• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
You are here: Home / Blog

Blog

Thom

Episode 3: Scott Thom

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Thom

Scott Thom has been the Head Coach for men’s basketball and the Director of Strength and Conditioning at the College of Marin since 2016. Thom began his collegiate coaching career in 2010 as an assistant strength and conditioning coach at the University of California–Berkeley, working with men’s basketball and track. A short time later, Thom was promoted to Head Strength and Conditioning Coach/Director of Player Development for the Bears Men’s Basketball program. He then became the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach/Director of Player Development for Washington State University’s Men’s Basketball program.

Coach Thom began his coaching career at Vintage High School in his hometown of Napa, California, in 2003. He taught physical education and weightlifting in addition to various coaching duties. Coach Thom is a graduate of Chico State (physical education) and obtained a master’s degree in coaching and athletic administration from Concordia University Irvine.

Coach Thom talks about his experience in developing a winning culture through buy-in, relationship building, and motivation. He shares with the listener the process of working with the athlete on a cultural level to create the environment needed to foster desired outcomes. Thom presents his unique perspective on becoming a basketball coach who then became a strength coach. He delves into his unusual journey from a high school coach with little to no formal strength and conditioning experience to where he is today.

In this podcast, Coach Scott Thom discusses with Joel:

  • His process of building a successful basketball strength program.
  • His philosophy on the responsibility of coaches to build bonds, respect, and communication with his athletes.
  • Bringing value that athletes can understand by making the weight room a place they want to be.
  • How to avoid the timeless coaching error of mistaking activity for achievement.
  • How he organizes his sessions to mirror sport practice.
  • Creating mental toughness through self-confidence.
  • Strategies to work with a difficult athlete.
  • Coaching the “bounce back” situation after a loss.

Coach Thom has a sports performance website: https://scottthom.com/. He has written two books on sports performance, and both are available on his website.

Podcast total run time is 39:04.

Keywords: basketball, buy-in, energy, mental toughness

Brad DeWeese Med Ball

Take Your Speed and Power Coaching to the Next Level with Brad DeWeese

Freelap Friday Five| ByBrad DeWeese

Brad DeWeese Med Ball

Dr. Brad DeWeese is an assistant professor in the Department of Exercise and Sport Science in the Claudius G. Clemmer College of Education at East Tennessee State University. He spent the past eight years preparing athletes for the Olympic Games and was the strength, speed, and conditioning coach for nine athletes and two alternates who went to Sochi. DeWeese began coaching these athletes while serving as head sport physiologist for the U.S. Olympic Committee’s Winter Division in Lake Placid, N.Y., and he has continued working with them since joining the ETSU faculty in August 2013.

Freelap USA: Periodization seems to be a controversial topic, and it often gets a lot of heat for having low amounts of research to support theoretical models. Could you get into the limitations and difficulties of using science or research in the real-world setting?

Brad DeWeese: Jumping right into the mix—love it! Yes, this topic continues to drive controversy, but most of the contention actually targets programming models and tactics, not periodization. This inadvertent misunderstanding fuels circular discussion and unwinnable debates, so it may be helpful to discuss terminology. Deconstructed to its most basic form, the term “periodization” literally deals with a partitioning of the time continuum.

Numerous professional domains outside of sport use this process of managing time, most notably history and the arts. Simply put, periodization allows us to look at specific moments in time so that we can make sense of our current state while being informed by our past, with an attempt to understand how it may impact the future. (Note that I did not say predict. This is not an aspect of periodization and is erroneously suggested by some sport theorists).

Periodization allows us to look at specific moments in time so that we can make sense of our current state while being informed by our past, says @DrBradDeWeese. Share on X

With that being said, “training-related periodization” is a concept that recognizes coaches are tasked with creating a training plan that maximizes the likelihood of their athletes’ competitive readiness. This readiness requires an acknowledgement that the training plan should be structured in a manner that permits the realization of all training efforts (neuromuscular, metabolic, skill, psychological) through a balance of work and rest.

Periodization
Image 1. Periodization helps with all areas of training beyond seasonal planning. Know what the role of good planning is with both coaching and sport science.


As such, it is difficult to isolate “periodization” in a lab setting—we cannot simply remove a training component (e.g., weight training) for short-term study and expect to understand how this singular variable will influence competitive outcomes. True study of periodization is ecological and observational (think Jane Goodall), as this permits the observer to merge contextual matters with monitoring data that is collected along the way.

Freelap USA: People talk about RFD, but many simply don’t measure it properly. Can you go into the value of this metric and explain how you track it over a season or career?

Brad DeWeese: Rate of force development, often called explosive strength, is indeed a valuable metric that provides meaningful insight on the training process. Practically speaking, it is common knowledge that most sporting actions occur within a time frame too short for the production of maximal strength. As a result, how fast an athlete can generate high force is a competitive advantage. This has been well-documented as a limiting factor for both running and jumping (see the work of Ken Clark, Chris Sole, Per Aagaard, etc.).

With regard to how we assess preparedness here at East Tennessee State University, this variable is a hallmark of our monitoring system in both the isometric mid-thigh pull and jumping protocols. For instance, during the IMTP, we consider RFD at a few time points that are approximate to most athletic movements: 50 ms (CNS/“time to strike”), 100 ms (mixed bag/“sprint ground contact”), and 200 ms (muscle/“time to jump”). From here, we can make sure our training plans influence these metrics in the right direction and at the right times.

Specifically, we understand that basic strength training will drive the force curve “up and to the right,” which permits RFD to increase at all time-points by default. However, once an athlete has accumulated appropriate strength, being able to mature and retain optimal RFD becomes a priority. Hence, the training plan becomes more pragmatic and/or advanced, with greater saturation of strength-speed and speed-strength aspects that hope to influence early-stage RFD. Strength always underpins RFD capabilities, and it is true that we can never be too strong. However, consideration of critical time-points allows us to be intentional in prescribing training content that would provide greater relative benefit in improving performance in sport compared to pursuing further gains in maximal strength.

Freelap USA: Medicine ball throws are great teaching tools, and you have excellent results using the techniques of throws and sprints. Any details you can share for younger populations in the high school arena?

Brad DeWeese: You hit the nail on the head: Medicine ball throws are great TEACHING TOOLS. With anything “strength” related, it is easy to get consumed with the notion of increasing external load. However, the emphasis of medicine ball throwing should be placed on demonstrating “power” through optimal technique that is more likely to have positive transfer to the sport. Placing load ahead of technique (especially within a younger population such as the high school arena) removes an opportunity for the athlete to “feel/experience” proper body positioning, while also preventing the coach from seeing where movement “leaks” arise.


Video 1. Simple medicine ball throws are effective. Throwing vertically for height can improve the extension qualities of athletes when practiced consistently.

With regard to my personal approach, we place multi-throw and multi-jump exercises just ahead of our sprint session so as to: (a) rehearse the session’s primary skill and (b) provide a small overload with respect to the ground reaction forces. In short, the throws and jumps serve to potentiate an aspect of sprint skill. For example, we may place horizontal medicine ball “chest passes” onto a high-jump mat prior to block starts, while performing more vertical-oriented movements such as a medicine ball toss for height prior to top-speed efforts. This approach allows us to rehearse key movement strategies at multiple points within a practice session while saving true overload for the weight room through movements such as the weightlifting derivatives.

Freelap USA: Technology and data are sometimes difficult to add into a coaching program. How do you manage a balance so your program has a paper trail? What are some tips to help keep the process honest?

Brad DeWeese: We are at an interesting time in our profession. Perhaps resulting from the conglomeration of teams investing in sport performance, a saturated commercial market of sport science toys, society’s (sometimes blind) acceptance of “big data” and “convenience,” and the recruiting “arms race,” performance coaches face ambiguity on their ultimate role within a team setting. In a compulsive reaction often fueled by keeping up with their competitors, they attempt to add breadth at the expense of depth and true expertise. Though all elite practitioners have to strike a balance between the two, an oftentimes irrational fear of specializing in multiple domains is resulting in an underperformance within our house.

In a compulsive reaction often fueled by keeping up with competitors, S&C/performance coaches attempt to add breadth at the expense of depth and true experience, says @DrBradDeWeese. Share on X

That being said, I certainly believe and advocate for longitudinal monitoring so as to inform and fine-tune the training process. Furthermore, objective information demonstrating your efforts within athlete preparation is valuable evidence when working in an industry that continues to see S&C/performance coaches being fired as a means to justify and “correct” poor on-field performance.

However, I believe in elegance. In other words: (a) understand your sport, (b) determine variables that are manageable and actionable, (c) seek tools or technology that help you address these metrics in a manner that fits your time and budgetary constraints, (d) take small bits and be patient, and (e) work to develop interdepartmental collaboration within your organization. Meaning, as you begin to look at the information from GPS or a force plate, attempt to layer it with the contextual information that is observed by the complete support staff across the training process. Not only does this help a coach “learn the metrics,” but it also provides them with the ability to lead a deeper and more meaningful dialogue with sport coaches and/or athletes.

Freelap USA: You have a wealth of knowledge as a strength coach, track coach, and sport scientist. How do you juggle all three when working with bobsled? With the sport having so much need for speed and size with athletes, how can American football learn from this event?

Brad DeWeese: I have been extremely fortunate to wear many hats over the course of my career. Since day one in the profession, I have dually served as a track coach and strength coach at the same time, while also juggling miscellaneous supplemental roles in Sports Information, Compliance, and Sport Science, among others. Collectively, these experiences have allowed me to keep my eyes on the big picture, as opposed to staying too deep within one particular silo.

As it relates to bobsled, American football, or any sport for that matter, I typically take a step back and strip the activity down to its basic structure: “How far do they move,” “How fast do they move,” “How often do they move,” etc. Once dissected, it then becomes easier to put together a plan of attack.


Video 2. Plyometrics take time before they actually actualize or gel, so make sure you have a well-rounded program. Vertical force development in hurdle hops is obvious, but they actually help with acceleration as well.

Bobsled, for instance, is a “downhill” sport that essentially relies on a balance of strength and speed to provide starting momentum for the sled’s descent. From a training perspective, I treat these push athletes like short sprinters or just “heavier” 60-meter sprint specialists. As a result, we prioritize a complementary approach so that strength training supports the speed training, not vice versa. Specifically, we work under the guiding principle that chronic exposure to strength training (in various forms) will assist in the retention of optimal sprinting/pushing technique during the face of constraints that are either presented from the environment (running on ice) or internally related (fatigue).

Within American football, I continue to assert that dedicated speed training should be prioritized, as exposure to higher velocities (above game- and weight room-related speed) will provide a performance reserve, while allowing for enhancements in neural drive that we commonly associate with RFD.

Gifford

Episode 2: Matt Gifford

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Gifford

Matt Gifford is currently General Manager and Director of Sports Performance for NX Level’s Mequon, Wisconsin, location. Gifford started as a sports performance coach at NX Level’s facility in Waukesha, Wisconsin, in 2009. He earned a degree in exercise science with a minor in coaching from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, and was a member of the 2007 UWW DIII National Championship team. He is a certified strength and conditioning specialist through the NSCA.

Coach Gifford takes a deep dive into his philosophy on football speed training and its common characteristics, as well as differences, from track speed training. He also gives details about his speed development progressions. Matt discusses his ideas on building an aerobic base in speed/power athletes. Additionally, he gives insight into the recovery, work capacity, and volume of training for an in-season athlete. Coach Gifford believes in creating mental images with his cueing system and discusses how he uses that to connect athletes to the workout.

In this podcast, Coach Matt Gifford discusses with Joel:

  • What a developmental speed session for field sports looks like, in detail.
  • The use of lateral movement in all aspects of training to improve movement and decrease the rate of athlete injury.
  • The possibility of diminishing returns in transfer to sport with strength training by field sport athletes.
  • What training max percentage range he believes transfers best to movement skill acquisition and power outputs.

Coach Gifford has also written a piece for SimpliFaster on the use of acceleration ladders in sprint training.

Podcast total run time is 39:04.

Keywords: cueing, maximal skill acquisition, tempo, strength

Separation Football

Separate from the Competition: Developing Breakpoint Mechanics in Football

Blog| ByEric Treske

Separation Football

If asked to describe a prototypical receiver, coaches will cite traits like speed, size, hand-eye coordination, foot speed, agility, and jumping ability. We essentially describe Julio Jones. The issue coaches all encounter is what to do when they aren’t blessed with a stable of Julios on their roster. The natural first step is to prioritize skills and play the kid who possesses the most crucial skills for the position.

For years, coaches, particularly at the high school level, have looked to their fastest athletes with decent hand-eye coordination to play wide receiver (WR). This seems to be common sense, as a coach should want their fastest kids on the perimeter to stretch defenses vertically and horizontally. But coach long enough and the inevitable question arises: Why can’t the all-conference track kid separate on the field?

I am a firm believer that the issue lies with traditional receiver development. Too often, coaches subscribe to the belief that many of those essential skills are fixed traits. We fail to develop the skills critical to be elite receivers.

Too often, coaches subscribe to the belief that many essential skills are fixed traits. We fail to develop the skills critical to be elite receivers, says @WLCCoachTreske. Share on X

This is more evident at each higher level of football. As the competition level rises, the margin for error becomes thinner. Players must master skills other than speed and hand-eye coordination. As coaches, we must then ask what skill(s) most drastically separates the good from the great receivers, and how do we develop that skill? The answer, like most answers in football and athletics, lies in the film.

Going Beyond Speed

If you analyze the film, the answer is not speed, it is movement efficiency. In fact, as the level of competition rises, the difference in speed is often minuscule. For example, in the 2013 NFL draft, the difference between the 10-yard times for the No. 1 and No. 100 WR prospects was .04. In fact, if you went through the top 100 prospects, you’d see a range of 1.5–1.61 seconds on their first 10 yards. This minor disparity carries over into the 20-yard times as well. If your passing offense is anything like ours—or any of the NFL teams, for that matter—that means that the speed difference is subtle in nearly 90% of your throws.

Break Point Pass Chart
Image 1. A visual breakdown of the distribution of passes in the NFL. With a third of all passes being within 10 yards, it’s important to understand that player speed differences are very narrow, just a few tenths of a second. Therefore, the ability to create separation requires more than just pursuing horizontal velocity.

This limited speed disparity is not unique to the NFL and D1 programs; it is found at all levels of football. Our team, for example, just performed initial off-season testing, and the difference between our fastest wideout and our slowest was .15 seconds. In fact, we’ve had several of our team’s top receivers in the middle of the pack. Though any subtle difference is an advantage, this limited range in times suggests it’s something more than speed that results in on-field production—it’s movement efficiency and technique.

This limited range in times suggests it’s something more than speed that results in on-field production—it’s movement efficiency and technique, says @WLCCoachTreske. Share on X

I have been fortunate to work with some great WR coaches, and we’ve discussed and debated the subtleties of stance, stem, demeanor, leverage, release techniques, and catch point and their impact on WR development. All of these techniques are critical factors in becoming a complete WR, but in my experience, the film suggests that the X factor in performance is efficient breakpoint mechanics. The ability to decelerate into a break and reaccelerate out of a break is what divides the best receivers from the rest. The beauty is that this is a skill that can be learned and trained over time.

Breakpoint Mechanics

To develop breakpoint mechanics, we need our athletes to understand the ideal body position they must be in to change directions. In our program, we call this our “stick” position, since it serves as both a term and coaching cue to reinforce the need for the athlete to apply force (“stick” his foot) into the ground. This position is foundational in movement mechanics.

1. The ‘Stick’ position.

Coaching Cues: Shoulder over knee and ankle, neutral core, hips dropped, sprint action in arms, weight loaded on lead leg, drive through ball of foot.

By getting into the stick position and loading the lead leg, we give ourselves the ability to drive out of our break explosively at almost any angle. The impact of this is tremendous; if you master the stick, you can master any route in your offense. We teach this position, much like you’d teach any body movement, through a progression series.

‘Stick’ Progression

We begin by positioning the athletes along a line in their WR stance with their inside foot forward. We then demonstrate and describe the cues of the position and then cue them to get into a stick position. Check and correct the athletes as they hold the stick position, then rep the movement repeatedly on each side—occasionally asking them to hold and control the movement. Like all movements, repetition is crucial. Once they master the baseline position, we work using a triphasic approach to teach and strengthen the position.

Three Phases of the Break (and all movements)

  1. Eccentric – Have athletes slowly descend (3–5 seconds) into the bottom portion of the movement.
  2. Isometric – Have athletes quickly drop into the bottom portion of the movement and hold the bottom position (3–5 second hold).
  3. Concentric – Have athletes quickly execute the movement and drive out explosively (we use jumps and sprints out of the position).

Once the athletes begin to execute from a stationary position, we have them walk the position out and stick on every third step. We gradually progress the tempo to 50%, 75%, and full speed between the stick step, always asking them to perform an isometric freeze and control the stick movement early on. Control is the key. Once we master the stick, we then teach them how to transfer and drive out of the position for the variety of routes we’ll run. We categorize routes into four categories by their angle of departure.

On the field, we rep all four of our techniques in a progression:

  • Stationary breaks
  • Controlled tempo breaks (walking, 50, 75, 100% with controlled holds)
  • Cone drills with multiple reps for breaks (also with tempo—can be creative with patterns)
  • Full routes

Three Essential Breakpoint Techniques

1. Stick and Snap 

Route Examples: Hitch, Curl, Comeback, Fade Stop, Perimeter Screens

This is one of the more challenging breakpoints, as athletes need to transition their body in almost the opposite direction. This requires precise technique on the upper and lower platforms, square shoulders, and eccentric strength to drop-sink the hips in position. We emphasize snapping the shoulders at the defender and staying square until AFTER the athlete drops his hips.

2. Stick and Roll

Route Examples: Speed Out, Deep Out, Speed Dig

This set of routes is the most varied in the way they are taught. Regardless of whether you teach a speed cut/square out, two-step, or four-step, the principle of the break is the same. We aim to have the athlete sink the hip and roll off the instep of the plant foot. Arm drive is key to rip to the outside explosively. In addition, teaching the athlete to turn their head out of the break is crucial to locate the ball.

We see two common mistakes on this one:

  1. Athletes do not lead the shoulder over the hip and ankle and get overextended.
  2. Athletes drag their opposite foot, which slows them down or causes a false step.

3. Stick and Lean

Route Examples: Slant, Post, Corner, Post Corner

This is the probably the most natural and most common breakpoint we see. Athletes execute the stick position with a slight outstep and shoulder lean opposite the break to: 1) load the outside leg to drive laterally; and 2) influence or “freeze” the defender opposite the break. The shoulder MUST follow the hip and ankle, or the athlete will false step (this is a common fault).

Progressing the Breakpoint

To challenge your athletes and help take the break mechanics to another level, there are a variety of tools and methods you can utilize, both on the field and in the weight room. In our program, we use three primary tools (bands, boxes, and medicine balls) and look to combine/progress them with this framework in mind: The athlete needs to be able to control the vertical force to stop before we focus on the rotational force required to transition horizontally.

Here is our foundational breakpoint progression:

1. Banded Stick

This an extension of our base stick drill, using the band as both resistance and sensory feedback. If the athlete does not drop the hips or keep the shoulders down, the band will pull back. We will also place the band laterally to work on getting an explosive drive out of the break.

2. Box Drop Progression

We use an elevated surface as a means to add resistance. The higher the box, the more force athletes are required to control. From the box, we work on dropping to a stick, sticking and popping off the floor, and ultimately sticking into our different route families.

3. Med Ball Rotation (from Stick)

Getting out of the stick position requires a strong push step and explosive rotational force. We love using med balls as a way to work the rotation. We begin with athletes in the stick position and work rotational throws into each route family. We then progress to catching the ball into a transition from different angles and then finally catching it mid-stick into the families.

4. Banded Stick Plus Med Ball Rotation

We now combine the two methods to work additional resistance. The combinations work from the easiest route families (stick and lean) and catch points (directly in front) to the more challenging positions.

5. Box Drop Plus Med Ball Rotation

The final combination of these methods and tools is dropping from the box to a med ball rotation/break. Like the other med ball methods, we add tosses from progressively varying positions to make it more difficult.

Taking It to the Next Level: Decelerating

Learning to break is the first step, and it will help your receivers be explosive in their routes, particularly the quick game. After we teach the essential breakpoints, we feel the next level is to teach our athletes how to get into those breaks at deeper levels by teaching deceleration mechanics.

There’s a wide variety of factors that go into being able to decelerate quickly (ankle, hip mobility, hip/glute stability, quad/core strength, etc.), but we try to break it down to three critical elements for our athletes to focus on:

  1. Remaining as level as possible in the route stem (showing vertical).
  2. Keeping shoulders over knees on toes to get to a stick position.
  3. Pushing down as hard as possible (feet, hips, and arms).

Key Drill: Drums to Stick

Route Examples: Curl, Comeback – Can also use for Dig or Deep Squared Out.

This is the most challenging breakpoint, as we need to transition our body in almost the opposite direction at depths of 10–15+ yards. We describe these as level 2 routes, and this technique is essential for them, especially curl and comeback variations. The nature of these routes requires us to decelerate using what my friend Brandon White calls “the drums technique,” to throttle down and decelerate to execute our stick technique.

To teach the drums, we use a completely new progression emphasizing arm drive, foot fire, and hip level to decelerate. To gain separation, our goal is to use this technique to throttle down in just 2–3 steps. This progression is critical to master as it must eventually lead us back into the foundational stick position to be efficient and explosive.

We use the following drill progression to improve our drums to stick:

1. Banded Stem

We use a partner to hold a band fixed around the WR’s waist to emphasize remaining level with shoulders over knees and toes. We will work all five stems we teach (vertical, inside, outside, radical inside, and radical outside).

2. Marching Drill Progression

This drill is the drums technique in action. Working on dropping our hips and breaking routes in three steps, we coach our athletes to push down as hard as possible as they march down the field. Many receivers will want to reach, so pausing on the final step is key to check if they get to the stick position. We use a band as a tool by holding it behind or from the side to cue the athlete to push their hips down to stabilize.

3. Angle Marching Drill


This is a progression of the marching drill that helps the athlete work on pushing hard and opening the hips out of the drums. We will progress our tempo and go from paused breaks to rapid fire.

4. Banded Drums Into Break

Now that we can better control force into our break, we work the break from our drums position with a band. The band forces us to learn to control our body by dropping and stabilizing with our hips, and it helps us really work an explosive drive out of our deceleration.

5. Cliff Drill Progression

This is a sprint to stick at a fixed point on the field. We like to use a line on the field as our imaginary “cliff” that the athlete can’t go over. We progress from 8–15 yards, depending on where the athletes are. We can add a band as well for athletes who are rising up or for athletes who need more resistance to challenge them. Once we have shown our technique is solid, we can also execute on a visual cue (coach drops or turns hips, etc.). This helps us work the read routes we use, such as a vertical or curl option.

The final progression of the cliff we use is a partner race to the football. We can do it where one partner is just beyond the top of the route, or we can have both partners work the route and break to a catch point.

Moving Forward

The wide receiver position is a position that is often under-coached, and because of this, we see dramatic results after working with athletes for only a few hours in our indy segments or at the summer camps we work with. To play at a high level, these athletes are required to possess a wide skill set, attention to detail, and incredible precision. What I hope excites you as much as it excites me is that all of these attributes can be developed and coached over time. The key to developing the fundamentals of movement is often stepping back and focusing on the basic elements to progress. Even speed, the elusive holy grail in sports, can be developed with proper coaching and programming.

The wide receiver position is often under-coached, and because of this, we see dramatic results after working with athletes for only a few hours, says @WLCCoachTreske. Share on X

Keep working and good luck this season! Thank you for this opportunity to share a little of what we do to develop our wide receivers. Please contact me at [email protected] if you or anyone on your staff has additional questions or would like to discuss wide receiver development further.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



Salwasser

Episode 1: Scott Salwasser

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Salwasser

Scott Salwasser is now the Head of Strength and Conditioning for football at Texas State University in San Marcos, Texas (an update from the podcast). Scott came to Texas State after a successful run as the Director of Speed and Power at Texas Tech University. He also served as assistant strength and conditioning coach at UC Berkeley in Santa Clara, California. Scott completed a master’s in science and kinesiology at UC–Sacramento in 2006. He has an extensive and successful background in the area of speed and energy system development for American football athletes.

Coach Salwasser covers the effect on the central nervous system of various modalities of speed training and how those translate to the weight room. He also discusses the neurostimulation of speed “days” and how often to train them for maximum transfer to the field and weight room. Scott gives his insights on using video to evaluate speed days the same way sport coaches use it for practice.

In this podcast, Coach Scott Salwasser discusses with Joel:

  • His philosophy of “being a track coach for the football program.”
  • His training variations for athletes, which depend on the strength of the athlete and specific needs of their position.
  • His training periodization for football and the protocols used during various blocks of the training schedule.
  • His plyometric program, as well as the use of special strength and competition sprinting to develop game speed in football players.
  • The use of sleds and how to vary load percentages based on player position and in-game needs.
  • How to develop and use speed stations.

Podcast total run time is 51:03.

Keywords: football, plyometric, periodization, speed development

Gabriel-Mvumvure-Race

How Stability Impacts Speed (and 4 Single-Leg Workouts to Improve Both)

Blog| ByGabriel Mvumvure

Gabriel-Mvumvure-Race

Strength training programs for sprinters often focus on total body, multi-joint exercises such as squats and deadlifts. These powerful exercises usually take up the majority of an athlete’s workout, such that there is only time for a few sets of auxiliary exercises. One type of exercise we believe is worthy of a sprinter’s attention are single-leg squats.

One reason to consider performing single-leg squats is they improve pelvic stability. If there is pelvic instability, it will take longer to absorb, store, and release energy during sprinting. As such, a sprinter’s ground contact time will be longer, and their stride length will be shorter.

Pelvic instability leads to longer ground contact time and shorter stride length. Single-leg squats are worthy of a sprinter’s attention because they improve pelvic stability. Share on X

A coach may have some success giving their athletes instructions to avoid excessive rotational movements during sprinting, such as “cheek to cheek” for their arms or “knees up and forward” for their legs. However, if muscle weakness is the primary cause, coaching cues alone are not an efficient way to correct this problem. At least, not as efficiently as performing a few sets of corrective exercise. Let’s look at some numbers.

When you sprint, you are continually supporting your entire bodyweight on one leg and dealing with additional disruptive forces acting on the body. In his book, Running Rewired, Jay Dicharry estimates that the side-to-side forces your body has to deal with when you run equal 10-15 percent of your bodyweight, the acceleration/deceleration forces equal 40-50 percent of your bodyweight, and the vertical forces could be as much as 2.5 to 3 times your bodyweight! With such high levels of stress, it’s no wonder that Dicharry’s book focuses on resistance training to correct poor running mechanics, especially variations of single-leg squats.

Although single-leg squats obviously work the quads, sprinters and their coaches should consider that they also strengthen the glutes. As a review, the glutes consist of three muscles: the gluteus maximus, the gluteus medius, and the gluteus minimus.

Manfred Reiger
Image 1. The split style of lifting was popular in the early days of the sport of weightlifting. This shows Manfred Reiger, a German weightlifter who competed in the 1964, 1968, and 1972 Olympics. Reiger officially clean and jerked 462 pounds using this style of lifting. (Photo by Bruce Klemens.)


The glute medius also has three subdivisions: anterior, middle, and posterior. Its functions include abducting the hip, stabilizing the pelvis, and eccentrically controlling internal rotation and hip adduction—as such, this muscle plays a major role in sprinting. Not only may a weakness in the glute medius cause excessive rotation of the pelvis, but it may also cause the knees to buckle inward, increasing the risk of knee ligament and overuse injuries.

With that background, let’s address the question, “What are the best exercises for the glute medius?”

The Science of Stability Training

In 2009, the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) published the results of a study that looked at the effectiveness of 12 popular glute exercises. One of these exercises was the forward lunge, which had significant activation of the glute medius.

Forward lunges have become a favorite of many sprint coaches, who believe that they are more sport-specific to sprinting than squats. Many other types of athletes perform them. In fact, in the early days of the sport of weightlifting, lifters often used the split-style snatch and the split-style clean rather than the squat style. The split-style receiving position resembles the low position of a forward lunge. Thus, as part of their training, some of these lifters often performed lunges to increase their strength and stability in the receiving position.

Alexeev Training
Image 2. Lunges are popular with sprinters, but weightlifters have also performed them to prevent muscle imbalances. Here is Russia’s Vasily Alexeev performing a lunge with the barbell resting on the front of his shoulders—note the low position with the knees extending over the toes. In 1970, Alexeev became the first weightlifter to officially clean and jerk 500 pounds. (Photo by Bruce Klemens.)


Although a weightlifter can potentially catch the bar in a lower position with the squat style, thus enabling them to lift more weight, many early lifters who practiced the split style could achieve extremely low receiving positions. Few lifters use the split style today, but some may perform lunges to prevent muscle imbalances developed by performing the jerk. In fact, Vasily Alexeev, a two-time Olympic champion from Russia who broke 80 world records and was the first to clean and jerk 500 pounds, performed front lunges with a barbell.

Liao and Topurov
Image 3. Because today’s lifters only jerk with the same leg forward, single-leg training can help prevent muscle imbalances in the pelvis. Shown are China’s Liao Qiuyun jerking a world record of 284 pounds at a bodyweight of 120 pounds, and Bulgaria’s Stefan Topurov jerking a world record of 396 in 1983 at a bodyweight of 132. Topurov was the first to clean and jerk triple bodyweight, eventually lifting 407 pounds at 132. (Qiuyun photo by Tim Scott @liftinglife; Topurov photo by Bruce Klemens.)


One of the exercises in the JOSPT study with the highest ranking for glute medius activation (ranked #2 behind the side-lying hip abduction) was the single-leg squat. It also beat out the single-limb deadlift for the highest activation of the gluteus maximus. Before taking a closer look at the single-leg squat, let’s examine some of the drawbacks of two of the most popular glute exercises: lateral band walks and hip thrusts.

Lateral band walks have become the “go to” exercise for the glute medius in physical therapy and “functional training” programs. This makes sense, as it ranked #3 for glute medius activation in the JOSPT study (but, interestingly, last in gluteus maximus activation!). As a plus, it’s performed from a standing position.

According to Canadian strength coach and posturologist Paul Gagné, the tendon signals that correlate to elastic strength storage and release are stronger with standing exercises. Unfortunately, when used with high levels of resistance, lateral band walks place considerable shearing stress on the knees. They also do little to develop body awareness, which is important because sprinters must deal with instability to run fast. Although lateral band walks strengthen the glute medius, exercises that improve body awareness should take precedence in a sprinter’s training.

Although lateral band walks strengthen the glute medius, exercises that improve body awareness should take precedence in a sprinter’s training. Share on X

Hip thrusts were not one of the exercises in this study, but consider that athletes perform these types of glute exercises supine and in a stable environment. Using the definitions developed by sports scientists Mel Siff and Yuri Verkhoshansky, the hip thrust should be classified as a structural or bodybuilding exercise, and as such has little carryover to athletic performance. That said, let’s look at some real-world research.

In an eight-week hip thrust study involving 21 college athletes (15 males, 6 females), researchers found that “…maximum hip thrust strength through use of the barbell hip thrust does not appear to transfer into improvements in sprint performance in the collegiate level athletes.” It’s certainly fine for sprinters to occasional use exercises such as the hip thrust, especially for glute activation before sprinting or lifting, but performing it on a regular basis with maximal weights may not be the most effective use of an athlete’s training time if the goal is to run as fast as humanly possible.

Gabriel Mvumvure Sprint
Image 4. Optimal pelvic alignment during sprinting is essential to achieve maximum speed. Demonstrating great form is author Gabriel Mvumvure, a 2016 Olympian who competed in two indoor and three outdoor World Championships. (Header image and Mvumvure photos courtesy of LSU Sports Information.)


Getting back to single-leg squats, one variation we like for sprinters is called a “pistol squat,” so named because at the bottom of the exercise your body takes the shape of a hand pistol. Although our main focus here is on sprinting faster, consider that pelvic stability is also essential for moving laterally and changing directions because you must be able to control the high forces your body is exposed to while moving in this manner.

Think about it: When you plant one foot to change directions, you’re pretty much standing on one leg and performing a partial single-leg squat! With all the side-to-side movement that takes place in athletics, especially in sports such as soccer and basketball, those extra fractions of a second needed for an athlete with poor pelvic stability to maintain their balance can be the difference between making the play or being part of an “ankle breaker” highlight video.

When you plant one foot to change directions, you’re pretty much standing on one leg and performing a partial single-leg squat! Share on X

Another advantage of single-leg squats—at least all but one of the versions we will discuss here—is that they work the legs through a full range of motion. If an athlete focuses on partial range-of-motion leg exercises (such as the so-called Bulgarian split squat), not only are the muscles around the knee inadequately developed, the connective tissues may lose their elasticity and their ability to react to high stress.

Barbell Drop
Image 5. The position of this Venezuelan lifter’s legs in the larger photo, and the issue of the barbell landing on her knee in the smaller photos, suggests she suffered serious knee and ankle injuries. She didn’t! This lifter’s exceptional body awareness and the highly developed elastic properties of her connective tissues enabled her to avoid injury. Knee, ankle, and also hamstring injuries are extremely rare in weightlifting. (Photo by Bud Charniga.)
Perhaps full-range leg exercises, even those such as the clean and snatch in which you bounce out of the bottom of the squat, are the future of pre-hab training? Share on X

If you follow the sport of weightlifting, you may have seen athletes dropping heavy barbells on their legs with their ankles and knees in awkward positions, but not suffering injuries. Further, hamstring, ACL, and ankle injuries are practically non-existent in this sport. Contrast that with sports such as soccer, volleyball, and football, where approximately 70% of injuries to these areas of the body are non-contact. Perhaps full-range leg exercises, even those such as the clean and snatch in which you bounce out of the bottom of the squat, are the future of pre-hab training?

The Workouts

Many strength coaches avoid single-leg squats because most athletes, due to flexibility or stability issues, cannot perform a full pistol squat the first time they try it. Rather than avoiding an exercise that can help correct these problems, how about trying a progressive system that enables athletes to not only to perform the exercise, but to do so with resistance!


Video 1. Marybeth Fitzsimmons, a multiple high school state champion sprinter from Rhode Island, demonstrates a progression to perform pistol squats using several of the exercises discussed in this article. Fitzsimmons earned a full athletic scholarship for track at Northeastern University, excelling in the long jump and the short sprints.

The program we will share with you contains four workouts, each building on the previous one. If an athlete can already do a pistol squat, they can jump to Workout 4. For everyone else, perform the workouts in the order presented. Some athletes will progress faster than others, which is fine—the goal is to master one sequence of exercise before proceeding to the next. Here are the workouts:

Workout 1

The first exercise requires little stability, but it works the legs through a full range of motion, even if the athlete has mobility restrictions. The second exercise, although performed through a partial range of motion, focuses on the glute medius and increases body awareness.

  1. Pistol Squat, Assisted: 2 sets x 10 reps, each leg, rest 30 seconds
  2. Single-Leg Squat with Lateral Press, Big Toe Up: 2 sets x 10 reps, rest 30 seconds

Workout 2

This workout increases the intensity of the first exercise performed in Workout 1, whereas the second is another, more stable version of the pistol squat.

  1. Pistol Squat, Assisted, Eccentric Emphasis: 2 sets x 5 reps, rest 30 seconds
  2. Single-Leg Friction Squat: 2 sets x 5 reps, rest 30 seconds

Workout 3

This workout introduces the full pistol squat, with the first exercise being a more stable version of the full movement. The second exercise is the full pistol squat, or at least as close as possible to a full pistol squat. The workout should continue until the athlete can perform five full repetitions of the pistol squat.

  1. Pistol Squat Between Boxes: 2 sets x 10 reps, rest 30 seconds
  2. Pistol Squat: 2 sets x 5 reps, rest 30 seconds

Workout 4

At this point, the athlete should be able to perform full pistol squats without any assistance. Thus, the first exercise is the pistol squat, whereas the second is the pistol squat performed with additional resistance.

  1. Pistol Squat: 1 set x 10 reps, rest 30 seconds
  2. Pistol Squat with Weights: 3 sets x 5 reps, rest 30 seconds

A few notes: The reps indicated are for each leg, not the total reps for a set. Next, these are stability exercises and, at first, should be performed at a relatively slow tempo—a good general guideline when you first try these exercises is that it should take twice as long to lower your body as it does to raise it. Also, as these are single-leg exercises, minimal rest is needed between sets because as one leg works, the other rests. This means each workout can be finished in about 6–8 minutes, depending on how long it takes to set up for each exercise.

The Exercises

Here are the details of the exercises, along with illustrations of each.

Pistol Squat, Assisted

One reason many athletes cannot perform a single-leg squat is that they lack the mobility in the ankles. An option is to perform partial single-leg squats and calf stretches, gradually increasing the depth of the exercise as their mobility improves. This exercise has more “bang for your buck,” as it enables you to perform a full range of motion of the legs from the first workout, increasing mobility in the lower extremities along the way.

The exercise is performed inside a power rack. You position a barbell at a height level of about the top of your pelvic bone. You need to set the bar so that when you perform the exercise, the bar pulls against the support (so that you don’t fall backward). Lift one leg and keep it off the floor throughout the exercise. Squat as low as possible, using your hands for support and leaning backward if necessary, then pull yourself upward. Check out the accompanying video to see exactly how this exercise should be performed.

During this workout, you should move slowly to ensure proper alignment. When you progress to Workouts 2–4, however, it may be okay to have a slight bounce out of the bottom, as these tissues have elastic properties.

Pistol Squat Assisted
Figure 1. Assisted Pistol Squat (Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, www.physigraphe.com)


Single-Leg Squat with Lateral Press, Big Toe Up

Coach Gagné created this unique exercise to strengthen the glute medius, help correct valgus feet (i.e., fallen arches), and improve body awareness. As an experiment, try performing this exercise before sprinting and then try performing lateral band walks before sprinting—you’ll find that Gagné’s exercise creates a better sense of stability. We should also mention that this exercise is especially valuable for hurdlers, as these events can lead to imbalances in the glutes.

Coach Gagné’s single-leg squat with lateral press and big toe up helps with stability and is especially valuable for hurdlers because it corrects imbalances in the glutes. Share on X

This exercise is performed barefoot alongside a high box (or another sturdy object). Stand on one foot with the other leg bent and behind you (forming a 45-degree angle). Lift the big toe of the foot on the floor. The primary muscle that lifts the big toe is the extensor hallucis longus, and it is important for correcting a valgus foot because it creates lateral tension on the foot. Press the rear foot alongside the box, which will increase the work of the glute medius. Now do quarter squats, maintaining the pressure on the box and keeping the big toe up.

Single Leg Squat with Lateral Press
Figure 2. Single-Leg Squat with Lateral Press, Big Toe Up (Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, www.physigraphe.com)


Pistol Squat, Assisted, Eccentric Emphasis

This is the same setup as the assisted pistol squat, but with this version you challenge yourself on the lowering phase. From the start position, let go of the bar, keeping your hands about an inch away from it. Lower yourself slowly, but grasp the bar for support if you lose your balance. When you reach the bottom position, grasp the bar and use your arms to assist you on the way up.

Single-Leg Friction Squat

This exercise was created by physical education teacher Bob Rowbotham. You need a sturdy box that won’t tip if you stand on one side of it (and it’s a good idea to have someone brace the box to prevent it from tipping).

Stand on one edge of the box so that your outside leg is in free space. Press the side of the free foot against the edge and keep pressure on it as you slowly lower yourself. When you reach the bottom, use that free leg to push off the floor and help you return to the start.

Single Leg Friction Squat
Figure 3. Single-Leg Friction Squat (Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, www.physigraphe.com)


Pistol Squat Between Boxes

This exercise is a full pistol squat, but it’s performed between two boxes so you can use your arms to assist you at the bottom of the movement. The boxes need to be about knee height, spread slightly wider than shoulder-width apart.

Stand between the two boxes with hands at your side. Lift one leg high enough so that it doesn’t touch the floor during the exercise. Bend your leg, but catch yourself with your arms as you near the bottom position to slow yourself down and increase your stability; then use your arms to help push yourself up to the start.

Pistol Squat Between Boxes
Figure 4. Pistol Squat Between Boxes (Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, www.physigraphe.com)

Pistol Squat

This is the full pistol squat. However, it’s not expected that you’ll be able to perform all the recommended reps for the sets prescribed at first. As such, you should perform as many full reps as possible for each set, then do the remaining as partial reps.

Pistol Squat
Figure 5. Pistol Squat (Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, www.physigraphe.com)


Pistol Squat with Weights

After you’ve mastered the pistol squat, it’s time to increase the intensity of the exercise by holding weights. Dumbbells and kettlebells are ideal ways to increase resistance. Perform the exercise just like a pistol squat, but with weights held at your sides.

Pistol Squat With Weights
Figure 6. Pistol Squat with Weights (Drawings by Sylvain Lemaire, www.physigraphe.com)

A Simple Solution as the Best Solution

Applying the principle of Occam’s Razor to athletics, the simplest solution to a sprinting problem is often the best solution. The single-leg squat is one simple solution to helping sprinters maintain optimal pelvic alignment to achieve the fastest times. Give the workouts presented here a try and see what this remarkable exercise can do for you!

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



References

Anderson, Frank C. and Pandy, Marcus G., “Storage and Utilization of Elastic Strain Energy During Jumping.” Journal of Biomechanics. 1993; 26(12):1413–1427.

Bishop, C., et al. “Heavy Barbell Hip Thrusts Do Not Effect Sprint Performance: An 8-Week Randomized–Controlled Study.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2019; 33:S78–S84.

Dicharry, Jay. Running Rewired, 2017, VeloPress, pp. 2-3.

Distefano, L.J., et al. “Gluteal Muscle Activation During Common Therapeutic Exercises, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy.” 2009; 39(7):532–40.

Goss, K. “The Case Against Stability Training.” Bigger Faster Stronger, March/April 2007, pp. 70–72.

Siff, M. and Verkhoshansky, Y. Supertraining, 1999, 4th Edition, Supertraining International, Denver USA 1999,pp. 7–8. (1st edition, 1993)

Kim GossKim Goss was a strength coach for the U.S. Air Force Academy and has a master’s degree in human movement.

Banyard VBT

A Master Class on Velocity-Based Training with Harry Banyard

Freelap Friday Five| ByHarry Banyard

Banyard VBT

Harry Banyard is a lecturer in Exercise and Sports Science at Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia. He has completed his Ph.D. in velocity-based resistance training and was previously the athlete development manager for the West Australian Football Commission. Banyard enjoys all things strength and conditioning, including training elite junior athletes and maximizing human performance in the gym and on the field.

Freelap USA: Velocity loss is popular in VBT, but many coaches in strength and conditioning only use bar speed in the Olympic lifts (clean and snatch). Could you share theoretical ideas to help with those exercises in regard to monitoring barbell speed and bar path?

Harry Banyard: Coaches will likely monitor bar speed to encourage their athletes to give “maximal concentric effort” and chase personal bests. So, there’s not much to that—just set up their velocity monitoring tool and off you go. On the other hand, the primary purpose for monitoring the magnitude of velocity loss is to guide the number of reps to be performed in a set. Therefore, if a coach is to use velocity loss thresholds, it depends on the exercise, phase of training, and desired target energy system.

If an athlete is training in a hypertrophic phase, they would likely perform reps to near concentric muscular failure, so when their velocity verges on their minimal velocity threshold, they can terminate a training set. If they are in a power phase or preferentially targeting fast twitch fibers, they can utilize tighter velocity loss thresholds with smaller decreases in allowable velocity loss so that they are training with velocities as close to their maximal velocity capacity for a given load. Notably, Olympic lifts have load-velocity profiles with gradients that are far less steep than core foundation lifts (squat, bench press, deadlift, etc.). Olympic lifts also require an all-or-nothing level of effort from an athlete in that, unless an individual produces a certain high velocity output for a rep, the rep won’t be completed.

Velocity loss thresholds for Olympic lifts must be much tighter than core foundation lifts, says @BanyardHarry. Share on X

Therefore, velocity loss thresholds for Olympic lifts must be much tighter than core foundation lifts. The larger, more traditional velocity loss thresholds in the core foundation lifts (i.e., 20%, 40%, etc.) might not be appropriate for Olympic lifts since the magnitude of velocity loss (e.g., 40%) may exceed the critical velocity required for the successful completion of a rep. So, if you were to use a velocity loss threshold in an Olympic lift, you could use tighter thresholds like 5%, 10%, or 20% velocity loss from the athlete’s max velocity for a given load.

Freelap USA: Concentric mean velocity is the measurement of choice in much of the research. Can you share why eccentric velocity is tricky to measure as well as hypothetical pros and cons of this metric?

Harry Banyard: It depends on the exercise, but I don’t think measuring eccentric velocity is tricky as such because most devices will report it for you. The trick is to get eccentric velocity reliable so that you can target specific adaptation. Eccentric contractions and eccentric velocities are important for enhancing stretch shortening cycle movements, strength adaptations, and coping with breaking forces in change of direction cuts, etc. We looked at eccentric velocity in the back squat without placing any constraints on our athletes, and it was highly variable.

However, you can increase the reliability of eccentric velocity by utilizing a metronome to constrain the athlete to one-, two-, or three-second eccentric contractions depending on the adaptation required. In addition, with acceptable resistance training loads, some coaches may even look to instruct their athletes to perform the eccentric contraction as fast as possible to enhance ground reaction forces and the subsequent concentric force output.

Freelap USA: Fatigue in lifting is often hard to determine due to the honest effort required and other factors. The research looks shaky in being able to truly monitor barbell speed and fatigue, so what should practitioners do regarding fatigue management with athletes in the weight room?

Harry Banyard: Fatigue is an interesting discussion point because an athlete requires significant stimulus to create adaptation, but most coaches would wish their athletes to perform the “optimal” amount of resistance training that requires the least amount of lifting for the most amount of adaptation. Monitoring barbell velocity can assist a coach in determining their athlete’s optimal training volume and load intensity. A prerequisite for VBT is that the athlete must provide maximal effort for every rep, and if that is the case, then you can use objective VBT methods to train. Two VBT methods can help guide appropriate training volume or training load intensity.

Two VBT methods can guide appropriate training volume or load intensity: sessional velocity loss thresholds and load-velocity profiles with training loads adjusted to hit a target velocity. Share on X

One method to guide resistance training volume is sessional velocity loss thresholds. By monitoring the first few reps of the first training set (usually the fastest reps), the athlete will perform as many reps in a set until a predetermined velocity loss is met. The strength coach should establish the predetermined velocity loss threshold depending on the training goal. For example, if training to enhance maximal power, then 5%, 10%, or 20% velocity loss thresholds are likely chosen, as it is desirable to train near the maximal attainable velocity for a given load and preferentially target type II fibers.

The second method is using load-velocity profiles where the training load (load intensity) can be adjusted to achieve a target velocity in the training session. Load-velocity profiles are reliable and unique to each athlete and each exercise. When an athlete is fatigued, their movement velocity will substantially decrease compared to their baseline load-velocity profile, and, if required, the coach can modify the training load accordingly.

Load-velocity profiles can also be extremely useful during athlete rehabilitation so as to individualize the load progression according to an individual’s rate of recovery. Current research suggests that meaningful changes (an increase in strength or resultant fatigue) in velocity occur around ±0.06 m/s (mean concentric velocity) compared to someone’s maximal attainable velocity for a given load.

Freelap USA: Consistent barbell displacement in strength training enables fair comparisons of the performance of the movement. Would you share a list of requirements to train properly with the right protocol and technology?

Harry Banyard: To utilize VBT to its fullest, athletes should perform exercises with consistent full range of motion based on their technical capabilities. The eccentric phase should utilize consistent, reliable eccentric velocity (maximal or constrained [one-second, two-second, three-second, etc.]), and the concentric phase should be performed with maximal effort. Studies have shown that mean concentric velocity (MV), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and peak velocity (PV) are all reliable, so you can monitor training with any of these velocity variables. You would typically use MV and MPV for traditional non-ballistic lifts (squat, bench press, deadlift), whereas PV and MPV are mainly used to monitor ballistic exercises (bench press throw, countermovement jump, Olympic lifts).

In terms of devices, research suggests that the best velocity monitoring technologies are 3D motion capture systems or linear transducers. New technologies are constantly evolving and improving, but they need to be properly validated.

Freelap USA: The Romanian deadlift is a popular exercise. With your research comparing it to other movement patterns, what should coaches do differently now to maximize holistic development? How does this research affect training and program design?

Harry Banyard: I don’t think they should do anything differently as such; I think all three exercises are important for holistic athlete development. Therefore, I would still incorporate all of the exercises, time permitting.

Our research suggested that the squat was more efficient than the hip thrust and RDL for training both the hip and knee flexors at high loads, says @BanyardHarry. Share on X

Our research article compared the muscle activity profiles of the squat, hip thrust, and RDL, and we suggested that the squat was the most “efficient” exercise of the three for training both the hip and knee flexors at high loads. Thus, if you are time poor and have to pick one exercise to perform with the lower body, the squat may translate better to athletic performance and movement patterns that require hip and knee extension within the same movement.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Isoinertial Training

7 Methods of Isoinertial Training Strength Coaches Need

Blog| ByShane Davenport

Isoinertial Training

Experimenting with isoinertial training during the last year has led us to seven methods that are useful for coaches, and are not just new or different for Instagram. Changing everything you do every time you leave a seminar or buy a product is a sign of a poor system. Evolution, however, is a must. After a great summer, we found our flywheel training start to grow and advance as we’ve practiced and learned from others in our field.

We’ve created a simple continuum, from basic concepts to very advanced techniques that are not for everyone. If you’re interested in flywheel training, the information below is compelling, at the least. If you’re a coach in the right environment wanting to push the limits and depend on flywheels, this article will be valuable as well. Whatever the case, this review covers methods that span from the most basic fundamentals to the elite.

The Spectrum of Techniques

While we wanted to show incremental progressions of flywheel techniques, we realize no continuum is perfect. Ideally, each method moves in a linear fashion, so coaches can safely ramp up the demand on their athletes. The science of strength and conditioning is far from perfect, so there’s enough art left to give coaches plenty to play with.

Flywheels can be used by new trainees as well as the most elite athletes. It may seem that experimenting with elite and pro-level athletes is a huge risk, but if we’re going to make progress, we will continue to progress. There are times when unconventional and new is just what a top-level athlete needs to improve their performance.

The spectrum of flywheel techniques ranges from secondary strength exercises to accentuated eccentric overload, the most extreme form of strength training. This list is the first crack at ways to progress training methods, not just progressions of exercise. Down the road, I’m sure additional ideas will become part of this continuum, but for now, this is will make a dent in flywheel programming.

Below are the seven primary methods we’re using at our facility. We hope other coaches experiment with them and share their practices in the future.

One

Supplemental Ancillary Training

If you’re new to flywheel training and don’t want to take a leap of faith, this method is perfect. Take any basic secondary exercise, which is usually placed at the end of workouts because they’re important enough to include but not a priority, and use a flywheel option. Ancillary exercises let athletes experience flywheels without shocking their system. In our experience, it’s best to take time to become familiar with both the resistance of flywheels and the exercises themselves. Remember, most youth athletes are new to training properly, and basic exercises with flywheels are rather demanding, so be patient.

We have both the kPulley and the kBox and like to mix and match the training just enough to give our athletes enough exposure so they understand the concept of flywheels before we start advancing. Progressing slowly leads to the fastest changes and adaptations by letting you avoid having to take a few steps back from errors or miscalculations. Slow and steady wins the race.


Video 1. Using a kPulley makes sense for arm assistance exercises. Elbow health and extension strength is vital for all athletes, not just those in throwing sports.

We know that some athletes will never use flywheels and others not for a year or so, and that’s not a problem. We have progression in mind from the jump because we tend to train athletes for long periods and built our business model on full-year clients. Also, waiting for an extended time before progressing to our more advanced equipment reinforces that the basics are a priority. Being disciplined and integrating flywheels slowly is not a punishment for athletes; it’s a way to make them earn their right to use the fancy stuff and progress.

With a few sets of 1-2 exercises, athletes can grasp flywheel training fundamentals & get hypertrophy & strength benefits without wasting time. Share on X

For coaches looking to enter the flywheel arena, we suggest arm exercises, single-leg training, single-joint training, and finishing sets of compound squats or deadlifts. With a few sets of 1-2 exercises, athletes will grasp the fundamentals of flywheel training and get solid hypertrophy and strength benefits without wasting time. I’m not promoting an overly cautious approach to flywheel training, but I also don’t recommend swapping all the ingredients out of your recipe as soon as you get a new mixing bowl.

Two

Conventional Replacements for Main Exercises

In many circumstances, the next logical step is to swap primary barbell or machine exercises with the flywheel options. Depending on the athlete’s recovery ability and the program as a whole, coaches can swap out one day, one week, or one phase entirely and use flywheels. While this sounds bold, some teams spend entire training phases using isoinertial methods. We have not gone “all flywheel” yet, but find it a viable option for someone with a large arsenal of equipment.

Sequencing from single sessions or even parts of sessions before going all flywheel is the sensible way to progress, in theory. We’ve used the kBox as a belt squat for countless athletes, and some of our athletes find it’s a nice break from squatting when they’re in heavy training phases. We usually do this to bypass an issue like a shoulder or spine injury, though we’ve also had our heavy athletes do it with similar success.


Video 2. Calf raises are great with flywheels and take a few sets to learn due to the timing of the eccentric pull. Experiment with tempos and rhythms based on what you feel you need with your athletes.

It is not, however, a 1-for-1 trade. I recommend increasing the rep range a bit when switching from standard barbell movements to flywheels. One consideration is that the increase in sets and reps will be more volume than some athletes are used to. Similar to any long term periodization, the key to success with isoinertial volume or loading is steady and manageable progression.

Steady, manageable progression is the key to success with isoinertial volume or loading, says @ExceedSPF. #FlywheelTraining Share on X

Regardless of whether we include flywheels or not, we tend to reduce volumes in certain areas when we increase volumes in another. Before pre-season, we increase fieldwork and our time in the weight room drops off. We do the same for flywheel replacement. When we increase heavy kBox squatting for an athlete, we reduce their jumping or change of direction work on the field that week to allow for “fair trade.” Or we might simply reduce the amount of other eccentric work in the weight room.

There's no point in doing #FlywheelTraining in a vacuum. kMeter readings help us quantify the training, and our force plates quantify the results. Share on X

Other times, we do the opposite and complement heavy flywheel use with other eccentric and deceleration methods. Instead of having a pretty workout on paper and hope it works in a few months, we jump-test athletes and look at eccentric measurements as best we can. There’s no point in doing flywheel training in a vacuum. Our kMeter readings help us quantify the training, and our force plates quantify the results of all of the work done during each week or month.

Three

Isometric Enhancement Techniques

There are two significant challenges with isometric work in team or group settings:

  • creating an environment with an immovable object that works universally for all the athletes
  • getting information regarding the effort of the contraction

We’re lucky to have tools for assessing force and effort as well as the kBox, which creates a unique and interchangeable immovable object very nicely. Whether you’re using the belt, harness, or an attachment for the upper body, you can adjust the length of the drive belt to have a custom-sized apparatus that works for all heights and strengths.

We can also add force plates to the ground or the flywheel’s platform to quantify the force or rate of force. This information shows us whether an athlete exerts sufficient effort early enough in the movement. One hard effort makes a difference and can be followed up with kMeter-guided feedback on the non-isometric repetitions that follow.


Video 3. You can add isometric benchmarks with load cells or force plates, but a good honest effort is all you need to get started. Athletes can use various leg angles to get started, but the most common is a deep squat.

Potentiation, like flywheel work, is a continuum. (I’ll cover potentiation later in this post). You can use potentiation to spark a workout, break through career plateaus, or increase an effort for a single set or movement. For the sake of this post, we use a few sets of hard, overcoming isometric efforts to ensure the work is performed with real effort. You’ll appreciate real effort after a single bout with an immovable object if you’ve never done so.

As a side benefit, we’ve found that people with tendinopathy often experience pain at specific joint angles, which makes training hard a difficult task in logistics alone. With the kBox, we can adjust the belt length to circumvent the provocative range of motion and get some serious training stimulus without causing the athlete further anguish.

Four

Ultra-High-Speed Flywheel Training

The highest velocity bouts on a flywheel require a little skill and experience, and decent athletes can grasp adding the extra spin after a few sessions. High-speed movements, especially squats, not only provide a great change of pace for athletes who train consistently at high levels but also are an excellent tool for athletes struggling to acquire deceleration skills.

The flywheel can get the athlete off the court or turf and minimize the typical stress of these activities, mentally and physically. The speed is fast enough to be realistic, slow enough to be safe, and the load realistic enough to make a difference. High-speed flywheel training is learning without teaching, and we love that.

#HighSpeedFlywheel training offers speed that's fast enough to be realistic, slow enough to be safe, & the load realistic enough to make a difference. Share on X

Similar to deceleration work, jumping can be too much for athletes during certain parts of the training block. Adding high-speed flywheel work can reduce a bit of the impact without compromising the eccentric forces we want on the tendons and musculature.

#HighSpeedFlywheel work reduces some of the impact without compromising the eccentric forces on the tendons and musculature, says @ExceedSPF. Share on X

Depending on what part of the squat or jump you focus on, you can manipulate your equipment to modify how the movement is executed. Setting up the drive belt at standing height emphasizes the turnover and change of direction as the primary focus. By simply extending the length of the drive belt, you give the athlete the ability to drive past the standing position and incorporate a much more extension-based exercise that even involves the ankle.


Video 4. Athletes can perform faster-than-normal squatting patterns with flywheel training without risk. As athletes practice the movement and advance, the speed can reach some impressive levels.

Similar to manipulating stresses with the flywheel, we sometimes switch out traditional jump work for high-speed flywheel squats. And we’ve even swapped elastic jump work for high-speed flywheel work. Moving fast in the weight room doesn’t necessarily translate to faster sprinting, but the emphasis on decelerating and accelerating the wheel with great intent is something not to overlook. Because speed and power work is neuromuscular in nature, you can consider this type of work learning rather than loading.

Five

Potentiation Techniques

Potentiation is a lot trickier than social media would have us believe. If you’ve done it for some time and used measurement tools, you know that nothing works for everyone and everything works for some people. Consider this important question when implementing potentiation: Do you want to potentiate the main movement, the secondary movement, or both? So far, the research is clear that heavy or intense training temporarily primes the muscles used in these exercises. This makes flywheels an obvious candidate for potentiation.

The major flaw I see is the setup. Some people use so many movements, they look like they’re doing an obstacle course. And the setup is often far from practical or sensible. If the goal is to potentiate, spend time finding combinations of movements, reps, sets, and rest periods that allow the athlete to improve. Potentiation isn’t about trying to add more output following an exercise. It’s making sure the entire session will improve the athlete down the road.


Video 5A. A good deal of new research is out on flywheels and potentiation. Make sure you read the protocols and repeat the specific loading and timing details in order to take advantage of the theoretical benefits.


Video 5B. After flywheel training, you can potentiate resisted sprints. Most coaches prefer more contrasting styles of pairings, but tinker with exercises to see what works best for you.

When looking at the research, it’s easy to assume that if you do heavy stuff and then jump, you’ll improve. But realistically, you have to see the improvement in performance. We’ve all seen a spike in social media posts about French Contrast training, and it shows great potential. But what we know about Cometti’s method is that it’s possible to prescribe more than just squats and jumps.

We’ve used both upper and lower body potentiation methods for a long time now but only recently incorporated the flywheel in the plan. We use the flywheel for both heavy and isometric contractions paired with loaded and unloaded jumping or plyometric movements with promising results.

We've used the flywheel for both heavy & isometric contractions paired with loaded & unloaded jumping or plyometric movements with promising results. Share on X

One thing I like about the flywheel in terms of potentiation is the setup, as discussed in the isometric section above. Taking that a step further, you can use the same tool for an overcoming isometric, followed by ultra-high-speed squats and then to jumps without any crazy setups or playing Frogger through a crowded gym. Set up the flywheel with low inertia, move the drive belt to the isometric height, perform the iso, do the fast squats, and then unclip the belt and jump (on the ground).

Regardless of how you incorporate flywheels in your potentiation protocols, do so with purpose and results in mind. As cool and trendy as some of this stuff is, most of us are writing programs to improve our athletes rather than our following.

Six

Contrast and Complex Training

Following a potentiation section, one might be fully aware of how to use contrast or complex training, and I’ll spare you the repetitive explanation. Contrast and complex methods with the flywheel don’t need to be complicated. Though we use some methods with more novice athletes, we gear most of our contrast or complex training toward our higher-level client who has a considerable amount of training time under their belt. At some point, athletes will approach their genetic ceiling and slow down. Sometimes a little change of pace using complex training can help these athletes make the minor gains they need at this level.


Video 6. After conventional squats, athletes can employ rebound jumps immediately after their strength work. After the inertia and speed are refined on the lift portion, coaches can see a better jump profile over time.

Although it’s great to feel fast, it’s better to be fast. With contrast training, your athletes may feel fast after doing slower and heavier work. Having your athletes perform slow or isometric holds to contrast into sprints is excellent if it actually creates a faster sprint time or velocity. Flywheels have a role to play whether you use heavy-slow to fast-light or use fast exercises to improve firing rates in your slow, heavy work. When we do complex training with flywheels, we simply replace conventional exercises with flywheel or isoinertial exercises. Simple as that.

Seven

Accentuated Eccentric Overload

The most demanding of all eccentric overload methods are the accentuated options—any methods that go beyond 100% maximal effort. As soon as an athlete hits a load they can’t perform concentrically, they’ve entered extreme territory, even if it’s with only one kilo. The million-dollar question is how much overload past 100% of concentric ability is necessary to get a greatly accentuated overload. I have seen theoretical numbers like 10-20%, but so far we’ve experienced benefits from 5-10%.


Video 7. Adding a shrug and your hips through the RDL will add more vertical force than the conventional exercise. Following the concentric motion with a bracing pattern does increase the eccentric contraction if timed right.

The biggest challenge in training is knowing how much overload is enough to make a difference. Since accentuated eccentric overload (AEC) is on the far side of the spectrum, it’s difficult to prescribe the perfect effort. In addition to the difficulties with selecting the right overload, flywheels are very dependent on feedback beyond the selected flywheel disc; you need to use the kMeter or you’re just guessing. AEC is no joke. If you choose to use it, you must be careful and have a solid understanding of an athlete’s past efforts and abilities.

I recommend sticking with the very familiar and primary movements when using AEC with the flywheel. Squatting and such make the most sense to me, as they’re the most familiar and are patterns people are used to loading heavily. If you’re not sure where to start in terms of loading, you can use traditional flywheel squats and look at the kMeter data to determine the athlete’s eccentric abilities. I’m sure you could also use force plate data or traditional squat information to create a map for your athletes.

Isoinertial Power
Image 1. Using a kMeter, you can see how an RDL can be made more effective with small changes to the technique. Recently, the kMeter was validated as a reliable measure, but you can add external sensors if you wish.


It’s important to note, as most will understand, that AEC methods will bring along a considerable amount of soreness for some athletes. I’m not aware of much research that’s gone beyond short studies, but it seems like off-season training would be the time to incorporate these methods and save the athlete some in-season pain. It might also make sense to allow the athlete to auto-regulate the remainder of the session or even the training week in response to what happens after AEC training.

#AECflywheel workouts reset what is possible for less demanding training & raise the ceiling for resilience and athlete durability, says @ExceedSPF. Share on X

AEC workouts reset what is possible for less demanding training and raise the ceiling for resilience and athlete durability. You only need a few sessions to make real progress, so be cautious when first prescribing volume.

Advanced Training Is for Advanced Trainees

Just because an athlete is elite on the field doesn’t mean they’re an advanced athlete in the weight room. Of course, you should consider their level of ability. If an athlete has a low training age, you need to train them based on what they can do in training—not how good they are in their sport. Most of the exercises and training methods in this post will come in handy years from now if an athlete is new to flywheel training and for programming for experienced athletes. Experiment and see what works for you, as every training program is unique and must make sense for the athlete and the coach.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



High School Strength Training

9 Core Principles for High School S&C Coaches (I Learned From Teachers)

Blog| ByJohn Garrish

High School Strength Training

There are so many more reasons to love and appreciate working at the high school level and, in particular, on a high school campus, but the one that I feel is often overlooked is the colleagues we work with. I’m lucky not only to work on a collaborative campus with some of the brightest teachers in Florida, but I have numerous teachers in close quarters who I call family. Working in near proximity to teachers has not only changed my outlook on the “how’s” of coaching, but also the “why’s” of doing it. There is so much we can learn from teachers and the principles of education; admittedly, they are resources that I ignored for far too long in my own coaching experience.

Working in near proximity to teachers has not only changed my outlook on the “how’s” of coaching, but also the “why’s of doing it, says @John_Garrish. Share on X

As the saying goes, coaching is teaching, and teaching is coaching. Although some of these principles directly apply to programming strategies—i.e., an emphasis on motor learning and teaching movement patterns—the more important ideas run a little bit deeper than that. It’s important to note that although not all of these ideas are universally accepted, they are principles that I’ve absorbed and practice as a result of learning from the teachers around me.

One

The Student Comes First

This isn’t to say that we shouldn’t look out for ourselves and each other as professionals, but as educators, we’ve agreed to an unwritten oath of unconditionally putting our students and their growth first. As a result of this idea, we’ve adapted our training program to a more autoregulative and autonomous approach. Readiness reports and surveys let the students know we care about how they feel and value their feedback. Accepting their feedback to adjust their training creates a sense of identity and ownership in the program, just the way it does in the classroom.

Two

Every Student Matters

In the team setting, sometimes we get lost in the sauce of wins and losses, trends and standards. I love working in a group setting because I get to see a large number of young people come together around a common goal. However, when we’re caught up in “getting with the program,” we can sometimes outcast the outliers.

I think it goes without saying that it doesn’t matter how much a young person contributes on the field; they should still be coached with the same attention given to a future Division 1 All-American. I suppose the more controversial thought would be that this is especially true for us as high school coaches because we are not hired or employed for the sole purpose of bringing more wins. I could be nearsighted, but I have yet to hear of an administration-hired high school strength and conditioning coach being fired for losing games.

We encourage every student to participate in our S&C program, and I think the diversity of participants is the most enjoyable part of being a high school strength coach, says @John_Garrish. Share on X

We encourage every student to participate in our strength and conditioning program, especially those who are resistant at first. I think the diversity of participants is the most enjoyable part about being a high school strength coach. There’ll be times in our room when we have kids from every sport and non-sport, with different abilities and individualized learning plans on campus. The differentiated progressions and regressions they find in the weight room are similar to what they experience in their classrooms.

Three

Parents Are the Ultimate Support Staff

Most strength and conditioning coaches, and coaches in general, considering a start or move to the high school level have concerns with eventual parent interaction. One of my unfortunate thoughts was that I didn’t want anything to do with parents because all I read were the headlines and all I heard were the horror stories. This led me to avoid parents like the plague during my first couple years working at the high school level. As a result, any time I heard from a parent it was because of a concern they had or bad news. Full disclosure: It was usually a failure on my part to communicate with them!

Midway through year three, I decided that I would over-communicate with parents, and instead of being reactive, I’d be proactive and include parents in as much as possible. What I found was parents who wanted to participate and contribute, and students who heard echoes of what they heard on the weight room floor at their dinner table. If you want the ultimate “buy-in,” start with the parents—the students will follow.

FourNever, Ever Give Up on a Child

Children are not miniature adults and, thankfully, are still growing and changing. One of my greatest regrets as a high school coach is holding on to a first, second, or even third impression of a few students for too long and allowing that impression to get in the way of instructing and mentoring them. I think it’s a standard rallying point for strength coaches, especially in a college environment, to form a “get with it or get lost” mentality, and that was something I clung to for my first few years.

What I’ve realized now, after a few years of experience, is that some of the most strongly forged mentorships with young people start with or include some form of early conflict. If you write off a high school student every time they act up or fail to follow orders, you’ll be left with nobody to coach. In a voluntary training environment like ours, my hot-headed self was not nearly as productive in building a program as I am now, coming from a position of patience and understanding.

Five

Stress Is Stress

 One of the great things about being a high school performance coach is being able to be around 14- to 18-year-old kids all day. On one hand, some of their “problems” are laughable—the relationship stress, the worry of getting a B+ instead of an A on a test, Instagram shutting down, etc. On the other hand, some of our students have faced circumstances and seen things that I couldn’t fathom, putting some of my own “problems” into perspective.

From a training standpoint, it’s important to realize that any stress we might add to a young person’s plate is likely magnified because of their emotional state, says @John_Garrish. Share on X

These stressors, no matter how big or small, captivate the young high schooler’s mind and are often all they can think about. From a training standpoint, it’s important to realize that any stress we might add to a young person’s plate is likely magnified because of their emotional state.

Six

Inspiration Is the Most Potent and Contagious Tool

We’ve all seen the movies that depict two types of classrooms: one that’s lifeless and unmotivated, with an uninterested teacher; and one that’s vibrant and full of passion, with students from similar walks of life who are lucky enough to have a teacher who’s optimistic enough about young people that they create a classroom climate and culture of positivity. One story comes from a place of pessimism, of “the teacher’s always right,” of disregarding circumstances and faulting “kids these days.” The other features a teacher who sees the classroom as a student-centered place of growth and problem-solving, not just for the students but for themselves.

Walk down any high school hallway and you’ll see classrooms just like each of these, side by side, with the exact same students at different times. It isn’t the room number or the decorations on the wall; it isn’t even the subject matter that’s inspiring or failing to inspire the students—it’s the teacher. Similarly, walk by the sport practices after school and you’ll find similar contradictions in inspiration, fire, and excitement. We challenge kids to never take the easy way out and tell them there’s no easy button in life, yet as coaches, we hit the easiest easy button of them all by using the “kids these days don’t care” excuse as cover for our own lethargic programming.

Seven

Some of the Most Successful People Were the Worst Students. Some of the Best Athletes Are the Worst ‘Workers.’

More likely than not, a main reason we get into teaching and/or coaching is because we’ve been personally influenced by a teacher or coach in the past. I can say with even more certainty that we serve in the role that we do because we believe in the value of the classroom and/or the weight room and probably worked hard in them when we were our students’ ages. Not all of our students will become teachers, just as not all of our athletes will become strength coaches, and that’s all okay.

Everyone’s interests will be about as different as their genetic gifts, and although once in a while the highest performers are the hardest workers, this is far from always the case. Just because a young person doesn’t “get it,” it doesn’t mean they lack drive or motivation; it doesn’t mean the child doesn’t want to succeed. Albert Einstein dropped out of school at 15, and I haven’t read too much about his “laziness.” I’d be equally surprised to find that the 20 American dropouts who became billionaires did so without some semblance of motivation.

There are plenty of athletes, especially young athletes, who have excelled without the weight room or with minimal work in the weight room. That’s not to say that their luck won’t run out or that others won’t eventually catch up as a result of their own hard work, nor is it to say that the weight room and the classroom are unimportant. Instead, I mean to bring perspective to a young person’s beliefs for why they might (wrongly) think the classroom or weight room is “not for them,” because they’ve had success without it.

The weight room needs high performers as much as high performers need the weight room, so it’s necessary to inspire both the student and the team to see the direct benefit. I’ve found many of the students who’ve outperformed their weight room work ethic have done so due to a motivation on the field/court that’s not lacking. The student has it in them, and nine times out of 10 wants to succeed in their sport; their means of doing so is what’s misconstrued.

Students will undoubtedly see the benefit of a long-term S&C program, but to get there it takes a passionate, understanding educator to turn on the switch for them, says @John_Garrish. Share on X

The fulfillment and direct mark of improvement with a ball in their hands or on their field of play seems closer than the gains made in the weight room that are just one step away from what they feel on the court. With time and experience, students will undoubtedly see the benefit of a long-term strength and conditioning program, but to get there it takes a passionate, understanding educator to turn on the switch for them.

Eight

Failure Is a Necessity

In my competitive years, I had frustrating tendencies that didn’t bode well for my “bad” practices. Whenever I had a practice that didn’t run without a hiccup, I’d get frustrated and, in the words of Tony Holler, I’d (mentally) “let today ruin tomorrow.” That meant not only would I be frustrated and mentally captured for the rest of practice, I’d try harder the next day and think somehow that would fix things.

One of the benefits of studying sports psychology in graduate school was being around classmates who were smarter and a lot more level-headed than me. A classmate of mine pointed me toward a better approach to practice; what he called a “no bad practices” approach. If you had said this to me before that day, I would’ve assumed it was a rally cry from my high school coach demanding perfection at every practice. Instead, it was an ideological outlook and approach to practice that would change my own perspective when things didn’t go “right.”

Instead of thinking “I did something wrong” at practice, I began to think “I found something I can improve on” instead. When all of our practices go so well that there’s nothing to improve on, I’d hope our team is winning because the ceiling is a bad place to be in a losing locker room.

Nine

If You Don’t Enjoy It, They Don’t Enjoy It

Children are really good at sensing and modeling energy. Weight rooms often reflect the energy of the coach just as a team usually takes on the mentality of their coach. That mentality could be reflected and presented in many different ways, and no two people have the same demeanor. However, one absolute non-negotiable is that, as educators, we see the value in what we do and there is enjoyment in what we do. Not every atmosphere is easygoing—that’s not the point—there are programs that are successful on both sides of the coin. The enjoyment is found in the outcome.

Weight rooms often reflect the energy of the coach just as a team usually takes on the mentality of their coach, says @John_Garrish. Share on X

In education, students (and teachers) usually find joy in the acquisition of new information. In training, athletes (and coaches) usually find the joy in acquiring new skills or bettering old ones to aid development on the field of play. If teachers/coaches and students/athletes don’t share this joy, then there is a very low likelihood for success in their arena. For coaches, it doesn’t matter where the lack of enjoyment stems from, the kids will sense it and mirror it. Much like some of the previous points on inspiration, this is largely the responsibility of the teacher or coach.

Teachers Benefit Us All

The benefits of working on a high school campus are endless and, of course, begin and end with the kids. However, working alongside teachers has been a tremendously rewarding experience not only for me personally, but for how I coach, interact, and program for our students. There are thousands of ways the teachers of our community have helped our strength and conditioning program; unfortunately, I couldn’t list all of them in the confines of this article. Teachers are generally loyal, honest, and goodhearted people who make great colleagues, but their greatest quality of all is their absolute selflessness and sacrifice for the betterment of our children.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



Speed Trap

30 Years Later: A Review of Speed Trap by Charlie Francis

Blog, Book Reviews| ByNoah Kaminsky

Speed Trap

I was born in 1991, one year after Charlie Francis published Speed Trap, three years after he coached Ben Johnson to another 100m world record in Seoul, 14 years after Francis became a part-time coach at Scarborough Optimist Track Club, and 24 years after he competed for Stanford University track and field. When Francis began coaching, he was 28 years old, and he had dozens of leftover, unanswered questions about training from his college days.

  • How does the central nervous system influence performance?
  • When is high-volume appropriate for sprint training?
  • How much recovery is necessary for high-intensity repetitions within a practice session?

I am also 28, but these questions do not keep me up at night: Francis—and other valuable coaches in our sport—answered them for us. In the 1970s, our modern training glossary existed only disparately in the minds of a few coaches whom Francis would one day seek out and learn from. These coaches included Percy Duncan, Gerard Mach, Horst Hille, and Bishop Dolegiewicz, whose methods Francis learned, refined, and integrated into his own widely respected national sprints program.

Today, we know more about training because of Charlie Francis. Almost 30 years after its publication, Speed Trap remains one of our fundamental texts for coaching and developing sprinters.

High School High: Intensity + Volume

I’m not sure whether to be disappointed or mad. While Francis innovated and elevated sprinting, I still observe track coaches relying on the same high-volume training methods Francis rejected. Somehow, my high school track coach never got the memo about his own antiquated, injury-inducing methods. I suffered through the same high-volume, moderate-intensity prescriptive training that Francis experienced in college, which left me speedless and depleted.

Although I earned some medals and my name continues to carry weight at my alma mater, I now know to attribute my success to my supportive parents and earlier athletic experiences. In Speed Trap, Francis’s reflections urged him to advocate for longer rest intervals between repetitions and more recovery days between high-intensity workouts.

For me, this same training philosophy came from my parents, who always felt they were fighting my misinformed understanding about recovery. I didn’t understand how much recovery I needed to overcome my coach’s developmentally inappropriate workouts.

I didn’t understand how much recovery I needed to overcome my coach’s developmentally inappropriate workouts. Share on X

Both high-intensity and high-volume track workouts necessitate a certain prerequisite strength, which depends on the athlete’s physical development and their training age. When applied and periodized correctly, either type of workout will improve an athlete’s speed and prevent injury.

In my freshman year of high school, I was slightly better off than some of my teammates because I had a more advanced training age. I had played club soccer for many years before running track and had a wonderful soccer coach who emphasized age-appropriate strength and conditioning. I wasn’t immune to the wear and tear of high-volume sprint workouts, but I certainly didn’t suffer from shin splints as often as my teammates did.

In my sophomore year, I missed an entire week of practice and competition after a single track practice that included high-intensity, high-volume sprints, five reps of prisoner jumps down a 40m hallway, and a few jelly-leg sprints to close out the workout. The next day, it hurt to walk. I was too sore to jog. My quads were tender to the touch for a week straight. No bragging rights earned for completing the workout were worth the training time I lost in the week afterward.

Walking On to Run

Looking back, those four seasons of high school track were remarkably similar to Charlie Francis’s description of collegiate track in the 1960s. In Speed Trap, Francis contextualized his abysmal performances by explaining that in the American “haphazard system…only a few would thrive” because “development was a matter of chance.” He was a good athlete who became a great athlete after he left college because Percy Duncan taught him to have patience with his training.

Similar to Francis, I was a good athlete and a product of that same “haphazard system.” But I never became a great athlete because I never found a coach like Duncan until after my window of opportunity had closed. The difference between the two of us is that Francis was no more than a product of the accepted training systems of his time while I’m a product of the system more than a decade after it had been rejected.

When I barely walked onto my college track team in the Fall of 2009, I finally saw a sprints group that practiced low-volume workouts. Not all workouts were high-intensity, but low-volume training was a beneficial step in the right direction for me. Unfortunately, the workouts were periodized poorly with our strength training, and we were overloaded.

In Speed Trap, Francis acknowledged that his sprinters required substantial recovery from the highest intensity sprint workouts before they could reproduce similar performances. He also discovered that all training factors cumulatively affected the central nervous system (CNS). For example, a max effort strength workout on Day 1 would reduce an athlete’s ability to sprint at race pace on Day 2, and vice-versa. The CNS requires holistic recovery from any biomotor skills that fry it.

Although I couldn’t see it at the time, I now understand that CNS fatigue obstructed my success in college and high school. And it wasn’t just me. Many athletes never lived up to their personal best performances from high school, or they were consistently nursing injuries. It was my second experience observing programmatic problems in track and field.

I stopped competing after my freshman year in college because I wasn’t good enough to continue. Like Francis at the end of his collegiate experience, I had many lingering questions about training. At the time, I didn’t realize that I also was sowing the seeds of coaching my sport years before I would consider the profession.

The More Things Change

In 2016, when I began coaching high school track in New York City, I observed “old school” all over again. Many teams still relied on high-volume training methods. While Francis wrote “precision matters more than effort” back in 1990, here I was in 2016 watching effort alone as hundreds of track athletes jogged, ran, hobbled, or bounced by me.

As I coached my jumpers and throwers, I watched athletes from other teams zip past on the track as they strained to finish repeat 300m or 400m reps with minimal rest. I didn’t have to know the kid or their coach to realize how they were training. If sprinting called for precision—”constant adjustments and interconnected variables”—then this was not sprinting. This was fatiguing, and it was exhausting to watch. Then, I started reading about it.

I became a voracious consumer of sports science research and coaching education. I sought new mentors who helped me realize that training for speed and power had shifted away from high-volume and increasingly toward high-intensity and low-volume, with ever more consideration for the CNS. I found myself reading SimpliFaster articles on the subway commute to and from work every day. I was looking for my coaching compass, and Charlie Francis helped me find it.

Polished Methods and Tarnished Medals

For anyone familiar with Francis’s coaching—or track and field history—you may remember how performance-enhancing drugs tarnished Francis’ professional record. At the 1988 Seoul Olympics, Canadian sprinter and former world record holder Ben Johnson tested positive for stanozolol. He was stripped of the gold medal in the 100m dash, which implicated Francis for his use of steroids with the rest of the Canadian sprint team. In Speed Trap, Francis offers his perspective on this episode, which begins with his personal athletic story and builds to the heartbreaking climax of the 1988 100m final.

Francis signaled what lies ahead and acknowledged the irresolute state of drug use in professional athletics worldwide. To his credit, this has been excruciatingly accurate. When we balance this against the evidence of corruption he presented in various agencies, like the International Olympic Committee (IOC), World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), World Athletics (formerly IAAF), and Athletics Canada, his solutions to the steroid epidemic seem reasonable and relevant today.

If Charlie Francis is anything, he is honest.

The Francis Legacy

Speed Trap is more than a darkened truth—it’s an instruction manual for training. Whether they realize it or not, modern sprint coaches use similar methods to those Francis developed in the 80s with athletes like Ben Johnson, Angela Issajenko, Desai Williams, and Tony Sharpe. Francis’ athletes and mentors compounded his understanding of technique, fitness, and periodization until his coaching became synergistically independent.

The result was athlete-centered sprint programming, periodized with an Eastern Bloc model for strength training and recovery. In Speed Trap, Francis described his methods plainly and offered justification for each aspect of his sprints program with personal anecdotes from the mentors who supported him. Today, these training philosophies remain vibrantly alive in programs like Feed the Cats, developed by Tony Holler, or Complete Track & Field, by Latif Thomas. Both USATF and USTFCCCA emphasize low-volume sprint training in their respective coaching courses.

I wonder now if coaches who haven’t adopted better methods have done so because they are too lazy to change their systems. Or have they demonized Francis and never entertained that his methods were superior regardless of his association with performance-enhancing drugs? I think you can guess what I believe.

I have no problem admitting that my personal account offers a mere sliver of the vast number of track and field programs that exist nationwide. There are, without a doubt, great coaches and teams in the United States who are training the next generation of world-class athletes.

Francis made a sizeable dent in our global understanding of sprint training. But we still have a long way to go until his methods are widely accepted and practiced. If your only takeaway from Speed Trap is that it’s time to forget those 4x300m or 10x200m workouts, sprint training will move in the right direction.

Speed Trap defines the generational shift necessary for coaches to improve sprint training & fix the unveiled culture of performance-enhancing drugs. Share on X

Speed Trap illuminates the generational shift necessary for coaches to improve sprint training and fix the unveiled culture of performance-enhancing drugs in track and field. To date, it remains a worthy read for any coach (novice or expert) in the sport. I would rather learn from a great coach who advanced our sport than demonize him for practices that remain widespread.

I’m a better coach for asking questions, for challenging the status quo, and for reading Speed Trap. Thank you, Charlie.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Dan Weaving

Managing Team Sport Work Load Intelligently with Dan Weaving

Freelap Friday Five| ByDan Weaving

Dan Weaving

Dr. Dan Weaving is a Lecturer in Sports Performance within the Carnegie Applied Rugby Research Centre at Leeds Beckett University and works as an applied sports scientist at Leeds Rhinos Rugby League Club. He is in his 10th year working in professional rugby league. Dr. Weaving gained his Ph.D. in 2016 and has experience working as a strength and conditioning coach, transitioning to a sports scientist with the increased use of data to support S&C practice. Alongside his applied science work, Weaving’s research interests focus on the multivariate quantification, modeling, and visualization of training load and response data, including the use of analysis techniques such as principal component analysis and partial least squares correlation analysis to help facilitate the use of data to help decision-making. He has published a number of peer-reviewed articles in this area.

Freelap USA: You have a great publication on modeling performance for the sport of rugby. In the U.S., most of the sports at best only monitor load with their athletes. Can you explain some of the complexities of trying to measure the training process?

Dan Weaving: While monitoring load is an essential aspect of measuring the training process, we can all appreciate that the true value is only achieved by understanding the relationship between load and both acute (e.g., measures of fatigue) and chronic (e.g., measures of training adaptation) outcomes.

We want to understand the dose-response for individual athletes, and as athletes will respond differently to the same load, we need to understand their own responses. However, when you start to unpack how we can measure these very broad areas of the training process, we start to see how complicated this can quickly become.

For example, if we consider the training load of an American football athlete across a single week of training, we know they undertake a lot of different modes (technical-tactical work, resistance training, speed, conditioning, etc.) that mean they complete a lot of different activities (i.e., external load—accelerations, distance, sprinting, 3×5 reps @ 70% 1RM, etc.). This will lead to different internal loads for the different physiological systems and, therefore, different accumulated fatigue responses.1

So, if we view “load” and “response,” etc. as all-encompassing terms for the training process, we can only conclude that we require different measures to represent these different aspects of “load” and different measures to represent different aspects of the “fatigue” response across the training week. However, at the moment, we collect multiple measures, but then in our modeling we try to extrapolate a single measure to represent each area (e.g., load = distance or heart rate TRIMP; fatigue = countermovement jump or heart rate variability), run multiple models, and expect to have a good understanding of the training process.

We need to move away from providing tables with lots of numbers or multiple line graphs to decision-makers who have a more limited background interpreting data than we do. Share on X

My view is that to gain a more valid model of these all-encompassing terms of load and response, we need to represent both areas with a number of variables in our models. While it is, of course, crucial to consider the reliability of the individual measures first, with developments in technology, a sports scientist in the field is still left with a number of measures that have been shown to be reliable! So how do you choose which to monitor? And how do we provide a lot of information in an understandable way to the coach? I think we need to completely move away from providing tables listing a lot of numbers or multiple line graphs to decision-makers who have a more limited background interpreting data than we do.

Freelap USA: Building on your outlined framework for load and response models, can you also highlight some of the steps/approaches to upgrade a simple monitoring program to something more sophisticated with regard to modeling?

Dan Weaving: To upgrade to a more sophisticated modeling system, we need to somehow represent the complexity of the overall training process highlighted previously, but in a way that we can communicate simply to the actual staff who design and deliver the training programs. We’ve proposed techniques such as principal component analysis to reduce multiple measures into simpler/fewer variables to represent the training process2 and as a method to evaluate which measures you could remove or keep within from your monitoring workflow3.

Figure 1 Dan Weaving
Figure 1. Plot of the principal components for each training day for external load variables (x-axis = body load, total distance, high-speed-distance) and internal load variables (y axis = session RPE and individualized training impulse) across 712 training days.


Using PCA, we’re able to condense a lot of data onto a single graph without losing much information. In this example (figure 1), we’ve reduced five training load variables (3 x microtechnology, sRPE, and heart rate) across 712 training sessions (712 * 5 = 3,560 data points) onto a single graph. By adding color coding to the data points to highlight different contexts (e.g., training types, training days, players), we can use the same data to provide us with a lot of different insights into the training process (as highlighted in the figures below).

Our duty as applied sports scientists is to advance our practices in this area and actually help the people who need to benefit from our data, says @DanWeaving. Share on X

We feel techniques like PCA can help to balance the theoretical complexity of the training process with the practical reality of avoiding data overload for the people who actually design and deliver the training in our fast-paced environments. While the math underlying PCA might be complicated, you don’t need to understand it to implement it, and there are plenty of online resources to walk you through its implementation. Plus, if your sole role is an applied sports scientist, I feel it is our duty to advance our practices in this area and actually help the people who need to benefit from our data, rather than simply paying lip service to our role (e.g., “there is no point, the coach doesn’t listen”).

Figure 2 Dan Weaving
Figure 2. Comparison of external and internal load responses of two players during the same training session.


Figure 3 Dan Weaving
Figure 3. Comparison of the external and internal loads between different training modes (small sided games, speed, technical-tactical training) across 712 training sessions using principal component analysis.


Figure 4 Dan Weaving
Figure 4. Comparison of the internal and external load responses for an individual player at the start and end of a training program when completing the same session. The green dot highlights a much lower internal load for a similar external load, providing some insight into training adaptation.


Freelap USA: Collisions in rugby can complicate recovery patterns and other components of play. Now that microsensors have evolved, what can professionals in sports such as American football and ice hockey learn from your rugby research? What should contact sports learn from the science that is available?

Dan Weaving: Quantifying and understanding the response to collisions is the holy grail for contact sports such as rugby league, American football, etc. I might be biased, but I feel that rugby league has a critical mass of researchers attempting to understand this topic, from its mechanistic aspects (Mitch Naughton – University of New England4) to the relationship between collisions and fatigue responses (Chelsea Oxendale – Chester University5, Dr. Greg Roe – Bath Rugby and Leeds Beckett6) to its impact on energy expenditure (Nessan Costello – Leeds Beckett University7) to understanding the highest collision intensities of competition (Dr. Rich Johnston – Australian Catholic University, Billy Hulin – St. George Illawarra Dragons8).

An important step has been the valid automation of collision detection in rugby league9. This has allowed us to more easily quantify the collision frequencies of training and competition. We’ve recently published a study8 investigating the highest collision intensities of competition, which we found can be as high as 15 collisions (either attack or defense) in a five-minute period of the match, highlighting just how tough the match can become! This should hopefully help the design of training practices to expose players to this intensity, particularly during return to play protocols.

From a response point of view, work by Nessan Costello7 within the Carnegie Applied Rugby Research Centre at Leeds Beckett (led by Professor Ben Jones) has highlighted the effect of collisions on the energy expenditure of adolescent rugby league players. When matching the training week and measuring energy expenditure with the gold standard (doubly labeled water), we observed a seven-day increase in energy expenditure of ~1200 kcal when the training week included 20 match intensity collisions compared to a non-collision week (see figure 5).

Given that rugby players and American football players will likely have more than 20 collisions when training and competing, the study highlights the important nutritional considerations when working with collision athletes, and also when training periods have an elevated collision prescription during training. After all, an important element of success in collision sports is to maintain appropriate muscle mass and strength to be successful in the collision bout, and, therefore, as practitioners we really need to focus in on how that impacts the athlete’s variability in nutrition away from the organization.

In addition to collision frequency, the holy grail is to get a valid measure of collision intensity, and this is where a lot of future work should focus, says @DanWeaving. Share on X

In the future, the holy grail will be to get a valid measure of collision intensity too, and this is where I feel a lot of future work should focus. It might be that we need to integrate other technologies than GPS, etc. to provide a valid understanding of this. For example, I feel monitoring mouthguards (e.g., Prevent Biometrics) could help this by measuring head accelerations, and this is probably where American football is ahead.

Figure 5 Dan Weaving
Figure 5. Summated total energy expenditure across non-contact (nCON) and contact (CON) training microcycles. Bar charts and dashed lines represent mean and individual total energy expenditure changes, respectively.


Freelap USA: High-intensity work on the field is hard to monitor and even visualize. When communicating their practices to team coaches, how do you recommend strength coaches who don’t have a full-time sports scientist chart out their practices to warn them of risk? With the ACWR taking some heat now, what are other promising options to communicate workload?

Dan Weaving: I think if I was an S&C coach without a sports scientist to help me translate the data to coaches, I would focus less energy on communicating the total training load (e.g., weekly total distance/ACWR, etc.) that has no contextual relevance for the coach. Instead, I would try and communicate the data through the coach’s drill terminology and measure the training intensity that specific drills provide. For me, rather than being reactive to “spikes” in training load, you can avoid those “spikes” in the first place through better planning of technical-tactical content (which takes up the largest proportion of field-based training) by helping the coaches to understand which typical components of training load (e.g., average speed, acceleration, high-speed, sprinting) a given drill provides.

This certainly isn’t anything new, but I’ve found that the biggest barrier to achieving this is gaining a consistent classification of the training drills by the coaching staff and then achieving that consistently over time. Some coaches are meticulous with every detail, while others scribble session plans on the back of a piece of paper, never to be seen again. If you’re unfortunate to work with the latter, it can still be done. It just takes more persistence and frequent verbal communication, but I think it pays off in the long run, especially if coaches have “go-to” drills!

Drill Bible
Figure 6. Example drill bible for classifying technical-tactical work.


What was interesting when we took this approach over a long period of time (figure 6) was that the coaches’ “go-to” drills for high-intensity were actually genuinely high-intensity drills (e.g., numbers game, etc.), which was positive. However, the drills typically used on “low-intensity” days, while being low for m/min or high-speed work, actually possessed higher acceleration intensities (e.g., try line shapes, short side defense, etc.—figure 6). For me, this highlights two areas where this type of load monitoring is very useful, as: 1) we were potentially prescribing too high an intensity (from an acceleration POV) on the days that were planned as more recovery sessions, and 2) you can’t just rely on a single measure (e.g., m/min or acceleration) to understand the demands of your training!

Freelap USA: The balance between internal and external monitoring isn’t easy, but it paints a more complete picture than only one method of tracking. Can you share what is a good solution outside of subjective data capture for scholastic athletes ages 14–18 here in the U.S.? With the GPS systems becoming more affordable and improving with data quality, how can an athlete take care of their own monitoring without overthinking it?

Dan Weaving: Based on the work we have completed in rugby league/rugby union, team sport athletes capturing their own data can achieve a good, but simple, monitoring system by tracking three measures: the overall volume of the session (e.g., total distance), the high-intensity aspect of the session (e.g., distance > 5 m/s), and then internal response (e.g., HR TRIMP). If sprinting is a key component of your sport, adding in exposure to 95% maximal speed could potentially be useful to take that count to four measures.

Team sport athletes capturing their own data should track three measures: the overall session volume, high-intensity aspect of the session, and internal response, says @DanWeaving. Share on X

Adding other measures is likely just adding redundant and less streamlined data.3 Simply tracking the total weekly load and how that changes can help with progression/regression of training volume. If the aim is to track changes in training response in a simple way, I really like the training efficiency index proposed by Dr. Jace Delaney.

Training efficiency is the relationship between your external output and your internal response and how this changes over time. If we think about it in its simplest sense, just like a car, if we use less fuel (internal load: heart rate) for the same speed (external load: distance), then this could suggest adaptation to training (e.g., better “miles to the gallon”). The value in this method is tracking the changes in efficiency over time. Dr. Delaney even provides a useful spreadsheet so that you can implement this without having to learn the underlying calculations!

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



References

1. Weaving, D., Jones, B., Till, K., Abt, G., and Beggs, C. “The case for adopting a multivariate approach to optimize training load quantification in team sports.” Frontiers in Physiology. 2017; 8: 1024.

2. Weaving, D., Beggs, C., Barron, N.D., Jones, B., and Abt, G. “Visualizing the complexity of the athlete monitoring cycle through principal component analysis.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2019; 1304–1310.

3. Weaving, D., Barron, N.D., Black, C., et al. “The same story or a unique novel? Within-Participant Principal Component Analysis of Training Load Measures in Professional Rugby Union Skills Training.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2018; 13(9): 1175–1181.

4. Naughton, M., Miller, J., and Slater, G. “Impact-Induced Muscle Damage and Contact-Sport: Aetiology, Effects on Neuromuscular Function and Recovery, and the Modulating Effects of Adaptation and Recovery Strategies.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2017; 13(8): 1–24.

5. Oxendale, C., Twist, C., Daniels, M., and Highton, J. “The relationship between match-play characteristics of elite rugby league and indirect markers of muscle damage.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2015; 11(4).

6. Roe, G., Jones, J.D., Till, K., et al. “The effect of physical contact on changes in fatigue markers following rugby union field-based training.” European Journal of Sports Science. 2017; 17(6): 647–655.

7. Costello, N., Deighton, K., Preston, T., et al. “Collision activity during training increases total energy expenditure measured via doubly labelled water.” European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2018; 118(6): 1169–1177.

8. Johnston, R.D., Weaving, D., Hulin, B., Till, K., Jones, B., and Duthie, G.M. “Peak movement and collision demands of professional rugby league competition.” Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019; 37(18): 1–8.

9. Hulin, B., Gabbett, T., Johnston, R.D., and Jenkins, D.G. “Wearable microtechnology can accurately identify collision events during professional rugby league match-play.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2017; 20(7): 638–642.

Feairheller-Speed

A Coach’s Guide to Creating Your Own Speed and Agility Program

Blog| ByJason Feairheller



Feairheller-Speed

By Jason Feairheller

In any sport, players and coaches are always looking to improve speed. Training solely in the weight room, however, will not result in anywhere near the same improvements in speed as participating in a well-thought-out speed and change of direction program. As coaches, we always hear about good speed programs, but what does that mean? What are the main components?

Throughout my years of coaching, I’ve created and modified my speed program to help my athletes gain speed as quickly as possible. One of the reasons I’m writing this article is because there are many resources to find good strength programs and progressions, but there are not nearly as many speed programs available. Just as different athletes need different strength programs, there are also different needs for speed training based on the athlete and the sport. This article will go in-depth with each component that a comprehensive speed and change of direction program should include.

Three Types of Speed Training

Athletes need to develop speed in all directions, not just linearly. This is especially true of field athletes. Since speed is the most sought-after element of sports, at Function and Strength we make sure our athletes get a half hour of focused speed training every time they come into the gym. We separate our speed training into three different categories:

  • Multidirectional
  • Acceleration
  • Max speed

Throughout the month, we set up a schedule to make sure all of our athletes get a variety of speed training. The first day has a multidirectional focus, which may include any type of change of direction, lateral movements, and backpedaling. The emphasis is on efficiently stopping or changing direction, as well as learning how to accelerate out of any turn or change of direction.

Our second component is an acceleration day, which includes linear running with a change from a slower speed to a faster speed. This may include static starts, walking-to-sprint transitions, or even a light jog to a sprint.

Because of low temperatures, we can’t train outside in the winter. A non-motorized treadmill has been a game changer for developing top speed year-round with our athletes. Share on X

The last type of speed training we do is our max speed day, which focuses on front-side mechanics and sprints reaching top end speed. We do this by using a non-motorized treadmill. Training in the winter can be tough because low temperatures don’t permit us to go outside. This treadmill has been a game changer with our athletes, as it has allowed us to develop top end speed year-round.

Warm-Up: General to Speed-Specific

As we prepare the athletes for the training session, we begin with a dynamic warm-up that goes from general to specific. The warm-up is specific to the type of speed training taking place that day. A multidirectional day should have a different warm-up than an acceleration or max speed day. Just like you warm up for squats by squatting, we should do specific speed drills as part of the warm-up. A max speed warm-up consists of more hamstring work than a multidirectional day, which has more lateral movements.

Sample General Warm-Up:

  • Banded shoulder dislocate – 10x
  • Heel walk – 10 yards
  • Toe walk – 10 yards
  • Spiderman stretch with rotation – 10x each side
  • Narrow stance squat – 10x
  • Lateral lunge + crossover lunge – 6x each side
  • Banded adductor walk out and back – :20 each side


Video 1. This is a demonstration of the last two exercises of the general warm-up. Specifically, the adductors are often overlooked, so I like to do an exercise targeting the adductors during the general warm-up.

Following the general warm-up, we get into specific warm-ups for the type of speed work we will perform that day.

Sample Multidirectional Warm-Up:

  • Side to side line hops (over, back, and stick) – 5x each side
  • Lateral skip – 10 yards each direction
  • Crossover skip – 10 yards each direction
  • Side to side line jumps (rapid fire) – 2x :03–:05


Video 2. After the general warm-up, athletes perform specific warm-ups based on that day’s type of speed work. These include side to side line hops, side to side line jumps, and lateral skips.

Sample Acceleration Warm-Up:

  • Front to back line hops (over, back, and stick) – 5x each side
  • A-skip – 10 yards
  • Fast feet – 2x :03–:05
  • Falling starts – 2–3x 5 yards


Video 3. Front to back line hops, fast feet, and falling starts are three acceleration warm-ups our athletes perform on days we’re training acceleration.

Sample Max Speed Warm-Up:

  • Snap skip – 10 yards
  • High knees (progressively faster) – 10 yards
  • Single leg buttkicker (progressively faster) – 10x each side
  • Fast claw wall drill – 10x each side

Address Strengthening the Feet in Every Workout

At our facility, drills promoting ankle stiffness and strong feet are one component all athletes do every day—regardless of the speed work. Marv Marinovich, a pioneer in the strength and conditioning field, began to understand early on the role that strengthening the foot played in improving performance. In his book, ProBodX, he writes, “When you exercise barefooted, the nervous system and musculoskeletal systems are more likely to be engaged than if your feet were sleeping comfortably in high-tech shoes.” He continues, “Working out barefooted will improve your abilities in sports, such as running faster, jumping higher…or changing direction.”

At our facility, drills promoting ankle stiffness and strong feet are one component all athletes do every day—regardless of the speed work. Share on X

Single Leg PVC Balance
Image 1: We use the single leg PVC balance exercise to develop foot and ankle strength.


For this reason, we always do some component of our warm-up with shoes off. This may include slant-board holds, rolling on PVC, or some low-level jumping or hopping drills. The goal of all of these drills is to get athletes to minimize ground contact time when jumping or running.

Slant Board Balance
Image 2: Athletes develop ankle strength in different positions by using slant-board holds.


Faster athletes produce greater forces into the ground over a shorter duration of time compared to slower athletes. The importance of strength and stiffness of the feet cannot be understated: Take a video of the feet of a few athletes accelerating and look at the differences in ground contact. When an athlete has a stiff foot, you’ll notice there is less movement of the heel toward the ground when they strike the ground as compared to a slower athlete.


Video 4. Pogo jumps with bare feet challenge the nervous system and musculature of the feet more than wearing shoes does.

Improve the Quality of Movement

As a coach, my No. 1 goal is to improve the quality of movement of my athletes. Simply improving mechanics is one of the easiest ways to improve speed. I want my athletes to understand how they should be moving when doing every type of speed drill. Just like any other movement or exercise, I first look to eliminate the gross faults of the athlete and then fine-tune their mechanics to get them moving as efficiently as possible. Improved efficiency means improving speed.

A good quality of movement means the athlete has proper posture as well as an effective position of the hips and a good shin angle. When performing any drill, think about the purpose of the drill and how to perform it as efficiently as possible. For example, if I have an athlete performing a side shuffle, there are a few things I’ll look at before the athlete even starts the movement. Do they have proper posture, or are they overly rounded in their back? Are they in an “athletic stance”? By that, I mean are they low enough with their hips, and do they have a positive shin angle to keep pressure through the ball of the foot?

A good quality of movement means the athlete has proper posture as well as an effective position of the hips and a good shin angle. Share on X

If the setup is not correct, I cannot expect the athlete to do the drill properly. Then I’ll have the athlete perform the exercise, and I’ll continue to look for quality positions and mechanics. This whole time I’m educating the athlete on what I want to see and how it can help them become a better athlete. If I just have my athletes go through drills without actually teaching them, then I cannot expect them to get better.

For acceleration training, I want athletes to master proper posture and focus on producing horizontal force to build up speed. Athletes who are too upright have a more vertical shin angle. This is not conducive to efficient acceleration. When the shin is vertical, the force into the ground is more vertical, which forces the athlete to stand upright instead of keeping a good lean for acceleration. To become more efficient at accelerating, I utilize a variety of drills, which may include:

  • A-skips
  • Starts from various positions
  • Resisted sprints with a harness

I’m personally partial to using a shoulder harness because I’ve seen too many athletes lose posture and bend too much at the hips with a waist harness. Our maximum speed training still stresses good posture as well as proper front-side positioning of the hip, knee, and ankle. Backside mechanics include an emphasis on quick turnover by focusing on hamstring activation. Building a solid foundation of mechanics from the start sets the athlete up for success as they continue to train. If you don’t address mechanics, an athlete will quickly top out their ability to improve speed in all directions and distances.

Field Athletes vs. Track Athletes

Field sport athletes and track athletes have different needs when it comes to improving speed, due to the primarily linear nature of track sprints. Field sport athletes are constantly stopping, starting, cutting, and changing direction. Rarely in sport will you see an athlete sprint in a straight line without having to change direction or slow down at some point. This is the reason acceleration plays a more important role for field sport athletes.

Let’s look at basketball players, for example. If they can’t stop, start, and accelerate quickly, they’ll easily become exposed on defense and will have a hard time creating offense. At no point in a basketball game will an athlete reach top speed—the court is not long enough. All field athletes still need to train top end speed, but it should not be the only focus of their speed training. Their training should primarily emphasize acceleration and deceleration of movements. I’m a big proponent of the resistance drills Lee Taft uses with the band.

You can use the band as resistance to promote more strength through the movement, or you can use the athlete to pull the athlete into a change of direction, which will focus more on deceleration. You can do a number of variations of sprints, backpedals, side shuffles, and lateral runs with the band. Track athletes, on the other hand, still need to work on acceleration, but top end speed is more important due to the distances of the events.

Rehearsed vs. Reactive Speed Drills

A popular topic in articles and podcasts is transitioning from rehearsed drills to more reactive- based speed drills. In the book, Training for Sports Speed and Agility, Paul Gamble writes: “Alongside the acquisition of component movement skills there is a need for the athlete to be progressively exposed to an unpredictable environment to allow them to develop the ability to execute these movement skills under reactive conditions.”  

Reactive drills can include reacting to another athlete or a tennis ball, or even sprinting to a specific colored cone. There is good reason to make sure both of these elements are part of a speed program. Just like hitting a baseball or kicking a soccer ball, running is a skill. If we think of running and changing direction as a skill, we need to make sure the athlete can perform the skill properly before transitioning them into a completely reactive-based program. If you have someone who wants to play ice hockey but has never skated before, will you have them just play games and expect them to reach their potential? No, you will go over all of the fundamentals to teach them how to stop, turn, cut, and transition from different positions, along with playing games to maximize performance.

The same principle should be applied to any type of speed drill. When looking at how skill acquisition occurs, it first begins with a conscious thought of how we want to move. As more practice of the skill takes place, execution becomes a subconscious thought until it happens without consciously thinking about it.

In our typical speed session, we cover the technique and mechanics of different movements, and then we utilize those movements in reactive-based drills toward the end of our speed work. Since sports involve the cognitive component of the athlete reacting to other players, the ball, and the speed of play, we make sure to get in some type of reactive speed work every session. While an athlete is focused on the cognitive components mentioned, they will not be able to think about any of the mechanics of sprinting such as posture, leg drive, or shin angles. This is why we reinforce good technique and eventually look for some carryover in the reactive-based drills.

Don’t Mistake Speed Training for Conditioning

A mistake many coaches make when it comes to speed development is not allowing ample rest between speed drills. This will compromise the quality of the speed work you are trying to do and will turn the session into conditioning.

Strength coaches need to do their homework on understanding energy systems and the rest periods needed when the goal is improving sport-related speed. Share on X

If you truly want your athletes to get faster, you need to focus on the quality of work you are doing. This means allowing time for the athletes’ ATP as well as CP (creatine phosphate) to be restored. Strength coaches need to do their homework on understanding energy systems and the rest periods needed when the goal is improving sport-related speed.

  • When doing speed drills, an easy rule of thumb is to allow one minute of rest for every second of max effort work for complete recovery.
  • For technique drills or drills done at submax speeds, you do not have to rest as long before starting the next drill.
  • If the athlete starts to look slower or the mechanics get worse, allow them more rest.
  • The time between drills is a great time to review a video of the athlete performing the drills.

How to Utilize Speed Drills for Conditioning

Conditioning for most sports should look to improve the repeated sprint ability (RSA) of the athlete. Very few sports require a steady state of output; instead, you may see the athlete walk, sprint, walk, jog, and sprint. This is typical as an athlete assesses the play and picks and chooses when to make a play and sprint. For this reason, athletes need to get used to doing lots of short sprints and recovering between them. Improving this quality is known as improving RSA. As an athlete gets closer to season, we like to use different drills as conditioning to help prepare them for the demands they will face once the season starts.

Conditioning for most sports should look to improve the repeated sprint ability of the athlete. Share on X

Let’s use a basketball player as an example, again. Instead of having them do repeat 60-meter sprints, I may have them do a multidirectional drill that is the same duration as their 60-meter sprint. This way I still work the energy systems the same way I would, but it’s more specific to the sport of basketball where they’ll have to change direction a lot more. This is a time coaches can get creative and pick conditioning drills based on the athlete and the sport.  

Choose Drills That Address Deficiencies

The purpose of this article wasn’t to tell you what drills to do, but to provide a template of how to develop an effective speed and agility program for athletes. Look for the positions and mechanics you want your athletes to achieve during drills and pick drills to address the deficiencies. More challenging drills are typically longer in duration, include a form of resistance, or involve more acceleration and deceleration by adding in more changes of direction. Be sure to take these factors into account when developing a speed and agility program for your athletes.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



References

Gamble, Paul. (2012) Training for Sports Speed and Agility: An evidence-based approach. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 151.

Marinovich, Marv and Heus, Edith. (2003). ProBodX. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers Inc. p. 23.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 102
  • Page 103
  • Page 104
  • Page 105
  • Page 106
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 164
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

FEATURED

  • Using Speed and Power Data to Bucket and Train Faster Athletes
  • Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive
  • 9 (Fun!) Games to Develop Movement Skills and Athleticism

Latest Posts

  • Rapid Fire—Episode #15 Featuring Kyle Brown: What is Universal Speed Rating (USR)?
  • Why We Don’t Perform Hang Cleans
  • 1080 Sprint: Four Essential Tips You Won’t Find in the Manual

Topics

  • Adult training
  • App features
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Athlete
  • Athlete performance
  • Baseball
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Career
  • Certifications
  • Changing with the Game
  • Coach
  • Coaching
  • Coaching workflows
  • Coching
  • College athlete
  • Course Reviews
  • Dasher
  • Data management
  • EMG
  • Force plates
  • Future innovations
  • Game On Series
  • Getting Started
  • Injury prevention
  • Misconceptions Series
  • Motion tracking
  • Out of My Lane Series
  • Performance technology
  • Physical education
  • Plyometric training
  • Pneumatic resistance
  • Power
  • Power development
  • Practice
  • Rapid Fire
  • Reflectorless timing system
  • Running
  • Speed
  • Sports
  • Sports technology
  • Sprinters
  • Strength and conditioning
  • Strength training
  • Summer School with Dan Mullins
  • The Croc Show
  • Track and field
  • Training
  • Training efficiency
  • Wave loading
  • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series
  • Youth athletics
  • Youth coaching

Categories

  • Blog
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcasts

COMPANY

  • Contact Us
  • Write for SimpliFaster
  • Affiliate Program
  • Terms of Use
  • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Disclaimer

Coaches Resources

  • Shop Online
  • SimpliFaster Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Coaches Job Listing

CONTACT INFORMATION

13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

Alachua, FL 32615

(925) 461-5990 (office)

(925) 461-5991 (fax)

(800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

Loading

Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.