretty good results individually and as a team, boasting top 5 finishes and one Illinois State Championship while breaking school records along the way. This is great, I thought. I didn’t stray too far from the nuts and bolts of conventional weight room work, so I figured, if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.

That is, until things did indeed break.

After the state championship year, the team hit a bit of a lull for a couple of seasons. We weren’t as fast and had a few mystery illnesses and injuries pop up at the most inopportune times. Even though the guys really enjoyed the training and the atmosphere we brought, things weren’t going the way we needed them to go to keep the needle moving forward. Yes, we lost some talent, but the pride of our program is in the Reload vs. Rebuild approach—except, we were reloading in a musket-like fashion rather than the machine gun pace we enjoyed in seasons past.

The pride of our program is in the Reload vs. Rebuild approach—except, we were reloading in a musket-like fashion rather than the machine gun pace we enjoyed in seasons past. Share on X

Things I initially thought to myself:

  • Do they just not get it?
  • What is wrong with them?
  • What should I have asked myself?
  • Are they recovered enough?
  • Are they trained enough?
  • What can I change in their training?

It was time for some humility and to learn from our coaches and swimmers. For the next several seasons (and even now), I delved deep into the murky waters of the swimming world (pun absolutely intended)!

Talking the Talk

The first order of business was learning their vernacular. I came to understand the above-mentioned references over the course of the next few seasons. Before, during, and after our lifts, I regularly asked the swimmers what happened in practice. They would have to dumb down the swim lingo for me, but l gradually learned what the aim of their practice sets meant. Most every set was based off a pace, interval, and density (volume done in a certain time).

These practice elements were not as foreign as previously thought, as I could now relate weight room work to help drive training qualities in certain training phases with respect to time and exercise pace. There was a need for certain exercises to be explosive, powerful, rhythmic, or a combination of these and sustain the ability to repeat these outputs. Applying their vernacular (blocks, turns, stroke pace) to their weight room sets cemented the intent of our lifts.

Second, regular conversations with the swimmers and coaching staff painted a better picture of what practice looked like from both perspectives. I learned to plan the weight room movements, volumes, and intensities accordingly to consolidate stressors and appease the coaches.

Applying the swimmer’s vernacular (blocks, turns, stroke pace) to their weight room sets cemented the intent of our lifts. Share on X

The way I see it, even though the architects can have the best-laid plans, the building will turn out to be severely flawed if those plans don’t make practical sense to the builders. For example, I found out the hard way that deadlifts or cleans after “fly day” (butterfly specialty sets) make it a bad day; there is no sense in beating the dead horse of the hinge pattern when the spine has been in repeat hyperextension for an entire practice. We simply switched this to our main leg day and vertical pull session to restore length.

I also decided to cut out barbell work during these seasons on the third workout. A few reasons for this:

  • This day was usually after our second lift day and the day of a morning practice—our recovery wasn’t optimal, to say the least.
  • This third day was also less than two days before a weekend invite—the team just wasn’t there mentally to grind through another lift.

I ended up going the way of body weight, medicine ball, and band work in Tabata fashion to keep the intensity and pace high in brief bouts: a 24-minute workout in total, followed by recovery work. If anything, this kept the overall volume at the minimum, given that two of the three lift sessions are their third session of the day. Yup, we lift after two swim practices each week. This aspect of their season still amazes me, as to this day, I do not know any other high school sport that practices twice a day DURING the season.

After looking at things from the bigger picture, understanding training phases in a short season (three months) was relatively simple. Given the post-season structure, our program follows a binary model of training phases (periodization, if you will), explained simply as, “It’s a grind until the taper.” Culturally masochistic? Maybe. But an invaluable insight into the mentality of coaches and athletes—the task becomes appeasing the coaches’ wishes without killing these kids.

If there was one significant shift in my approach to training swimmers, it was using time as a factor for work, rest, and when and how to train certain biomotor qualities. Share on X

Lastly, understanding time for a swimmer is like knowing where their Holy Grail is. Time is of the essence! Every bit of a practice set is written off of timed interval models in an attempt to tolerate outputs for distance splits and chop as much time during the qualifying meets as possible. If there was one significant shift in my approach to training swimmers, it was using time as a factor for work, rest, and when and how to train certain biomotor qualities. Using time and intervals resonates with swimmers because it is a language they already speak…so why not speak it in the weight room?

Rebranding the Taper

As seasons passed, my deeper understanding of time helped refine our training process for both the grind phase and the taper phase. Within the grind and taper model, we must understand that what goes up must come down—you cannot grind in perpetuity. For us, the grind phase is simple: two broken circuits revolving around a core lift, explosive drill, and exercises for the trunk and shoulder dexterity are consistent orders of the day. We work through about nine weeks of this, gradually reducing the rest interval but keeping the volume the same, seeking density of work over this period.

The taper is where things get a little interesting. For strength coaches who have worked with swimmers, we all know the nuanced changes in mindset this time of the season brings. For most, it’s like the last week of school before the summer break (read: they’ve officially checked out and want nothing to do with early mornings, a pool, or a weight room), which is not exactly ideal if we’re trying to stay sharp.

For others, it’s like a kid during Christmastime: they hope they were “good enough” all year long and will receive all the presents they worked for on the big day. The operative word is hope. As soon as I hear a swimmer say hope, it worries me a bit, as I am fully aware of the pending anxiety that results from that paradigm, which is amplified if hands are idle. The last thing these “worriers” need is to empty their time and gain dead space where doubt can creep in and wreak havoc on their confidence. The psychology of the taper is as significant as the physiology.

In the pool, practice volume is reduced as morning practices are eliminated, quality sets replace the volume, and the practice of starts and timing relay exchanges ensures the pertinent parts of each race are in good working form. The synergistic effect of normal sleep patterns, stress reduction (to the energy systems), and precise practice drives a restorative effect. My question was: How can we replicate this approach in the weight room to amplify the effects of the taper and nullify the potential psychological drawbacks?

The answer? We don’t taper; we prime!

In the mundane world of swimming, where staring at the black line several hours of the day creates stir-crazy athletes, finding purpose in the most arbitrary ways is sometimes what it takes to keep the “squirrels” at bay. For us, it has meant redefining Taper Time into Prime Time!

In the mundane world of swimming, where staring at the black line several hours of the day creates stir-crazy athletes, finding purpose in the most arbitrary ways can be a necessity. Share on X

The definition of priming is the act of making something ready: preparation in advance of some act, purpose, or performance. I feel this definition commands positive pro-action, where the finishing touch is in the hands of the athlete.


Video 1. Jumps, kicks, throws, slams, and other exercises in the “priming” phase.

Physiologically, we do strip the program down, but we do not take away what got us there. In congruence with the theme of this training period, we eliminate the “grind” from our core lift repertoire, opting for higher-speed counterparts like high pulls and loaded jumps for 3–5 reps (to keep our starts and walls sharp). We use oscillatory work and med ball throws for the upper and lower body that replicate split times for each swimmer.1 The movements here are specific in terms of duration and output but can also mimic the action and rhythm of the strokes, given that you have the tools at hand.

The benefits of this are twofold, as the combination of lighter loads and higher speeds (for time) allow the CNS to recover and recalibrate to familiarize the athlete with event outputs as much as possible. The combination here is simple; we do the following:

  • One upper body med ball throw or extensive plyo for time, 15–40 seconds.
  • One horizontal or vertical jump exercise for starts and walls.
  • An oscillatory exercise for the kick.2

Beginning three weeks from the championship meet, we have two training blocks per day with one exercise for upper, lower, and explosive, ramping down the sets from three, two, and one each week until the meet.

Psychologically, priming works much the same. “Priming is a technique used in cognitive psychology that conditions responses through exposure to specific stimuli. It works with our unconscious responses to change our thought patterns and reactions by tapping into the way our brains process, store, and recall information. Priming is known to improve cognitive and behavioral response times.”3

This sounds like the exact thing we are trying to do as we enter championship performances. Stripping the work to the necessities in such a way that it resonates with the athlete (movements for time) is the key to merging the physical with the mental while staving off the doubt monsters lurking in the shadows of idle times.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


References and Further Reading

1. Triphasic Training: A Systematic Approach to Elite Speed & Explosive Strength Performance. Dietz & Peterson. Dietz Sports Enterprise, 2012. p. 310–313.

“Because the loading of the movement is light, the high power stimulus must come from maintaining as high velocity (eccentrically and concentrically) throughout the entire duration of the set. Actively pushing the bar against gravity and intentionally pulling the bar during the eccentric.” ~Pulling with gravity increases the virtual force during the amortization phase.~

“Sets are done for time, loads are kept static, progress is measured by performing more work within the allotted time.”

Table 6.1 Under 55% loading parameters

Swim 50-200-25s,17s,32s

Swim >200-32s,25s,40s

End Swim- 40s,32s,47s

2. Triphasic Peaking Methods 1, 2, and 3 for advanced results for all levels of athletes.
Triphasic Peaking Method 1.
Peaking Method 2.
Peaking Method 3.

3. What Is Priming Psychology And What Is It Used For?

Updated September 30, 2022, by Betterhelp.com Editorial Team

“Priming is a technique used in cognitive psychology that conditions responses through exposure to specific stimuli. It works with our unconscious responses to change our thought patterns and reactions by tapping into the way our brains process, store, and recall information. Priming is known to improve cognitive and behavioral response times.”

“Priming is widely used by psychologists as therapy to treat patients with stress, anxiety and depression. Positive priming creates positive responses and emotions in patients and can significantly help to manage mood disorders. However, priming is also used in various other aspects of life apart from mental health care.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 164
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

FEATURED

  • Using Speed and Power Data to Bucket and Train Faster Athletes
  • Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive
  • 9 (Fun!) Games to Develop Movement Skills and Athleticism

Latest Posts

  • Running Through Time: An Athlete’s Story of Resilience and Recovery
  • Rapid Fire—Episode #14 Featuring Rodrigo Alvira Isla: Training Smarter in the NBA and G League
  • Maximizing Success in the Weight Room: A College Strength Coach’s Playbook

Topics

  • Adult training
  • App features
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Athlete
  • Athlete performance
  • Baseball
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Career
  • Certifications
  • Changing with the Game
  • Coach
  • Coaching
  • Coaching workflows
  • Coching
  • College athlete
  • Course Reviews
  • Dasher
  • Data management
  • EMG
  • Force plates
  • Future innovations
  • Game On Series
  • Getting Started
  • Injury prevention
  • Misconceptions Series
  • Motion tracking
  • Out of My Lane Series
  • Performance technology
  • Physical education
  • Plyometric training
  • Pneumatic resistance
  • Power
  • Power development
  • Practice
  • Rapid Fire
  • Reflectorless timing system
  • Running
  • Speed
  • Sports
  • Sports technology
  • Sprinters
  • Strength and conditioning
  • Strength training
  • Summer School with Dan Mullins
  • The Croc Show
  • Track and field
  • Training
  • Training efficiency
  • Wave loading
  • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series
  • Youth athletics
  • Youth coaching

Categories

  • Blog
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcasts

COMPANY

  • Contact Us
  • Write for SimpliFaster
  • Affiliate Program
  • Terms of Use
  • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Disclaimer

Coaches Resources

  • Shop Online
  • SimpliFaster Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Coaches Job Listing

CONTACT INFORMATION

13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

Alachua, FL 32615

(925) 461-5990 (office)

(925) 461-5991 (fax)

(800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

Loading

Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.