• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
You are here: Home / Blog

Blog

Coaching Adjustments

8 Training Elements That Coaches Must Be Able to Change on the Fly

Blog| ByKeith Ferrara

Coaching Adjustments

The best program that any coach can put together is one that they can adjust at any given moment, so it’s no surprise that the quote I have heard a lot of coaches speak about lately references that the best ability is adaptability. This statement rings even truer during this time when most coaches are out of their comfort zones and trying to find a path to designing effective programs with little to no equipment. When we finally do get back to a state of “normalcy,” coaches will likely go back to the basics and adjust programs based on what was lost during the time they spent away from their athletes.

The best program that any coach can put together is one that they can adjust at any given moment, says @bigk28. Share on X

In this article, I cover areas of adjustments that we, as coaches, need to make on a weekly and/or daily basis in order to design an optimal program to keep our athletes fresh and continue to drive adaptation.

1. Training Goal – Weekly

For my program specifically, I run an undulated block model, so each 2- to 3-week block needs to have a specific goal to facilitate adaptation. I have found this method to be the most effective, since we are forcing the body to adapt to only one specific stimulus (absolute strength, speed strength, etc.), as opposed to pulling it in a million different directions in a single workout. With this type of approach, you must be cognizant of residuals so that you continue to maintain qualities that were previously trained.

We are misguided in thinking every athlete can benefit from the same type of training program since there are so many factors that go into the correct sports performance prescription (training age, playing time, body weight/strength ratio, speed, DSI, etc.). Not only is it important to be able to prescribe the proper training goal to continue to improve performance, but also to be able to scale back when you notice a decline in performance (which could be an indication of overtraining and potentially lead to injury).

I have built sprint training into part of our testing protocol that we do 2-3 times per week. To me, sprinting should be the base upon which all programs are built, so testing a category that has relevance to all sports is a good place to start. I get either 5/10- or 10/20-yard splits, depending on the sport.

After evaluating sprinting numbers, I look at two types of jumps: squat jump and countermovement jump. Using these numbers, I find the athlete’s eccentric utilization ratio (EUR). These two numbers also paint a good picture of what the athlete needs to work on—strength, power, speed, or some combination of them—for their lifting and jumping. This allows me to constantly change the program and help the athlete continue to adapt to the new stimulus being presented.

2. Volume – Weekly

Your program is only as good as the player’s performance in their specific sport. Volume is a huge factor in whether your players are going to feel fresh and ready on game day or overworked and unprepared. Manipulating volume is an art form that coaches must understand early in their career if they want to achieve the goal of improving sports performance.

I preach minimum effective dose and finding the absolute minimum they should do in order to elicit a change. I believe weekly testing allows us to see whether the dose we prescribe is effective in producing change. When you are in-season, manipulating volume is crucial in order to get to peak performance for each competition.

The best approach for manipulating volume so that you find the balance of feeling fresh and addressing the proper stimulus is to develop a base in your off-season and preseason—nothing beats consistent training all year round. Also have weekly testing measures built into place (jumps, sprints, etc.) to be able to see how athletes’ bodies respond to the training. If athletes continue to improve, you are on the right track and have found the correct dose. If athletes start to have decrements in performance over a two-week period, it is time to manipulate volume.

Sometimes the best tool we have as coaches is rest. Another big factor to look at for volume is the number of competitions per week. The volume for the week will change when players have only one competition versus 2-3 competitions in one week. As long as you manipulate volume the proper way, you can maintain the same lift schedule whether they play one or multiple competitions in the same week.

My general rule of thumb is that I have a set number of sets and reps I know they need to hit in order to attack a stimulus. If we are far out, we will hit either the medium or low end of the volume scale. On the day before a game, always hit the low end of the necessary volume and never be afraid to knock down the volume as long as the effort is high. You can even manipulate volume with VBT by having a cut-off point for each athlete once the speed moves below a certain threshold. This tailors the program specifically to each athlete, without getting crazy with exercise selection.

3. Exercise Prescription – Weekly

Your exercise prescription must match the training goal for the specific block. When my goal is to develop absolute strength, I look to do my squatting movements through a full range of motion. In that same block of absolute strength, I like to do all my weightlifting movements from the ground, as you are working more of the force end on the force-velocity curve. As we get to more power- and speed-based movements, depending on training age, I transition my athletes to more partial range of motion squats (either half or quarter squats) to work joint angles that are more similar to actions completed in their sport. I also begin to transition my Olympic movements to below the knee and power positions with a lighter load, working more on the velocity end of the force-velocity curve and increasing the RFD.

4. Exercise Selection – Daily

It doesn’t matter what your exercise selection is for a given day—you must be ready to change the exercise based on a few factors: practice volume, games, injuries, autoregulation measures, etc. I believe as a coach you have two ways to go with changing the exercise selection:

 

    1. Stick with it no matter what (except in the case of injuries).

 

    1. Give players options for exercises that will have similar outcomes.

 

To me, the best plan is one that can be changed at any given moment. For example, my first tier of exercises for Day 1 is a back squat (most of the time). I know if it isn’t an option for the day, we can switch to a front squat, deadlift, trap bar deadlift, safety bar squat, etc. All of those exercises give me a similar outcome to what I am looking for with my first tier.

Have your training day outlined with movements rather than specific exercises. Movements give you multiple options that you can deviate from at any given moment, says @bigk28. Share on X

For the most part, I like to stick with the first option because in the collegiate environment, I think it’s easy for the athletes to get confused with what they actually need versus what they actually want to do. I would give the second option to a more experienced group of players and professionals who have a better idea of how their bodies react to different training stimulus.

Have your training day outlined with movements rather than specific exercises. Movements give you multiple options that you can deviate from at any given moment.

5. Load – Daily

You must manipulate load on a daily basis because body readiness changes on a daily basis. I heard Bryan Mann reference a study where the 1RM of an athlete fluctuated anywhere from 30 kilograms above to 22 kilograms below on any given day. Travis Mash reiterated this same point when he said that your max can fluctuate 17-18% on any given day.

I think the days of just working off of percentages alone are outdated. VBT is the future, and without it, you will never be able to autoregulate efficiently. There are so many affordable options for VBT out there that it should be a priority for strength coaches at all levels. Companies like Vmaxpro do a great job of offering a reasonably priced product for coaches that provides a ton of feedback and valuable information. This lightens the load of inputting numbers and making graphs/charts by yourself and allows you to focus on things that actually help your athletes.

I have found that the most effective strategy for manipulating load is to prescribe percentages to your athletes based on their 1 rep max for that particular exercise and manipulate the load based on the VBT. This requires getting a pre-test measure of 1RM; with the right VBT choice, I can develop load-velocity profiles and look at different ranges the athletes should fit into. It really is simple from there: If the athlete is moving the bar faster than the pre-test measures, increase the load for that day, and if the speed is down for the day, decrease the load. This increases the efficiency and effectiveness of your program.

6. Set Number – Daily

Once again, I think the belief that all athletes need the same exact set numbers for a given exercise in order to drive a particular adaptation is outdated. Athletes are unique individuals, and we must treat them as such. This is where VBT has a huge impact, once again.

By using VBT and working with percent velocity drop-off, you can determine how many sets an athlete can effectively do without overworking them. For some athletes, 3×1 at 85% load might be enough to develop the stimulus for the given day, but if I see the bar moving fast and the quality is still high, we do “bonus” sets to hit the higher end of the threshold and adapt the program specifically to the athlete. Like I said, it is important to have a plan for what your ideal sets and reps range is. Once you have that in writing, you can start to manipulate both ends of the spectrum.

7. Sprint Prescription – Daily

If sprinting is a big part of your program, timing sprints should be too. Timing sprints allows you to make an effective sprint prescription for your athletes daily.

I set the upper limit on my athletes’ sprinting at three reps, as I have found that to be the minimum effective dose necessary to continue to develop speed. However, if I see a significant drop-off from their best on that day, I know that athletes may not be in the optimal state to do the upper limit of speed work.

Timing sprints allows me to see, on any given day, how the nervous system of the athlete is responding, and whether or not we can work up to three reps for that day, says @bigk28. Share on X

Timing sprints allows me to see, on any given day, how the nervous system of the athlete is responding, and whether or not we can work up to three reps for that day. I usually compare their first two reps to their all-time best. If I see times that are significantly slower (roughly two-tenths), I know that it may not be the right day to test their limits. So, while it may not be ideal, we still get two reps of high-speed, high-intensity reps.

Timing sprints also allows you to manipulate load if you choose to do resisted sprints. I’ve heard coaches discuss what the ideal drop-off time is when doing resisted sprints, and I have found the sweet spot to be 125-150% of an athlete’s best time. So, for an athlete with a 20-yard sprint time of 3.0 seconds, the ideal resisted sprint time window is 3.75-4.5 seconds.

I always err on the safe side and aim for the lower end of the range, but at least this gives you a formula to work off of when looking to add or decrease load for resisted sprint work.

8. Plyo Prescription – Daily

This goes along the same lines as the sprint prescription: If jumping is a big part of your program, measuring jumps should be too. When you measure qualities that are part of your everyday program, it creates more value for your athletes. I believe that a system that measures jumps should be one of the staples of any sports performance program. I just bought the MuscleLab Contact Grid, and it might be one of the greatest things I have ever purchased in my career. The amount of information that I can use to help my athletes immediately is beyond anything I could have ever imagined.

I believe that a system that measures jumps should be one of the staples of any sports performance program, says @bigk28. Share on X

Use the same strategy here that you used for the sprints. If you have jumps scheduled as part of the plan, you need to measure each set to see how the athlete’s body is responding for that day. If the athlete’s numbers are significantly lower than what is expected, you should scale back on the volume of jumps. If the numbers are on par or higher, you can go with the planned volume. The default number for me when workouts are spread out over 24-48 hours is three sets of jumps. If athletes don’t have the numbers they usually do, we scale back to 1-2 sets.

The same goes for weighted jumps when looking at prescribing the appropriate load. Let’s look at an example of how I prescribe load for looking at jumps:

    • Player A vertical jump height: 20 inches

Goal of the day: maximum strength @ 90% load

Goal for vertical jump: 20 x .9 = 18 inches

20 inches – 18 inches = 2 inches

When performing a weighted jump exercise for this particular goal, I want my athletes in the range of 2 inches. If the athlete picks a load and jumps higher than 2 inches, they need to increase the load. If the athlete jumps lower than 2 inches, they need to decrease the load. Once again, you must do a pre-testing measure on the jump in order to be able to make this correction in prescribing the appropriate load for jumping.

Effective Programs Need to Be Adjustable

The most effective program is one that you can change at any given moment depending on how your athlete comes into a training session. There are things we need to change from week to week, and there are factors that change daily. Your ability as a coach to manipulate factors will ultimately be the biggest determinant of how effective your sports performance program design is.

Your ability as a coach to manipulate factors will ultimately be the biggest determinant of how effective your sports performance program design is, says @bigk28. Share on X

Never lock yourself into a given workout or exercise selection, as athletes are fluid beings who experience changes in their readiness daily. Finding tests that are easy to perform at the beginning of your workout is key to being able to manipulate your program for that specific day. Having equipment that can be used seamlessly in your workout is another big factor in improving the effectiveness of your program.

Never be afraid to go away from the plan and adapt your program when you feel it is necessary. You can still stay with your core beliefs as long as adaptation and results are your main objectives.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

KBox by Eccentric

kBox Best Practices and Article Anthology

Blog| ByCraig Pickering

KBox by Eccentric

Eccentric loading has been shown to be incredibly effective when it comes to building muscle mass and strength, as well as reducing the risk of a number of injuries. As a result, interest in being able to effectively program and implement eccentric loading within an athlete development program has grown. One space-efficient method is to utilize a flywheel, which harnesses the force the athlete produces during the concentric phase to provide resistance during the eccentric phase—allowing better regulation of load.

A leading flywheel with coaches and athletes is the kBox, manufactured by Exxentric in Sweden (and providing a nod toward the flywheel’s Scandinavian origins). Here, we take a look at the popular kBox articles on SimpliFaster, outlining why it might become an important tool in your toolbox.

kBox

10 Reasons Your Gym Should Buy a kBox

Where else to start but this iconic article from Sean Smith? Here, Smith discusses why all gyms should have a kBox, telling us how his initial skepticism about the product was quickly laid to rest by the results he and his athletes achieved. The reasons for having a kBox, as identified by Smith, include:

 

    • Improved results.
    • Enhanced safety.
    • Portability.
    • A strong level of science underpinning the tool.

 

Free Weights Flywheel

Flywheel Training vs. Weights: What Does Science Say?

 

This is perhaps the seminal SimpliFaster article on flywheel training, authored by Fredrik Correa, founder of Exxentric (the company behind the kBox). Here, Correa breaks down the science underpinning flywheel training, discussing a 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis that detailed the effectiveness of eccentric overload flywheels as a resistance training tool. It’s always crucial to have good science backing up practice, especially when it comes to commercial products, which makes this article especially important.

kBox 3

Exxentric kBox 3 Review

 

Drew Cooper talks us through his thoughts and experience with using the Exxentric kBox 3. Cooper notes that the kBox is surprisingly light—just 27 pounds—and therefore highly portable. The addition of a kMeter—a wireless Bluetooth transmitter displaying kBox training data—allowed Cooper to track and monitor the performance of his athletes, understanding aspects such as their levels of readiness to train and how they were adapting to their training loads. Overall, Cooper was a fan of the kBox, strongly recommending it as a tool in every coach’s armory.

Isoinertial Training

7 Methods of Isoinertial Training Strength Coaches Need

 

In this article, Shane Davenport takes us through the various techniques coaches could utilize to develop their athletes through isoinertial training. This includes:

 

    • Using the kBox for supplemental ancillary training.
    • As a replacement for main exercises (such as the calf raise).
    • As a way of loading athletes under high speed.

 

Davenport also touches on using the kBox as a means of potentiating athletes prior to a major training session or competition, and as a method of harnessing the performance benefits of contrast training. An important read for coaches looking to add isoinertial training to their practice.

Par4Success kBox

Eccentric Rotational Training: Elevating Club Speed with kBox and kPulley

 

Chris Finn of Par4Success guides us through some principles for improving the performance of golfers, with flywheels such as the kBox playing a prominent role. Finn placed 20 golfers into three groups: one group that utilized barbells and standard cables in their training; one that utilized the kPulley for their standard lifts (bench press, back squat, deadlift, bent-over row) and rotational work; and one that used the kBox in a similar manner to the kPulley group. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the flywheel training in enhancing rotational strength and power—making it an important tool in your toolbox.

Finn Sports Sci

Better Coaching Through Science—How to Collect Data That Matters

 

In this article, Chris Finn takes us through his process of what data to collect in the weight room, how to do so, and what it all means—a powerful read for all coaches. The kBox makes an appearance as a recommended tool, with its ability to track power and speed metrics labelled as a huge positive.

kBox Force Plates

How Peak Eccentric Forces Reduce and Rehabilitate ACL Injuries

 

In this article, Carl Valle makes a bold promise: that he will identify the external factors that result in higher ACL injuries, and assist us in reducing their occurrence within our own programs and squads. Valle writes how lower levels of eccentric strength increase the risk of ACL injuries—testing and developing eccentric strength with the kBox is therefore a crucial component in reducing ACL injury risk. Doug Gle cites this article as the main reason he chose to add a flywheel to his program.

Flywheel Vertical Jump

How Flywheel Training Can Help Vertical Jump Performance

 

In many sports, jump height is an important component of successful performance, and in this article Sean Smith breaks down how to use flywheel training—such as the kBox—to enable athletes to jump higher. Smith discusses how he uses force plate data to identify athletes who might be a good candidate for eccentric flywheel training before detailing his methodology for creating great jumpers using a range of exercises carried out on the kBox.

F1 Pit Crew

Screening, Injury Prevention, and Sport Technology Implementation with Ryan Horn

In this article, one of the Freelap Friday Five series, Coach Horn discusses how he uses the kBox to develop athletes, labelling it as one of his most versatile and trusted training weapons. Horn details the progressions he uses, comprised of two-week blocks of eccentric, isometric, and concentric emphases. It’s always great to understand how coaches use key pieces of equipment in the real world, and this article certainly delivers.

Sport Science Flywheel

Sport Science of Flywheel Resistance Training

 

Similar to Fredrik Correa’s article detailed above, this from Carl Valle outlines:

 

    • How flywheels develop athletes.
    • Whether they have an advantage over free weights.
    • What specific adaptations are possible when athletes utilize flywheel training.

 

Valle also explores who can benefit the most from flywheel training—the short answer being “everyone.”

High Speed Eccentric Squat

High-Speed Eccentric Resistance Training in Sports

 

In this article, Jason Feairheller allows us to understand the role of eccentric muscle action in sport, and how we can harness the principle of specificity when it comes to developing eccentric strength. The main method Feairheller outlines is the kBox, describing it as “the best option for high-speed eccentric resistance training.” Feairheller rounds out the article with an overview of the science underpinning eccentric flywheel training, citing studies that demonstrate the tool’s effectiveness.

Eccentric Rotation

Eccentric Overload with Flywheel Training and Rehabilitation

 

While we might often focus on the use of flywheel training as a method of improving sports performance, eccentric loading is also an important way of creating bulletproof athletes. In this article, Brandon Marcello details how the kBox can be used to create eccentric overload, which in turn prevents athletes from getting injured—demonstrating the utility of eccentric flywheel training in athlete enhancement.

Pronertial Flywheel

A Buyer’s Guide to Flywheel Training Equipment

 

In this article, SimpliFaster breaks down what you need to know before purchasing any flywheel training device, and gives an overview of some of the main companies on the market.

Eccentric Flywheel

How to Use the kMeter to Develop Eccentric Power

 

The kMeter is a sensor that is utilized alongside the kBox flywheel, giving us an estimate of the work done per repetition and set. To get the most out of it, we need to spend some time considering what this actually tells us and how we can export and analyze it, and then use this information to improve performance—all expertly laid out in this article by Carl Valle.

Young Athlete kBox Training

Eccentric Training and the Younger Athlete

 

While it may be tempting to think that eccentric training is just for senior and elite athletes, this article by James Baker discusses how eccentric training can be safely and effectively programmed for developing youth athletes. Baker discusses how he introduces the kBox to his athletes, allowing him to safely and effectively increase eccentric overload in a group-wide manner. A crucial read for those looking to utilize the kBox with younger athletes.

Pullup

6 Sure-Fire Eccentric Exercises to Build (and Rebuild) Athletic Monsters

 

Carl Valle profiles eccentric kBox squatting, discussing how his experience using the kBox with athletes provided “the fastest drug-free changes I have seen on paper.” Valle’s protocol with the kBox is six sets of six bilateral squats at the end of a session, and it’s a powerful endorsement for adding the kBox into your program.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Weightlifting

Exploring Weightlifting Sport Science with Tim Suchomel

Freelap Friday Five| ByTim Suchomel

Weightlifting

Originally from Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, Tim Suchomel graduated from East Tennessee State University’s Sport Physiology and Performance PhD program. Before coming to ETSU, he received his bachelor’s degree in Kinesiology from the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh and his master’s degree in Human Performance from the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse. Suchomel is currently teaching and performing research at Carroll University. His research interests include postactivation potentiation, sports biomechanics, power development, athletic performance enhancement, plyometrics, and athlete monitoring for improved performance.

Freelap USA: Catching the bar in the weightlifting movements is controversial, as some coaches have dumped the idea of catching. Being a leader in the research, what do you believe the takeaway is with receiving the barbell in the clean and snatch?

Tim Suchomel: The weightlifting research that I, Paul Comfort, and Kristof Kipp completed has compared catching and pulling derivatives. No acute or longitudinal differences have been shown between the two in some studies1-3, but other studies displayed greater performance potential with weightlifting pulling derivatives4-9. However, it should be noted that none of our research has stated that coaches should stop having their athletes catch the barbell. This is a common misinterpretation and may be due to a couple of reasons.

None of our research has stated that coaches should stop having their athletes catch the barbell. This is a common misinterpretation, says @DrTSuchomel. Share on X

First, individuals may only read the abstracts and/or view the results (tables and figures) of a study instead of reading the entire paper. If this is a common practice, they may miss out on key information. The second cause may not be so much the interpretation of the information, but the resistance to information that challenges a practitioner’s philosophy. Many would agree that the incorporation of traditional weightlifting movements and their derivatives within resistance training programs is a polarizing topic.

Furthermore, a number of weightlifting traditionalists may view variations of weightlifting movements (e.g., catching or pulling derivatives) as inferior lifts because they do not incorporate the full Olympic movement. It should be noted that the purpose of the current research on weightlifting catching and pulling derivatives is not to replace or remove exercises from our coaching toolbox. Instead, its purpose is to expand our coaching toolbox. There are advantages and disadvantages to every weightlifting movement, whether it is the full lift or a partial movement. However, practitioners should keep an open mind and know that both catching and pulling derivatives may be incorporated into resistance training programs to improve performance.

Freelap USA: Building on the earlier question, what is the value of the catch at specific depths, specifically the power clean? Similar to squat depth, coaches will be interested in the topic as it’s very theoretical but also scant on research.

Tim Suchomel: There may be value to catching the bar at various depths at different times throughout the training year. However, this should be based on the training status of the athlete (e.g., technique competency, injury status, etc.), as well as the goals of each individual training phase.

There are several benefits to incorporating the catch. First, by continuing to incorporate a catch, an individual will be able to maintain movement competency when transitioning from triple extension to triple flexion and turning over the bar. From a technique standpoint, this would be advantageous and may be revisited using different catching variations (e.g., mid-thigh power clean, hang power snatch, clean from the knee, etc.)

Second, athletes may benefit from receiving a rapid eccentric stimulus in a front rack (e.g., clean) or overhead position (e.g., snatch). This may allow athletes to improve the eccentric rate of force development qualities and their ability to “accept” or “absorb” a load in specific positions. In fact, Moolyk et al.10 indicated that clean variations may provide an effective training stimulus for load absorption during jump landings. Thus, based on the training goals of the phase(s), athletes may benefit from performing catching variations during low- to moderate-volume strength phases.

Finally, catching the bar may help train an individual’s work capacity. When an athlete performs multiple repetitions with a clean or snatch variation, they can both drop the bar and pick it up again or they can lower it down to their hips from the catch position by absorbing the load. When performing the latter, athletes may increase the amount of work they are completing and, thus, increase their force absorption capabilities. However, it should be noted that performing repetitions in this manner can be very fatiguing and lead to alterations in technique if the exercise is performed with loads that are too heavy.

Freelap USA: What’s your response to those who say catching the bar best affects the core? We have some information about bracing and squatting, but we really don’t have much information on how the torso responds to barbell catching—be it above the head or below.

Tim Suchomel: There is little doubt that catching a barbell during a clean or snatch requires a unique sequence of muscle activation that may train the core musculature. During catching variations, an athlete must produce and maintain a rigid core to effectively “stop” or “absorb” the external load. Due to the rapid acceptance of a load, the rate of force development within the core musculature must be high. Thus, catching the bar may provide an effective training stimulus for the core. However, little is known about how this compares to traditional resistance training movements such as squatting variations, lowering the bar from an overhead position to a front rack position, or weightlifting pulling derivatives. Based on the type of squat, the load (potentially supramaximal during accentuated eccentric training), and the technique used, an athlete can receive a significant stimulus within their core musculature.

There is little doubt that catching a barbell during a clean or snatch requires a unique sequence of muscle activation that may train the core musculature, says @DrTSuchomel. Share on X

Previous research has displayed large magnitudes of muscle activation during back squats11. When an athlete performs the push press exercise for multiple repetitions, they must lower the barbell in a controlled manner; however, performing this motion slowly requires a lot of effort and increases time under tension. Thus, some athletes adopt a strategy where they control the load, but essentially “catch” the load in a front rack position.

Although no research has examined the muscle activation of the core during this motion, there is a larger displacement during this action compared to the catch phase of a clean. Thus, more force absorption may be required based on the external load and technique used. Finally, previous research that has compared the load absorption phases of both catching and pulling derivatives has indicated that the amount of work performed either was no different12 or favored pulling derivatives12-14.

It should be noted that the previous studies did not compare core musculature activation. However, the primary issue with performing this type of research is that the barbell path during an efficient catching or pulling derivative requires the barbell to remain close to the body. An obvious issue with this is that the barbell may make contact with the electrodes that would be used to record muscle activation within the core. Therefore, while catching derivatives may provide a training stimulus for the core musculature, further research is needed to examine its effectiveness compared to other training methods.

Practitioners who use clean and/or snatch for core musculature should also note that the absorption stimulus is primarily based on two things: load and technique. Regarding the latter, it should be noted that the absorption stimulus may actually decrease as technique improves. Specifically, the distance between peak bar displacement and where an athlete catches the bar decreases, thus creating less of a stimulus.

Freelap USA: Since catching the bar is limited in “surfing” the force-velocity curve, wouldn’t pulling variations be king in that area? What are your thoughts on pulling variations and athlete development?

Tim Suchomel: From a theoretical standpoint, weightlifting pulling derivatives expand the original force-velocity curve that is present when using only catching derivatives. On the force side, a catching variation is limited to using a 1RM, whereas weightlifting pulling derivatives may use loads in excess of the catching 1RM due to the elimination of the catch. This is supported by previous studies from Haff et al.15 and Comfort et al.16-17 that used 120% and up to 140% of a catching 1RM when utilizing the clean pull from the floor and mid-thigh pull, respectively.

On the opposite end of the curve, catching derivatives are limited in their capacity to produce a velocity stimulus due to the deceleration of the body that must take place in order to perform an efficient catch. While lighter loads may be used to increase the velocity of the movement, it should be noted that athletes tend to use the minimum amount of effort needed to elevate the barbell to a position that allows them to perform the catch phase. If maximal effort were to be used with lighter loads, this may result in a poorly performed catch phase due to the likely larger displacement of the barbell.

Catching derivatives are limited in their capacity to produce a velocity stimulus due to the deceleration of the body that must take place to perform an efficient catch, says @DrTSuchomel. Share on X

In contrast to catching derivatives, weightlifting pulling derivatives may allow athletes to accelerate throughout the entire second pull (i.e., triple extension movement), ultimately leading to a larger velocity. For example, the jump shrug requires an individual to jump as high as possible while using the same countermovement and transition mechanics as a hang power clean18. As a result, greater velocities are achieved due to a larger acceleration period during the jump shrug compared to weightlifting catching derivatives8,9.

From a practical standpoint, there is also unpublished data from our lab that suggests programming weightlifting pulling derivatives with or without force- and velocity-specific loads may produce greater training effects (e.g., 1RM strength, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, sprint, change of direction, squat jump, and countermovement jump) compared to weightlifting catching derivatives5. Therefore, it would appear that, from both a theoretical and practical standpoint, weightlifting pulling derivatives are advantageous when attempting to “surf” or train the force-velocity curve compared to catching derivatives alone. However, it should be noted that much of these adaptations may be dependent on the loading of the exercises19 and that both catching and pulling derivatives may produce similar adaptations.

Both theoretically and practically, weightlifting pulling derivatives are helpful when attempting to “surf” or train the F-V curve compared to catching derivatives alone, says @DrTSuchomel. Share on X

This idea is supported by Comfort et al.3, whose study showed no differences in strength, squat jump, or countermovement jump adaptations following eight weeks of training with weightlifting catching or pulling derivatives that used the same relative loads. Thus, it would appear that while weightlifting catching derivatives are limited in their capacity to train the force-velocity curve, the implementation of weightlifting pulling derivatives with catching derivatives may also provide an effective force-velocity stimulus.

Freelap USA: Recently, you were part of a study discussing the rate of force development (RFD) in weightlifting. Coaches want to know how to use RFD with athletes, but understand some limitations exist with teasing out this measurement data with exercises. Can you share an appropriate way to look at RFD with training adaptations and monitoring explosiveness?

Tim Suchomel: Rate of force development (RFD) can be a tricky measurement when it comes to monitoring athletes, but that doesn’t mean it’s not beneficial to look at. RFD can be a great indicator of rapid force production characteristics, especially when measured over several early time intervals (e.g., 0-50, 0-100, 0-150, 0-200 ms). By monitoring RFD across these time intervals, practitioners may be able to see how quickly an athlete is able to produce large magnitudes of force during time periods that relate to other sporting movements (e.g., 50 ms—striking, 90-100 ms—sprint ground contact time, 200-250 ms—net impulse length during a countermovement jump).

It should be noted, however, that peak RFD may not be as beneficial to a coach rather than average RFD over the course of a phase of movement due to the measure providing a tiny snapshot (1/1000 of a second if measuring at 1000 Hz) of the overall movement. Therefore, it is suggested that the practitioner determine the phase of the movement that is of interest. For example, it is pretty easy to measure RFD during an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), assuming that an appropriate and consistent starting threshold that accounts for signal noise is used (see Dos’Santos et al., 2017 for recommendations)—given that the first large increase in force is the phase of interest. Measuring RFD during a countermovement jump (CMJ), however, may be more challenging due to the number of phases of the movement (e.g., unweighting, braking, propulsion, etc.) (McMahon et al., 2018). For example, some coaches are interested in propulsion RFD during a jump. While this metric may sound beneficial, it is possible that the average RFD during the propulsion phase may be close to zero depending on the duration in which RFD is measured. This situation may occur if there is a notable drop in force production following peak braking force.

A more effective measurement may be average RFD during the braking (eccentric) phase that starts when force production returns to body mass following the unweighting phase and ends with peak braking (eccentric) force. From a practical standpoint, this may provide valuable information about an individual’s ability to decelerate their body mass, which may be important when it comes to injury prevention as well as change of direction tasks. One of the primary issues with measuring RFD is the consistency (reliability) of the measurement, given how sensitive changes in force over short time intervals may be. However, if properly assessed using consistent and strict standards (thresholds and phase identification), RFD measurements may provide practitioners with valuable information about an athlete’s rapid force production characteristics, which may provide some insight into their central nervous system fatigue.

Note: Thanks to Bob Alejo for the lead on the questions as they were instrumental to this week’s Friday Five.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


References

1. Comfort P, Allen M, and Graham-Smith P. “Comparisons of peak ground reaction force and rate of force development during variations of the power clean.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011;25(5):1235-1239.

2. Comfort P, Allen M, and Graham-Smith P. “Kinetic comparisons during variations of the power clean.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011;25(12):3269-3273.

3. Comfort P, Dos’Santos T, Thomas C, McMahon JJ, and Suchomel TJ. “An investigation into the effects of excluding the catch phase of the power clean on force-time characteristics during isometric and dynamic tasks: An intervention study.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018;32(8):2116-2129.

4. Kipp K, Malloy PJ, Smith J, Giordanelli MD, Kiely MT, Geiser CF, and Suchomel TJ. “Mechanical demands of the hang power clean and jump shrug: A joint-level perspective.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018;32(2):466-474.

5. Suchomel TJ. “Surfing the force-velocity curve with weightlifting derivatives: Real-world application.” Presented at 2019 Australian Strength and Conditioning Association International Conference on Applied Strength and Conditioning, Sydney, Australia, 2018.

6. Suchomel TJ and Sole CJ. “Force-time curve comparison between weightlifting derivatives.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2017;12(4):431-439.

7. Suchomel TJ and Sole CJ. “Power-time curve comparison between weightlifting derivatives.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2017;16(3):407-413.

8. Suchomel TJ, Wright GA, Kernozek TW, and Kline DE. “Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;28(2):350-360.

9. Suchomel TJ, Wright GA, and Lottig J. “Lower extremity joint velocity comparisons during the hang power clean and jump shrug at various loads.” Presented at XXXIInd International Conference of Biomechanics in Sports, Johnson City, TN, USA, 2014.

10. Moolyk AN, Carey JP, and Chiu LZF. “Characteristics of lower extremity work during the impact phase of jumping and weightlifting.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27(12):3225-3232.

11. Hamlyn N, Behm DG, and Young WB. “Trunk muscle activation during dynamic weight-training exercises and isometric instability activities.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2007;21(4):1108-1112.

12. Comfort P, Williams R, Suchomel TJ, and Lake JP. “A comparison of catch phase force-time characteristics during clean derivatives from the knee.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;31(7):1911-1918.

13. Suchomel TJ, Giordanelli MD, Geiser CF, and Kipp K. “Comparison of joint work during load absorption between weightlifting derivatives.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. In press, 2018.

14. Suchomel TJ, Lake JP, and Comfort P. “Load absorption force-time characteristics following the second pull of weightlifting derivatives.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;31(6):1644-1652.

15. Haff GG, Whitley A, McCoy LB, O’Bryant HS, Kilgore JL, Haff EE, Pierce K, and Stone MH. “Effects of different set configurations on barbell velocity and displacement during a clean pull.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2003;17(1):95-103.

16. Comfort P, Jones PA, and Udall R. “The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull.” Sports Biomechanics. 2015;14(2):139-156.

17. Comfort P, Udall R, and Jones PA. “The effect of loading on kinematic and kinetic variables during the midthigh clean pull.” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2012;26(5):1208-1214.

18. Suchomel TJ, DeWeese BH, Beckham GK, Serrano AJ, and Sole CJ. “The jump shrug: A progressive exercise into weightlifting derivatives.” Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2014;36:43-47.

19. Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, and Lake JP. “Enhancing the force-velocity profile of athletes using weightlifting derivatives.” Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2017;39(1):10-20.

 

Weight Room Environment

More Than Science: 4 Principles for a Successful Weight Room Environment

Blog| ByRachel Hayes

Weight Room Environment

Science. Strength coaches love to use the word “science,” and they are the first to point out and defend their backgrounds “in science” or discuss how their program is “based on science.” Additionally, I’ve never seen or known a group of people prouder of the letters behind their name than the strength and conditioning community.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not jeering—I’m just stating observations. Perhaps fueling our insistence is that when it comes to strength and conditioning, a level of ignorance pervades most of society—and even the greater athletic community. Of course, science provides the backbone for the profession, and in any given training session, a coach may use information from multiple disciplines of science to perform their job. The science is undoubtedly important, but being a strength coach entails just as much, if not more than, the science we’re all so obsessed with.

The science is undoubtedly important, but…for all that science to have any relevance, the relationships and training environment must come first, says @rachelkh2. Share on X

Much of what transpires in a successful training session is the result of coaching our tails off day in and day out, as well as the relationships we build with our athletes. For results to abound, and for all that science to have any relevance, the relationships and training environment must come first. A successful environment is indicative of numerous intangibles, many of which are not solely based on science. Establishing these things requires a great deal of communication and persistent work by the strength coach, but they are instrumental in reaping weight room dividends.

The following four principles are the building blocks I have in place to establish a successful training environment. Points 1 and 2 discuss the inflexible but important nature of structure, while points 3 and 4 revolve around the interpersonal side of coaching. Although vastly different, their coexistence is possible and necessary for success.

  1. Safety as the driver.
  2. Unwavering expectations.
  3. Education and relevance of training.
  4. Emphasizing the individual.

1. Safety as the Driver

It is not the basis of this discussion to provide a multipoint checklist for weight room safety, but I would be sorely remiss if I overlooked safety’s importance and overarching role in a successful weight room environment.

Regardless of level or scenario, safety in the weight room is the principal concern and should provide the backbone for the whole of the environmental structure. While culture and team building have tremendous importance, their influence should never compromise safety. Additionally, the weight room should be a controlled environment where rigidity and structure are standard, not only for safety but for positive training outcomes.

Regardless of level or scenario, safety in the weight room is the principal concern and should provide the backbone for the whole of the environmental structure, says @rachelkh2. Share on X

When it comes to garnering support, particularly at the high school level, sport coaches, parents, and administrators are much more likely to be in your corner if they know safety is your primary concern. I have witnessed this time and again in my own situation, whether it be through parent meetings or in persuading my administration to make changes to the weight room.

Lastly, a rigid environment does not mean the weight room can’t be enjoyable—quite the opposite. It teaches athletes how to set their mentality for work but simultaneously find enjoyment in a safe manner. For me, there is hardly a better feeling than watching my teams work while enjoying camaraderie or jamming out—although I do adhere to a recommended decibel level.

2. Unwavering Expectations

When safety is the foundation, it’s easier to establish everything else. Establishing expectations helps ensure safety and positive training outcomes in a variety of ways.

Expectations look different from coach to coach, and program to program, based on each unique situation. For me, the expectation of attention to detail cannot be overstated, and I would contend it is the main reason my teams thrive in the weight room. For me, everything, from following instructions to re-racking weights, should be completed with the upmost attention to detail. If you don’t do the small things right, the big things will never come to fruition.

This expectation begins when I first interact with my athletes at the middle schools. During my initial visits, we practice getting into warm-up lines, which we may do multiple times in a day until we get it right. I tell them how many lines I want and how many people I want per line. Once the warm-up lines are set, I demonstrate and explain the warm-up movements, along with some specifics I want them to follow. For instance, making sure their front foot is straight when performing a backward lunge, and that they finish everything through the line.

We practice and rehearse simple, basic things over and over and then gradually keep adding. Having an expectation of attention to detail is no different than teaching an exercise progression. Start basic, establish proficiency, and continue building, never neglecting the original focus on detail.

Note: Anecdotally, I’ve found younger athletes are the most impressionable and soak up everything you teach in a most enthusiastic way. If you’re able to get face time with your youngest group, I highly recommend doing so.

Freshman year is a highly formative time for my athletes because everything they do revolves around strict attention to detail. The training process is extremely gradual for them, as progression is dependent on their ability to consistently perform according to my expectations. They must perform all movements, no matter how basic, with exacting proficiency before we progress.

This is also when they learn how to clean up and replace equipment according to my preferences—which, like many coaches, is precise. The status of the weight room at the end of a session is under scrutiny, and we don’t break out until it meets the expected standards. It takes some time, but eventually it becomes automatic and evolves into a group effort of communication and teamwork.

The weight room is a perfect place to set expectations, and although carrying out expectations is on each athlete, it’s the job of the coach to consistently see that those expectations are met. As adults and coaches, we are responsible for molding kids into what we expect. They can and will rise to the bar we set, but it is our job to help them reach it.

Athletic Position
Image 1. Example of a middle school session. We practice getting into warm-up lines until we get it right. Once the warm-up lines are set, I demonstrate and explain the warm-up movements.

3. Education and Relevance of Training

Although education and relevance are similar, they aren’t the same, and each has a different focus and delivery in my program.

Education

Weight room education plays a large role in safety, but it’s also my goal to impart some training knowledge to my athletes for when they graduate and are responsible for their own fitness.

I place the most importance on the following four beliefs when it comes to lessons about the weight room and general exercise education:

  • Technical proficiency is imperative.
  • Consistency is crucial.
  • More is not better.
  • Enjoyment is a must.

We have no curriculum or set plan, but we utilize teachable moments to impart the importance of these four points and others on a consistent basis. I specifically like to emphasize that exercise can and should bring enjoyment. Strength training is a vital part of athletic performance, but not everyone possesses a passion for lifting, and that’s okay. Post athletics, we should want our athletes to lead active lives and do so; finding an enjoyable form of exercise helps ensure sustainable, healthy practices.

Beyond these four points, the teachable moments have proven to be bigger than just lessons about working out. Several of my athletes have gone on to pursue degrees in exercise science, education, and health care because of interests sparked in the weight room. Education is empowerment and weight room time should be utilized for more than just moving heavy things around. For the majority of kids, athletics will only be a temporary part of life. Use your platform and influence as a coach to continue bettering your athletes after they graduate and move on.

Relevance

I’m just going to come right out and say it—if you want compliance with your expectations and the weight room to be safe and productive, you’d better be able to make it relevant to whomever it is you’re training. This is perhaps truest when coaching kids and youth athletes. Middle and high school-aged kids have the best BS detectors on the planet. If you can’t explain to them why they need to front squat in terms they understand, you might as well be invisible.

If you want compliance with your expectations and the weight room to be safe and productive, you’d better be able to make it relevant to whomever it is you’re training, says @rachelkh2. Share on X

Relevance is important, and when someone is able to understand the why, how, and what of whatever it is you’re attempting to impart to them, their buy-in will be authentic. This is true for female and male athletes.

I’m making a point to address this because the archaic narrative that only females need context for the weight room is tiresome and quite frankly incorrect. Males may feel more comfortable in the weight room or may be more inclined to voluntarily lift weights, but this in no way equates to their having a better understanding of how strength training can benefit them. It is prudent and only logical to spend time explaining how the weight room can benefit everyone you train regardless of sport or gender.

4. Emphasizing the Individual

For the weight room to be successful, each athlete needs to feel valued. Investing the time to build individual rapport and treating everyone fairly, regardless of ability, will give you a major return through individual buy-in.

One way I accomplish this is by making it a priority to give feedback to every athlete I train each day. This doesn’t require lengthy conversations or detract from training, but every athlete, whether a starter on varsity or a non-starter on freshman B, leaves the weight room knowing that I pay attention and see them among everyone else.

Another way is by meeting your athlete where they are in regard to training. Every athlete in the care of a strength coach has different and unique training needs, and each deserves due consideration. I’m not implying you need to make a different workout for every person, but being observant and coaching to the needs of each athlete is the job of the strength coach and shows that individual that you are looking out for their welfare.

Listen and pay attention to your athletes: If they tell you a certain exercise hurts, don’t blow them off. There’s always the proverbial grain of salt, but taking a minute to listen to a kid may do more than create buy-in—it may open a door of trust where that athlete feels comfortable enough to confide in you about their life.

Lastly, although the weight room environment is rigid and structured, my athletes know there is always an open line of communication with me. They know we are going to train, and we are going to train intelligently, but how we train may differ at times based upon their needs. They understand the importance of communicating and feel empowered to do so because they know I care about their well-being.

Making Science Matter to Others

Earning the trust and support of your sport coaches is vital for building a successful weight room environment. Your athletes will be your best marketers and will greatly influence this relationship.

Sometimes it may just take time, humility, and genuine conversation before all that science between your ears matters to anyone but you, says @rachelkh2. Share on X

Sometimes it may just take time, humility, and genuine conversation before all that science between your ears matters to anyone but you. Strength coaches should understand that even with the practice of scientific principles, it takes exposure and consistency to produce results. This goes for people, too.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


SimpliFaster Track

7 Ways That SimpliFaster Made Me a Better Strength Coach

Blog| ByJoshua Collins

SimpliFaster Track

As a strength and conditioning coach, I am well aware of the value of recognizing those experts who not only help propel me forward in my field, but also help me to assist the coaches and athletes who I work with on a daily basis to surpass their personal conditioning goals. For years, SimpliFaster has been bookmarked in my browser.

I have read articles from many trainers that helped inspire me and caused me to feel that tug between what I think I already know and what I undoubtedly want to know more about because my curiosity has been aroused. I appreciate that SimpliFaster offers a repository of articles in a digital society where many people view blogs as an antiquated way to gather information.

SimpliFaster, in my eyes, is a hub for people in the sports medicine field to share their expertise, trials, and successes. The articles that I choose to read provide me with a sense of belonging in my field. I actually told myself last summer that I would aspire to write an article or two for SimpliFaster, and since I have been granted the opportunity to do so, I decided to share seven ways that SimpliFaster has helped me as a coach.

Coach Joshua Collins
Image 1. I’ve had SimpliFaster bookmarked in my browser for a few years, and the site has really helped me grow as a coach.

 

1. Providing Access to Other Coaches

There often seems to be a gap between colleagues and between their practices, so a bridge is needed to span this divide. SimpliFaster has given me personal access to coaches through the articles they have written. When you read about other coaches’ training methodologies and recognize similarities with your own, it adds needed confirmation that is sometimes forgotten during the training of others. Confirmation combats the occasional uncertainty of training.

These articles, backed by science, are relatable because of shared experiences and have helped me determine the most efficient way of training for my work at DeKalb High School. This is especially true for me when being charged with changing the athletic interface of a high school through strength and conditioning. Raising a family and training athletes are tasks that keeps me busy and apart from other coaches who are outside of my coach’s circle. SimpliFaster fills that void.

I follow quite a few coaches on Twitter whose articles I first read on SimpliFaster. To say that I have received encouragement through their posts and articles would be an understatement. Iron sharpens iron. A friend sharpens a friend. These are two statements in which I have always believed.

Publications on the SimpliFaster blog keep me sharp by reminding me to adjust training habits and remain current with data, says @__JoshuaCollins. Share on X

Publications on the SimpliFaster blog keep me sharp by reminding me to adjust training habits and remain current with data. Being able to access articles from high school strength and conditioning coaches helps me analyze parallels and differences. After reading his interview, I reached out to Scott Meier, a physical education teacher and strength and conditioning coach at Farmington High School, with questions about testing metrics in his strength and conditioning classes. He was very accessible and answered every question thoroughly.

If you want answers, there are coaches willing to share information and provide research to back up the data. I may not agree with everything, but it is not about my compliance—it is about forming the relationships to have conversations that lead to practical information for the people you train. I use some of the same principles in strength and conditioning training that I learned from other experts in the field. Learn things that are foreign to you to add stimuli and have high intent when trying to help others execute.

2. Supporting Athletics Without the Kill Intent

SimpliFaster has opened the door for trainers to collaborate with each other. In a field that is overshadowed by mainstream glitz and glamour, I found out there are more people in my shoes than not. Many strength coaches who use various social media platforms are linked to SimpliFaster. They are also approachable.

I came across the Twitter page of Mike Whiteman at Hounds Speed. I appreciated his post about the science of movement and how he actually demonstrated what he speaks about throughout the exercise. He used the Probotics Just Jump System, which I own, and made workout videos in his garage similar to what I have done. I directly messaged him to ask where he got his bumper plates and barbells, and those questions later turned into me wanting to learn more about his speed-driven workouts.

In addition, his age is somewhat similar to mine (36), yet he still moves with a high force rate. Usually on breaks from work I arrange times to shadow some coaches, but since COVID-19 happened during my spring break, I thought I would virtually reach out to Mike with additional questions.

Communicating with Mike Whiteman on programming and being “twitchy” has revealed to me the personal passiveness in my workouts. I have been doing a program of his for five weeks now, and I feel great. A fair question here would be, “If things are great, what’s the issue?” The issue is that my intent was not as high as it should have been, and I had been satisfied with just doing the movements. I acknowledge that it is great in terms of the recognition that I completed a workout, but that is only the surface level for force development. My aim would be more efficient with a focus on adaptation through dynamic movement. Intent is a linchpin for adaptation, and I was lacking it.

Whiteman’s program that I have been doing is a five-day split with three intense days. This program, along with the expertise he shared with me, has enabled me to shadow him virtually. Throughout these five weeks, it dawned on me that I would never have realized that my intent was low, and that stress should be bleeding out through these violent movements. Intent can make an objective clear-cut, whereas I might have missed the objective due to my passivity.

Recording workouts has been a way for me to communicate and tweet videos to show others. As I edited my recordings, I watched natural strength with a passive mentality. I sent my rate of force development and ground time for the 4-jump to Mike. He showed me his video of 4-jumps, and his numbers blew mine out of the water. I was not even close. My numbers were rather pitiful in comparison.

In his video, I could see that he was violent during the 4-jump. He was in attack mode; it was the same effort you see in a wild animal chasing its prey. Mike’s arms were in sync with his legs, and his legs were stiff like a jackhammer smashing concrete as he jumped with so much force. Mike is three years older than me, too! As I sulked, two feelings hit me in the gut: I was fired up with competitiveness and wanted to beat Mike (with the utmost respect, of course), and I was also filled with motivation.

I thought back to the first time I spoke to Mike—prolonging Father Time was the topic. People like Justin Gatlin, Lebron James, and Allyson Felix are all professional athletes above 30 years of age who are still able to produce at the elite level. Allyson Felix had a child and still competed eight months later. Those “old athletes,” by society’s standards, are pushing forward whether or not fans notice. The evolution of the athlete is now.

I can tell by Mike’s 4-jumps that he believes he can preserve and maximize what’s left in his athletic tank. As my reflection of that conversation came to an end, I expressed gratitude to Mike and committed myself to continue to reach my personal goals as I work out. I will follow suit by having strong intentions.

3. Embedding in Me the Knowledge of Training

I am doing really well as a trainer at DeKalb High School. I give everything I can to both myself and my athletes each year. Different training programs and protocols have given me a better understanding of when to use different approaches with athletes. I have improved and become a better trainer, and I have seen results, whether in the reduction of injuries or in increased athleticism. SimpliFaster has helped me attain these results.

I have improved and become a better trainer, and I have seen results, whether in the reduction of injuries or in increased athleticism. SimpliFaster has helped me attain these results. Share on X

Athletes fill up my strength and conditioning classes throughout the day. Teams fill the weight room to maximum capacity after school. The community is getting used to my face, and the coaches are starting to trust me. I seem to be doing well but know that at times I can do better. There are training concepts that I still want to learn so I can teach them to my athletes and coaches so that we, in turn, can all become the best competitors in our respective sports.

People in the industry like Max Schmarzo of Strong by Science and Jake Tuura of Youngstown University convinced me to learn more and to spread knowledge widely. I thought I was giving everything I had to DeKalb High School but actually realized I was nowhere near giving them my full potential. I had so much more I could improve upon and share: programming, learning basic physics for data reading, and more.

I have made connections with the athletes, but I want better for them. No—I want the best for them. I understand that not every high school has a strength and conditioning coach. A lot of coaches do not have one either. This realization has made me want to dig deeper and provide more for everyone.

I am excited knowing that there is no cap on what I can learn. There will always be more for me to learn and teach. This ignites my passion even more and causes me to go to SimpliFaster to read more books, talk to more coaches, and reach out to experts in their fields to continue my personal education.

Coach Joshua Collins Gym
Image 2. SimpliFaster has shown me that there is no cap on what I can learn, and I use that knowledge with my athletes, helping make them the best they can be.

I started becoming smarter by listening to what my colleagues have to say, by watching what they do, and by recognizing what they have their athletes do and why. The “why” is the most important part of doing something; it shows intent of an action. If intent falters, you learn from it versus just having athletes sweat and do a workout because it seems cool. I must admit I have done that before, but I wanted to drift away from the practice because it’s morally wrong in my eyes. If my expectations are to have athletes train wholeheartedly, then my program and instruction must also be up to par for them and at an elevated standard.

I started becoming smarter by listening to what my colleagues have to say, by watching what they do, and by recognizing what they have their athletes do and why, says @__JoshuaCollins. Share on X

4. Sponsoring the Just Fly Performance Podcast

With podcasts being the prevalent go-to for information of personal interest, the Just Fly Performance podcast has been nothing short of essential for me. Host Joel Smith interviews an array of people who have accomplished amazing feats under the strength and conditioning umbrella. I have done case studies from claims by some of his guests, like Keith Barr, Ph.D.; Ebonie Rio, Ph.D.; and many others.

The podcast is great because I can play it through my headphones when I work out and still stimulate my mind with information when I am not able to read. Dr. Keith Barr’s interview about tendon health helped me to understand how tendon tightness is dependent on collagen and that tendon tightness aids in athletic movements. If you’re loading with good nutrition, you will have a high turnover rate and will see the dynamics and functionality of the tendon. I must have listened to that particular interview 50 times. Each time I listen to it, I learn something new, and I am led to research new concepts to try on myself and on the teams that I train.

Hearing theories from the podcast and reading articles about the experiences grew my excitement while challenging me to read. I may not be an athlete anymore, but I use the same competitive qualities to get better at my job. My intention is to level up through training and teaching my classes. I love training athletes and monitoring their adaptations. It has bred a passion to read current research and given me the ability to cite credible sources. SimpliFaster has been a part of that.

As a kid, I despised reading; as an adult, I love it. It is easy to read up on certain topics, and it helps when they are applicable to my job. I’m blessed to be working in a field that I love, and because of that, I have learned to appreciate reading. The podcast is nice and all, but SimpliFaster puts all the content in one hub so that all I have to do is pick a topic of interest to read. The sources are credible because I have read older articles from years ago that are current today. So, for that, I am greatly appreciative of having content in one place that I can rely on for learning.

5. Teaching Me How to Program

Being a student of the game, or in this case, strength and conditioning, has led to other areas in the training paradigm. SimpliFaster publications humbled me. When science can prove that what you’re doing is not as efficient as it should be, something must change. When I began in this field, my programming focused on the exercise and the uniqueness of how it looked. That may be okay for likes on social media, but just because it looks cool does not mean it transfers to athletic development.

SimpliFaster publications humbled me. When science can prove that what you’re doing is not as efficient as it should be, something must change, says @__JoshuaCollins. Share on X

Through reading and listening to others in my field, I have gained an understanding of training concepts and isolated exercises. Training concepts organize training principles into a program that most athletes need and appreciate. Concepts also provide further knowledge on the why and how of movement goals as opposed to just being familiar with how to perform an exercise.

Knowing concepts allows you to determine what exercises to use at a given time. Just knowing an exercise when you work with teams does not determine when you should do it or why. It may look cool, but when you understand concepts, you have the clue to understanding what exercises to use. You can build a program around concepts but not around one exercise movement. As a high school strength and conditioning coach, it is imperative that I program in this conceptual manner to have a better grasp on large groups of different teams.

6. Introducing Technology for Sport

Early in my career, before I became a high school strength and conditioning coach, I was a sports performance coach and I had the opportunity to use the Freelap Timing System. I had heard of it from my frequent visits to SimpliFaster.com and from trying to win a Freelap Timing System on Twitter. As most coaches recognize, the handheld timer is the highest level of technology. Let’s be real, though. A stopwatch is the cream of the crop of timing systems only when it is the only option. It is the “old reliable” way that is not so reliable.

When my place of employment bought four Freelap Timing Systems to train athletes, I was excited to use such elite technology for better accuracy during sprint sessions. It is so simple to use that even someone who is not tech-savvy can learn to use it. It is accurate, and the athletes love it because it is not archaic.

There is something to be said about developing a skill to push a button to start the timer on a stopwatch the moment an athlete moves from a sprint position. I have been around more coaches who missed the button without noticing they were not timing the athlete until the sprint was over. Athletes’ time and energy are then wasted while possibly placing exasperation in their minds because they cannot trust the timing system.

Freelap allows coaches to observe and examine athletes instead of using a handheld stopwatch, says @__JoshuaCollins. Share on X

With the Freelap Timing System, I have never worried about that. There are multiple ways to time someone. Freelap allows coaches to observe and examine athletes instead of using a handheld stopwatch. Athletes can use a start button or sprint through a cone transmitter that connects the analysis of the movement to the free downloadable app. Its simplicity of use makes it a beneficial tool for all parties involved.

I recommend the Freelap Pro Coach BLE 112 to all high school and sports performance coaches. SimpliFaster provided me with the edge I am looking for at this point in my seven-year career. It is a one-stop shop. Whatever you need, the answers always seem to be there.

7. Positively Influencing My Daughter

My last reason for using SimpliFaster is that it has helped me introduce training to my daughter. I was blessed that my daughter developed an interest on her own by watching me train female athletes. There were times when she accompanied me to work, and from the corner of my eye, I watched her mimic movements on her own. Someone once said to me, “Copy the wise and become wise. Keep company with fools, and you will be ruined.” My daughter copied wise movement patterns, and I could not be happier.

I have seen training habits harm kids, especially young ladies who are more susceptible to injuries such as knee ruptures. I am not saying that I am this almighty trainer, but through reading article after article and via the experiences that I have had, I want to make sure that any person who trains with me can transfer force to their sport or wherever they need force to be applied contextually. There are no gimmicks this way. I teach fundamentals and build principles from there. Everything complex derives from basic principles.

Lunge Squat Hinge
Image 3. SimpliFaster helped me teach proper movement techniques to my 4-year-old daughter, and teaching a child helped me understand those techniques even better.

As the father of this very active, little 4-year-old girl, it is difficult not to ponder how I would like my daughter to be coached and trained if she decides to participate in sports. Females tend to get the short end of the stick when it comes to sports and force development training. During my tenure in sports performance, I have seen that coaches tend to give up on or show partiality when it comes to women’s sports. In my experience with training female athletes, I may have seen the highest levels of improvement when it came to force development. I had the pleasure of seeing monster numbers in the weight room along with increased athleticism.

My daughter has learned fundamental motor skills like getting into an athletic position, jumping, landing, throwing, sprinting, and more. These motor skills will give her an advantage in functionality and build up her confidence. As parents, we should give youth better opportunities and pass down tools they can use. I view athletic training in that same way.

Being able to teach a 4-year-old has helped me teach those who are older. Once you can understand anything that is newly learned and try to explain its complexities in a simple manner to a child, you find out if you absolutely comprehend it yourself. With all that SimpliFaster has helped me to attain, one of the most important things to me personally is being able to train female athletes and being able to show my daughter that she can train like an athlete.

SimpliFaster Is One of My Guides

SimpliFaster is a comprehensive tool for any coach at any level. To sum up, the lessons SimpliFaster has taught me are that the weight room is a lab, and we as strength and conditioning coaches are the mad scientists. We calculate physical data and control velocity through programming. We are more than motivators; we are more than people making others sweat by doing random movements. We are passionate about the sweet science of force production that gives each and every individual a winning edge to compete at the highest applicable level.

To sum up, the lessons SimpliFaster has taught me are that the weight room is a lab, and we as strength and conditioning coaches are the mad scientists, says @__JoshuaCollins. Share on X

The untrained coach’s eye will miss those things and try to imitate without understanding. SimpliFaster is a staple to give reasoning and to guide coaches to better efficiency. Thus, SimpliFaster will always be my personal go-to for everything under the training sun.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Coach Whiteboard

10 Tips to Maximize Your Strength & Conditioning Internship

Blog| ByRumin Aghabozorg

Coach Whiteboard

In 2016, I finished my bachelor’s degree, knowing I wanted to become a collegiate S&C coach. While it was only an idea at that time, I made it a reality when I passed my CSCS in May 2018, and three months later I decided to leave my halfway-decent career to get my master’s degree in strength and conditioning studies.

Pursuing postgraduate studies has transformed my coaching style and afforded me a chance to participate in numerous additional learning opportunities. Through both online and in-person internships, I have learned firsthand from many great coaches and staff at institutions across the country. Based on my unique experience in the field of S&C, here are 10 useful tips for all young coaches trying to navigate their career trajectories.

1. Live Close to Your Internship

You’ll want to be less than a 15-minute drive from your internship. If you plan to be an intern where you did your undergrad, go ahead and jump to tip #2. If you decide to do an internship halfway across the country, pay attention.

During my graduate degree internship, I lived with a close friend of mine who was 45 minutes away from the university. For a standard 9-to-5 job, a 45-minute commute is not bad. For a full-time coach who is potentially on campus from 5 a.m. to 6 p.m., it can be brutal. Often, by the time I got home, I had just enough time to shower and pack my lunch before I went to sleep, all so I could wake back up by 4 a.m.

You will likely not have a fixed schedule. You will have breaks during the day, and sometimes you will need to get away. We all got into this field because we want to have a positive impact on young lives, but at the same time, you have to be able to take care of yourself. One thing I did to get out of the “office” was pick up all the orders for the nutrition center. I got to leave the facility, and it made me look good since I always volunteered to do it.

2. Show Up Ready to Work

Other articles might suggest that if you are not the first one there, then you are not hungry enough for this industry. On the first day of my graduate internship, my boss said, “Show up on time, and you will be good to go.” He also said, “Please don’t be that guy waiting at the door at 4:15 a.m.” If the coach says be there by 5:00, be there on time, at the minimum. Five to 10 minutes early is enough. Getting there 45 minutes early just means sitting in your car, since you don’t have a key to the facility.

The moment you walk through that door, be ready to move. This is not the office, where you can relax for a little bit, drink some coffee, and slowly ease into the day. Share on X

The moment you walk through that door, be ready to move. This is not the office, where you can relax for a little bit, drink some coffee, and slowly ease into the day. You are about to have 75 football players come in, and every second of prep time matters. It is far better to get everything set up first and then relax, rather than vice versa.

At one of my internships, coaches were supposed to be there by 5:15. Most of us rolled in by 5:10 at the latest. We started getting set up immediately, and most of the time we were done when athletes started rolling in for pre-workout nutrition.

3. Bring Your Own Pen, Clipboard, and Workouts

I picked this up while I was in grad school: Always have a writing implement, a writing surface, and the day’s workout and warm-up. Nothing makes you look more like a novice than not knowing where you are in the workout. You will always need a pen to write notes and observations from the workout.

For example, at one institution we had an EliteForm system, which measures bar velocity. If an athlete moved 75% of their max at an average velocity of .7 m/s, that showed their training max needed to be bumped in the system we were running. Write that down! You will not remember it at the end of the day. Writing down nuggets of information as they happen will almost certainly answer your questions down the line. Coaches I’ve worked with have all lauded the virtue of paying attention to details as a key to becoming a better coach.

4. Shut Up and Listen (aka Practice “Active Listening”)

At the beginning, go in with an open mind and do what you’re told. Whether this is your first internship or your fourth, I strongly suggest that, in your first week or two, you just sit back and observe the coach’s style with athletes. If you are interning at a D1 or under a Master Strength & Conditioning Coach (MSCC), just listen and learn.

Most places will probably tell you to be on the sidelines anyway. This coincides with the previous tip—by listening and watching, you are bound to pick up some useful information to write down. They are at that level or earned that specific title for a reason. Most important of all, use your observations to generate smart questions.

5. Do Not Be a Robot 

Athletes are people too. And I cannot stress this enough: Do not be so focused on S&C that you forget to talk to and get to know athletes. It is okay to be affable with athletes to an extent, but you should always remember that you are in a position of authority. For me personally, I have found that the more an athlete trusts you, the better their buy-in. Crack jokes with them, be there for them, and just be the voice of reason.

I cannot stress this enough: Do not be so focused on S&C that you forget to talk to and get to know athletes. Share on X

6. Remember, It Is Just Business

The head S&C at one institution said this in the first week of the football off-season: “It’s just business.” What goes on in the weight room is just business, and collectively we are in the business of making athletes better. Coach them hard and love them harder.

At the end of the day, if a student-athlete decides to transfer or quit, it is their decision. For instance, one of the players I got close to chose to transfer mid-semester. I was disappointed that he left, but at the end of the day he did what he thought was best for him. From a business perspective, you move on and focus on the athletes you have and try to make them better.

7. Don’t Forget About Nutrition

I was fortunate at one of my internships to have access to the nutrition center, where I had dinner four nights a week. Suffice to say, I stumbled on a good deal. If you are like me and have a singular focus on your career, you will be there 10-12 hours a day. You need to learn how to meal prep and meal prep for cheap. PB&J, rice & beef, broccoli & chicken—you get the idea. A coach I met during grad school had his weekly grocery plan dialed in at $36.28 a week. He kept it simple and cheap.

You can cook bulk amounts of beef and rice at the beginning of the week, and it will last you several days. Also, throw into your lunch bag more snacks than you think you will need. It is okay if you do not eat all your snacks that day, but at the end of the day you will always wish you had more food rather than not enough.

Try your best to have a balanced diet. The coaching life is grueling, so make sure you keep yourself healthy. Working with athletes will expose you to a lot of potential for illness. Keep your machine running right and you will (hopefully) avoid getting sick.

8. Balance Your Free Time

If this internship is during your final semester, I strongly suggest that you do not take any additional classes with it. I made that mistake while doing my graduate internship. Your weekends end up getting devoted to class, and boom! there goes your free time. If you have a significant other or major family obligations, you will want to communicate with them prior to the internship that you are going to be busy for the next 4-6 months.

On the other hand, if you need to get a part-time job to help with some bills, talk to your supervisor beforehand. They might be able to help you find a position in the university and, based on my past experience, help you balance the responsibilities of classes, internships, and work. You have to be extremely dialed-in to manage all of it, but communication with your coach supervisor is paramount.

9. Do Not Chase Logos

Just because you interned at X University does not mean you are an amazing coach. An internship at X University might look great on a résumé, but the experience you get may be a little different than what you expect. I’ve had friends intern at major universities (football and Olympic), only to end up cleaning for the semester. No coaching, no intern education, nothing. I am not saying all schools are like that, but you need to be cognizant of the type of internship program you are thinking about joining, especially if getting hands-on experience matters to you.

Be cognizant of the type of internship program you are thinking about joining, especially if getting hands-on experience matters to you. Share on X

Some questions to ask during your program interview are:

  • What elements does the internship curriculum include?
  • What are some of the duties assigned to interns?
  • What is the path to working my way up to coaching athletes?
  • What are some qualities of past interns that have made them excel?

You have to remember you are there to learn! If you only stand in the corner and clean after every session, and that’s the extent of your internship, you are not really getting much out of it (other than observation and taking notes, to which I would refer to point #4.) If you think chasing a specific logo is how you will become a better coach, you may need to rethink your priorities. Also, just as a side note—go in with the mindset that you will be doing a lot of cleaning, especially given the shifts in our standards during the COVID-19 era.

10. Enjoy the Process

Enjoy the process, learn to accept criticism and feedback, and take the opportunities where they come. If you get to run a warm-up or session or assist with programming, take the opportunity and do it well. The more responsibility you earn, the more likely you will enjoy the process. Above all, consider your internship a test of whether or not this is the career path for you. The barriers of entry into S&C are high, and an internship is absolutely vital if your goal is to become a strength and conditioning coach at any level.

Above all, consider your internship a test of whether or not this is the career path for you. Share on X

I hope these tips will help maximize your experience at any level and throughout your journey in this industry. Even for myself, as I search for my next opportunity, I try to keep all of these in my mind. Our lives were fundamentally altered this year, for better or worse, and our job is to adapt to the changes. Especially for a young coach, being able to adapt to any situation is extremely important. Please feel free to reach out to me—I am always excited to talk S&C with others and expand my network.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Weightlifting Myths

8 Myths About Weightlifting for Athletes

Blog| ByKim Goss

Weightlifting Myths

Explosive weight training movements have become a mainstay in training serious athletes, especially those at the high school and college level. Note that I said weight training and not weightlifting.

Let me be clear. When I say weightlifting, I’m referring to the snatch and the clean and jerk—lifts performed in the Olympic Games. Not power cleans, hang power cleans, snatch pulls, one-arm snatches, and so on. Yes, competitive weightlifters often include such auxiliary exercises in their workouts (well, except for one-arm snatches—those are pretty worthless). Still, the core exercises in their programs are the snatch and the clean and jerk.

A research study about how the power clean affects sprinting or jumping ability is not a study about weightlifting. Share on X

Next, consider that much of the North American research about weightlifting does not involve the full lifts but rather partial variations, primarily the power clean. A research study about how the power clean affects sprinting or jumping ability is not a study about weightlifting. It’s about an inferior variation of one of the two weightlifting exercises; in this case, the clean and jerk. These studies are certainly better than nothing, but not by much, for determining the true value of weightlifting for improving sports performance and preventing injuries.


Video 1. Christian Rivera, an athlete coached by the author, shows the explosive nature of weightlifting. During his third lift, note how Christian’s training and athleticism enabled him to save an out-of-position snatch that was 85 pounds above bodyweight. (Video by Lifting.Life)

Yes, many strength coaches and personal trainers take seminars that cover weightlifting, and among the most popular are those sponsored by USA Weightlifting. A good start, but few coaches take their weightlifting education to the next level by practicing the full lifts, even fewer compete in weightlifting meets, and most prefer to have their athletes perform partial variations.

Many myths about true weightlifting have come from limited hands-on experience coaching the snatch and the clean and jerk. Share on X

This limited hands-on experience and the lack of coaching the lifts are responsible for many myths circulating about real weightlifting. Here are eight of them.

Myth #1: Partial Weightlifting Movements Are Easier on the Knees

I started competitive weightlifting in 1972 after reading about the sport in Strength and Health magazine. It was a time when many health care professionals condemned squats. The most notable opponents were Professor Karl K. Klein and Dr. Fred L. Allman, authors of the controversial book published in 1969, The Knee in Sports.

If an athlete insisted on doing squats, these doctors said they should only perform them through a partial range of motion. Klein and Allman argued that squats—specifically full squats—could cause permanent lower body instability (by stretching the knee ligaments) and, as such, increase the risk of serious injury. They were wrong.

The highest amount of harmful knee stresses during squats occurs with the thighs at or above 90 degrees, not full squats (hamstrings to calves). Share on X

The highest amount of harmful stresses on the knee during squats occurs with the thighs at or above 90 degrees, not full squats, meaning hamstrings touching the calves. Wimpy exercises such as the hang power clean (which starts and finishes with the legs in a quarter-squat position) are not knee-friendly. What’s more, the finished position is horrific because the athlete jams their knees when they abruptly catch the loaded, rapidly moving barbell. Let me take this discussion a step further.

Surgeons have often found that during ACL surgery, the ligament(s) they repaired already showed signs of chronic damage. This means many ACL tears were not a result of a single “supramaximal force” but from cumulative trauma caused by “submaximal forces” that predisposed this ligament to debilitating injury. Like an old rubber band that is frayed and stiff, these ligaments were ready to snap. Incidentally, the recommendations by the authors of one paper on this subject were to limit the number of jumps young athletes performed during training, such as the Little League “pitch count” that limits how many pitches a young baseball player can throw in a game.

Although advances have been made in ACL reconstruction that let many athletes to return to their previous levels, why subject an athlete to such harmful stress in the first place with quarter-squat movements? This advice would be especially wise for female athletes because—depending on the sport—they can be up to 5x more likely to injure this important ligament.

Myth #2: During the Pull, the Feet Should Be Flat on the Floor Until the Knees Fully Extend

The common technique taught in many strength coaching courses is to stay flat-footed during cleans and snatches until the knees fully extend—the so-called “triple extension.” Such advice belongs in the Iron Game history books.

In Russian weightlifting textbooks from the 1970s, coaches promoted staying flat-footed before achieving full knee extension. That was then—this is now. If you study slow-motion video or sequence photos, you’ll see that many of today’s elite lifters perform plantar flexion (i.e., lifting the heels) well before their legs straighten. Doing the triple extension during a weightlifting exercise is equivalent to today’s high jumpers performing the scissor-type jump rather than the Fosbury Flop—it works, but it’s inefficient.

Elite athletes lift their heels before the knees are completely straight, using the Achilles tendon to increase force production dramatically. Share on X

Many strength coaches argue that sports involve triple extension, and therefore we should practice this method in weightlifting. Ah, no. Watch jumping movements by elite athletes in sports, and you’ll see their heels will rise before the knees are completely straight, enabling them to make better use of the Achilles tendon as a biological spring. In effect, they use this powerful tendon to dramatically increase force production, much more than the make-believe triple extension concept.

It follows that performing hang or block movements are also less effective for power production than performing lifts from the floor. I say this because, in every video, article, and book I’ve seen describing how to perform hang cleans and hang snatches, these lifts start with the entire foot on the floor. Further, you often see many non-weightlifting coaches teach these partial variations so the barbell doesn’t move directly upward. Instead, the bar’s initial movement is diagonal, looping back around before violently slamming back into the athlete’s shoulders. Ouch!

Russian and Chinese Lifters
Image 1. Russia’s David Rigert, a 1976 Olympic champion, used a pulling style in which he kept his feet flat on the floor until he straightened his knees. Elite women weightlifters have found that they can lift heavier weights by coming up on their heels early. (Russian photo by Bruce Klemens; female photo by Tim Scott, Lifting.Life)

Myth #3: The Shoulders Should Move in Front of the Knees During the Pull

Many strength coaches incorrectly teach weightlifting as a jump. They tell their athletes to extend their shoulders far in front of the bar when it passes the knees and then move to a vertical posture and “jump.” Weightlifting scientist Bud Charniga has done extensive research on the training methods of successful Chinese women lifters and says they found a better way.

Chinese coaches have enjoyed tremendous success by having their female athletes start with the shoulders directly on top of the barbell and then pull their shoulders behind the bar after it reaches knee level. This technique reduces the stress on the lower back (a weak link in the Russian method) and positions the bar closer to the center of mass, where athletes can apply more force to the barbell. It also increases the torso’s range of motion, enabling the athletes to use their upper body more effectively to move under the bar faster. If an athlete can move under the bar more quickly, the bar doesn’t have to be pulled as high. And the lower you have to pull the bar, the more weight you can lift.

Some male athletes can reach an elite level using the shoulders-in-front technique, but those who do often need to spend additional time with special exercises to strengthen the lower back. If you study their weightlifting textbooks, you’ll see that Russian weightlifting coaches frequently prescribed exercises like back extensions and good mornings for their athletes in the ’60s and ’70s. These exercises were essential because their pulling technique put excessive and prolonged stress on the lower back.


Video 2. Elastic strength enables athletes to produce more powerful movements than muscle strength alone. Here Christian clean and jerks double bodyweight, a New England record. This is followed by a clip showing that his shoulders don’t extend over the bar at any point in the lift.

Myth #4: The Powerlifts Generate More Power than the Olympic Lifts

Athletic movements are characterized by fast eccentric (muscle lengthening) contractions. You would see such actions when a quarterback cocks their arm back to throw a pass or when a weightlifter dips for a jerk.

Strength coach and posturologist Paul Gagné and his colleagues have conducted considerable research on what he calls Velocity Eccentric Overload (VEO) training using flywheel devices that increase the eccentric load at high speeds. Gagné says fast, powerful eccentric movements enable athletes to use the elastic qualities of the connective tissues to produce higher levels of power. Take sprinting, for example.

Sprint speed is not only determined by stride length and stride frequency but also ground contact time. One of the qualities that set Usain Bolt apart from his competitors was that he spent so little time on the ground compared to his competitors. You’re not going to achieve these benefits by performing slow, partial-range powerlifting exercises.

Myth #5: Weightlifting Doesn’t Develop Rotational Strength

I see many workouts for baseball players and other athletes in throwing sports that involve performing horizontal twisting exercises with bands and cables. The idea is to focus on the obliques to develop rotational strength and power. Nice try.

Gagné says the problem with this approach is that few muscle fibers in these core muscles are transverse (aligned horizontally) to the trunk. Instead, most are arranged in a diagonal pattern more suited for producing positive torsion, which is rotation coupled with flexion, such as the downswing in golf.

“Consider the biceps, which has fibers arranged longitudinally,” says Gagné. “You would not work the biceps by pulling your arm across your body because the fibers are not arranged this way. Also, because rotating the spine on a single axis is not a natural movement pattern, and this type of activity, especially when performed seated, creates large shearing forces on the spine that can easily damage the disks.”

There is also the issue of counter-rotation.

“J. P. Roll, the founder of Posturology, found that what occurs to one side of the body will help neurologically ‘code’ what can happen on the other side,” says Gagné. “As such, the ability to rotate in one direction is influenced by how well that individual can create rotation in the opposite direction—this is called ‘counter-rotation.’ In other words, the body will only allow for a certain amount of disproportionate development of the muscles. In working with professional golfers, for example, we found we can increase the ability of a right-handed golfer to generate club speed by having them work with a left-handed club.”

Feuerbach jerk lift
Image 2. Athletes who require exceptional rotational power often do weightlifting exercises. Shown is Al Feuerbach, a former world record holder in the shot put who won the 1975 Senior National Weightlifting Championships in the 242-pound class. (Bruce Klemens photo)


What type of weight training exercises strengthen counter-rotation?

“The late Mel Siff told me about research showing that the snatch is the best way to work on rotation, because to perform it you need a lot of counter-rotation,” says Gagné. “An overhead squat, performed as weightlifters do them, involves a lot of counter-rotation to maintain proper alignment.”

Hmmm…maybe this explains why so many elite discus throwers and shot putters perform weightlifting exercises in their workouts.

Myth #6: Weightlifting Exercises Should Be Performed with Submaximal Weights

Apparently, it’s fine for strength coaches to overload all areas of the strength curve of squats and bench presses with chains and bands because, as they say, “All things being equal, the strongest athlete always wins!” But when it comes to weightlifting, many strength coaches seem to believe that light weights rule. This trend appears to be especially evident with many sprint coaches.

When sprint coaches recommend weightlifting exercises or their variations, I often see workouts focusing on weights that represent about 70 percent of an athlete’s one-repetition maximum. The exercises also are performed for relatively high reps, such as power cleans for sets of five. For example, Bolt can be seen on YouTube doing sloppy hang power cleans for a set of 10 reps with what appears to be between 115 to 135 pounds. His time would be better spent taking a Zumba class. Seriously, my point is that many other sprinters often run super fast despite their weight training workouts, not because of them. By the way, several Chinese female lifters have clean and jerked 2.5x their bodyweight, and a half dozen male lifters have done 3x their bodyweight.

Many sprinters often run super fast despite their weight training workouts, not because of them. Share on X

Light weights may not add muscle mass, which is important. Too much bodyweight, even if it’s muscle, will adversely affect speed because it’s more weight to move—wear a 20-pound weight vest and see what happens to your 40-time. That said, light weights for high reps will do little to develop power because they will not train the powerful, fast twitch muscle fibers. In fact, when I look at many of the published workouts of Russian sports scientists about training programs, often lifts of 70 percent and below are not listed, as these are considered warm-ups and don’t contribute to the training effect.

Light weights for high reps will do little to develop power because they will not train the powerful, fast twitch muscle fibers. Share on X

By focusing on heavier weights, such as 85-100 percent for sets of 1-3 reps, you can develop more powerful muscles with minimal increases in bodyweight (i.e., relative strength). Weightlifters often train for several years and become considerably stronger without adding any additional bodyweight. Further, bodybuilding methods can adversely affect a muscle’s ability to produce high levels of muscle tension quickly.

Bodybuilder Model
Image 3. Shown here are the results of two types of training, which have a dramatic contrast. The first is 4x Mr. Olympia Jay Cutler, who trains for maximum hypertrophy; the second is Jordan Dwyer, a scholarship softball player trained by the author who is also a fashion and fitness model. Jordon clean and jerked over bodyweight in high school, full squatted nearly double bodyweight, and has a 23.2″ vertical jump (no step). In three years of weightlifting, Jordan has avoided bodyweight gain by focusing on relative strength training methods. (Cutler photo by Miloš Šarčev; Dwyer photo by Daniel Gagnon)

There also seems to be a prevailing idea among many sprint coaches that it’s possible to reach the highest levels in the sport without ever touching a barbell. Yes, it’s true—sprinters need to sprint. Likewise, baseball players need to throw and hit baseballs, basketball players need to dribble and shoot baskets, and golfers need to hit golf balls and wear ugly pants.

The reason so many athletes don't get much benefit from explosive exercises is that their workouts are designed poorly. Share on X

On this subject, I highly recommend Dr. Harold Klawans’ book, Why Michael Couldn’t Hit. My point is that the reason so many athletes don’t get much benefit from explosive exercises is that their workouts are poorly designed.

Myth #7: Weightlifting Workouts Should Be the Same for Men and Women

Although this is the subject of a more extensive article, the physiology of women is such that they need more warm-up sets to reach maximum results in weightlifting, and they can handle more sets at higher intensities than men. Yes, it’s much easier for a strength coach to have everyone follow the same workouts, but it’s not the most effective way to train female athletes.

Myth #8: Weightlifting Exercises Are Too Difficult to Teach

Many coaches believe the Olympic lifts performed from the floor are too difficult to teach. I guess if we can’t teach a weightlifting exercise in five minutes or less, it’s not worth learning? If this is the case, why practice any sport? Hitting a 90-mile fastball seems like a pretty hard skill to teach, as is sinking a three-point shot and performing a triple axel.

If an athlete does not have the flexibility to do a squat clean, consider that you just identified a mobility problem that may affect athletic performance and increase the risk of injury. Rather than working around the issue with inferior exercises, consider that practicing the lifts, even with light weights, often quickly fixes the problem. And consider that lack of mobility to perform weightlifting exercises is mainly a problem with male athletes—it’s rare to find a woman who can’t achieve the full squat clean position the first time they try.

Certainly, performing a full squat snatch can be difficult for many athletes, and the jerk is even more difficult. However, it’s not that hard to teach a full clean or a push jerk. For those with extreme mobility issues caused by chronic injuries (or just because that’s the way they are), there is the option of the split-style of snatching and cleaning. I would also caution that if a coach is going to teach full lifts, they must have the athlete practice missing the lifts to avoid becoming a highlight for a “Weight Training Fail” video on YouTube.

Older Modern Lifters
Image 4. Alternative techniques in weightlifting are often used in competition by those with mobility issues. Shown performing the split-style snatch is former American record holder Jim Napier, and shown doing a push jerk is CJ Cummings, a junior world record holder from the United States. (Napier photo by Bruce Klemens; Cummings photo by Tim Scott, Lifting.Life)


If a coach is new to lifting, rather than just taking a course, they should try to recruit a weightlifting coach to help them with their teaching. At the very least, call a local weightlifting coach (USA Weightlifting has a directory of clubs nearest you) and ask to sit in on a few training sessions and ask questions. I’ve been in this sport since the ’70s, and I’ve never heard of a weightlifting coach turning down a strength coach or sports coach’s request to stop by and watch their athletes train and ask questions.

Weightlifting and Athletic Fitness

As a weightlifting coach and a former weightlifter, I certainly have a vested interest in dispelling myths about the sport and promoting the snatch and the clean and jerk for athletic fitness. After all, weightlifting is the greatest sport in the world! That doesn’t change the fact that the snatch and the clean and jerk are valuable exercises that can help athletes achieve physical superiority and reduce their risk of injury.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


References

Terry, T. “Historical Opinion: Karl Klein and the Squat.” Strength & Conditioning Journal, 1984; 6(3): 26-31.

Hartmann H, Wirth K, Klusemann M. “Analysis of the Load On the Knee Joint and Vertebral Column With Changes in Squatting Depth and Weight Load.” Sports Med, 2013; 43(10): 993-1008.

Junjie Chen, et al. “An Anterior Cruciate Ligament Failure Mechanism.” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019; 47 (9): 2067-2076.

Charniga, A. “Can There Be Such a Thing as an Asian Pull?” EWF Scientific Magazine, 2016; 2(4): 24-32.

Goss, K. What Sprinters Must Know About Elastic Strength.

Meijer, J.P., et al. “Single Muscle Fibre Contractile Properties Differ Between Body‐Builders, Power Athletes and Control Subjects.” Experimental Physiology, 2015; 100(11): 1331-1341.

Klawans, H. Why Michael Couldn’t Hit: And Other Tales of the Neurology of Sports, pp 10-53, W.H. Freeman & Company, 1996.

Charniga, A. “Comparison of Warm Up Protocols of High Class Male and Female Weightlifters.” EWF Scientific Magazine, 2015; 1(1): 56-71.

Yearby Movement

An Ecological Dynamics Approach to Agility & Movement with Tyler Yearby

Freelap Friday Five| ByTyler Yearby

Yearby Movement

Tyler Yearby, M.Ed., is Co-Founder and Co-Director of Education at Emergence, and the Director of Sport Movement Skill Enhancement at Inspire Movement in Minnesota. With more than 13 years of experience, Yearby has taught 200+ training courses in more than a dozen countries, spoken at Olympic training centers, and been featured on podcasts. He currently works with athletes ranging from youth to professional and is a former strength and conditioning coach for the University of Minnesota football program.  

Freelap USA: What is ecological dynamics, and why should it matter to coaches?

Tyler Yearby: The ecological dynamics framework sustains a scientific approach to studying the behaviors of neurobiological systems, especially processes of action, perception, and cognition.1 It is a framework that appreciates the whole athlete and the environment where the interactions occur. There is a reciprocal relationship between the two.

The ecological dynamics framework acknowledges ideas from ecological psychology and dynamical or nonlinear systems. The dynamical system’s side addresses the emergence of coordination tendencies that exist between and within components and levels of complex neurobiological systems.1 Dynamical systems theory harnesses ideas of complexity and self-organization. The ecological psychology side can be thought of as the functional act of picking up information to use for regulating actions.2

Information is omnipresent, and there is a circular link between information and movement. Information specifies invitations or opportunities for action (affordances) that are available for pickup in a performance context. These invitations are athlete-specific, and they emerge and decay rapidly in sports. Think about a gap that opens for a running back in football but then closes just as quickly as it opened. It is unique to each athlete because of each individual’s action capabilities.

The performer-environment relationship is reciprocal, and the information that emerges between the two is viewed to guide movement activity. The confluence of the constraints shapes the movement solution that emerges. Constraints are classified as related to the task (rules, equipment, boundaries, etc.), the environment (light, humidity, temperature, social expectations, etc.), and the individual (height, weight, emotional and motivational levels, etc.). The landscape of constraints is undulating, so it is important to consider that a change in constraints may lead to changes in the movement solution that emerges.

Proponents of an ecological dynamics framework view learning as occurring by continuously solving movement problems and not performing repetition by rote, explains @TylerYearby. Share on X

Under an ecological dynamics framework, athletes and sports teams are considered complex adaptive systems. Additionally, proponents of an ecological dynamics framework view learning as occurring by continuously solving movement problems and not performing repetition by rote. This is crucial if coaches expect athletes to adapt their skills to different problems they encounter in sports. Finally, under an ecological dynamics framework, the athlete-environment relationship is viewed as the appropriate scale of analysis for studying emergent behavior. As a coach, we can design-in relevant invitations to the practice sessions if we study this relationship.

Freelap USA: From an ecological dynamics perspective, how can we use the warm-up as a departure point for athlete ownership and creativity?

Tyler Yearby: Bruce Lee once said, “Honestly expressing yourself…now, it is very difficult to do. I mean it is easy for me to put on a show and be cocky and be flooded with a cocky feeling and then feel pretty cool…or I can make all kinds of phony things, you know what I mean, blinded by it or I can show you some really fancy movement. But to express oneself honestly, not lying to oneself and to express myself honestly, now that, my friend is very hard to do.” Bruce Lee was a dexterous mover and a deep thinker. His thoughts are powerful and continuously shape my Form of Life.

All sessions begin with some form of a warm-up, and this is a wonderful opportunity for the athletes to have some ownership and honestly express themselves. The warm-up takes on several shapes and serves many purposes. I strongly feel it goes beyond just getting the body heated. To be frank, if that is all it is about, then we should just stand in a sauna for 10 minutes before we start the training session.

Let’s look at some of the more widely recognized reasons that an athlete needs to warm up. Some benefits are that it:

  • Creates an environment for the athlete to psychologically prepare for the training session.
  • Increases blood flow and temperature, which helps with the release of oxygen from hemoglobin.
  • Increases joint movement and health by secreting more synovial fluid.
  • Increases fascial elasticity.
  • Increases sweat production, which aids in cooling the body.

The above does not need to occur in a rigid, boring, and often linear fashion. In addition, the warm-up should respect the performer-environment relationship. Under an ecological dynamics framework, athletes are considered complex adaptive systems. In complex adaptive systems, the multitude of parts continually form coordinated patterns (synergies) that are shaped by surrounding informational constraints.3

So how else can the warm-up be used? In my opinion, the time should be spent connecting to information in the environment and exploring movement. Essentially, interacting with a rich landscape of opportunities. When designing the warm-up, I suggest that you include activities that promote exploration and potentially encourage the athlete’s behaviors to emerge in a similar way to the body of the practice or training session. In the Emergence course, “Approaching the Weight Room from an Ecological Dynamics Perspective,” we discuss the need for athletes to open up their degrees of freedom (motor, perceptual, and cognitive) in order to potentially harness them when the training becomes more specific.

When designing the warm-up, I suggest that you include activities that promote exploration of the environment and movement, says @TylerYearby. Share on X

We place a premium on holistic movement, specifically in the warm-up, where the athlete can use their intentions and attention to guide their movement. Maintaining control of the body in space is a collective effort from the perceptual systems as the athlete connects to the information available to them at that time. No two movements ever occur in the same way, so we approach our warm-up through what Nikolai Bernstein called “repetition without repetition.”4Experiencing movement in different ways helps with adaptability. It’s our job as coaches, or “environment architects” to give the athlete a chance to gain ownership of their movement. The warm-up is a great place to start.

Here is an example of repetition without repetition using crawls, jumps, and traditional movements, and more!


Video 1. “Repetition without repetition” using crawls, jumps, and other traditional movements. 

Freelap USA: What are some of the key ideas from ecological dynamics that are generally missed in traditional coaching models?

Tyler Yearby: Traditional models of coaching have adopted a one-size-fits-all philosophy, whereas ecological dynamics appreciates that each athlete has unique constraints that shape the movement solution that emerges. Essentially, ecological dynamics takes a learner-centered approach to skill adaptation versus a coach-centered approach. As mentioned above, an ecological dynamics framework views the athlete-environment relationship as the appropriate scale of analysis for studying emergent behavior.

Traditional coaching models have a one-size-fits-all philosophy, whereas ecological dynamics appreciates that each athlete has unique constraints that shape the movement solution that emerges. Share on X

In addition, ecological dynamics adopts ideas from ecological psychology, where the continuous regulation of human behavior is predicated on the role of information that emerges from the individual-environment system to guide activity.1 In an information-based approach, information specifies invitations for action (affordances), where each learner’s action capabilities and the information they pick up serve to guide what they can and cannot do. Athletes perceive affordances based on their own action capabilities, and this is where the learner-centered approach begins to take shape. Traditional models have placed too much emphasis on the athlete and have neglected the task and environment that help shape the movement strategy.

The constraints-led approach (CLA), which is underpinned by nonlinear pedagogy and ecological dynamics, was first proposed by Karl Newell in 19865. As mentioned above, constraints can be viewed as related to the task (rules, equipment, boundaries, etc.), environment (light, humidity, temperature, social expectations, etc.), and individual (height, weight, emotional and motivational levels, etc.). The landscape of constraints is undulating, and it is the confluence of the constraints at any given moment that gives rise to the emergent movement solution.

Adaptive behavior is important because conditions like the environment, task requirements, and our motivations can change every time we perform a motor skill.6 Adaptability is crucial for any athlete. In this way, coaches shift to becoming “environment architects” or “problem designers”.3 Skill adaptation is an ongoing process rather than one with an endpoint. This approach places great emphasis on problem-solving, where the search process allows learners to solve problems in creative and authentic ways.

Freelap USA: How do athletes solve problems in their sport, and how can coaches help guide the process?

Tyler Yearby: Athletes often impress with flashes of dexterity and seamlessly solve problems in their sport. How do they solve these problems, and how can we help? If we view skill adaptation as “the establishment of a reciprocal, functional relationship between an individual and the environment,”7 then among other things, we need to discuss information, representative task design, and attunement. Jacobs and Michaels described attunement as being perceptually sensitive to the most specific informational variables for achieving a task goal.8

With this in mind, and as I mentioned earlier, in an information-based approach, information specifies invitations for action (affordances), where each learner’s action capabilities and the information they pick up serves to guide what they can and cannot do. It is also important to remember that athletes perceive affordances based on their own action capabilities, and these affordances emerge and decay rapidly in sports.

In 1955/56, psychologist Egon Brunswik acknowledged that in our inherently complex, dynamic, and uncertain world, humans would need to detect and use perceptual information for emergent decision-making and the organization of their movement solutions.9 Brunswik determined that whether it was an experimental design looking to assess the capabilities of the environment’s movers or a training setting with the aim of improving upon the ability of the mover, the conditions should be set up to represent the behavioral settings to which the results were intended to carry over.9

Representative learning design (RLD) or representative task design (RTD) helps with functionality where information is like the performance environment and action fidelity, which is the degree to which an athlete’s movement behavior during practice replicates movement performance during competition. Coaches can harness Brunswik’s (1955/56) ideas of representative design by including information from the performance environment in the practice setting.

If we use RTD and scale the information, then the athlete can develop relevant information-movement couplings. In the Emergence courses “Underpinnings” and “Ecological Dynamics for Dummies,” information-movement couplings are described as being as much about the environment as about the organism. The transactions that take place between the athlete and the environment and the nuances of the problem serve to guide the movement solution organized. When athletes interact with slices of their sport, they become attuned to relevant information, which serves to guide the organization of their movement.

Essentially, an athlete’s perceptual systems become sensitive to informational variables that they need to control their actions without the need for extra processing. If we view ourselves as problem designers and not teachers of idealized models, practice for athletes becomes a search process, where they can organize adaptive and functional (useful or relevant) solutions to the unique and complex problems they face in sports.

Originally proposed by Karl Newell5, the constraints-led approach (CLA)—which is underpinned by nonlinear pedagogy and ecological dynamics—first addressed the development of infants and quickly became the methodological model used in sports to help guide athletes’ behavior by reducing or eliminating options.3 The CLA appreciates the performer, task, and environment relationship, where all three dynamic components shape the behavior that emerges. Below are a few examples from each category of constraints.

  • Task: Number of opponents, space, boundaries, time, rules, equipment, surface, etc.
  • Environmental: Light, temperature, humidity, friends or family present, etc.
  • Individual: Height, weight, muscle-fat ratio, emotional and motivational levels, etc.

When athletes search an affordance landscape, certain invitations emerge based on their intentions and action capabilities. As a coach, we can help to channel their search by changing a rule, amplifying the space, directing their attention to a particular area, adding or taking away opponents, and so on. In conclusion, when athletes interact with slices of their sport in training, there is a greater likelihood of functional movement solutions emerging in the game.

When athletes interact with slices of their sport in training, there is a greater likelihood of functional movement solutions emerging in the game, says @TylerYearby. Share on X


Video 2. Skill is a search—constraint manipulation in American football.

Freelap USA: Can I use an ecological dynamics approach in the weight room?

Tyler Yearby: Variation in exercises is an important way to prevent long-lasting imbalances and asymmetries.10

The above delineates one of the many reasons why a “repetition without repetition” approach in the warm-up and weight room is such a valuable addition. While being far ahead of his time, the late Nikolai Bernstein coined the phrase “repetition without repetition,” which implies that repetitive attempts at the same task are accompanied by variable trajectories of elemental variables11.

The performer-task-environment relationship is dynamic. For this reason, Emergence introduced a repetition without repetition approach to the weight room. In our course “Approaching the Weight Room from an Ecological Dynamics Perspective,” we appropriately cover ideas that support a nonlinear approach to the weight room. Here, I will highlight a few points as well as offer some practical takeaways.

The weight room is a place where the focus has long been on muscular development and overall strength gains. This is all fine and dandy, but has our focus been too narrow? Is there a need to take a more holistic approach? I think so! I propose that the weight room is a component of a larger system. Essentially, it has value, but for most of us, maybe our focus has limited our opportunity.

First, let’s look at physical literacy. It is hard to land on a single definition for the term, but Will Roberts, Senior Lecturer in Sport and Exercise from the University of Gloucestershire, said, “It’s more holistic than just the physical. It’s more about how people become confident, motivated, and have the knowledge to become more physically active.”12 At Emergence, we like to use the warm-up and what are traditionally viewed as weight room exercises to help guide the athlete in becoming more physically literate. Beyond the physical development, there is perceptual, cognitive, social, emotional, and so forth. It transcends sports, but certainly helps with athletic development as well!

So, before we discuss the obvious contributions, let’s briefly touch on social and emotional development. If we offer our athletes some guidance and allow them to explore their movement capabilities, you can imagine that most will leave the training sessions with more confidence and competence. In efforts to design an environment that offers multiple areas of development, try designing exercises that allow them to engage with a partner.

To create an environment that offers athletes multiple areas of development, try designing exercises that allow them to engage with a partner, and also change partners from time to time. Share on X

I also encourage changing partners from time to time. Not only do people move differently, but it provides the athlete with an opportunity to work with someone else, which continues to promote social growth. The movements or exercises selected can vary a bit depending on age, physical development, etc. but should include nontraditional choices.

I view strength training sessions as a time to help guide the athlete in opening their degrees of freedom on all levels (motor, perceptual, and cognitive). This approach helps the athlete explore different positions and shapes, as well as experience varying loads. In addition to being able to express strength and power in many ways, we should also design exercises or movement situations where the athlete searches for the appropriate coordination strategy/movement solution.

Coordination can be viewed as the function that constrains the potentially free variables (degrees of freedom, or DoF) of a system into a behavioral unit/movement solution.5 The idea is that an athlete has experienced a range of movements in the hopes of harnessing the free variables as the training becomes more specific. Co-Director of Education at Emergence, Shawn Myszka, talks about using the early off-season to increase effectivities (capabilities or physical capacities of a person) and determined rate limiters.

Rather than sticking with the same approach for everyone (which is often too bilaterally focused), I suggest adding variety, which will help with the determined rate limiters of each individual athlete. This approach can certainly be used throughout the season as well. Every athlete and every team is different, so the timing and length will vary.

Let’s face it, we need to trade the traditional way of coaching for a different approach if we hope to bridge the gap between the weight room and the sport. This does not mean we can’t challenge our athletes. It is how and why they are challenged that should change.

Traditional strength and conditioning coaches (and personal trainers) are very technically driven and often assume that every athlete moves the same way. This is generally accompanied by copious amounts of instruction before and during the movement. Let’s be frank—assuming there is only one way to move is ludicrous. The video below is just one example of how some of the total body lifts can be adjusted to fit a “repetition without repetition” approach.


Video 3. Repetition without repetition in the weight room

This approach provides the athlete with autonomy while allowing them to move weight from a variety of positions, at different tempos, with different stances, etc. Note that we’re not suggesting the athlete do whatever they want. Some explicit guidance is still used, which allows the athlete to problem-solve in a safe way. It is just the amount that should decrease.

In “Approaching the Weight Room from an Ecological Dynamics Perspective,” we discuss how and when to appropriately use variability. Our athletes often find themselves in unique, unfavorable, and disadvantaged positions. If we can push the needle even a bit in the way we approach the warm-up and the weight room, then our athletes will be in a better place to succeed. Remember, successful skill acquisition results in the emergence of behavior that is adaptable to a range of varying performance contexts.13

Major takeaways:

Accept – learning is nonlinear, a “repetition without repetition” approach, explicit guidance is still needed (just not drowning them with instruction), and athlete autonomy.

Avoid – coaching every repetition, trying to progress everything in a linear manner, inundating them with information, and assuming there is one biomechanical truth.

Just like the session design for the field, court, pitch, and so on, we hope to guide the athlete in chasing dexterity.Dexterity is not confined within the movements or actions themselves but is revealed in how these movements behave in their interaction with the environment, with its unexpectedness and surprises.4

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


References

1. Seifert, L. and Davids, K. “Ecological Dynamics: A theoretical framework for understanding sport performance, physical education, and physical activity.” CS-DC ’15 World e-conference, 2015.

2. Chow, J., Davids, K., Button, C., and Renshaw, I. Nonlinear Pedagogy in Skill Acquisition. (Routledge, 2016).

3. Renshaw, I., Davids, K., Newcombe, D., and Roberts, W. The Constraints-Led Approach. (Routledge, 2019).

4. Bernstein, N. The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. 1967.

5. Newell, K. “Constraints on the development of coordination.” In M. Wade and H. Whiting (Eds). Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control. 1986.

6. Davids, K., Bennett, S., and Newell, K. M. Movement System Variability. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2006.

7. Araujo, D., Davids, K., Bennett, S., et al. “Emergence of sport skills under constraints.” In Williams, A.M. Hodges, N.J. (eds) Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice (London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2004), pp. 409-433.

8. Jacobs, D, and Michaels, C. “Direct Learning.” Ecological Psychology. 2007;19(4):321-349.

9. Brunswik, E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1956.

10. Wormhoudt, R, Savelsbergh, G, Teunissen, J, and Davids, K. The Athletic Skills Model. Routledge, 2017.

11. Latash, M. “Movements that are Both Variable and Optimal.” Journal of Human Kinetics. 2012;34:5-13.

12. Roberts, W. (June 26, 2019) Talent Equation Podcast, “Coaching is a merry go round…the challenge is knowing when to jump on.”

13. Araújo, D. and Davids, K. “What Exactly is Acquired During Skill Acquisition?” Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2011;18(3-4):7-23.

 

Holler Speed Train

Solo Speed Training in 700 Words

Blog| ByTony Holler

Holler Speed Train

Buy spikes.

Buy Freelap Pro BT112.

Find your constraints. How many days can you train fresh?

If you have NO constraints, train Monday through Friday. Three speed workouts (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and two X-Factor workouts. Never let today ruin tomorrow. Small doses stimulate, moderate doses inhibit, large doses kill.

(When it comes to workouts), small doses stimulate, moderate doses inhibit, large doses kill, says @pntrack. Share on X

What Is a Speed Workout?

Total time: 25-40 minutes. If you know Reflexive Performance Reset (RPR), do it. If you don’t know RPR, get the online course.

Do “wake-up drills,” aka “speed drills.” I suggest doing fast marches, A-skips, high knees, box jumps (jump over five imaginary boxes), prime times done fast x2 (aka straight-legged bounds), and butt kicks done fast x2 (aka retro sprints), and finish with one acceleration into top speed.

These speed drills need to be done with max intent, max intensity, and 100% effort for 5-6 seconds each.

Never jog.

Try to look like Carl Lewis (run tall, knee up with foot under knee, hand crosses the hips).

Spike up.

Do three sprints with five minutes’ rest. Do two flys (10-yard or 10-meter) and one 40-yard dash. To time the 40 with Freelap, put the start cone 3 feet in front of the starting line. Put the finish cone 3 feet past the finish line.

Flys are max speed sprints, so do a 20- to 30-meter run-in.

Always run with the wind.

Record every time.

For fun, convert your fly times into miles per hour. Mph = 20.45 ÷ 10-yard fly or mph = 22.37 ÷ 10-meter fly.

What Is an X-Factor Workout?

X-Factor workouts are 25-40 minutes of maximum intent, non-sprint work with each effort lasting 6-10 seconds and enough rest to repeat at the same level. Plyometrics are the most common X-Factor exercise. Strength work is fine as long as it doesn’t ruin the next day. Hip mobility work should be done once a week. Med ball work is great.

Wickets are obviously close to sprinting, but since we aren’t timing and aren’t wearing spikes, wickets are done on X-Factor days. Sprint into eight wickets, spaced at 6 feet.

Have fun. Be innovative. There are a lot of X-Factor videos out there. Check out the Twitter accounts of @kyle_edwards32 and @grahamsprints. Even if you do something worthless like speed ladders, the low-dose approach will ensure that no harm is done.

My team doesn’t push or pull anything, but if you are into that kind of thing, this is when you do it.

If You Have Constraints

If you have football workouts for five hours a day on Monday through Thursday and 7on7 tournaments on the weekends, forget about speed training. You are doomed to get slower this summer. Athletes with this schedule will become efficient at playing in third gear. It’s everywhere.

Over-scheduling is an enemy of speed, says @pntrack. Share on X

If you have basketball in the morning and baseball in the evening, you will stay slow. Over-scheduling is an enemy of speed.

I recently set up a speed program for an athlete with the ubiquitous 7-12 football obligation Monday through Thursday. Obviously, this is not conducive to speed work, but there’s a way to at least maintain speed and a slight chance of improving speed.

My program called for a minimum of eight hours of sleep every night. Yes, that’s what’s wrong with 7:00 a.m. workouts. To be at your best, you need to be up by 5:30 a.m., which means you must be sleeping by 9:30 p.m. the previous night. This is NOT optimal for teenagers.

Since sprint training can only be effective when athletes are rested and energetic, Friday must be an off-day (total rest). Saturday and Sunday will be speed days. Pick the best time of the day, the time when you feel the most energized. If you drink coffee, do it before your speed workout.

X-Factor, like speed work, is also rest-dependent. With a grueling schedule Monday through Thursday, it’s highly likely that X-Factor can’t be done. However, with the help of an afternoon nap and some pre-workout caffeine, the athlete might squeeze in some X-Factor work in the evenings.

If you learn nothing else from this article, train speed when fresh.

If you learn nothing else from this article, train speed when fresh, says @pntrack. Share on X

If You Need More

You can find all my courses on CoachTube.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

 

Choose Your Path

Applying Ockham’s Razor to Coaching

Blog| ByBrennan Mickelson

Choose Your Path

William of Ockham was a 14th century English philosopher who is famous for his ideas in the category of metaphysical nominalism. (Please, don’t stop reading. I swear there is some decent content here.) His most famous concept is “Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitate,” which in English means, “More things should not be used than are necessary.”

While there is no indication that he wrote that exact phrase, he is given credit for the idea of not lending mental bandwidth to something that is not “self-evident, known by experience, or proved by an authority.” These three rules result in a burden-of-proof spectrum ranging from easiest to most challenging to prove. When developing a program (whether you’re periodizing, individualizing, or choosing exercises) or making on-the-fly changes to a program (based on accumulated workloads, players’ daily psychological testing, or undulations based on feedback from VBT or RPE), it’s critical that what you implement is bucketed into one of these categories.

Apply this burden-of-proof spectrum to help navigate data collection, program development, and on-the-fly changes to achieve the outcomes you want. Share on X

If you’re unable to bundle your changes into one of these three categories, then there’s no point in implementing them and expecting the outcome you want. And don’t confuse this with the scientific process!

Self-Evident

I would characterize self-evident as two things:

  1. Something obvious: “Hafthor Bjornsson is strong” (yep, that checks out).
  1. Something that a person knows about themselves: “My body doesn’t respond well to barbell back squatting.” Okay, then I probably won’t barbell back squat this athlete.

I would describe a self-evident change as something intuitive. Assume, for example, an athlete has a major force production imbalance with one of their legs. Intuitively, as a coach, I would recommend a decrease in bilateral lower body work with an increase in unilateral lower body work. Also, possibly some correctives if the loading pattern for their squat jump is askew. Those of you who are thinking, that’s pretty obvious, my guy—that’s the whole point. Self-evident changes need to be extremely obvious to justify being in this category.

For those of you asking: Why would I make an emphasis on correctives and unilateral training? The athletes I work with squat 2x bodyweight, they don’t need single-leg work. I’m not saying you should inundate an athlete only with corrective exercises to fix the imbalance and never lift heavy. If the athlete is strong, they should continue to train, but with a unilateral emphasis until the imbalance is more manageable.

There’s also something to the idea of a self-fulfilling prophecy when working with athletes, and this is what makes coaching tricky. Each athlete has their own psychological makeup that, at the very least, we need to consider. How an athlete appraises a situation is critical to understanding the hormonal cascade that will ensue. If an athlete believes something is good or bad for them, it probably is. This self-evident category is perhaps best used for athletes who are in-tune with their bodies and minds and know how they respond to demands; it’s not very applicable for youth and novice athletes.

Known by Experience

This category is similar to the self-evident classification regarding athletes’ experiences with their bodies. However, I would argue this is based more on a coach’s experience and their relationships with their athletes and can be applied more globally. I think of self-evident responses as a 1:1 ratio. Does the athlete have poor arm swing during a sprint? Work on front side mechanics; you probably won’t fix the problem as effectively if you don’t work on the exact issue. With knowing by experience, there are many different changes you can make based on one problem. The athlete isn’t sleeping well at night and has acquired a 12-hour sleep debt. What do you do? Well, if you don’t know your athlete’s nightly routine, this would be a good place to start. Another example is knowing that collegiate athletes are going to have a tremendous amount of stress during finals week. Having the wherewithal to program a de-load week or to schedule optional activities is knowing from experience.

Essentially, this means knowing that uncontrollable stressors—sport performance stress, school stress, family stress, financial stress, sleep stress—all affect athletes in a similar way as the stressors you program in the weight room or on the field. These uncontrollable stressors compound the acute stresses in your program because they are chronic and affect athletes continuously throughout the week(s). Knowing when individual athletes are more stressed (academic tests, a poor run of form, continuous weekly sleep debt, etc.) and responding appropriately based on your experience and your relationship with the athletes are what makes knowing by experience effective, though more challenging than self-evident responses.

Proved by an Authority

This category has the highest burden of proof and is mostly reserved for the hard sciences and using the scientific method to prove cause and effect. For example, HIT training can yield similar aerobic adaptation when compared to moderate-intensity training and can do so with less training volume (shameless plug). Having a proven, accurate, and reliable way to measure performance outcomes is the most effective way to achieve this category. For example, I wanted to improve my vertical jump, so I embedded more plyometrics and jump training into my program. My LBM and fat mass stayed the same, and my vertical jump increased. I can prove the program caused the change.

So, how do these philosophical tenets reflect where strength and conditioning coaches and sports scientists are now in the 21st century? Great question!

Our Data Obsession

Currently, our industry is obsessed with data, linear regression models, correlations, and statistical significance. We search for these things as if they will tell us exactly when our athletes will be sick or injured or what exercise will make inferior athletes better than the genetically gifted athletes. We attempt to find correlations with random data points to all good and bad outcomes (Good God! We’ve had ten soft tissue injuries on Tuesdays this year, therefore to limit soft tissue injuries, we shouldn’t train on Tuesdays). We don’t remember the first thing we learned in Stats 101: correlation does not imply causation. Now, before I get too carried away and make every sport science department in the country scream at their computer screens in disgust, data in athletic development is necessary.

However, we’ve been ignoring the simple principle that Ockham described over 700 years ago. In the same vein, Leonardo da Vinci said, “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” The more screens, tests, and data collected during a year, the more noise there is, and the harder it can be to find the signal you’re looking for. The key is the data needs to have (data analytics people say it with me…) actionable insight. So how does this bring us to programming? Another excellent question.

The three most important programming steps:

  1. Data Collection. Accurate and reliable testing of athletes on specific characteristics that are important to the sport they play or the goals you want them to accomplish (these play a varying role, but are required by all sports).

    • Sufficient mobility: ROM testing, mobility screens, etc.
    • Adequate motor control: OH squat testing, dissociation testing, etc.
    • Aerobic capacity: HR recovery testing, VO2 max, etc.
    • General strength: Repetition max testing, force plate testing, etc.
    • Power: Vertical jump testing, broad jump testing, force plate testing, etc.
    • Speed: 40-yard dash, 5-10-5, etc.
  1. Periodized Program. A well thought out plan that varies based on the test results of each athlete.

    • Attacking weaknesses while solidifying strengths
  1. Retesting. This ensures the program accomplishes the athletes’ goals.

    • Our actionable insights and Ockham’s razor come into play here. If the data you collect does not change the way you program, coach, or interact with an athlete or if the changes you make don’t alter the data or outcome, is the data worth collecting?
    • If the data you’re collecting causes a change in the way you program, then I would argue yes, it is worth collecting—it’s causing actionable changes to the way you’re programming for an athlete. However, if these changes do not show results, is the test viable for the athletic characteristic?

With these three programming steps in place, how can Ockham’s razor and actionable insight help us design effective programs?

Avoid Death by Data Collection

Just as Ockham described, “More things should not be used than are necessary.” So, if you’re collecting data on athletes and don’t take any actions after you collect data, what is the point of gathering it in the first place? For example, if you monitor an athlete’s power output on a force plate and don’t make changes to the program based on their data, why do you have them jump in the first place? Don’t just check the box to say that you monitor athletes. You’re wasting your time and, more importantly, the athlete’s time.

Attack Their Weakness and Solidify Their Strengths

In a well-designed program, each athlete will most likely perform similar movements with modifications based on training age, mobility deficiencies, and movement preferences. Particularly in professional sports, athletes do have a say in their program. If they don’t want to do the movement you have programmed, you need to explain why you included that exercise and then give them a choice on modifications that are similar to the original plan.

If an athlete needs to improve their force production based on force plate measures, there are hundreds of ways to accomplish this, and it becomes increasingly specific when you have other data points to consider for the athlete. Knowing by experience comes into play here. We need to consider many factors, and having the experience and the knowledge of the athlete’s future goal will be critical in the decision-making process. If this same athlete has an excellent rate of force development, adding additional mass could hinder their RFD. Therefore, it would be best if the athlete added as much LBM and as little FFM as possible. Making sure that the athlete is aware of the goal—and giving examples of how they can achieve that goal nutritionally—is critical. However, if the athlete doesn’t need an extremely high RFD (think of offensive lineman in football), adding any kind of mass takes precedence. The key is to monitor progress and change course when the data you collect indicates it’s time to do so.

Monitor Adaptations with a Test and Retest Method

As stated earlier, we need to test and retest athletes to ensure that desired adaptations are occurring. The testing methods you choose must be self-evident or proved by an authority. You can effectively program for teams based on the goals set forth by the on-field coaching staff and then individualize the program based on the desires and needs of each athlete. When you’re initially testing your athletes, the tests must be reliable and accurate. If changing body composition is a goal, make sure you use a properly calibrated machine (underwater weighing and Bod Pod are the gold standards). If the initial testing is wrong or if force plate numbers were inflated, there is no way to show changes resulting from the program. Or, even worse, you reveal that your athletes got worse because of some incorrect numbers you initially gathered. Being able to show that adaptations occurred not only proves that the programming was effective but also demonstrates your inherent value as a practitioner.

You display even more value when you show that you accomplished the overall goal for the team (increasing team power output via force plate measures, for example) while also improving individual imbalances measured by the force plate, all while improving cardiovascular fitness demonstrated via a fitness test. (I’ll take the bonus in a lump sum, thanks!)

What Now?

As a coach, if you ever find yourself saying, “This is the way that we have always done it,” take a step back and listen. Take an unbiased look at what someone is suggesting. See what their evidence suggests and try to understand why they think a change could be helpful. The best way to implement Ockham’s razor in your programming is to use it as a lens to analyze your current program, “Know yourself and seek self-improvement.” See where you can make improvements as a coach, whether it’s the data collection process, the implementation of individual training, or showing adaptations to on-field staff or even athletes. No competitive athlete I’ve worked with has ever been disappointed by seeing improvements in the data.

As with anything, Bruce Lee’s quote “absorb what is useful, discard what is useless, add what is uniquely your own” remains true. If something is useful, use it. If a training method comes out that shows improvement in every athletic quality at the same time, you best believe I’m going try it out for myself. If something isn’t useful, discard it. If a test doesn’t measure what it says it measures, get rid of it—it’s a waste of time. Add what is uniquely your own. If an athlete believes something will improve their performance, let them have their placebo effect. Just remember, “More things should not be used than are necessary.”

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Arroyo-Clean

What I Did During the Pandemic (and Why)—COVID Stories from an S&C Coach

Blog| ByPete Arroyo

Arroyo-Clean

One day I served some fish to an older man. He asked me: “Are you grieving?” Or at least I thought he did. Grieving for what? I wondered. My perplexed looked spurred him to repeat his question, and he slowed his cadence to let the words be understood even with his accent and the muffling of his mask: “How’s your breathing?”

I guess my mask was a dead giveaway. He then asked, “How much longer?” and I replied, “I’ll have your order right up, sir!” “No! No! How much longer like this?” he said, meaning the social distancing rules, the pandemic, the quarantine. I optimistically replied, “I’m hoping our governor gives us some leeway come June.”

“Are you praying for it?” he asked.

“Sir,” I answered. “I don’t pray. I prepare.”

I didn’t intend to belittle him, nor do I have anything against praying in general. My statement was a verbal confirmation of how I am currently dealing with the world around me. During situations like this, I think it best to reflect on how good we still have it. As someone who has been fortunate enough to make a living in the fitness and training industry for nearly 20 years, I’d say I (and we all) have it pretty good.

Why We All Should

The story above is an account of an interaction I had with a customer in my new job in the meat market of a local grocery store. You may ask why would I be working at a grocery store during a pandemic? Because I can! In fact, most of us in this industry can! We are all able-bodied, supposedly service-driven, and currently have the time.

It has almost become cliché these days to hear many of us in this industry speak or write about “serving others” or “impacting the community.” What better way to act than to help a local “essential” business provide for the community? Is it hard work? Yes! Do you get paid comparably? Not even close! But do you get the opportunity to serve the community and keep them safe? Absolutely!

Initially, the quarantine downtime was much needed and not all bad. But for me, the routine of waking up and preparing for nothing got old quickly. Share on X

Initially, the quarantine downtime was much needed and not all bad. Taking some time to step back and regroup was probably a great thing for all of us. But for me, the routine of waking up and preparing for nothing got old quickly. Leave it to watching a few old-school Dusty Rhodes promos to get me going:

Times like these will reveal who we really are. Are we the ones who pray for better times…wishing that things get better? Or are we the ones that prepare to make things better? Are we the ones to go out there and do what we can, given the hand we are dealt? THIS IS A GREAT TIME to find out who we really are! Find out what we are made of! Find out what we are capable of!

Coach Arroyo Grocery
Image 1. Coach Pete Arroyo dressed for his shift as an essential worker at a local grocery store’s meat and fresh seafood counter.


For those of us who approach our daily sessions as providing “the best part of our client’s day,” the approach is the same but in a fraction of the time. Let’s face it, our service in private sector is a luxury for most people who can afford us. The service provided by grocery store clerks, staff, and management, on the other hand, is an everyday necessity for most (exacerbated by the current situation).

This meat market job required getting back to basics both physically and mentally. It specifically called for lifting and transporting heavy boxes of meat, handling heavy-duty cleaning equipment, and moving and positioning non-ergonomic landscapes.

For example, the counter is meant for customer presentation without regard for the comfort of the worker. Those big, plexiglass-covered cases look great from the front, but our access to safely get your order is not always easy. A small sliding glass door that sometimes gets stuck from semi-frozen meat juices serves as the only way in to access misaligned display trays. Getting the tray out was sometimes an effort in grace and balance, and you didn’t want to spill any chicken juices on the pork or beef…yikes! Flashbacks of working in tightly packed rooms, weaving in and out of forests of racks and bodies, came to mind—avoiding hazards while not infringing on personal space.

After my first few weeks of on-the-job-training, I was put in charge of “the pier.” Depending on my shift, this entailed setting (opening shift) or breaking (closing shift) the day’s catch with a combined focus on presentation, safety, and shelf-life preservation. I cannot understate the attention to detail needed for setting and breaking, as well as its tediousness. The cooked, raw, and live products needed to be assessed for freshness and separated. Avoiding cross-contamination while maintaining freshness were the key goals.

Pier Case
Image 2. “The Pier” when empty and then later after the painstaking effort to carefully stock.


Comparably, the skill sets of area setup and incoming athlete assessment will become equally tedious and focused tasks moving forward. As we return to our work settings, preparing workspaces for safety (and the clear perception of it) will be paramount. Properly spacing small groups, applying surface barriers, and checking temperatures will now be our new normal.

Dealing with the pier, on top of the monumental efforts of cleanliness and dealing with shortages of both product and overall customer confidence, added to the pressure of the job. Even during pre-COVID times, customer interaction is the key to driving sales. Add the mental stress, emotional pendulum, and panic of a pandemic, and you have an exercise in futility on some days.

To start, market clerks must undergo double the safety training of any other employee in the store. What I thought were just regular sanitary procedures were amplified: constant handwashing, cleaning of surfaces, and avoiding cross-contamination became a lesson in obsessive-compulsive behaviors. Checking fridge/freezer temps, the stock of items, and when the fresh load was coming kept my senses on high alert during my entire shift.

Our initiatives to keep our athletes safe need to be visible to set their minds at ease as well as reflect our level of care for them. Share on X

This was especially important for customers to witness: The heightened level of care became habits in good “selling.” Setting minds at ease and maintaining customer confidence became an art form, as our everyday behaviors became our path to increasing store sales. Likewise, some of our clients may not want to return to our facilities immediately. As every sound business uses word of mouth to drive their sales, our initiatives to keep our athletes safe need to be visible to set their minds at ease as well as reflect our level of care for them.

Closing Is Crucial

Closing is the job that no one wants, but it was the most crucial to our success. It was clear to me how loathed this duty was when the two other guys that started at the same time I did in mid-April—both of whom had similar shift times—only lasted a combined total of two days. My first night closing was a lesson in humility and what hard work truly is. Breaking down the grinder, saw, and tenderizer correctly—followed by the most thorough cleaning process I have ever experienced—left my body sore, my clothes stinking, and the taste of sanitizer in my nostrils every single night.

As much as we all hate late-night gym checks, we need to take the time to leave our facilities as if we are opening on Day 1—not only to give us pride in our ownership, but also to tell our clients everything they need to know about our programs.

Closing the back room was made much easier due to a younger co-worker, Rich, who trained me. I cannot say enough about him: This young man displayed more patience than he should have and allowed me to learn by screwing a few things up. He did what every good coach does in that regard and taught me the road to perfection is littered with failure. For myself (as a coach), I found value in taking a step back and being less vocal, which allowed for more concise instruction in the spaces of time in-between. I must thank Rich for showing me what that looks like.

The first couple of times I closed, I had to do it on my own since the woman who was supposed to operate the front never showed up (and quit a few days later). Closing is a two-person job, where one cleans the back room and the other tends to customers and keeps up with other general duties. In this case, I was doing two jobs at once, and the effectiveness of each was marred by my attendance to the other.

You know the old saying about chasing two rabbits? If any of us have had staff no-show at our facilities, we know the havoc it wreaks on our plans. Well, in this case, just take a deep breath and do the best you can, even if it breaks you a couple of times. Those nights were rough, but as I gained experience, I mentally planned to do this job alone and developed a routine that made things easier.

Much like any new job environment, the learning curve depends on your level of attention and desire to do the job better and better. This is also imperative for all of you younger coaches breaking in: Develop your routines and contingency plans immediately! At the very least, it will keep you aware and ready for the worst.

Lessons and Customer Stories

The kicker with cleaning the back room in this store was that it did not have a central drain, which made the finishing touch a royal pain in the butt. As the machines were sprayed down, leftover meat particles sluiced with standing water bogged the area.


Video 1. Coach Pete Arroyo in action during the backroom closing and sanitizing process.

We rigged a Shop-Vac to suck up all this standing water. Every time it backed up, I had to stop the rinse and allow it to empty into a sink compartment. Any of us who have worked in or near bigger cities know the frustrations that come with stop-and-go traffic—in this case, my flow (no pun intended) was interrupted several times, making a long job even longer and wetter. But, hey, I signed up for this after all.

The lesson here is that even when situations and settings are less than ideal, there is always a tool available to get the job done, no matter how “primitive.” Share on X

The lesson here is that even when situations and settings are less than ideal, there is always a tool available to get the job done, no matter how “primitive.” Most coaches have many high-tech tools at their disposal these days, but if that OFF button was ever hit, what would you do? What if that fancy software program decides not to cooperate or the Wi-Fi crashes? Do you still know how to use a notebook? This actually did happen to me the week upon returning to my training facility.

One day I had a gentleman (or so I thought) ask for a few pounds of shrimp, but it had to be the Argentinian shrimp. “Don’t give me that Chinese s**t!” he demanded. “You can’t trust nuttin’ from there!” I was caught a bit off-guard that his reason for requesting the Argentinian shrimp wasn’t due to flavor or a particular recipe, but instead reflected some of the hysteria of the pandemic. I gladly directed him to the bagged shrimp in aisle eight, and I told him it was what we have in the display anyway (it’s the dirty little secret of the fish counter).

He told me he would wait instead for a fresh load another day. Did I not just tell him this was what we had on display? I was slightly entertained because his line was in one of my favorite movies of all time, “The Wrestler,” when Randy “The Ram” Robinson was placing an order of his own with the big guy in the gym. I won’t elaborate what that means. In this job, you interact with all types, and dealing with the stupid in a classy way becomes a skill.

You may have experienced this in dealing with well-to-do parents or ignorant sport coaches giving you “advice” on what they want their athlete to do. The best secret you can tell them is that there are no secrets.

Another older gentleman ordered some salmon one day and then asked: “Is that salmon fresh?” Quickly remembering my prior interaction with the Argentinian shrimp-shopper, I saw it as high time to use another line from “The Wrestler.” “Fresh as monkey’s breath, brother!” I replied. At first, he looked perplexed, but my subsequent giggle set him at ease, and he chuckled slightly when he realized I was joking. We have to keep things fun in dark and uncertain times!

Another day, an older woman came to the block and said, “I want three pounds of beef, freezer-wrapped, and I want it now.” At that point, we just happened to be out of the ground beef she wanted, and the butchers had to grind it fresh. This wasn’t a good start—she sighed loudly in disappointment, and I then had to turn my attention to other customers.

What made it a bit rougher was the fact that I wasn’t yet coached on how to freezer-wrap—after doing what I thought was right, I asked a more experienced cutter, only to have him point at the brown paper and tell me, “Use that.” Okay, I took my time and wrapped to the best of my ability (which, looking back, was not particularly good). And—you guessed it—she used that time to loudly complain, “Hurry up! Don’t you know what you are doing?” All this with a decent line of customers behind her.

Thankfully, the manager popped up, stepped in, and wrapped it, but when I turned around to give the customer her order, she had disappeared. I tracked her down and gave her the package, only to have her slam it into her cart without any verbal response. A few minutes later, a front-end worker brought it back to the market counter and said the customer didn’t want it. Man, was I angry…and the lesson here is you cannot please everyone (nor be everything to everyone), no matter the lengths you go to. For some, it will never be enough, and those are usually the ones who point fingers when they fail.

Continuing to Serve

In retrospect, taking a part-time job in the meat market at a local grocery chain was my way of preparing as opposed to praying. As anyone in our line of work can attest to, this pandemic situation has been rough on many fronts. Many of us in this field have businesses or jobs at schools and need our income to support our families. The financial, mental, and physical toll of having our livelihoods stripped away without foresight of “if” or “when” we could return goes without saying.

The anxiety from the idle time can wreak havoc on our bodies, minds, and souls. The best remedy for me was to continue to serve the best way I possible could. Share on X

I am lucky: I do not have anyone I am solely responsible for. The only responsibility I have in that regard is taking care of those in the world around me (clients) and my reputation. The anxiety from the idle time can wreak havoc on our bodies, minds, and souls. For myself, the best remedy was continuing to serve the best way I possibly could. I’m certainly not a spring chicken anymore, but am able-bodied, have nothing but time, and love making an impact anywhere I can.

“Isolation is not desperation.” –Unknown

Teamwork

Team Culture in Sport

Blog| ByRobert Panariello

Teamwork

Whether professional or collegiate organization sport coach, strength and conditioning (S&C) coach, medical staff, executive, senior administrator, department director, etc., the role of somebody in a position of authority is to consistently establish and introduce the strategic platforms and advances that will result in successful team outcomes. A career in athletics also necessitates an obligation to foster a high standard for the positive development of the organization’s administration, workforce, and athletes both on and off the field of play.

Many opportunities are available to continually improve one’s professional craft, including educational seminars, internet searches, reviews of scientific and non-scientific literature, webinars, travels to successful athletic programs, discussions with successful professional peers—the list goes on and on. Improvement also requires persistent professional practice, the experiences that occur over a career, and of course, positive outcomes.

A sports organization’s pursuit of the “Holy Grail” of sustained success appears to be limitless as well. This includes the relentless search for renowned professionals for executive administration, department heads, coaching, medical care, S&C, nutrition, “specialty” staff, and technology, to name a few. During the many conversations that have occurred throughout my career with various medical, professional sport, and collegiate peers, the topic of creating a strong organization and team culture was rarely discussed. When these infrequent “culture” conversations do arise, they usually contain limited substance as to the specifics of achievement versus the often-stated theoretical attainment of a resilient culture.

Whether currently occupying or desiring a future role of authority (e.g., head coach, department head, executive management, etc.), the realization of success is very unlikely without the presence of a strong organizational and team culture. Culture is essential to ensure the frequent and effective desired achievements that lead to success or to transform the kiss of failure into one of triumph.

The realization of success is very unlikely without the presence of a strong organizational and team culture. Share on X

The following summation is founded upon my various experiences as a corporate CEO, department head, head S&C coach, athletic trainer, and practicing sports physical therapist. Also included in the content of this article are my experiences and relationships with prominent professionals, including corporate CEOs and senior-level business executives, nationally recognized medical and healthcare providers, and Hall of Fame sport and S&C coaches.

What Is the Cause of a Once Successful Organization’s Demise?

When placed in a position of authority to establish a resilient culture within an organization, one should recognize that a strong correlation exists between the operations of a sports organization/sports team and that of a corporate business entity, and vice versa. As significant financial revenue is produced from TV contracts, season ticket sales, playoff games, bowl games and national tournaments, team apparel sales, concessions, parking, marketing and advertising, etc., isn’t a team sport organization in reality a business enterprise?

There are various explanations for an organization/athletic team’s decline from its once successful ways, and one significant reason is the deterioration of a strong culture. The demise of any business organization often transpires in a progression of “stages,” as described by business CEO and author Les McKeown. A sports organization and sports team are no exception. The following is a representation of each particular stage founded upon my experiences as applied to a sports organization, department, team, etc. that is failing and perhaps hostile as well.

Having Fun Stage

Once the sport organization, collegiate institution, or sports team has surpassed the initial early struggle stage (a phase omitted from this discussion) of building and establishing a consistent level of success, the organization enters what is deemed the fun stage. During this period of sustained success, the organization has likely assimilated exceptional personnel with the utmost proven ability and skill level into their senior management, administration, work force, medical staff, spectrum of coaches, and team athletes. This is also where all previous efforts result in on-the-field “wins.” As these wins continue to accumulate, the “big dogs” of the organization will now emerge. There is also a persistent exemplary presence of the organization’s vision, processes, policies, systems, education and skill training, accountability, and, of course, culture.

Whitewater Stage

Over time, if the sports organization does not adhere to the established details and culture that have provided persistent success, these accomplishments will be jeopardized to eventually enter the whitewater stage. This is the period where the established processes, policies, systems, and culture are brought into the spotlight and questioned. An attitude of complacency may also ensue, with an evolving mindset of “Why do I have to work so hard now that we’re winning? Haven’t we achieved our objectives?” It is imperative to avert this apathy, as it is vital for the organization to endure in its vision and continue to enhance the platforms, commitments, operations, and culture that achieved initial success.

The phrase “success breeds success” only becomes real with an unrelenting work ethic, a fierce determination for continued advancement, and a thirst for competitive success. The whitewater stage is a very difficult one to endure, and it is here where organizations and leaders may begin to suffer a lack of confidence.

The phrase “success breeds success” only becomes real with an unrelenting work ethic, a fierce determination for continued advancement, and a thirst for competitive success. Share on X

Personnel may plateau and perhaps even regress in their role, requiring reevaluation and possible replacement. As staff and player contracts terminate, renewals may or may not be renegotiated. Staff as well as athletes may vacate, trades are made, and competing organizations may poach executives, administrators, coaches, and athletes in an attempt to reverse their own particular failures. These deleterious circumstances now place unfamiliar stress upon the organization, resulting in a consequential repetitive restarting of the personnel process. The restarting process will likely resemble something similar to the following:

  • Identify the new personnel or athlete.
  • Acquire the new personnel or athlete.
  • Develop (education and train) the new personnel or athlete.
  • Replace the personnel or athlete.

Each new member of the organization must adapt and adhere to the cultural mindset of the organization. Without the sustainment and, if necessary, reestablishment of a strong culture, the reoccurring restarting personnel process cycle will likely become persistent.

Predictable Success Stage

This stage follows the whitewater stage, and it is during this period that all members of the organization must continue to work in unity for the same common cause in accordance with the established organizational objectives. Due to the fluctuating environment, the adjusted strategic objectives must be achieved. At times there may be a hesitation in vision, creativity, risk-taking, and initiative; however, with the continued establishment and maintenance of the ideal foundation of organization personnel, processes, accountability, and culture, success is usually predictable. Predictable success also allows for the addressing and correction of the most recent risks, dangers, and threats that may arise as a possible disruption to the organization’s success.

Treadmill Stage

If the sports organization enters the treadmill phase of this continuum, the organization has probably begun its preliminary demise. Personnel at all levels have continued to become too “comfortable” with their level of sustained success and consequently create an attitude of daily “routine.” The new mindset of “routine” brings with it the consequences of persistent amplified mediocrity and apathy.

NFL Hall of Fame Coach Bill Parcells has taught me that there is a big difference between routine and commitment. When entering the treadmill stage, the workforce becomes less “committed” and is stuck in a repetitive daily performance of “routine,” as little if any positive progress is established. Those still expending a great deal of energy and effort find little if any forward momentum. The organizational culture wavers to place too much emphasis on policy, process, and data, thus reducing the emphasis on direct operational contact, communication, and especially action. Procedures and methods are executed as always but with a corresponding lack of advancement and subsequent poor accountability.

The Big Rut Stage

This stage is the final chance for the organization to avoid a dismal environment; however, for many entering the big rut stage, it may already be too late, as the organization has regressed to its previous losing ways. The ability to be self-aware is lost as animosity now develops between management, coaches, and athletes. Attitude, performance, and culture spiral downward. A rectification is desperately sought as staff is terminated, athletes are released, and new staff and players enter the organization, reinforcing the repetitive restarting process. The restarting process becomes a vicious cycle that initiates time and time again, as failure is now almost certain.

Many professional sport franchises, collegiate sport teams, and business organizations have gone through this unfortunate process of failure to eventually take the appropriate steps to properly reorganize and reestablish themselves as a successful organization. The revival of a once dismal situation is not just an emotional touch, it’s a comprehensive takeover of mediocrity, apathy, and poor culture, and, depending upon the severity of the situation, the filling of empty hearts as well.

The following are recommendations to consider when attempting to reverse a deteriorating sports organization, department, or team into one of sustained success.

Determine the Strategic Platform and Objectives

A successful makeover in organizational culture will require the executive management team, along with the senior administration and head coach, to collectively devise a new organization platform strategy. The foundation of this new platform is based upon the four “P” pillars identified as follows:

  • Position – where to go
  • Perspective – what is seen
  • Plan – what to do
  • Projects – what to prioritize
A successful makeover in organizational culture will require a new organization platform strategy based upon the four “P” pillars: position, perspective, plan, and projects. Share on X

Strategic platform objectives should be established for the parent organization, each department, and the athletic team, as the achievement of these planned objectives will give rise to the overall success of the organization. The strategic objectives should also be achievable, measurable, and specific, and not generalizations such as “Our goal is to win a championship,” as isn’t that every organization’s aspiration? The preliminary objectives may also not be intended for the achievement of an immediate championship, but instead present a fragment of staged objectives with noted timelines of achievement.

The staging of objectives is also instituted with the intention to rapidly change an “unstable” situation to one of “stability.” An example of such a staging may comprise a progressive plan of action to eliminate a lengthy playoff drought, attain success in the playoffs, and progress to win championships. The transformation plan should be specific to the circumstances presented, as a “cookie cutter” or “cut and paste” approach will likely not attain the success desired.

New leadership will plan enhancements for the existing processes, procedures, informative data, and other vital information. There may also be a need to fill the organization’s voids—i.e., additional specific skill-set staff, establishment of departments and/or programs, collection and distribution of new information for attaining the desired objectives, and a new culture to warrant the achievement of the strategic plan objectives to ensure a successful transformation.

Unfortunately, there are also events that happen where the initial planned objectives may be prioritized to steer the organization from disaster to stability, including a defined role to assist in restoring stability to the surrounding community as well. Such ominous circumstances include an organization on the verge of financial and emotional disaster as realized during the somber events of the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attack on New York City, the 2008 financial crisis, Hurricane Sandy in 2012, and the present COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, my professional experiences include all of the above-mentioned events. Whether the objectives are to achieve a gold medal, hoist the championship trophy, or reverse a crisis, the odds of achievement increase dramatically when the organization establishes, and conforms to, an appropriate and strong culture.

Who to Hire?

Only when the organization’s new platform and objectives are determined can the selection of the most suitable candidates to lead this campaign transpire. During arduous times, the current leadership is likely to be removed, and candidates then vie for these newly vacant positions. These candidates will arrive from “within” the organization or from “outside” the organization. Each of these scenarios has advantages as well as disadvantages.

Promoting from within the organization is often appropriate. It is beneficial to have someone at the helm who the organization is familiar with and deems trustworthy—someone acquainted with the organization, as well as the former objectives and present operations, and who has established relationships within the workforce and team athletes. These candidates must also display confidence in their demonstrated ability to reverse the organization’s current undesirable performance.

However, “in-house” candidates may also be limited in “outside” experiences. Some may be restricted by their lone prolonged experiences within the same organization, placing a possible constraint upon their abilities. Candidates from within the organization may also be regarded as “guilty by association” and perceived as partially responsible for the current organization/athletic team demise.

There is an old saying that an “expert” is defined as someone from out of town. “Outside” candidates do provide some advantages for the new leadership roles. These include, but are not limited to, proven unique experiences in present or former leadership roles, the familiarity with proven strategic platforms, planned processes, and the establishment of organizational culture. Many “outside” professionals present a proven “resume” for turning dismal organizations into successful ones. Coach Bill Parcells was well respected for his proven ability to accomplish this task.

Outside candidates are able to make informed unbiased decisions because they lack personal relationships within the organization. These candidates also lead to an opportunity for additional “outside” relationships, staffing, and athletes to now be available to the organization. It is recommended that if an outside candidate is selected to lead the organization, a department within the organization, or the team itself, they should be allowed to employ some of their relationships as well. Newly hired leadership should not be expected to remain isolated on their own island without familiar professional peers who will both conform and believe in the new strategy plan and culture to be implemented. The addition of familiar workforce staff and athletes will contribute to the acceleration of a successful transformation.

One last thought on organization employment. When assembling this new workforce, it is important to not lose focus on the concept of “team.” Many organizations may hire the “best” executives, department heads, staff, and coaches, as well as sign the “best” athletes, yet never achieve the success desired. Although all personnel must possess both the knowledge and skill proficiency to perform their responsibilities admirably, it is not required that they all be regarded as the “best” professionals in their field. However, this new workforce must demonstrate the ability to provide 100% of their skills and efforts each and every day. Therefore, the accretion of such talent may not necessarily include individual “world-renowned” professionals, but on the contrary, the organization will now embrace the best team of professionals in the sport league or conference. There are also occasions for the preference of a hire or signing who displays a bit less talent, but who presents the right fit in an organization’s culture.

Have a Comprehensive and Precise Plan of Action

It is important to remember that hope is not a plan of action. It would be very disingenuous to believe that the reversal of a dismal culture will happen arbitrarily. I am also not aware of any head coach or business executive who has access to a crystal ball. Therefore, at the time of the initiation of this transformation process, an “absolute” prediction of the future is unfounded. Nevertheless, a strong and concise detailed plan of action—one that specifically correlates to the achievement of the new and measurable objectives—is always favorable for implementation.

It is important to remember that hope is not a plan of action. It would be very disingenuous to believe that the reversal of a dismal culture will happen arbitrarily. Share on X

The new strategy must address the role, expectations, and accountability of all in senior management, the workforce, the spectrum of coaches, and athletes. The components of the prescribed plan of action should include, but not be limited to, the following:

  • Identify the current state of the organization and how it measures up to other successful competitive organizations in the sport league or conference.
  • Identify the immediate as well as any significant problems and/or conditions to be resolved along with the corresponding achievable and measurable objectives to ensure this correction.
  • Identify the primary organization departments and personnel best suited to assist with this campaign of culture transformation.
  • Provide the details of the processes, as well as any and all “staging” of this new strategy, including timelines for anticipated achievements.
  • Provide all additional financial costs and structure necessary for the implementation of this strategic plan of action.
  • Provide in detail how this new strategy will reverse the present breakdown in culture and attain success.
  • Describe the advantages of this new strategy and how it positions the organization when compared to other similar competitive organizations.

Culture

Culture is the foundation and backbone of any organization. When a change in leadership takes place, there will likely be an associated change in culture as well. It is important to point out that culture changes through a process of transformation. This transformation is necessary, as the greatest threat to the organization is not the present-day downward spiral but addressing the crisis with yesterday’s logic.

Changing culture requires an acknowledgement of what a strong culture is. With regard to team sports, the physical qualities necessary for athletic success—i.e., strength, power, speed, etc.—are not considered a culture, as these physical qualities are beliefs for athletic achievement. A strong culture encompasses the entire organization and workforce, not just a few segregated departments.

Changing culture requires an acknowledgement of what a strong culture is. Share on X

As an example, how would the enhancement of physical qualities assist the departments of human resources, accounting, legal and compliance, marketing, and technology? Culture necessitates the resilient attributes of cooperation and effort from the entire organization to lead to the appropriate self-accountability (more on this later) of all departments and members of the workforce. This commitment ensures that the obligations and contributions of all departments within the organization will cooperatively assist the team athletes to become stronger, more powerful, and faster.

Culture is also considered the character and personality of the organization. It provides a feeling of unity that positively impacts the organization by solidifying values and objectives while also increasing morale. As Henry Ford stated, “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” An individual commitment to a group effort is essential to establish a strong culture and result in success.

The following 10 behaviors require no talent and will assist in a positive transformation of an organization’s culture.

  1. Be on time.
  2. Bring a strong work ethic.
  3. Provide your best effort daily.
  4. Exhibit positive body language.
  5. Exhibit positive energy.
  6. Have a positive attitude.
  7. Exhibit passion in your work efforts.
  8. Be coachable.
  9. Do the extra.
  10. Always be prepared.

Establishing a strong culture encompasses many parts. To keep this dialogue brief, I will highlight the importance of organizational communication and accountability.

Communication

The practice of good communication lays the groundwork for a strong and resilient organizational culture. When a change in leadership occurs, the various workforce members who have had experiences with a change of leadership versus those who have not should be acknowledged. People react differently to perceived stressful situations, and some individuals may require an altered approach in the communication of the new expectations now placed upon them.

Everyone in the organization is to be informed of the organizational operations. Regardless of the operational methods of the past, this new strategy will now be the precedent moving forward. That stated, those in positions of authority should be open to input from all colleagues and staff for whom they are responsible. These opinions and assessments should be respected and acknowledged; however, these discussions should not alter the foundation of the strategic plan moving forward.

As changes transpire within the organization, some individuals may not have an affinity toward these new adjustments. However, change is the only mechanism that will ensure the transformation of culture and success. It is important to keep the workforce and athletes constantly informed, as daily communication will eventually eliminate the distrust that may be present at the initiation of this cultural transformation.

Change is the only mechanism that will ensure the transformation of culture and success. Share on X

Be explicit and clear with all expectations placed upon each member of the organization, as nobody should have to guess at their role and expected accountabilities. Every associate should understand that their energies are for the greater good of the organization. Inquire each week, “What did your staff love, and what did they loathe?” Employ this information wisely and appropriately.

It is natural for people to want to know why they are unique, why are they special. Everyone in a position of authority should encourage, acknowledge, reward, and reinforce positive achievements, exceptional performances, and especially results. The appreciation and recognition of these achievements should occur in a “public” manner.

Acknowledgement should not be limited to a single department or the athletic team alone, but involve all departments and workforce within the organization, including senior management. It is also significant to recognize that communication frequency trumps quality. Superior culture, work proficiency, and desired outcomes are achieved via the frequency of daily communication versus a single “high quality” end-of-year review.

Accountability

“The single most powerful characteristic of the Predictable Success organization is the existence of a culture of self-accountability.” –Les McKeown

To successfully achieve the desired transformation in workforce culture, every person must be held accountable for their specific role and achievable objective responsibilities. As culture is always evolving, accountability must then advance to a level of self-accountability, an environment where each person is acceptingly accountable to themselves. Self-accountability transforms the perspective of a job as solely a source of income to an opportunity of enthusiasm for the relaying of messages of importance to peers. As each workforce member realizes their own self-accountability, success will come about more easily and rapidly.

Self-accountability also acknowledges all efforts are for the “good of the whole” and not individual accolades. Then again, the success of the whole will also bring forth the individual accolades that many desire. During my time as the head S&C coach at St. John’s University of New York, Hall of Fame Head Basketball Coach Lou Carnesecca often reminded our teams, “Athletes who play the game for fame and fortune will likely achieve neither, but players who strive for championships will likely achieve both.” Everyone in the organization must work in unity for a common vision of success, as none of us is as smart as all of us.

Everyone in the organization must work in unity for a common vision of success, as none of us is as smart as all of us. Share on X

The advancement of self-accountability also leads to trust. The establishment of trust within an organization is imperative to ensure the success of any sports or business entity. Trust can’t be bought, traded for, or spoken about in passing—trust is earned. Trust demonstrates the steadfast dependability of an individual’s contribution of consistency of performance.

As new leadership continues to evolve, additional circumstances may arise that require attention. As previously conveyed, certain individuals in the workforce may not be comfortable or may even contest organizational change. Those refuting the planned organization transformation will require a direct conversation to reinforce the new strategic system presently in place.

As these discussions take place, personalities who may be “stuck in their old ways,” not onboard, and perhaps even disruptive may be exposed. Those who are noncompliant will need to determine if they can conform and remain or leave the organization, informing their direct report accordingly. If a particular individual is regarded as an esteemed member of the organization with a valued skill set, an additional consideration may be a reevaluation for a possible amicable adjustment in organizational role and responsibilities for which they are still held accountable.

Most individuals likely have aspirations for their present and future careers. Those not conforming to the new strategic plan and culture should be confronted with a focused discussion on the effect of their unsuitable and/or defiant behavior upon their personal career opportunities. These opportunities include, but are not limited to, remaining on the team roster or within the organization; playing time; draft status; professional advancement including executive, senior administrative, department head, head or assistant coaching opportunities; future job references; and a poor overall professional reputation, to name a few.

A more positive result for culture “buy-in” will likely take place with an appropriate and respectful conversation based upon an individual’s personal opportunities versus their poor conduct and its effects upon the organization. Although the latter should also be acknowledged, expressed personal interest in the individual emphasizes a sincere appreciation of concern that is often acknowledged with gratitude at the time of these discussions.

Accountability not only correlates to rewards for outstanding performances but consequences for those failing to meet their communicated roles and expectations. Expectations are placed upon the achievement of objective responsibilities. These objectives are to be measured, as quantifying ensures fairness, accuracy, and accomplishment; affords accessibility to pertinent information; and, of course, reinforces the old adage that states: “What gets measured gets done!” Objectives are measured with the purpose of the achievement of progression as well as the attainment of valid and useful information, and not simply for the sake of measuring. Individual popularity, length of tenure, etc. do not allow for “modifications” in accountability, as all in the workforce are expected to conform to the newly recognized standards of the organization.

There are other possible causes for poor individual performance. Absent organization divisions/departments, obsolete equipment and processes, limited number of skilled staff, absent or inadequate education/training methods, poor communication, etc. should also be appraised as contributors to poor performance versus a lack of an individual’s effort or ability to achieve their assigned responsibilities. When these organizational inadequacies are realized, they should be rectified as soon as possible.

Conversations with my peers from various business and sport organizations also reveal an opinion that the enforcement of accountability includes treating all personnel as equals. As this point of view is acknowledged, it should also be recognized that individual backgrounds and personalities vary, the severity of “violations” is wide-ranging, and repeat violations do not materialize from each person within the organization. Therefore, when addressing accountability, there’s no obligation to be fair, there’s an obligation to be right. Each violation of accountability should be addressed based upon the individual and each distinct incident.

It should also be noted that there is a significant difference between discipline and rules. A good friend of mine, now retired, was previously employed on a professional sport team coaching staff that had just gone through a change at the head coach position. The new head coach asked my friend to remain on his new coaching staff, to which he agreed. On one particular occasion, the new head coach called my friend to his office and stated, “I’ve kept all of our players’ fines and records from the time of the previous head coach until now. I’ve fined our players three times more than the previous head coach. Why do you think these problems are still occurring?” The response was simple and direct, “Coach, that’s because you have rules, the previous head coach had discipline.”

The presence of self-accountability also correlates directly to an awareness of self-discipline, resulting in the requirement for very few rules. Share on X

The presence of self-accountability also correlates directly to an awareness of self-discipline, resulting in the requirement for very few rules. Hall of Fame Basketball Coach Bobby Knight, considered one of the greatest college basketball coaches of all time, had one rule for his basketball teams and one rule only: “Don’t do anything that you think I might not like.” The genius of that one statement is that it covered an enormous amount of territory. Coach Bill Parcells places the “discipline” versus “rules” conversation in the proper perspective: “Discipline isn’t about punishing people. It’s about creating an atmosphere where you don’t have to.”

Accountability also correlates to the athletic team’s anticipated performance. I have witnessed athletes being awakened by the coaching staff to confirm class attendance and coaches pursuing athletes to attend team mealtimes even though these meals are provided free of charge, as well as other absurd scenarios. When inquiring why this conduct is tolerated, one implied concern was if the athlete becomes “disgruntled” because they are held accountable, they may transfer to a different institution. The concerns that arise from such scenarios are as follows:

  • Coaches have more appropriate uses of their time than ensuring their athletes attend class or eat meals.
  • Athletes who attend class, attend team meals, etc. demonstrate self-discipline, responsibility, and the willingness to prepare. They earn the trust to be depended upon and the expectation of consistency for their best efforts during team training, practice, and crucial game situations. Can the same be said of an athlete who needs to be “hunted” to attend class, team meals, etc.?
  • If the noncompliant athlete is fairly popular, their inappropriate behavior may spread to their teammates, potentially making a bad situation even worse.
  • All of the team athletes will eventually see through the facade of accountability and no longer tolerate the expected team culture. Such a large setback will eventually establish a large team divide. The cultural foundation is now severely compromised, placing the team at high risk for failure with any additional episodes of adversity or high-pressure situations.

To reflect upon this type of situation from a different perspective, let’s assume that there are staff and team athletes who deliberately violate an organization’s culture and are not held accountable for their actions. As the organization and locker room becomes segregated, the cultural foundation will begin to crumble. The team may win a few games, but it will likely never achieve the level of anticipated success. This state of affairs will likely result in the termination of some combination of senior administrators, head coach, staff, and athletes.

However, the situation won’t end there. There will be an assessment of the organization and team landscape by the newly hired personnel. Upon review of the state of affairs, the new authority will likely release all of the remaining members of the organization and team who continue with their nonconforming conduct, while also questioning how these individuals were ever allowed to remain. Therefore, the accountability that should have initially transpired eventually does transpire, unfortunately at the cost of employment, scholarship, or position on the athletic team.

Successful sports organizations usually have one factor in common—the recognition of and adherence to a strong organizational culture. Share on X

The sustained success demonstrated by some sport organizations is not established by coincidence. Successful sports organizations usually have one factor in common—the recognition of and adherence to a strong organizational culture. During the stressful occurrences of an organization’s demise, the establishment of a new strategic platform that includes measurable objectives, leading to a workforce and athletic team environment of self-accountability and self-discipline, will result in the reestablishment of a strong organizational culture and the eventual return to sustained success.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 80
  • Page 81
  • Page 82
  • Page 83
  • Page 84
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 163
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

FEATURED

  • Using Speed and Power Data to Bucket and Train Faster Athletes
  • Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive
  • 9 (Fun!) Games to Develop Movement Skills and Athleticism

Latest Posts

  • Rapid Fire—Episode #14 Featuring Rodrigo Alvira Isla: Training Smarter in the NBA and G League
  • Maximizing Success in the Weight Room: A College Strength Coach’s Playbook
  • RTP Module #3: Force Plates and Decision Making—A Conversation with Brian Buck

Topics

  • Adult training
  • App features
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Athlete
  • Athlete performance
  • Baseball
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Career
  • Certifications
  • Changing with the Game
  • Coach
  • Coaching
  • Coaching workflows
  • Coching
  • College athlete
  • Course Reviews
  • Dasher
  • Data management
  • EMG
  • Force plates
  • Future innovations
  • Game On Series
  • Getting Started
  • Injury prevention
  • Misconceptions Series
  • Motion tracking
  • Out of My Lane Series
  • Performance technology
  • Physical education
  • Plyometric training
  • Pneumatic resistance
  • Power
  • Power development
  • Practice
  • Rapid Fire
  • Reflectorless timing system
  • Running
  • Speed
  • Sports
  • Sports technology
  • Sprinters
  • Strength and conditioning
  • Strength training
  • Summer School with Dan Mullins
  • The Croc Show
  • Training
  • Training efficiency
  • Wave loading
  • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series
  • Youth athletics
  • Youth coaching

Categories

  • Blog
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcasts

COMPANY

  • Contact Us
  • Write for SimpliFaster
  • Affiliate Program
  • Terms of Use
  • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Disclaimer

Coaches Resources

  • Shop Online
  • SimpliFaster Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Coaches Job Listing

CONTACT INFORMATION

13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

Alachua, FL 32615

(925) 461-5990 (office)

(925) 461-5991 (fax)

(800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

Loading

Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.