• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
You are here: Home / Blog

Blog

Male Hurdler

Applying the ALTIS Principles at the High School Level

Freelap Friday Five| ByJason Hettler

Male Hurdler

Freelap Friday Five with John Corkle

John Corkle is a former ALTIS intern and current co-head coach at Sandra Day O’Connor High School in Phoenix, Arizona. Prior to his three-month role with ALTIS at the beginning of the 2017-2018 season, Corkle lived in the Czech Republic, where he worked with semi-professional and professional clubs in both football and handball. John received a master’s degree in Physical Education-Pedagogy from the University of Nebraska-Kearney.

Freelap USA: Why did you decide to apply for an ALTIS internship position?

John Corkle: I applied to the program because I wanted to get a glimpse of what the “pros” do. I’ve spent time with a lot of different levels of field and court sport athletes but never the track & field professional. I love the sport and it is my “first love” as a coach; however, the highest level I’ve experienced has been at the NCAA Division II level as an athlete and coach. My thought was that if I was exposed to the highest level of the sport, I would have more context around the development of both track and field and team sport athletes.

Freelap USA: What expectations did you have coming in and how did your experience match up? What were some of the most profound takeaways from your internship experience?

John Corkle: I had just returned from living abroad and was working part-time, so I was completing the internship to gain work experience as a full-time assistant coach. As I got more comfortable within the environment, I really started to enjoy my time. An internship is a small amount of time and requires the individual participating in it to be willing to make a change. I felt I was able to do that, and therefore being at ALTIS is something that I will not forget.

The list of takeaways is lengthy and growing as I continuously review my notes. That being said, a few areas that really stood out to me were:

  • Planning year-round for skill acquisition
  • Stress management of athletes
  • The mastery of fundamentals for any level of athlete
  • Being able to adapt and coach multiple areas of need

Freelap USA: Is there anything you’ve directly applied and/or adapted and applied to fit your current role/environment?

John Corkle: I work with a very inexperienced group, so I’ve had to adapt or break down how to teach certain skills or concepts. I’ve really enjoyed doing various complexes of skips, bounds, and sprints, as they are easy ways for young athletes to feel the positions and postures necessary to sprinting. Also, patience to stay with an activity until the group shows mastery.

In one of his presentations on ALTIS 360, Coach Dan Pfaff shares his experiences as a high-school level coach and admits that he would often consider the front half of the “stimulate – adapt – stabilize – actualize” process while ignoring the latter half. I’ve realized I was following in the same footsteps, as many times in the past I would rush. Learning to be patient and allow for the growth of the athlete (stabilization and actualization) before moving on is so important.

Many coaches repeat what a memorable coach did for them, but this is not a best practice. Share on X

Developmental level coaches need to know how young athletes acquire skills the best. Motor learning has made huge advances and many coaches repeat what their most memorable coach did for them. That is not a best practice; rather, it is copying and pasting. If these coaches understand whole-part-whole, random vs. blocked, or any other concept of motor learning, they will be better coaches and have a better program or business because of it.

Freelap USA: How has the experience benefited you as a coach?

John Corkle: The ALTIS internship has been a bridge that allowed my career to progress from “seasoned young coach” to developing the comfort and ability to take the reigns as a head coach. Being able to see coaches use different zoom-levels when observing training gave me a perspective I didn’t always use. As a young coach, you tend to position yourself up close. Learning to take a step back at practice, and see the yearly plan in action and how the whole training group is progressing, is an interesting experience.

Freelap USA: Lastly, the human element is a key component of everything we do as practitioners. How have you factored this into your role?

John Corkle: Working with the high school population, you have to wear many hats as the adult: coach, mentor, teacher, parent figure—just to name a few. High school athletes are still learning what it means to be an adult, so educating them about how to manage the world around them is important and creating an environment that sees failure as a catalyst for learning is VERY important.

As a high school coach, if you understand that every athlete will have some form of baggage every day and are willing to help that athlete navigate that baggage and teach them how to manage it you will see growth—not only in maturity, but in performance as well. Caring and mentoring are a huge component of the high school scene. If you mentor appropriately, you can have a successful program for your entire career.

Caring and mentoring are a huge component of the high school coaching scene. Share on X

Once I understood and allowed kids to be late to practice when they were receiving tutoring for difficult classes, there was a huge change in attitude towards me and how they viewed practice. I was worried they would blow off practice, but all those athletes needed was time to eliminate a stress they were having difficulty controlling.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Sevilla FC

Improving Sport Performance Through Nacsport Video Analysis

Blog| Bynacsport

Sevilla FC

In sports analysis and high performance settings, video provides an essential resource. However, many teams and video coordinators still need to overcome the significant obstacle of having countless hours of game film but little time to review the footage.

In this context, it becomes important to find solutions for organizing videos and locating key moments in performance to ease the review and analysis process. Companies like Nacsport have developed specific video analysis software to meet these needs.

Video analysis systems allow video coordinators to observe and analyze critical moments that occur in sport events (mainly during games and training sessions). These are then presented to athletes and coaches so they can count on high-quality information to make better decisions in the future.

Video analysis of moments enables athletes and coaches to make better decisions in the future. Share on X

Nacsport software solutions are specifically designed to improve sport video analysis. Unlike conventional video editing programs, Nacsport offers tools and features developed to simplify and speed up the analysis, so coaches and video coordinators can have access to the precise data in a more effective way.

How Does the System Work?

Nacsport programs have been created to assist every video coordinator or game analyst, no matter their level or budget. Six different options have been carefully scaled with tools to adapt to a full range of needs.

The observer decides which “items” need to be analyzed in any specific game or training situation. These items can be specific actions, players, pitch areas, or any other points of interest. Once decided, buttons are created for each item.


Video 1. Nacsport video analysis software is available in six different options: Nacsport Basic, Basic Plus, Scout Plus, Scout Plus Unlimited, Pro Plus, and Elite.

Any time these items or moments happen during a game or training session, the analyst clicks the corresponding buttons for each of them. Each click generates a register—a tag marking the time when they happened.

When the event is over, the video coordinator will have all these registers organized in two ways: grouped into category rows and with the registers showing chronologically on a timeline.

The coach and/or team will have immediate access to all registers and be able to work with them in the film room. This includes editing their length, adding drawings or text notes, comparing actions, and creating stats, as well as many more features to improve sport analysis workflows.

Analysis concludes with a presentation of the highlights, which can be shared either by exporting the files or playing them back on a computer.

All Sports
Image 1. Since 2003, Nacsport has helped coaches, video coordinators, and individual athletes in around 60 countries and more than 35 different sports.

Applying Video Analysis to Achieve Results

Since 2003, more than 5,000 teams and individuals, encompassing more than 35 sports in over 60 countries, have utilized Nacsport video analysis. Here, the analysts on five of those teams discuss the benefits and impact of video analysis on athlete performance.

Atletico Madrid

“Our main goal is to become one of the three most important analysis departments in the world,” says Jose Luis Sanchez Vera, Head of Analysis for Atletico de Madrid.

According to their methodology, Atletico de Madrid’s Analysis Department “want[s] our analysts to observe games to get information, not just capture videos to get footage. We think our work will be important if our knowledge is applied during game day, to reshape goals if necessary so we can improve our players’ performances both as a team and individually.”

Atletico de Madrid
Image 2. Atletico Madrid uses the same analysis system for both their First and Academy teams.

The relationship between Nacsport and Atletico de Madrid began during the 2016 season. Daniel Velazquez, then performance analyst with their first team, started to use the software on a personal level. Simultaneously with the club’s U19 side, another performance analyst, Jose Luis Sanchez, did the same. Both teams achieved great results that season.

In light of the outcome, the red and white teams’ managers decided to go beyond by creating the Department of Analysis and increasing their package of licenses so all the Academy teams could be analyzed with the same software.

With Nacsport, Atletico de Madrid “can optimise our time and we can easily extract any data we need. It’s an intuitive tool providing us with insights that enable us to reach the deep data we are looking for. Along with this, it’s so easy to understand the basics that anyone can start using it with a couple of instructions. Our team has adjusted really quickly to the solution.”

Gloucester Rugby

“A lot of our content starts as big files of video, which are then edited down into the most important things our players need to know, to give them the confidence to take the field as prepared as possible,” explains Darren Lewis, Head of Analysis at Gloucester Rugby, a competitive team in the Aviva Premiership.

“We also analyse all of our training sessions. It’s the time on the training field that is so important, so what we provide for the players and coaches in terms of our training resources is crucial. It’s a huge learning environment, so it’s important we take as much out of what we practice as possible.

Gloucester Rugby
Image 3. Gloucester Rugby moved to Nacsport from another analysis system.

“We’ve been working on this project for a long time now as there are a lot of factors to consider in making the move to Nacsport,” Lewis continues, describing Gloucester’s switch from a previous analysis system to Nacsport. “But the more and more I sit on the program, watch the reactions of coaches and players when they see some of the features and how easy it is to use, just gives me the absolute confidence that we are going to be able to completely surpass everything I’ve done up until this point.”

Valencia CF

Current Valencia CF boss Macerlino Garcia Toral has been a longstanding Nacsport user. For almost a decade, he has been faithful to the same software. At the beginning of this season, he signed for Valencia CF to restore their lost prestige after some particularly disappointing seasons—and he did it. Now the team is at the top of the table in La Liga, and video analysis played a key role in achieving this result.


Video 2. A Nacsport user for almost a decade, Marcelino Garcia Toral passes on some lessons on how he uses Nacsport video analysis to improve his coaching methods.

“You can customise whatever aspect you need to analyse,” says Toral about versatility as a vital factor in video analysis. “We always analyse our rivals—how they attack and how they defend—but it’s different when it comes to our own analysis. It depends here on how we are facing the game and specific needs on each game.”

Nacsport allows him to customize this analysis.

Silver Ferns

Coaches with different inputs and cultures can all find ways to use the same tools for video analysis, revealing the adaptability and versatility of the solutions. The Silver Ferns are a New Zealand netball team, and Bobby Wilcox has been their performance analyst for over a decade. In 2017, they decided to start using Nacsport.

Bobby Wilcox
Image 4. The Silver Ferns netball team preparing for the 2018 Commonwealth Games. (Photo credit to Michael Bradley.)

Wilcox explained: “We use the software to give visual feedback to the players, as well as prepare them for upcoming opposition, through both team presentations and online sharing for the players to watch processes and discuss in their own time. We have found Nacsport very intuitive and easy to pick up quickly—an important feature in a hectic environment!”

Sevilla FC

Sevilla FC has recently showed the world of soccer they are ready for big dreams. After winning four Europe League trophies in a row, this season was time for a major goal: the UEFA Champions League. They did it. Although they were not among the favorites, they reached the Final Eight, even knocking out top-flight Manchester United from the competition.

The Sevilla FC success comes from a commitment across all levels of the club. Their First and Academy teams have worked with Nacsport video analysis software for many years. The ability to apply video analysis does not depend on the head coach or the individual players: The software is established within the whole sporting structure of the club and it has been an essential tool for their analysis workflows.


Video 3. The analysis department at Sevilla FC, a four-time Europe League winner, analyzes future stars.

The Area of Analysis currently has five members. They are responsible for capturing and analyzing all Academy games, and they are also a booster for other areas. “We started with one goal, but today we are much more than that. We are still responsible for capturing and analysing games and training sessions, but we are now helping staff in specific training sessions when they request it. We capture and analyse strength work, physical tests, etc.,” explains Ramon Vazquez, Head of Analysis. “The Area of Analysis is now a booster for other areas, but they all have a common goal: improve the team’s performance.”

“We intend the Academy to benefit from our work by any means, filtering information and footage. Without Nacsport, this task would be impossible. You help us save hours of work and you enrich our work. We can do this with a couple of buttons. Saving time make us more efficient so we can focus on improving players and teams.”

Analysis for All

Nacsport pursues the ideal of Analysis for All. The company has developed its software solutions to comply with the requirements of all coaches and sports staff—no matter their level, budget, or sport—with a suite of products that is scalable depending on end user needs. Nacsport provides the performance analysis community with simple, quick, and effective leading video analysis solutions that are constantly updated and improved to provide users with more and better tools each and every day.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Weight Training Supplements

Nutrition and Supplementation for the Modern Athlete with Rick Brunner

Freelap Friday Five| ByRick Brunner

Weight Training Supplements

For the past 31 years, Rick Brunner has helped over 1,500 explosive athletes and their strength and conditioning coaches in football, baseball, hockey, basketball, track and field sprints, throws, jumps, Olympic weightlifting, and many others achieve breakaway gains in reaction, starting power, maximal speed, striking force, and power-endurance.

Freelap USA: Can you describe the importance and relationship between mTOR and AMPK, its relevance to today’s athlete, and its implications for the general population?

Rick Brunner: Throughout evolution, men and women have been required to do one primary thing, and that is to reproduce. For you as a fetus in the womb of your mother to your 40s, a primary physiological goal is to get up and run fast so you don’t get eaten, to get strong, to hunt and fight for your tribe if you’re the man, and to reproduce and nurture if you’re the woman. This requires plenty of mTOR (TOR) driven growth. The sweet spot of performance, which is, say, from their teens to their 30s, requires that athletes be TOR-centric (elevated TOR).

It makes practical sense to spread #protein consumption out throughout the day. Share on X

It makes practical sense to spread protein consumption out throughout the day. Because of muscle-full, the building of new body proteins may best be optimized by consuming a highly digestible protein source with about 10 grams of essential amino acids (such as 20g of whey) just after a workout, and then additional protein about every three hours, throughout the day.

Freelap USA: What should an athlete’s approach to pre-workout stimulant-based supplements be?

Rick Brunner: If the supplement actually contributes to some functional-stress effect, such as amplifying the influence of training so that you have a boost in adaptive response (i.e., more muscle proteins, more mitochondria, etc.) in post-exercise recovery, a pre-workout supplement might be useful. The key is you need to truly get measurable results from training. I’m not sure many pre-workout supplements are functionally useful, and they may in fact deter from the optimal training adaptations from training.

We know that the stress of training creates post-exercise signaling to improve sport results and that many nutrients consumed prior to or during training actually reduce the benefits of training (such as antioxidants like vitamins C and E, and many vitamins and minerals in general) in blunting the needed stress signal. Coaches and athletes would be wise to validate the usefulness of any pre-workout supplement. For example, is there any published science on the ingredients or formula as functional performance enhancers, resulting in an amplification of training to improve athletic ability?

Freelap USA: How should athletes approach the peri-workout nutrition window? How has this window been abused by well-meaning athletes throughout the last decade?

Rick Brunner: This is a very complex question. Nutrition before, during, or just after training should be better thought through. I’ve developed supplements for use prior to training, but only if they are shown to enhance some performance trait such as improved reaction time, force output, etc. But, all too often, pre-workout supplements don’t do much, or actually reduce the training effect.

All too often, pre-workout #supplements don’t do much, or actually reduce the training effect. Share on X

The whole idea of training in and of itself is to elicit some training-based stimulus that will result in some adaptive response such as an improvement in muscle strength, power, reaction, balance, endurance, etc. Many pre-workout supplements seem to do just the opposite by interfering with the adaptive response.

I’d stay away from anything flavored prior to a workout, unless of course you are running a marathon or ultra-endurance race and need the electrolytes and sugar. After exercise, a little quality protein is all you need. The window has been abused by athletes looking for an easy fix by chugging down various powders and drinks when, in fact, they should make the workout as “functionally intense” for their specific level of ability as possible to elicit an optimal adaptation, and then modify training again and again as they adapt to a higher level.

Freelap USA: How can we be better buyers of supplements? What is your advice for navigating the vast swath of dietary aids coming down the pipe?

Rick Brunner: It comes down to effectiveness and trust. We can all do our homework and not simply play into the marketing hype. Supplement companies are, after all, focused on selling more supplements. There is nothing wrong with this so long as the supplement performs measurably.

There are hundreds of supplements to choose from today and many more come on the market every year. Each athlete should be responsible for educating themselves using published science and some common sense to make decisions for themselves personally. Go to Medline PubMed and plug in keywords to see what the latest science says. When reviewing a supplement, don’t be taken in by the label and messaging—look at all the ingredients.

When reviewing a #supplement, don’t be misled by the label and messaging—look at all the ingredients. Share on X

Many supplements are poorly researched and formulated, contain what may seem to be safe nutrients (like vitamins C and E, for example) that can in fact be disadaptive, contain non-optimal doses (too little or too much), etc. And don’t pay retail if you can avoid it. Retail products are double the price, marked up 100% or more just for stocking on the shelf. Buy supplements when they’re on sale or buy online.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Sport Psychology

Developing Psychological Traits that Enhance Physical Qualities

Blog| ByJamy Clamp

Sport Psychology

Sport can cause swings in emotion, varying from passion to disappointment. It can produce an emotional environment that, at times, causes us to wobble and lose our composure. However, that same environment can also cause us to proactively respond and find new levels of competitiveness that raise our game.

The psychology of sport is certainly not a cliché element. It can be, and often is, claimed as a romantic and comfortable part of something that we have all probably participated in: competition. The role of this article is to break away from the clichés and offer well-founded information that is currently being used with young athletes who have the ambition of pursuing excellence.

If we are not quite ‘mentally switched on,’ our physical qualities will probably also decline, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

There is an undeniable link between our attitude, our approach, and the effort that we exert towards a task and its overall outcome. In essence, if we offer a positive attitude and direct our energy towards the desired outcome, then, ultimately, there is a greater chance of eliciting conducive thoughts, feelings, and, importantly, behaviors.1 So, cognitively, if we are not quite “mentally switched on,” our physical qualities will probably also decline.

Work Ethic and Accountability

There is an increasing number of young people that, as Kelvin Giles says, “want it now and want it easy.” It is definitely not all doom and gloom, however, because there is a very large number of people out there that will commit with 100% intent, acknowledge their mistakes, and seek options to make things better, remain close to their values, and tell you what they think. If you work with someone like that, look after them because they are a real gem.

As strength coaches, we like to see PBs in the weight room, but I personally enjoy nothing more than working with somebody who brings character, intensity, and effort to the floor. They can serve as a role model and raise the ceiling for everyone in the environment. As coaches, we must project the characteristics that we seek. So, if we have identified honesty as a key quality in our environment, we should also be bold enough to “fess up” and say what needs to be said, as opposed to saying what people would like to hear.

Honesty is not just something that we use when we make a mistake; it is doing what is best for an individual at any time. We are role models to those that we coach. Nobody will benefit from hypocrisy—if we say we value something and we agree on it, that is that.

I attended one of Mark Bennett’s Performance Development Systems workshops and he stresses the importance of “non-negotiables.” These are the elements that we agree on with our athletes, and then are relentless and patient in pursuit of them. We need to demonstrate them in everything that we do.

12 Psychological Characteristics of Developing Excellence

Areas that are commonly discussed within sports psychology include confidence, attitude, “culture,” motivation, frustration, focus, and arousal. All play their part in performance, but there are definitely more psychological skills that coaches need to foster in order for an athlete to sustain their performances over a prolonged period of time. In the literature, these traits are referred to as “psychological characteristics of developing excellence (PCDEs).” 2 As the term suggests, they include many psychological traits observed among individuals that have achieved relative success in their careers. Some will say, “If you’ve got them, great. If you don’t, good luck.” Let’s say that if they are present, there is a greater chance of a young person fulfilling their potential.

If a young person is ‘present,’ there is a greater chance of them fulfilling their potential, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

As is often the case, the path of performance sport, whatever that means for the particular individual, is rarely a linear and smooth route. The likelihood is that the athlete will encounter some bumps and, with help from their support network (including us as their coaches), they will need to work out how to either roll over a bump or navigate their way around it.

Before delving into the highlighted characteristics, it is important to recognize that, as coaches, we have a great opportunity to foster the desired skills and contribute towards the overall growth of the individual we work with. That being said, it is not only the coach that can influence psychological development. Parents, family, teammates, friends, and teachers all have a role to play, so it is worth involving them in the process.

Without support and understanding from those stakeholders, the progress that athletes make during training, and sometimes away from training, can be undone when they do not recognize the underlying reasons behind the changes in behavior. With this, always provide a “why” when introducing new concepts regardless of how “right” they are. It is not always as clear to the stakeholders who has the best possible intentions for their child or friend, including us as their coach.

Consider the young player that is eager to develop their nutritional habits but, when they suggest “better options” to their parents, they are brushed away. Thus, the usual—and sometimes poor—habits remain. This is a fundamental problem because I guarantee the young player will become frustrated and suffer the consequences of poor habits, and this will reduce their chance of realizing their potential. Involve their parents, clearly explain why nutrition is paramount, and suggest ways that it can be made more effective and—you guessed it—they might just warm to the idea. Even more than them warming to the idea, we need them to actualize it, so keep in touch and see how things are going.

Highlight what psychological characteristics look like as you would with technical models, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

We need to highlight what these psychological characteristics look like as we would with technical models, such as teaching the squat. It’s great shouting them from the rooftops, but unless people actually know what they mean, they are more or less useless.

12 Psychological Traits
Table 1. These 12 psychological characteristics for developing excellence significantly contribute towards the realization of performance. (Based on Talent Development: A Practitioners Guide.)3

1. Commitment
Without motivation, commitment will more than likely stumble. As you have probably gathered, many of the psychological characteristics are interdependent, meaning that without one, the others may suffer. Commitment is our direction, drive, resiliency, and energy towards our role. I recall coaches asking me; “Did you apply yourself to that?” If we have applied ourselves to the role, we will direct almost, but not all, of our energy towards it. “Pursue excellence because nothing else is worth your time” springs to mind.

Many psychological characteristics are interdependent, such that without one, the others may suffer, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

Commitment and motivation are inextricably linked and, for this article, I will link it with Self-Determination Theory. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness are three of our basic psychosocial needs. When none of them are met, our motivation and commitment towards a task wane. That is a problem because, as with most things, there can be a “hurricane effect” whereby one issue grows and starts to pick up, and feed into, other issues. There are then those athletes driven by progressing and those fearful of regressing.

Progress generally motivates the people who can self-regulate their behavior, and their thoughts. One of the best ways to develop commitment is to create an emotional attachment and an understanding of what is happening and, importantly, why it is happening. If the athlete is invested in the goal, they will not want to let their team down and they will do what is necessary to maintain progress.

2. Focus
Maintaining focus when distractions inevitably occur is an important skill. Without it, not an awful lot will happen. The ability to regain focus is maybe even more practical. Unless you are a robot, I would suggest that you have momentarily lost your focus at one time or another. It is important how we respond and regain composure and, with that, focus. Sport obviously requires a variety of skills, so there is a danger that athletes start to direct “too much” energy, both physical and cognitive, towards a particular element. As a result, they are more likely to lose sight of their goal.

If an athlete’s behavior isn’t conducive to their goal, then why are they doing it? Share on X

As Mike Young told us as a group of interns in 2016, “The goal’s the goal.” To elicit focus, I personally like to ask the athlete what the goal is: “Remind me what you are working towards?” If the behavior is not conducive to the goal, then why is it occurring?

3. Intent
Determination, drive, and application all come to mind. Approaching our work with an intent to produce our best possible output should be the goal, but to do that, we have to care about what we do. If we have little interest in the work that we do, we are unlikely to work with the desired intensity, unless the value is highlighted. For example, why are we doing heavy squats today? What is the benefit of doing this? Answer that with clarity and, if your athletes are there to progress, they will lift with intent.

This particular psychological quality is very much linked with the PCDEs mentioned because there will be a good number of people that require a very small amount of additional motivation. Often, people will have their goals, as well as their drives, and they will direct all their energy towards that outcome. However, when it is not as straightforward, and intensity is lacking, we need to relate our approaches to the overall goal. Again, Mark Bennet refers to goals as “critical outcomes.” So, in essence, it is a matter of relating, and transferring, everything towards the critical outcome.

As a simple example, if somebody wants to improve their starting speed and we prescribe exercises with a dynamic effort emphasis, we need to clarify the reasons behind that approach. We can definitely develop intent because, ultimately, behavior will change over a period of time. Behavior is a dynamic concept and we largely serve as “choice architects.”

4. Realism
“Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face.” We need to accept that somewhere along the way, our plan will probably let us down. However, if we understand that and don’t become too rigid and structured, we are more than capable of reacting. It becomes an issue if we plan and are completely oblivious to potential roadblocks because, if and when it all falls apart, it might take a while to react and work things out. That concerns planning, or periodization, in the sense of “writing in pencil and being prepared to change.”

We need realism in our ambitions. While it is great to set lofty targets, if they are out of reach at that moment and we know that they are, it will hurt when we don’t achieve them. There is then the argument of “talent needing trauma” for us to learn how to respond to future setbacks and adapt. That concept, of course, has a place, but considering the effect of stress on our health and performance, is it sensible to expose ourselves to a chronic stress stimulus?

We need realism in our ambitions so we can see and react to potential roadblocks, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

I think that a lot of goals are imposed on people, which raises the topic of perfectionism. As a coach, I tend to provide regular feedback at the end of the session to address what is going well and what needs improvement. If something is not quite good enough, then I will state it because it is of no real benefit to temporarily fill the cracks. Feedback is positive and objective in nature, wherever possible. By that, I mean that comments are not just positive buzzwords but, rather, they carry genuine meaning and are founded upon observations and measurements.

5. Coping Under Pressure
Excessive stress is not good for our health in general, let alone when we are attempting to perform and improve our standards. Similarly, on the idea of “chaos in training”—Is there not already enough chaos in “our” athletes’ lives, including school, work, personal relationships, and personal commitments? Are we throwing larger rocks at people who, unbeknownst to us, have already had a few thrown their way recently?

Don’t shelter someone from stress—help them develop tailored #CopingMechanisms that work for them, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

With that said, we need to take the time to engage with people without making it a fluffy questioning session. Investing your effort, energy, and interest, and giving positive-objective feedback, far outweighs the often “tea party”-like approaches to psychology. It is not appropriate to shelter someone from stress because, the reality is, it will probably show up at some point and challenge our ability. Instead, we need to help develop coping mechanisms that work for the individual as opposed to rolling out the book of standardized questions that work for everyone—they don’t.

Why Developing Coping Strategies Is Important

We must also consider the attitudinal effect on biochemical balance, particularly in and around dense training periods. John Kiely has really sharpened my approach to this area with his belief that imposing stress on the body is more than a physical stimulus. Instead, as an athlete executes a program, there are psycho-emotional and cognitive stressors occurring that influence our output. This is obviously not only applicable in sport.

If we are chronically stressed, anxious, and just generally a walking time-bomb, our performances will be quite poor. Sleep, for example, is often neglected, both by choice and by nature, due to chronic stress. With stress comes increased allostatic loading, or our body tries to restore internal balance, and then sleep quality declines.4 Why is this important? Well, if we ignore the reality that stress is a psychological concept and neglect the biochemical stress response, the athletes that we coach will more than likely have limited progress. More holistically, it will damage their overall condition both physically and mentally.

6. Perfectionism
Perfectionism is one of those traits usually associated with the devil and it has certainly been thrown on the coals. However, while the pitfalls of the quality are regularly highlighted, there are also plenty of positives. There are two forms of perfectionism: harmonious and obsessive. Harmonious perfectionism is driven by enjoyment, passion, and autonomy. Obsessive perfectionism is powered by, well, obsession and a feeling of guilt and failure if certain things are not done.

Perfectionism needs to be controlled, but certainly not caged, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

We certainly want perfectionistic traits because, with harmonious drives, there are evident benefits. However, if they become excessive, the damaging effects are also noticeable—primarily burnout, but also the lasting effect that these traits have on the individual, their family, and their friends. Whichever type of perfectionism we identify needs to be controlled, but certainly not caged.5

There are plenty of “perfectionism stories” in sport that are then glorified. However, it is often just people doing their jobs to the best of their ability and wanting it done well. Perfectionism is a difficult trait to control, so this is where regular conversations become paramount. If things are not going quite to plan, then you need to have a conversation about why this is the case and that it is okay, as long as you all work hard to get back on track.

7. Self-Awareness and Self-Regulation
Without self-awareness, we will struggle to understand what we are good at and what we are poor at. It is, therefore, no coincidence that some of the greatest athletes and coaches all tend to display high levels of self-awareness in their behaviors and performances. Self-criticism is, again, another trait that people view as a “dark side” quality. There are two sides to the coin, however, as excessive self-criticism can be damaging but there needs to be sufficient honesty to accept that things are not quite good enough. With that comes self-regulation: the process whereby people manage and change their own behaviors in accordance with their goal.6

It is no coincidence that some of the best athletes & coaches display high levels of self-awareness, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

In general, those with better self-regulation skills, such as evaluation, reflection, and planning, achieve more productive learning and performance outcomes. Athletes that self-regulate their behavior have a strong overriding purpose, and they understand their current levels and what they can progress towards.7 Active learning will always encourage self-regulation because it encourages high levels of accountability and autonomy, so while the coach acts as a facilitator, the athlete works things out for themselves. To me, this is the ultimate goal: Give the athlete the tools to then replicate their training without supervision.

8. Goal Setting
Goals must be created by the athlete. A goal that is imposed will not have the same meaning to the individual. In essence, it has to invoke a sense of passion and determination, so that when things do go wrong, there will be a work ethic in place that is capable of overcoming the obstacle.

By all means, follow the SMART principle, but you must also regularly monitor the goal. In addition, identify what the goal is and then work backwards. This is the principle of reverse engineering in process. To achieve the goal, we must know what is required to achieve it because, without the requisite components, we are probably training aimlessly.

9. Quality Practice
There is a substantial amount of literature surrounding the type of practice that we plan; however, that is beyond the scope of this article. By “quality practice,” I mean the attitude that coaches and athletes display in terms of commitment, intent, and effort. The coach assumes a pivotal role in developing quality practice sessions, but then the athlete must take ownership of their performance and approach everything with the desire to develop. Every session is an opportunity to develop.

In my experience, there have been many young athletes that display a genuine desire to learn how to train and develop their ability. They are exactly what we look for. Now, because we are social beings, there is a danger that if we highlight those individuals as the “shining lights,” other team members are going to grow to dislike them.

This is not what we want, but rather, a desire from every team member to represent the environment and help things move forwards. This is where an environment of excellence becomes prevalent again. Frank Dick talks about “the badge” and being passionate about the organization. I fully agree, because if you care about the “badge,” you will probably do the required work, and do it with high levels of intensity, commitment, and effort.

10. Imagery Skills
Having an idea of what success looks like is a valuable skill. Everyone has different ambitions and success looks extremely different for many of us. For some, it may be tangible (financial reward), but for others, it may be intangible (making family proud). Neither are “wrong” because, as always, the two rewards can intertwine.

With effective imagery skills, there is a greater chance of developing a confident performer. During practice, they envision the required intensity, and then they perform the repetitions. They can imagine themselves performing with clarity and, when the time comes to physically execute, they are often ready.

Knowing what success looks like and being able to visualize it is a valuable skill, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

Obviously, to truly prepare for competition, they need to experience a competitive atmosphere. There are many athletes that are excellent during practice, but on game day they do not fulfill their potential. As long as we do not simply throw them into the competition without any guidance, I am confident that they will be okay. Part of the issue is that athletes often do not have a coach with them, which is very important.

11. Effort
To progress at something, whether a skill, education, or our job, we must commit to it. If we are simply going through the motions on a regular basis, progress will be limited. It is about starting with a goal at the front of the mind, lighting the fire, and keeping it alive for as long as possible. Effort means taking a relentless, but very patient, path towards that goal.

12. Seeking Social Support
“Everyone needs a mentor and a couple of people around them that will give them a clear, unbiased view.”–Paul McGinley

This quote typifies what seeking social support is about. With that, I think we all have a responsibility to make sure that people are okay because, sometimes, they won’t be comfortable seeking support. We have to create a warm environment because we definitely do not want people on edge.

Everyone on the Same Path, Bringing Their Value

Being part of a team, naturally, requires working together to achieve the objective at hand. This is the Shared Mental Model concept: Everyone shares the desire to achieve the objective and an understanding of what is going to happen.8

I primarily work in private coaching, and this is particularly important because, at times, we are not there when “our athletes” train. So, whoever is available should be able to offer the necessary support and ensure that everything is done correctly. There will be more than one coach in contact with athletes, which is a good thing. However, if we want clarity, we need to all think in the same way, only with different approaches.

An athlete’s coaches should all think in the same way, although they have different approaches, says @JamyClamp. Share on X

There are many ways to get to Rome. Some may get us there quicker, but on the whole, most routes will get us there.

References

  1. Hays, K., Thomas, O. & Bawden, M. (2009). “The role of confidence in world-class sport performance.” Journal of Sports Sciences. 27 (11); 1185-1199.
  2. MacNamara, A., Button, A. & Collins, D. (2010). “The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance. Part 1: Identifying mental skills and behaviours.” The Sport Psychologist. 24 (1) 52-73.
  3. Collins, D. & MacNamara, A. (2018). Talent Development: A Practitioners Guide. p.69. Routledge: Abingdon.
  4. McEwen, B. (2007). “Physiology and Neurobiology of Stress and Adaptation: Central Role of the Brain.” American Physiological Society. 87; 873-904.
  5. Hill, A., Macnamara, A. & Collins, D. (2015). “Psycho-behaviourally Based Features of Effective Talent Development in Rugby Union: A Coach’s Perspective.” The Sport Psychologist.
  6. Kirschenbaum, D. (1984). “Self-regulation and Sport: Nurturing and Emerging Symbiosis.” Journal of Sport Psychology. 6; 159-183.
  7. Toering, T., Elferink-Gemser, M., Jordet, G. & Visscher, C. (2009). “Self-regulation and performance level of elite and non-elite youth soccer players.” Journal of Sports Science. 27 (14); 1509-1517.
  8. Jonker, C., Riemsdijk, M. & Vermeulen, B. (2010). “Shared Mental Models: A Conceptual Analysis.” Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Swim Coach

How Reflective Practice Improved My Coaching

Blog| ByXavier Roy

Swim Coach

A coach should continually reflect, adapt, and innovate to develop, both as a professional and as an individual.3 Indeed, according to some authors, “it is the capacity of coaches to practice, reflect and then learn from their experience that is central to developing coaching effectiveness.”13

How can we implement reflective practice on a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly basis? This article provides reflective tools that coaches can easily use in their daily practice along with examples from my work in Canadian university football.

As an interesting starting point, we can combine the different sources of information that represent the constant change associated with sport and use the combined information to support the coach’s decision and training processes.12 Nowadays, data is required not only to evaluate and track improvements in training and competition but also to help coaches make training decisions. 

Decision Making Information
Image 1. This chart shows how coaches can combine various sources of information to make decisions regarding training. It’s adapted from Kiely’s article, “Periodization Paradigms in the 21st Century: Evidence-Led or Tradition-Driven?”(12)

Tools to Implement Reflective Practice

Using statistics, video analysis, and discussions with peers enables the coach to take a step back and evaluate an event.7 Different sports will generate different sets of game-related statistics. For example, in Canadian university football, we had a game-related key performance indicator (KPI) that characterized our defensive play. Per game, we wanted less than three explosive plays or plays where the opponent’s offensive unit completed a play of more than 20 yards. These statistics provided coaches with specific information regarding the game’s tactical aspect.

Reflective Cards

Reflective cards can be part of our data analysis either post-training or post-competition.4,5,10 As part of my Ph.D. thesis, we asked Canadian university football coaches to fill out post-competition reflective cards. The cards contained a few questions related to contextual variables (opponent, score, home or away, weather, etc.), game-performance KPI, and weaknesses they should address in the upcoming week of practice.

We also had coaches fill out reflective cards after each training session during the week, answering prompts such as:

  • briefly describe the training session
  • evaluate what went well and what went not so well
  • explain why they went well and why they did not
  • propose improvements for the next training session

Reflective cards, as opposed to a reflective journal, take a few minutes to complete, are straight to the point, and can provide valuable information that coaches can compile and review.

Video and Voice Recording

Time can be a limiting factor, however, when using a written form of reflective practice. Luckily easy access to technology gives us other tools to use such as video. As reported by Kidman,11 videotaping oneself while conducting a training session has gained popularity in coach education settings as a means to self-train. Another interesting method we can pair with video is the Thinking Aloud (TA) method where coaches are asked to verbalize their thoughts while performing a coaching task.

Using a Dictaphone or microphone, for example, they can then put into words their inner speech; encode and vocalize any scents, visual stimuli, or movement; and explain their thoughts, ideas, hypotheses, or motives regarding a specific task. TA shares some principles with Schön’s “reflection-in-action” by allowing “coaches to reflect-on their in-event reflections” when reviewing the recordings19 by themselves or with the help of a coach educator or mentor.

Reflective Journal
Image 2. While useful, time and motivation can be barriers to written journaling strategies for sports coaching.

Obtaining Objective and Subjective Data

We can obtain objective and subjective data in a variety of ways. To gather information on external training loads (work completed by the athlete and measured independently of their internal characteristics) and internal training loads (the relative physiological and psychological stress imposed on the athlete), we can use three main approaches:18

  • the observational approach
  • the physiological approach
  • the subjective approach

We could also add any neuromuscular assessments to these approaches, such as various jump tests.

Training Load Monitoring
Image 3. Observational, physiological, and subjective data collection are three approaches coaches can take to monitor training load (1,9,16).

With Canadian university football players, we monitored internal training loads using the Session-RPE method (sRPE = duration of training x RPE) to gather information about training. Looking retrospectively at the data collected over the previous two years, we were able to adjust the training content to match the various demands of the student-athletes better.

For example, in the graph below, we can identify increased acute training load and decreased freshness levels at the beginning of the winter semester, during winter camp, at the beginning of summer training, and during the pre-season. Equipped with this information, the coach can adjust training and implement more recovery methods before or after these periods to facilitate recovery. The coach could also plan for lower training load at specific times in the academic calendar, such as the last two weeks of April when student-athletes have assignments to hand in and exams to prepare for.

Combining objective and subjective data such as training load with wellness questionnaires is a powerful way for coaches to optimize training and prevent overtraining. It also provides good feedback about how players are handling different stressors and sets the dialogue for good communication between the coach and the athletes.

Training Load 1 Year
Image 4. With information about how training loads correspond with athlete freshness levels, coaches can plan training and recovery periods.

Daily Introspection

Reflective practice requires a certain degree of introspection from the coach and should be a daily activity.15 One could use a reflective journal, reflective cards, video, shared reflections, or an oral approach such as TA to implement a reflective practice.

Writing down one’s actions and thoughts following an event or a day’s work in a journal or logbook quite often serves as an introduction to reflective practice. However, recent studies question this approach,2 especially the time it takes to sit down, pause, and reflect.14 Moreover, the entries in a coach’s reflective journal at first might look more like descriptions of the various events rather than a reflection on those events.

Critical reflection on events improves a coach's decisions and training processes, says @xrperformance. Share on X

Instead, coaches can engage in a critical reflection. This requires coaches to not only question their thought-process but also question or review their beliefs and values regarding their experiences as well as the wider social context of their practice.6,8 This “self-induced momentary confusion” can be supported and guided by a coach educator or mentor, who can help motivate one to sustain a reflective practice.

Here’s a very good example of this support system as described by Gallimore.3 A struggling high school basketball coach implemented reflective practice after meeting and communicating over several years with legendary basketball coach John Wooden. The high school coach’s practice and coaching record improved over these years.

In the end, a reflective practice appears to benefit both professional and personal development in various fields, including coaching. Using reflective practice to improve one’s knowledge and coaching qualities, such as communication, also impacts the coach’s athletes. The coach-athlete-performance relationship would likely benefit from taking time to reflect. Fellow coaches are encouraged to triangulate the different sources of training decision-making information that best fits their own coaching context.

References

  1. Borresen, J., & Lambert, M. I. (2009). The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 39(9), 779‑ http://doi.org/10.2165/11317780-000000000-00000.
  2. Dixon, M., Lee, S., & Ghaye, T. (2013). Reflective practices for better sports coaches and coach education : shifting from a pedagogy of scarcity to abundance in the run-up to Rio 2016. Reflective Practice, 14(5), 585‑ http://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.840573.
  3. Gallimore, R., Gilbert, W., & Nater, S. (2014). Reflective practice and ongoing learning: a coach’s 10-year journey. Reflective Practice, 15(2), 268‑ https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.868790.
  4. Ghaye, T. (2008). Putting reflection at the heart of good practice: The user guide. Reflective Learning-UK.
  5. Gilbert, W. (2017). Coaching Better Every Season : A Year-Round System for Athlete Development and Program Success. Windsor, Ontario: Human Kinetics.
  6. Gilbert, W., & Trudel, P. (2013a). The Role of Deliberate Practice in Becoming an Expert Coach : Part 3- Creating Optimal Settings. Olympic Coach Magazine, 24(2), 15‑
  7. Gilbert, W., & Trudel, P. (2013b). The Role of Deliberate Practice in Becoming an Expert Coach: Part 2 – Reflection. Olympic Coach Magazine, 24(1), 35‑
  8. Hickson, H. (2011). Critical reflection : reflecting on learning to be reflective. Reflective Practice, 12(6), 829‑ http://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.616687.
  9. Hopkins, W. G. (1991). Quantification of training in competitive sports. Sports Medicine, 12(3), 161‑
  10. Hughes, C., Lee, S., & Chesterfield, G. (2009). Innovation in sports coaching: the implementation of reflective cards. Reflective Practice, 10(3), 367‑ http://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903034895.
  11. 11.Kidman, L. (2005). Athlete-centred coaching: Developing inspired and inspiring people. (T. Tremewan, Éd.). Christchurch, New Zealand: Innovative Print Communications Ltd.
  12. Kiely, J. (2012). Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: Evidence-led or tradition-driven? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 7(3), 242‑ https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.7.3.242.
  13. Knowles, Z., Borrie, A., & Telfer, H. (2005). Towards the reflective sports coach : issues of context, education and application. Ergonomics, 48(November), 1711‑ http://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500101288.
  14. Knowles, Z., Gilbourne, D., Borrie, A., & Nevill, A. (2001). Developing the Reflective Sports Coach : A study exploring the processes of reflective practice within a higher education coaching programme. Reflective Practice, 2(2), 185‑ http://doi.org/10.1080/14623940120071370.
  15. Lyle, J. (2002). Sports coaching concepts : A framework for coaches’ behaviour. London: Routledge.
  16. Robson-Ansley, P. J., Gleeson, M., & Ansley, L. (2009). Fatigue management in the preparation of Olympic athletes. Journal of sports sciences, 27(13), 1409‑ http://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802702186.
  17. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflexive practioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books Inc.
  18. Wallace, L. K., Slattery, K. M., & Coutts, A. J. (2009). The ecological validity and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying training loads in swimming. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 23(1), 33‑ https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874512.
  19. Whitehead, A., Cropley, B., Miles, A., Tabo, H., Quayle, L., & Knowles, Z. (2016). ‘Think Aloud’: Towards a framework to facilitate reflective practice amongst rugby league coaches. International Sport Coaching Journal, 3(3), 269‑

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Squat Rack

Owning the Intangibles in the Strength and Conditioning Profession with Mark Watts

Freelap Friday Five| ByMark Watts

Squat Rack

Mark Watts is a fifth-grade school teacher and U8 Girls Soccer coach in Columbus, Ohio. Watts was formerly the Director of Education at elitefts.com and the host of the Elitefts Sports Performance Podcast. He has a master’s degree in exercise science & health promotion from California University of PA and a master’s degree in elementary education from Clarion University of PA. He has held professional certifications through the NSCA, CSCCa, NASM, and USAW.

Freelap USA: What is one of the biggest problems with the upward growth of the strength and conditioning professional?

Mark Watts: The strength and conditioning profession has become more about attrition than upward mobility. Coaches have been expressing their needs to be more valued at their own universities or in athletics in general for decades. Strength coaches that have survived a sport coaching change are anomalies and no one you ever talk to actually knows any strength coach that has retired.

For most strength coaches, their ability to feed their family is directly tied to wins and losses, says @MJ_Dubs_XIII. Share on X

Even the best, most experienced strength coaches who were always deemed “untouchable” have taken the necessary steps to venture into administration or academics. For some strength coaches, being associated with the football or basketball coaches has given them job stability and financial freedom, but for most, it has meant their ability to feed their family is directly tied to wins and losses.

Freelap USA: You’ve talked about the difficulty of the strength and conditioning profession being the difficulty of quantifying effectiveness. What aspects can, and cannot, be quantified in the job of a strength coach?

Mark Watts: This profession is so much about process and progress and so little about outcome and product to the individuals that perform in it every day. The issue is, as we know, that the process can rarely be quantified. What compounds this issue is that the specific aspects that can be quantified, (testing results, injury rates, wins and losses, etc.) have two distinct inconsistencies.

First, these quantifiable measures may not have a correlation, let alone causation, to on the field/court/track performance. Improvements in performance tests may not be directly responsible for wins and losses.

Strength coaches generally don’t want the blame for wins and losses, or the credit for them either, says @MJ_Dubs_XIII. Share on X

Second, improvements in these performance tests are not necessarily because of the guidance of the strength and conditioning coach. The team that wins is usually the team with better players. Just as strength coaches generally don’t want to take the blame for wins and losses, they usually won’t take credit for them, either. This goes back to no real quantifiable way to evaluate a strength coach’s impact on performance.

Freelap USA: How can the sports performance industry properly prepare and guide interns for career success? What’s your advice to young aspiring strength coaches in such a saturated field?

Mark Watts: An important question that everyone in our profession should be honest about is whether we are really taking responsibility for guiding interns for career success. I really don’t think most sports performance professionals have a vested interest in truly developing the people around them. Whether this is due to lack of time, lack of resources, or something much more disheartening like the desire to keep our peers from career advancement, I am unsure if there are sincere efforts to do so.

There are several pieces of advice I would give to aspiring strength coaches. Not everyone is at the same level before they start this journey, but most of this will apply to the majority of coaches seeking a career in the field.

1. Make sure it is really what you want to do. There are countless numbers of recent college graduates who suddenly decide that “coaching is not for them” after accepting a full-time internship. Just because you enjoy the gym doesn’t mean you should be a strength coach. If you like working out, join a gym. Most coaches learn early that for almost all coaches, the hours, the money, and the job security make pursuing the profession very difficult. The only way you will know for sure is if you volunteer and find out what the job is really like.

2. Be honest with yourself. How are you different from the other thousands of exercise science majors? Having a degree and being certified is the bare minimum for anyone pursuing a career in the field. The opportunities you will usually get are indicative of the work you’ve put in. Any coach would rather get paid to coach as opposed to volunteer. But, if you turn down the volunteer internship, is it because you have paid opportunities? If a position was a paid position, would you be in contention for it compared to your peers?

3. You have to jump through the hoops. You need the degree and the certification. Having these does not guarantee a job, but not having either will keep you from getting a job. Trevor Kashey, one of the smartest men I know, said this: “An exercise science degree doesn’t mean you know how to exercise, it just means you know how exercise works.” So, with your degree, you still need to spend time under the bar, and under the direction of a mentor.

Having a certification doesn’t mean you are a good coach. What it means is you are willing to understand the basics of keeping athletes safe and will continue to make an attempt at continuously learning. Without that certification, you have to explain why you are more hirable than every other coach that sacrificed to become certified. It may not make a huge difference overall, but it can make one on a resume, and in a court of law, in case you are in a situation where you need it.

4. You must volunteer. I don’t know any head strength and conditioning coach that is willing to pay someone to learn how to be a coach. Whether it is fair or not, the difference between one coach and another is usually their experience. For every strength coach not willing to work for free, there are 10 that will. I don’t know if that is good for the financial progress of our profession, but that seems to be the reality.

Freelap USA: What should the attitude of a coach and athlete be towards competition? We tend to see some interesting behavior around the times of championship games, and I’d like to hear your take on what you feel coaches and athletes should ultimately be motivated by.

Mark Watts: If we are talking about competition between teammates, I feel coaches may sometimes go overboard with their methods of facilitating competitive drills between teammates. Whether it is the sport coaches or strength coaches, I sometimes question the motives and the effectiveness of some of these competitive drills, but then again, it is not my program. Somehow, these coaches feel this is a necessary step in the process.

Coaches may go overboard with their methods of facilitating competitive drills between teammates, says @MJ_Dubs_XIII. Share on X

I think if you are going to improve factors like competitiveness, mental toughness, resiliency, etc. you must be able to do two things. First, you must be able to define it. Second, you must be able to measure it. If you can do both of those tasks, then you must be able to prove they correlate to performance. I guess I need further convincing that wrestling a stick away from another player or winning a tug-of-war goes beyond an acute training effect and will actually improve sport performance.

Freelap USA: What is the biggest impact a strength coach can make on an athlete?

Mark Watts: Being a strength and conditioning coach means you are able to set goals for athletes they can’t set for themselves, and objectively assess them. There is so much subjectivity in coaching a sport, particularly non-stopwatch sports. Strength and conditioning coaches try to do everything they can to remove that subjectivity, even when their own jobs cannot be objectively quantified. Strength coaches can hold athletes accountable in ways that sport coaches can’t. The weights don’t lie, the stopwatch doesn’t lie, etc. Athletes have standards they can meet without multiple variables affecting how they meet them.

S&C coaches can hold athletes accountable in ways that sport coaches can’t, says @MJ_Dubs_XIII. Share on X

The second impact would be self-efficacy. The combination of self-confidence and an increase in skill sets can directly impact performance on the field or court. Athletes understand that the investment they make in the weight room can lead to success in their sport. The greater that investment, the more difficult it is for athletes to quit. To me, that is the intangible that makes the most significant difference.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



Scholarship Application

7 Steps to Land a College Roster Spot

Blog| ByBryan Drotar

Scholarship Application

Are your athletes counting on you to help them find a college roster spot? As coaches, our athletes view us as experts. We may not know everything about the recruiting process, but we do have an obligation to give our athletes encouragement, and assistance if they want to compete in college.

You need to be able to offer them direction on getting started. Here are a few guidelines you should pass on to your athletes.

What Athletes Can Do

Tell your athletes to be proactive. The athletes willing to market themselves are the ones who will have the most opportunities. Share these seven easy-to-remember steps your athletes should take. Since a teenager will feel like you’re asking them to scale Mt. Everest, encourage them (and their parents) to take one step at a time.

Tell athletes to be proactive: Those willing to market themselves will have the most opportunities, says @bryan_drotar. Share on X

1. Research colleges. Athletes should come up with a list of 10 colleges that have the athletic programs that interest them. This list will change over time, but it will help them get started. They should research the academics, athletic program, area, etc. and make sure each school is a place that would interest them even if they were no longer on the team.

2. Contact coaches. They should call and email each coach to introduce themselves and make the coach aware of their interest. If the coach responds, they should send follow-up emails and phone calls regularly.

“When a high school athlete takes the time to send an email with their contact information, personal best marks, academic information, etc. it means they are serious about considering Duke as a potential university.” Rhonda Riley, Duke University Cross Country Coach.

3. Fill out the questionnaire on the team’s home page. This will get the athlete into the database of both the coach and the admissions department.

“If an athlete knows they are interested in our college, they should reach out to someone on our coaching staff or complete a recruit questionnaire.” Scott Bahrke, Northwestern College Cross Country and Track & Field Coach

4. Prepare a video highlight film. Athletes should post the film on YouTube and send a link to each coach they are in contact with.

  • Highlight starts and show complete races.
  • Jumpers and throwers should make sure their technique is clear and visible.
  • Be as close to the event as possible so there is an unobstructed view.

5. Keep college coaches updated. Athletes should let college coaches known when they will be competing.

6. Send stats. Keep track of the athlete’s stats and the event(s) they were in, and have them send the information to college coaches. The place the athlete finished is not that important.

“We are in a very objective sport where the initial 90+% of recruit filtering takes place by simply using their marks/performances.” Bob Braman, Florida State University Track & Field Coach

7. Attend camps. Athletes should go to university camps and summer camps where coaches from the schools that they are interested in will be working. These are advertised on the program’s web page. They will see a link or a banner to click on.

What Coaches Can Do

One of the most important things you can do is give your athletes honest guidance about the collegiate level at which they can be successful. Some coaches will only recommend Division 1 or 2 programs, but there can be excellent coaching and competition at every level. The continuum is NCAA D1, D2, D3, NAIA, and NJCAA (JUCOs). Give them several options to look at based on their talent, work ethic, and academic level. If you don’t know, don’t make it up. Ask another coach for their opinion.

Give your athletes honest guidance about the collegiate level at which they can be successful, says @bryan_drotar. Share on X

You can also assist athletes in getting film. Good quality is the key to good film. It doesn’t have to be expensive: You can use your tablet or phone. Try to use a tripod if you can. If you don’t have the resources to film your athletes, ask the parents and see who has the skill and equipment to get it done for you.

Finally, contact college coaches for your athlete. Coaches at Division 1 and Division 2 have strict guidelines governing them when they contact athletes. The club or high school coach is often the intermediary for communication. It is your job to provide a reference for the athlete and relay information from the college coach to the athlete. This is how athletes can verbally commit to a school before a college coach is allowed to call them.

Remember: Your reputation is on the line each time you speak with a coach. Your honesty and integrity about an athlete will impact whether a college coach uses you or your athletes in the future.

“A student athlete that has interest in a particular school should have his or her coach contact the school.” Gary Pepin, University of Nebraska Track & Field Coach

Help Position Athletes for Future Success

As coaches, our job doesn’t stop at the finish line; our goal isn’t to see an athlete win the next meet. Our goal should be to help an athlete transition their hard work and talent into future successes. For many athletes, the next prize for which they are competing is a college roster spot. They need to earn that prize, but coaches can help.

A coach’s goal is to help an athlete transition their hard work and talent into future successes. Share on X

Jeff Jenkins, Piedmont College cross country and track & field coach, lists three common mistakes that student-athletes make during the recruiting process:

  1. They wait too late to begin.
  2. They make premature, uninformed decisions.
  3. They don’t communicate effectively.

Your goal is to coach an athlete’s recruiting mindset. Teach, educate, and guide them through the process. Coach toward the best version of their future.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Yael Averbuch

The Path to Ball Mastery with Techne Futbol

Blog| ByYael Averbuch

Yael Averbuch

It all started because I did what I always do when I’m a bit “down” or lonely—I grabbed my soccer ball and went out to find a wall to kick off of. In my typical fashion, I got obsessed trying to master some challenge I set for myself. Not thinking much of it, I decided to film myself and post the video on YouTube to see if anyone else could do it. From there, it became a fun little experiment—who out there in the world of the internet would try my skill challenge and post a video of themselves doing it?

And so, my YouTube channel grew and I felt the power of technology tying us all together; people from all over the world who shared this common interest. To my surprise, many people reach out and tell me how they use my training ideas or that their kids spend hours trying a certain Backyard Skill Challenge. It has become my way to give back.

Love the Journey

When I was 9, I dreamed of becoming a professional soccer player. Thanks to the hours and hours I spent on my own with the soccer ball, I’ve been able to live that dream. I was incredibly fortunate as a young player to have some amazing coaches and mentors, including my parents, who inspired me to spend time with the soccer ball, mastering the tool of my trade.

Players, parents, and coaches often ask me what’s the most important thing young players can do to set themselves up for success. My answer: Spend time with the ball! So many youth soccer players are playing the game without having mastered some of the basics that are vital to not only performing well and becoming elite, but enjoying the game more fully.

Technique is one of the few things that athletes have complete control over, says @Yael_Averbuch. Share on X

From ages 11-14, I was the only girl on an all-boys team. Overall, the boys were much more aggressive and athletic than me, even at that age. This was the time frame where I REALLY started to hone my technique. Not only is technique the great equalizer—there’s no reason that male and female players of any age should have a gap in technical ability—but it’s one of the few things athletes have complete control over.

Some people are born faster, quicker, bigger, or smaller, and there’s not much we can do about that. You can certainly improve your athletic capabilities, whatever they may be, in small percentages. But technique is something you have full control over as an athlete. There’s no magic or predisposition to it. It’s a simple equation—your ability correlates to the time you’ve put in to master the skill.

Moreover, ball control and skill are not qualities that exist in a vacuum. Developing these areas forces players to improve coordination, agility, quickness, and even flexibility and endurance. The process of practicing repetition and working towards mastering the ball also encourages athletes to be self-coaches and really delve into the concept of deep practice, which trains focus and mental toughness as well.

It’s a simple equation—your ability correlates to the time you’ve put in to master the skill, says @Yael_Averbuch. Share on X

Long term, I always had a vision of offering soccer players something a bit more substantial than the random training videos I put out on YouTube. When I was a young player, all that was available were a few VHS tapes that my dad would order from soccer catalogs. When they came in the mail, we’d watch them over and over and I’d write down all the skills from them to go out and practice on my own until I had them memorized. To this day, I can still quote lines from those videos!

Nowadays, there are thousands of videos out there all over YouTube and social media. There are tutorials, training sessions, freestyle, trick shots. I always tell players: “There’s no limit to what you can learn to do with the ball!” In addition to my YFutbol channel, here are a few YouTube channels I recommend:

  • Beast Mode Soccer
  • Trainer Gorres – Performance Coach
  • Indi Cowie
  • F2Freestylers

With so many amazing ideas and resources out there, I saw that it could be hard for young players to figure out what’s most important to work on if they have the time and desire to train on their own. So, the idea for Techne Futbol was born.

Training with Techne

I wanted to create a way to curate all the amazing content available and give players an actual blueprint to follow to achieve their dreams. After all, that’s what I had done for myself, with the help of my amazing mentors and the limited resources I could find at the time. Beginning with the very ambitious vision of creating a personal trainer for each and every player out there, I set out to start with the minimum viable product.

Techne app
Image 1. I created the Techne Futbol app to curate all of the amazing content available and give players a blueprint to follow to achieve their dreams. The app includes stats, drills, leaderboards, and so much more.


App Features

  • Profile Page: Each player can create a profile and view their stats: Total/Daily/Weekly Time Trained, Training Streak.
  • Training Sessions: Every training session includes 30 total drills, all with a demo video and written description. Many drills have an option to adjust the difficulty so players can work along a progression, depending on their current ability. Each drill also includes a timer, which allows the player to work on the skill for one minute and then adds that time to their training log.
  • Sock System: Similar to the belt system in martial arts, we have a Training Sock system where players earn their next level of socks after logging a certain amount of time in the app.
  • Leaderboard Competition: Players can compete with others from all over the U.S. and the world and view where they stand on our Leaderboards.
  • Time Trials: To measure technical proficiency, players are prompted to record scores in the app for various time trials. They can work to improve these scores over time and track their progress.

Types of Drills

  • Juggling: If you love juggling, it’s probably because you’re good at it. If you hate it, it’s probably because you haven’t spent enough time practicing to make it fun! I think juggling is one of the most important skills to master, not just for first touch. It helps with balance and coordination, and it’s easy to keep track of your progress because you can count your juggles.
  • Dribbling: The app includes stationary ball work, dribbling through cones set up in different formations, 1v1 moves, and pretty much any way you can imagine being on the move with the ball at your feet. Dribbling is cool to practice because there are a lot of different ways to be a good dribbler. Personally, I don’t often attempt to dribble past players (like Messi or Mallory Pugh), but I do pride myself on being able to maintain possession of the ball in tight spaces.
  • Wall Work: While growing up, I always used to try to force my sister to train with me. On the days she refused, the wall was the perfect training partner. It never says no! I used to spend hours at the schoolyard near my house, kicking against the wall.

Anywhere/Anytime:

  • One thing I like to stress through Techne is to get creative with your training. I train on/in fields, parking lots, parking garages, tennis courts, racquetball courts, driveways, and the house. That way there are no excuses. There’s always a way to make it work if you want to train!
Get creative with your training—there’s always a way to make it work if you want to, says @Yael_Averbuch. Share on X

Inspiring Youth Soccer Players to Own Their Development

The amazing thing about business and technology is that they’re incredibly similar to athletics in some ways. You start off with the grand vision of what you want to make or who you want to be. Then you ask yourself: “What can I do right now with the tools I have?” and “What should I be doing every single day to bring me closer to that vision?” As in athletics, I was well aware of my areas of expertise (my strengths) and where I would need to find experts I trust to guide me.

From the start, I employed the help of a friend and advisor, Samantha Weber. A former college soccer player, she understood the vision, and had also worked in the tech world in San Francisco. Samantha had a good understanding of business and technology, which I certainly lacked. She connected me with a freelance developer, Daniel Woodall.

Over roughly seven months, Dan built out the first version of Techne. It was a subscription-based web app that offered subscribers a weekly training session based on a drill library that I had spent hundreds of hours preparing as we built out the first version of the app. The idea was to spend minimal money (although if you could monetize my sweat equity it would definitely not be minimal!) and then scale up as we proved the concept was viable.

Since September 25, 2016, when we first opened signups and October 2, when the first training session went live, not a day has gone by that work hasn’t been put in to improve the product and user experience. Since then, we expanded our subscription system to allow for groups and I’ve brought an amazing developer, Russell Richardson, on board as a partner in the business. Through Russell’s work, Techne Futbol is now in the Apple and Google Play app stores and we continue to push forward on product development, chipping away with a very ambitious long-term vision in mind.

I view the project as threefold: the technology/product development, the development of the Techne system as a whole and the subscriber experience, and the actual training content. Each of these pieces is a constant work in progress. My goal is to form a community of people who care deeply about the process of mastery and skill development in soccer and leverage their expertise and passion to grow the Techne brand. The future will include more options for players and coaches to customize training sessions, as well as more training content from other players and coaches around the world.

Yael Techne
Image 2. Training with Techne is about empowerment. Techne subscribers tell me how much more confident they feel when they play, and that they can feel themselves improving and doing things on the field that they couldn’t do before.

Training with Techne is about embarking on a journey. It’s about making the ball your friend and understanding the process of mastery. But more importantly, it’s about empowerment. Techne subscribers comment all the time on how much more confident they feel when they play, and that they can feel themselves improving and doing things on the field that they weren’t able to before. And players don’t have to rely on their parents, coaches, or any fancy equipment to make that improvement. All they need is a ball, a wall, and the Techne app!

It’s been a fun but exceedingly challenging process to share this part of the sport that I love so much in a quality and engaging way. I’ve fallen in love with the puzzles of technology and business, in a similar way to falling in love with the soccer ball as a young girl. Techne Futbol has brought me full circle in some very powerful ways.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

Grip Strength

Is Grip Strength as Important as We Think It Is?

Uncategorized| ByBob Alejo

Power Lift Sport Science Education

Grip Strength

Grip strength is a huge topic. It is often associated with performance enhancement and not just with those sports that common sense would lead you to think of first—baseball, judo, racquet sports, strong man competitions, etc. Programs dedicate time to specifically train grip. But is it just one of those things we talk about as being important or do we focus on it as a necessary component because there will be a glaring weakness if we don’t train it? Is it merely another one of those things that everyone talks about, so it must be true?

Well, I’m here to tell you the information out there is pretty clear and also inconclusive, at the same time. I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t surprised. Let me explain.

How important is #gripstrength? The supporting information is pretty clear, and also inconclusive, says @Coach_Alejo. Share on X

Several factors influence grip strength: age, sex, hand size and grip span, posture, and position of the shoulder, forearm, and wrist (Espana-Romero et al., 2010). When you add in the validity and reliability of the dynamometer, the settings used for the test, and the different protocols, it’s easy to see that testing for grip strength is a cloudy proposition at best. In the Espana-Romero study alone, there were different results using the same test protocol but three different dynamometers!

Look, for sure if you can’t hold something well in sports (ball, bat, jersey, judo gi, barbell), your success is limited. My question is how much importance and commitment should be put on improving grip strength and what support exists beyond “I think it helps our athletes.”

Where Do the Studies Come From?

While I focused on athletic-related information, I found a tremendous amount of work on everything but that. As Mike Young (PhD, Athletic Lab owner and founder, member of Power Lift’s Sports Science Educational Board) pointed out to me and I found to be true, there’s a great amount of grip strength work related to mortality, wellness, quality of life and aging, and specific diseases like CPD, arthritis, diabetes, and hypo/hyperthyroidism.

Roberts et al. (2011) concur, as illustrated in the introduction portion of their review: “As an assessment measure, grip strength has been shown to have predictive validity and low values are associated with falls (Sayer et al., 2006), disability, impaired health-related quality of life (Syddall et al., 2009), and prolonged length of stay in hospital (Kerr et al., 2006), as well as increased mortality (Gale et al., 2007; Cooper et al., 2010).” It’s a simple and apparently obvious tool when looking at wellness. Other health-related handgrip studies include: LeWine, 2016; Pedão et al., 2014; Syddall et al., 2009; and Cooper et al., 2010.

On the other hand, athletic studies come from all levels—male, female, adolescents, high school, collegiate, and non-elite. I will cite some of the sparse information on elite and professional athletes in this article.

The Validity and Reliability of Grip Strength Testing

Before going all in on grip strength as a performance assessment, you’d have to start with the validity and reliability of the grip testing: both the protocol and the instrument. It is definitely more muddled than the results themselves. In the Espana-Romero study again, for example, the position of the elbow AND the dynamometer used (as I mentioned, three were in the study) have conflicting results in the same study.

The researchers looked at how elbow position affected grip strength in 12-16-year-old males and females using the TKK, Jamar, and DynEx dynamometers. Without going into too much detail, strength levels were significantly higher when the elbow was flexed at 90 degrees with the TKK. Results of the study indicate that of the three dynamometers, the TKK offered the highest validity and reliability for that “particular population,” if for no other reason than the TKK could be adjusted to 12-16-year old hand size whereas the Jamar and DynEx were not practical to accommodate that size.

When working with college hockey and possible future NHLers, comparison to NHL Combine grip testing scores would make sense for goal setting and programming. The NHL Combine uses the Jamar dynamometer for grip strength testing. For the test, the athletes put their arm overhead and fully extend it, squeeze the dynamometer as tightly as possible, and slowly release their arm down to their side (Chiarlitti et al., 2017). I thought it odd to have a grip test overhead until I read a study (Su et al., 1994) showing that the shoulder flexed at 180 degrees (overhead) and arm fully extended had the highest mean grip (using the Jamar) out of four positions (shoulder flexed at 0-90-180 degrees, and elbow flexed at 90 degrees/0 degrees shoulder flexion).

The point is that each dynamometer has its virtues and limitations in measurement of error, validity, and reliability. Different populations (age, sex, gender) are also affected by not only the dynamometer, but the protocol as well. The following are some additional references that include the topics of validity, reliability, and test protocols: Cardenas-Sanchez et al., 2016; Roberts et al., 2011; and Yingling et al., 2017.

Grip Training vs. Forearm Training: They’re Not the Same Thing

Here it is—doing wrist curls is forearm training. Opening and closing your hand is grip training. Sure, you get grip training just from weight training (as illustrated in most studies) and isometric strength is important (pinching, holding), but flexion and extension of the gripping muscles is the only way to comprehensively train the grip from an anatomical and kinesiological perspective.

Doing wrist curls is forearm training—opening and closing your hand is #grip training, says @Coach_Alejo. Share on X

Think about it: In what other area do we ONLY do isometric training? The grip is comprised of the strength of each finger and often the thumb. While forearm strength is important, there is no way to get to that strength if the grip “gives out”—if it’s not strong enough. If you are in a sport that requires forearm strength via the grip, you must give training the grip, including finger strength, equal training time for both volume and intensity.

I ran into a few great hand studies in engineering and ergonomic journals that were very enlightening from a data standpoint. Amis (1987) published a study that is critical for all of us in sports performance. It was an investigation of “maximal isometric cylindrical grasping actions” of cylinders 31-116 mm (1.22-4.56 in.) in diameter. He was able to measure all three phalangeal segments of each finger and their force contribution to grip and found the “…mean contributions of fingers from index to little were: 30, 30, 22 and 18%, proportions that did not vary significantly for the range of grasp diameters.” As the cylinder size increased, grasp forces decreased. Simply—and I see very little of it—finger training is grip training.

Another study looked at isometric gripping force on five cylinders of different sizes (Edgren et al., 2004): 2.54 cm (1 in.), 3.81 cm (1.5 in.), 5.08 cm (2 in.), 6.35 cm (2.5 in.), and 7.62 cm (3 in.). Edgren goes on to note that “On average, magnitude increased 34.8 N as handle diameter increased from 2.54 cm to 3.81 cm, and then monotonically declined 103.8 N as the handle diameter increased to 7.62 cm.” The 7.62 cm “handle” data from this research (the study was to benefit those designing tool handle sizes, optimizing grip for varying hand sizes) showed the smallest force. That both the smallest and largest cylinders showed the least amount of force illustrates the role of hand size and finger strength capabilities.

Comprehensively train the grip by flexing and extending the fingers, like you would any muscle, says @Coach_Alejo. Share on X

These two studies clearly demonstrate the contribution of the fingers to grip strength. Training must include different-sized training widths for isometric gripping, and gripping strength should be trained with a full range of gripping motion. Comprehensively train the grip by flexing and extending the fingers, like you would any muscle in the body.

Does Grip Strength Make Us Better at Sports?

There has been a very recent review addressing exactly this question: “A brief review of handgrip strength and sport performance” (Cronin et al., 2017; 203 references). A full discussion on the validity and reliability of dynamometers and protocols, this review covers the spectrum of sports and the relationship of handgrip strength and performance. The following is a mix of quotes and paraphrased summary:

Two sporting grips were deemed common, or at least a variation of the two:

  1. Precision grip—used for grasping sphere-shaped objects (e.g., balls)
  2. Power grip—used for grasping cylindrical-shaped objects (e.g., clubs, bats, rackets, sticks, and paddles).

The study was divided into five categories:

  1. Stick, club, bat, racket, and ball sports
  2. Water sports
  3. Climbing and gymnastics
  4. Combat sports
  5. Strength disciplines

1. Handgrip Strength in Stick, Club, Bat, Racket, and Ball Sports

“Trivial to nearly perfect correlations” were found between handgrip strength and throwing velocity; throwing energy; cricket bowling accuracy; 10-pin bowling accuracy; bat, club, and stick/puck speed; bat energy; fielding percentage; and golf, field hockey, ice hockey, and lacrosse shot. The authors suggest that handgrip strength has less of a relationship with actions that have a “high amount of technical precision and accuracy.”

This information suggests that the timing and sequencing of the force applied to an implement or object by the hand (palm, digits, and thumb) in sport is of greater importance than the magnitude of applied force alone. In addition, perhaps a handgrip strength threshold is reached where gaining more strength is of no advantage “where the coordination and timing (e.g., bat, club, stick, and racket sports) of skilled actions is more important.”

“Strength (e.g., bench press strength and wrist, elbow, shoulder, and knee torque), ballistic (e.g., medicine ball throw distance, and bench throw velocity and power), flexibility (e.g., shoulder and wrist), and anthropometric (e.g., body mass, lean mass, height, and arm span) measures were also moderately to very largely correlated with serving, spiking, and throwing velocity in tennis, volleyball, and handball athletes, respectively.” Ergo, when two or more key variables are analyzed, they better predict performance-based measures than any one variable (grip strength).

2. Handgrip Strength in Water Sports

In water sports, the hand is usually involved in propulsion through the water in some form. “Other single and multiple measures of strength (e.g., tethered swim force, upper arm, shoulder, and abdominal flexion), along with horizontal jump performance, aerobic and anaerobic capacity, anthropometry (e.g., height, arm span, and foot length), and flexibility (ankle and shoulder range of motion) are of equal or greater importance (than grip strength) to predicting swim performance in adolescent, teenage, and adult swimmers.”

Even though there were moderate to large correlations between handgrip strength and throwing velocity in elite water polo athletes, it was found that “certain anthropometric characteristics, such as limb length, height, lean muscle mass, and somatotype along with throwing technique, may be greater predictors of throwing velocity in water polo athletes.”

3. Handgrip Strength in Climbing and Gymnastics

The average observer would think, as the correlated and comparative information showed, there is plenty of good evidence suggesting that “a high amount of relative HGS is advantageous” for success in climbing and gymnastics (rings, bars). Although the research is limited, one study had a very large correlation between handgrip strength and handgrip strength endurance in ring athletes. With relative body mass being as important for climbing as in gymnastics, “large to very large correlations were observed between maximum relative hand grip strength, crimp grip strength, pinch grip strength, and rock climbing ability.”

4. Handgrip Strength in Combat Sports

Handgrip strength for combat sports (boxing, mixed martial arts, wrestling) seems more applicable than in a lot of sports. Although the studies with great correlations were not unanimous, there were moderate and very large relationships found between HGS and wrestling success and boxing competition ranking. Related to those data points, elite male athletes had much larger handgrip strength production than sub-elite groups, as did elite adult over sub-elite adults.

Elite combat sport athletes seem to possess greater overall maximum strength, explosive strength, lower-body fat percentages, and greater aerobic and anaerobic capacities in comparison with amateur and sub-elite combat sport athletes. It makes sense.

Comparing the grip strength of elite and non-elite Brazilian jiujitsu players (Da Silva et al., 2012) found tests that were reliable and sport-specific: “Considering that endurance as well as the grip on the lapel of the opponent’s kimono are vital to success in grappling combat sports, it seems these tests (maximum static lift and maximum number of repetitions) can be an important aspect of the physical evaluation of these athletes. In fact, our results showed elite athletes were superior in performance when compared to recreational practitioners of BJJ.”

5. Strength Athletes

Due to a lack of current research examining handgrip strength in strength athletes, only a small cohort could be reviewed. While not a specific handgrip study, Fry et al., 2006, observed large differences between the elite (stronger) and sub-elite junior Olympic weightlifters. As in other previously noted studies, the stronger grip group was also “more impulsive (i.e., vertical jump) and stronger across all lifts (i.e., snatch, clean and jerk, front squat, back squat, and bench press).”

 Note: “Efficacy off Handgrip Strength in Predicting Total Body Strength Among High Performance Athletes” (Jawan et. al., 2014) was an interesting piece. I only had access to an abridged version of the full text. From what I could find out, including the abstract, the high-performance athletes (N=100; 21 sports; team and individual sports) used in this study “represented their university, state, or country in sports and were reported as being healthy and fit through the interview sessions held before selecting them into the program.”

 Oddly, this study found no significant correlation between handgrip strength and “all the 1RM tests, including the bench press, lat pull-down, the leg press, leg extension, and strength test. Likewise, the leg power test also showed no significant correlation with the handgrip strength test. Hence, this study showed that the handgrip was not a significant measure of total body strength of high-performance athletes.” It was really the only study I read that showed no correlation between overall strength and handgrip strength.

Baseball

Baseball has some very good grip strength studies, although not many at the MLB level. However, the information is enough to develop some pretty good suppositions. It’s pretty simple: Swinging a bat, hitting, and throwing a ball with a strong grip could be beneficial. Spaniol (2009) sums it up in his article about a baseball-specific test battery he proposed: “It is strongly suggested that one such test, grip strength, be included in the assessment process because research suggests a positive relationship between grip strength and throwing velocity, bat speed, and batted-ball velocity.”

Grip strength plays a role in baseball, but not the most critical role, says @Coach_Alejo. Share on X

It’s also clear that there is a significant difference (stronger) in grip strength from high school to NCAA NAIA to specifically NCAA DI. I would say age has something to do with the increase from high school to college and perhaps skill level influences the differences between NAIA and DI college players. Nonetheless, grip plays a role. Additionally, based on the kinetic chain involved in hitting, grip strength does not play the most critical role.

The following is a summary of a few studies that should stimulate some thought:

Fry et al., 2011 – For NCAA DI baseball players, there was a significant relationship between batted ball velocity, grip strength, and incline bench press; squat strength was not significantly correlated. Eleven of the 31 participants had played a season prior to the study, so there were performance statistics to compare. For the 11, grip strength was significantly correlated to slugging percentage but “non-significantly” to batting average. Also reported was that grip strength was lower than previous studies, perhaps due to a “different hand grip dynamometer used.”

Hoffman et al., 2009 – Significant bivariate correlations were found between grip strength and home runs, total bases, and slugging percentage. Speed and lower body power were also significantly correlated with baseball specific performance variables.

Mangine et al., 2013 – Assessing professional pitchers and position players from under-20 to 35+ years of age (seven groups divided into three-year increments: under 20, 20-22, 23-25, etc.), of the eight total variables measured, grip strength, lean body mass, and total mass were the only variables to peak in the 29-31 age group; others peaked at a younger age.

Watanabe et al., 2017 – Vertical jump height correlated with individual performance records (total bases, slugging percentage, and stolen bases) of professional Japanese female baseball athletes. Grip, back, and lower-limb strength, and hamstring “extensibility” were not significantly correlated with game performance.

Kohmura et al., 2008 – This study proposed a testing protocol for college players that did not include grip strength. Most baseball studies typically include a gripping test as some assessment.

Szymanski and colleagues [2004, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2010] – In two articles (2009 & 2010), statistically significant relationships were demonstrated between grip strength, bat-end speed, and batted-ball exit speed in adolescent, high school-aged, and college athletes. In other articles (2004, 2006, 2010), grip strength training and a traditional (stepwise periodized) total body strength training significantly increased forearm and grip strength.

The group that completed additional grip strength and forearm training had statistically greater improvements in the seven grip and forearm variables tested compared to the control group; however, the additional supplemental grip strength and forearm training group did not have any further improvements in bat velocity (BV), center of percussion velocity (sweet spot; CV), or hand velocity (HV) in high school baseball players, indicating that a total body weight training program “…alone is a sound approach to statistically increase linear BV, CV, and HV in high school baseball players.”

Kinetic chain impact on swinging/rotating with an implement—in this case, a bat—is not related to any one variable. Improving kinematics and kinetics (forces that cause motion) of swinging a baseball bat is more complex and, in general, related to proper swing mechanics and power. (Many thanks to my friend and colleague, David Szymanski for co-authoring these two paragraphs with me. And by that, I mean thanks for the lesson!)

FYI baseball people: Grip a baseball or clench your fist and feel the ulnar collateral ligament area—tightened and flexed! Wouldn’t it make sense that with all that gripping of the baseball, there should be some balance in grip training with finger and wrist extension (the opposite of gripping), knowing there is a direct effect on that area!? We already know the throwing arm is out of balance and spend a great deal of time addressing balance—not necessarily a 50/50 balance—yet not one word about the grip. Why not the grip?

Golf

A study comparing fat grip resistance training with regular grip resistance training (Cummings et al., 2018) found “…that training with FG (fat grip) compared with normal diameter bars can significantly increase both RT (resistance training; left hand grip strength) performance and golf driving performance (ball speed, carry, drive distance) in DI male golfers.”

Fat bar training note: Ratamess et al., 2007, concluded what most of us already know, “the use of 2- and 3-inch thick bars may result in initial weight reductions primarily for pulling exercises presumably due to greater reliance on maximal grip strength and larger hand size.”

What’s your intent when using fat grip training? If it’s for grip training, good idea. At the same time, bar width will lighten your load, thereby sacrificing pulling strength and maybe pressing strength for grip. It’s a nonsensical proposition if you are trying to optimize pulling strength or hypertrophy by way of a given exercise. It’s like limiting squat loads because you want to do calf raises.

Tennis

Even though the force transducers measuring grip tightness were built into a mechanical arm and wooden rackets were used (4.37” grips), the results were interesting (Elliot, 1982). Tighter grips “increased the reaction impulse and rebound velocity of the ball (balls were delivered by a ball machine; racket velocities were approximated to that of college-level baseline drives), particularly for off-center impacts.” No surprise given the amount of conflicting grip strength conclusions in sport. Grabiner et al. (1983) found in a primary conclusion, contrary to Elliot, “…that grip firmness plays no role in tennis other than pre- and post-impact implement control.” Smart et al. (2011) found grip strength significantly correlated to post-test serve velocity, but so did bench press, vertical jump height, squat, gender, and arm length.

Four other studies (Ulbricht et al., 2016; Girard et al., 2009; Genevois et al., 2013; Baiget et al., 2014) looking at serve velocity or physical parameters. Two did not include grip strength as an assessment and the other two gave no real recommendation of any kind for grip strength contribution to performance. To me this points to a lack of grip strength studies and a lack of interest or punctuation for grip strength.

My Anecdotal Experience, Hypotheses, and Common Sense

Hand size and strength play a role in sporting success, albeit not a crucial role. Think about it: The bigger the hand, the more coverage you’ll have “up the handle” on a bat and therefore better control of the bat head. These benefits would be obvious in racquet sports.

Strength aside, the control of the implement in these cases would be important. Bigger hands would mean more jersey to grab and hold, more gi to control, better wrist control, or holding a submission in wrestling (not the piledriver or throwing someone over the ropes). To anybody who’s done it, the more hand you can put on a football, basketball, baseball, or any ball for that matter—not to exclude a shot put, javelin, or disc—the better control and direction you might have of the object.

Gripping is a common, everyday thing. You could posit that reversing the action of gripping (opening the hand and fingers as wide as possible against resistance) makes total sense. We always talk about muscle balance in the legs, shoulder, and trunk, but I hardly ever hear of that discussion in relation to grip during all the grip hullabaloo. Putting an elastic band around the fingers and thumb and opening the hand against that resistance makes total physiological sense. So much so that if you’re saying grip strength is that important, then reverse grip movements should be on the workout sheet too!

There are times when grip strength, or at least maximum grip strength, is not needed. It’s important, but not always necessary. I know of programs spending up to 15 minutes of a 45-60-minute workout on grip strength. A coach has to shrewdly address committing 25% of a workout to grip, knowing that there are several other more important parameters most of the time. A well-rounded program includes grip strengthening—it’s called training. A coach can’t dismiss that. Research has proven it.

A well-rounded program includes grip strengthening—it’s called training. A coach can’t dismiss that, says @Coach_Alejo. Share on X

My takeaway from my investigation is that the impact each finger has on grip strength is magnified when you look at the force produced over a range of gripping widths. Therefore, train the flexion and extension of the fingers through many ranges of motion!

Summary

After reading some 70 abstracts and studies, as I said in the second paragraph of this article, it’s pretty clear that it’s unclear how much gripping contributes to athletic or physical performance. Stronger people have stronger grips than weaker people; bigger people (body mass) have stronger grips than smaller people; older people have stronger grips than younger people. If you want to be able to hold heavy objects, lift heavy objects—this is common sense to anyone who has coached at least one month.

I only saw grip strength having predictive validity when it relates to wellness. Studies have shown that grip strength increases with grip strength training added to regular lifting. Studies have also shown that the added increase in grip strength did not improve performance. In fact, Layton et al. showed that in racquetball tournament play, there was no “significant or practical difference” between first place finishers and the remainder of the field.

Research shows that #GripStrength is important, but not critical to athletic performance, says @Coach_Alejo. Share on X

Grip strength is shown to be important, but not critical to or predictive of athletic performance. There are plenty of correlates, but overall it appears as if grip strength is a by-product of other measures and qualities and not the other way around.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

References

Abraldes, J.A., Canossa, S., Soares, S.M., Fernandes, R.J. & Garganta, J.M. “Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength and Shot Speed in Different Competitive Level Water Polo Players.” Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport. 2014.

Amaral, J.F., Mancini, M. & Novo Júnior, J.M. “Comparison of three hand dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of the measurements.” Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2012.

Amis, A. “Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters.” Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 1987.

Baiget, E., Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Iglesias, X., Vallejo, L. & Rodrıguez, F.A. “On-court endurance and performance testing in competitive male tennis players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2014.

Cardenas-Sanchez, C., Sanchez-Delgado, G., Martinez-Tellez, B., Mora-Gonzalez, J., Löf, M., España-Romero, V., Ruiz, J.R. & Ortega, F.B. “Reliability and validity of different models of TKK hand dynamometers.” American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2016.

Chiarlitti, N.A., Delisle-Houde, P., Reid, R.E.R., Kennedy, C. & Andersen, R.E. “The Importance of Body Composition in the National Hockey League Combine Physiologic Assessments.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017.

Cooper, R., Kuh, D. & Hardy, R. “Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.” British Medical Journal. 2010.

Cronin, J., Lawton, T., Harris, N., Kilding, A. & McMaster, D.T. “A brief review of handgrip strength and sport performance.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017.

Crossland, B.W., Hartman, J.E., Kilgore, J.L., Hartman, M.J. & Kaus, J.M. “Upper-body anthropometric and strength measures and their relationship to start time in elite luge athletes.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011.

Cummings, P.M., Waldman, H.S., Krings, B.M., Smith, J.W. & McAllister, M.J. “Effects of fat grip training on muscular strength and driving performance in division I male golfers.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018.

Da Silva, B., Marocolo, M., de Moura Simim, M.A., Rezende, F.N., Franchini, E. & da Mota, G.R. “Reliability in kimono grip strength tests and comparison between elite and non-elite Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu players.” 2012.

Derwin, J. “Effective Methods of Grip Strength Development.” NSCA COACH 2.3 | NSCA.COM.

Edgren, C.S., Radwin, R.G. & Irwin, C.B. “Grip force vectors for varying handle diameters and hand sizes.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2004.

Elliott, B. “Tennis: the influence of grip tightness on reaction impulse and rebound velocity.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1982.

España-Romero, V., Ortega, F.B., Vicente-Rodríguez, G., Artero, E.G., Rey, J.P. & Ruiz, J.R. “Elbow position affects handgrip strength in adolescents: validity and reliability of Jamar, DynEx, and TKK dynamometers.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010.

Follmer, B., Dellagrana, R.A., Franchini, E. & Diefenthaeler, F. “Relationship of kimono grip strength tests with isokinetic parameters in jiu-jitsu athletes.” Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano. 2015.

Fry, A.C., Ciroslan, D., Fry, M.D., LeRoux, C.D., Schilling, B.K. & Chiu, L.Z. “Anthropometric and performance variables discriminating elite American junior men weightlifters.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2006.

Fry, A.C., Honnold, D., Hudy, A., Roberts, C., Gallagher, P.M., Vardiman, P.J. & Dellasega, C. “Relationships Between Muscular Strength and Batting Performances in Collegiate Baseball Athletes.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011.

Gale, C.R., Martyn, C.N., Cooper, C. & Sayer A.A. “Grip strength, body composition, and mortality.” International Journal of Epidemiology. 2007.

Garcia Pallerés, J., López-Gullón, J.M., Torres-Bonete, M.D. & Izquierdo, M. “Physical fitness factors to predict female Olympic wrestling performance and sex differences.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2012.

Genevois, C., Frican, B., Creveaux, T., Hautier, C. & Rogowski, I. “Effects of two training protocols on the forehand drive performance in tennis.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2013.

Girard, O. & Millet, G.P. “Physical Determinants of Tennis Performance in Competitive Teenage Players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009.

Grabiner, M., Groppel, J. & Campbell, K. “Resultant tennis ball velocity as a function of off-center impact and grip firmness.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1983.

Hoffman, J.R., Vazquez, J., Pichardo, N. & Tenenbaum, G. “Anthropometric and performance comparisons in professional baseball players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009.

Jawan, L., Adnan, R., Sulaiman, N. & Ismail, S.I. “Efficacy of Handgrip Strength in Predicting Total Body Strength Among High Performance Athletes.” In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Sports Science, Exercise, Engineering and Technology. 2014.

Kerr, A., Syddall, H.E., Cooper, C., Turner, G.F., Briggs, R.S. & Sayer, A.A. “Does admission grip strength predict length of stay in hospitalised older patients?” Age and Ageing. 2006.

Kohmura, Y., Aoki, K., Yoshigi, H., Sakuraba, K. & Yanagiya, T. “Developments of a baseball-specific battery of tests and a testing protocol for college baseball players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2008.

Layton, J.S. & DeBeliso, M. “Is There a Relationship between Maximal Grip Strength and Racquetball Success? A Pilot Study.” Athens Journal of Sport. 2017.

LeWine, H. “Grip strength may provide clues to heart health.” Harvard Health Blog. Posted May 19, 2015, 12:11 pm, Updated September 08, 2016, 5:16 pm.

Mangine, G.T., Hoffman, J.R., Fragala, M.S., Vazquez, J., Krause, M.C., Gillett, J. & Pichardo, N. “Effect of age on anthropometric and physical performance measures in professional baseball players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2013.

Pedão, S.T., Aguiar, S., Cunha, B.P. & de Freitas, P.B. “Grip and load force control and coordination in object manipulation during a night of sleep deprivation.” Sleep and Biological Rhythms. 2014.

Platzer, H.P., Raschner, C. & Patterson, C. “Performance -determining physiological factors in the luge start.” Journal of Sports Sciences. 2009.

Ploegmakers, J.J., Hepping, A.M., Geertzen, J.H., Bulstra, S.K. & Stevens, M. “Grip strength is strongly associated with height, weight and gender in childhood: a cross sectional study of 2241 children and adolescents providing reference values.” Journal of Physiotherapy. 2013.

Ratamess, N.A., Faigenbaum, A.D., Mangine, G.T., Hoffman, J.R. & Kang, J. “Acute muscular strength assessment using free weight bars of different thickness.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2007

Roberts, H.C., Denison, H.J., Martin, H.J., Patel, H.P., Syddall, H., Cooper, C., & Sayer, A.A. “A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.” Age and Ageing. 2011.

Sayer, A.A., Syddall, H.E., Martin, H.J., Dennison, E.M., Anderson, F.H. & Cooper, C. “Falls, sarcopenia, and growth in early life: findings from the Hertfordshire cohort study.” American Journal of Epidemiology. 2006.

Smart, J., McCurdy, K., Miller, B. & Pankey, R. “The Effect of Core Training on Tennis Serve Velocity.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011.

Spaniol, F. “Baseball Athletic Test: A Baseball-Specific Test Battery.” Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2009.

Su, C.Y., Lin, J.H., Chien, T.H., Cheng, K.F. & Sung, Y.T. “Grip strength in different positions of elbow and shoulder.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994.

Syddall, H.E., Martin, H.J., Harwood, R.H., Cooper, C. & Aihie Sayer, A. “The SF-36: a simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies.” Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2009.

Szymanski, D.J. & DeRenne, C. “The Effects of Small Muscle Training on Baseball Hitting Performance: A Brief Review.” Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2010.

Szymanski, D.J., DeRenne, C. & Spaniol, F.J. “Contributing factors for increased bat swing velocity.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009.

Szymanski, D.J., McIntyre, J.S., Szymanski, J.M., Molloy, J.M., Madsen, N.H. & Pascoe, D.D. “Effect of wrist and forearm training on linear bat-end, center of percussion, and hand velocities and on time to ball contact of high school baseball players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2006.

Szymanski, D.J., Szymanski, J.M., Molloy, J.M. & Pascoe, D.D. “Effect of 12 weeks of wrist and forearm training on high school baseball players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2004.

Szymanski, D.J., Szymanski, J.M., Schade, R.L., Bradford, T.J., McIntyre, J.S., DeRenne, C. & Madsen, N.H. “The relation between anthropometric and physiological variables and bat velocity of high school baseball players before and after 12 weeks of training.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010.

Trosclair, D., Bellar, D., Judge, L.W., Smith, J., Mazerat, N. & Brignac, A. “Hand-Grip Strength as a Predictor of Muscular Strength and Endurance.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011.

Ulbricht, A., Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Mendez-Villanueva, A. & Ferrauti, A. “Impact of fitness characteristics on tennis performance in elite junior tennis players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2016.

Watanabe, Y., Yamada, Y., Yoshida, T., Matsui, T., Seo, K., Azuma, Y., Hiramoto, M., Miura, Y., Fukushima, H., Shimazu, A., Eto, T., Saotome, H., Kida, N. & Morihara, T. “Relationship between physical fitness at the end of pre-season and the in-season game performance in Japanese female professional baseball players.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017.

Yim, S.Y., Cho, J.R. & Lee, I.Y. “Normative Data and Developmental Characteristics of Hand Function for Elementary School Children in Suwon Area of Korea: Grip, Pinch and Dexterity Study.” Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2003.

Yingling, V.R., Webb, S., Inouye, C., O, J. & Sherwood, J. “Muscle power predicts bone strength in Division II athletes.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Post Acceptance: August 29, 2017

NFL Player with Football

Assessing NFL Combine Drills with Paul Beckwith and Pro Scouts

Freelap Friday Five| ByPaul Beckwith

NFL Player with Football

Paul Beckwith is the Director of Sports Performance at Apex Athletic Performance in Columbia, SC, and has trained athletes in the National Football League, Major League Baseball, PGA Tour, and Major League Soccer. He was recently in Indianapolis for the NFL Combine, after preparing several athletes for the event.

“With the idea and understanding that 90% of the grade of an NFL athlete comes from game film, medical reports, and personal interview, the actual ‘Combine tests and drills’ are what I call an up-close-and-live audition of athleticism,” Beckwith said.

While there, Paul spoke with NFL scouts about the Combine showcase. In this modified Freelap Friday Five, contributed via 1080 Motion, Paul shared with us some of what he heard from these scouts and how they evaluate the individual drills as they assemble their profile of each prospective player.

One Speed Tests: Less Is More (Not Always, but Often)
Scout: For certain positions, the 40-yard dash matters greatly. It’s important for wide receivers and cornerbacks, not so much for linemen and quarterbacks. Our league is about speed, and this test helps attach some speed numbers to players. It’s not as important as people think, but it’s not as overrated as people think, either.

The NFL is about speed: For certain positions, the 40-yard dash matters greatly. Share on X

Beckwith: I know a few colleagues around the league who value the results of the 10-yard split more than any other speed metric here. I still haven’t seen any verified data that backs that up, but I get it. Initial burst and quickness are obviously important.

Two Shuttle and Agility Tests: Direct Transference to the Sport
Scout: I love the 20-yard short shuttle. Stiff athletes can’t escape the shuttles with good times. Burst, bend, and lateral range are tested, and tightness is exposed.

The three-cone drill is the single most important drill at the Combine, plain and simple. Share on X

Beckwith: The three-cone drill is the single most important drill at the Combine, plain and simple. Regardless of position, I want to know how the player performs in space, and this helps show change of direction, explosiveness, and overall athleticism. There is validity to this test translating to the football field.

Three Jump Tests: Minimal Utility for Football
Scout: The higher you can jump, the better, but it’s more of a threshold drill. As long as you jump at a certain level, depending on your position, you’re fine. The best numbers in this drill don’t tell me much.

The broad jump is an overrated drill. Share on X

Beckwith: The broad jump is an overrated drill. It helps gauge lower body muscles and twitch, I suppose, but you can’t convince me it necessarily translates to an athlete being a better player.

Four Bench Press: Drop It
Scout: If we forgot to do this drill at the Combine, no one would miss it. It’s overrated and useless. If a player has a low number of reps, he’s not a weight room guy—but we already knew that.

Five
What is the likelihood of the Combine changing to reflect what we now know about sport science, particularly transference between drills or tests and the sport performance they supposedly predict?

Beckwith: The Combine isn’t going to change drastically. It’s too established. Plus, at its core it’s as much about entertainment and furthering the NFL narrative in February as it is about scouting.

The way to improve the Combine isn’t to change the drills, but to expand how they’re measured. Share on X

People are attached to the mystique of the 40-yard dash, and that’s fine. The way to improve the Combine is not to change the drills, but to expand how they’re measured.


Video 1. High performance professionals can use technological tools and analytics to create a blueprint to prepare athletes for the Combine.

Teams can compare the big numbers—that’s what they’re looking at to compare athleticism. As sports science/sports medicine practitioners, we can use the more detailed analysis to really understand how to create a blueprint for that athlete to make sure that you fix them and have them ready between now and when they show up at that first camp.

That’s the next step: Use the Combine not just to evaluate players, but to maximize those players’ abilities once they latch on with a team.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



A digital watch with a black strap and a metal case is displayed on a white background. The watch is attached to a dark, adjustable chest strap heart rate monitor. The watch screen shows a time of 12:03:54.

A Buyer’s Guide for Coaches for Team Heart Rate Monitoring Systems

Buyer's Guide / ByChristopher Glaeser

 

Heart Rate Monitors

As the wearable market grows, so does the accessibility to heart rate data. Commercial heart rate monitors have been around for decades, but they are still viable options for coaches and athletes wanting to know how training challenges the cardiovascular system. While there have been major technology breakthroughs with hardware and software since the late 1970s, the science is still the same and there have been very few advancements outside of TRIMP and heart rate variability (HRV) measurement.

The interest in mechanical loading from other sensor technology has led to us seeing heart rate measurement take a back seat for now. Even with the rise in popularity of GPS-guided player tracking, the measures of the heart are timeless for supporting coaching decisions and athletic development.

Why Heart Rate Monitoring Is Still Relevant

Since the early 2000s, we have observed a slow and slight decline in the heart rate monitoring of practices. At the same time, there has been increased interest both in the autonomic nervous system from HRV data and in player tracking technology from GPS-powered systems. New is not always better, and the inclusion of both heart rate monitoring and player workloads is a perfect match.

The inclusion of both heart rate monitoring and player workloads is a perfect match. Share on X

External loading options like player tracking systems are an estimate of the total and type of work, while internal response options like heart rate monitoring measure the physiological reaction to the bout of work. Add in the fact that real-time HRV readings can be done now, so many coaches like adding that safety net to overtraining by scanning a team right after warming up for practice. Including a complete monitoring option to practices and training provides a robust checks and balances to the work and recovery of sport preparation.

Heart Rate Data
Image 1. Devan McConnell is one of the few coaches in the U.S. not to leave metabolic and heart rate data tracking. The extra work is worth it, and he is a leader in monitoring in the U.S.

 

Currently, there is declining interest in heart rate monitoring, but we expect a rebound for several reasons. The main reason the data is growing in interest is that smart fabrics and newer textiles are improving the user experience of wearing a chest band. There is surging interest in wrist-based products, but the research indicates that data is not as good as a chest strap option.

The second reason why data is coming back in vogue with heart rate monitoring is the improvement in data aggregation from athlete management system (AMS) software. In the past, juggling data alone—the common burden of smaller club and college coaches—was just too much. Now the burden of exporting or transferring data is lifted, and the coach is free to do the analysis instead of the monkey work.

With the burden of exporting data lifted, coaches are free to do analysis instead of monkey work. Share on X

Heart rate data is more important for endurance sports and open field continuous sports like soccer, but with team practices in power-oriented sports lasting hours, the data is just as relevant as in the past.

Understanding Heart Rate Monitor Signal Quality and Telemetry Demands

Before coaches or athletes look into features and other secondary benefits, the two key areas that make or break a heart rate system are the quality of data and how the data is pushed out either in real time or post session. The first step in getting an accurate heart rate is not a technology decision, but an anatomical choice with where to measure. Sensors near the heart, such as a shirt or strap, are common because of signal quality. Other options like finger and wrist measures are fine, but artifact problems increase and signal fidelity decreases as the measure becomes more distal to the midpoint of the body. Electrocardiograms (ECG or EKG) will sometimes use “limb leads,” but the primary zone of measurement is the chest.

The first step in getting an accurate heart rate is an anatomical choice of where to measure. Share on X

Unlike health monitoring options, body motion can really corrupt the data quality of sensors away from the heart. That’s why the Apple Watch and Mio bands are great for recreational athletes, but not for competitive athletes that push the limits and need solid data. The heart rate monitor market can be confusing because buyers must be informed whether the watch collects and displays data or whether sensors on the watch actually collect the data directly. EKG tests are the gold standard in collecting a comprehensive signal beyond changes in heart rate, and that type of information is beyond the scope of this article. Omegawave, a physiological monitoring system, does provide very high resolution data, but that enters the realm of medical data, not coaching information.

Transmitting the signal should be a non-issue today with the advancement of wireless transmissions, but things break down or fail with any technology. On paper, several options like ANT+ and LE Bluetooth sound robust, but the more moving parts, the more likely something will go wrong. Often the problem is not the transmission but a battery issue or something like a strap not placed properly. Also, conductance breaks down because sweat will literally corrode the materials used to collect the data, even if it helps improve a signal. Some products provide boosting components to help outdoor or indoor signal capture, and that is a necessity when looking at real-time data and wanting no transmission loss.

Software and Third-Party Applications

The common frustration with nearly all heart rate monitoring systems is the general pattern of less support for software engineers than for hardware engineers. In the past, some software platforms looked rushed or last minute compared to the hardware, but now web-based software is solving the problem. The other growth area is apps that are agnostic to consumer products and provide a way to visualize, analyze, and store the heart rate data.

The line between consumer products and team enterprise is becoming fuzzier, as a company like Polar provides a leaderboard app for tablets that exploits the ability to sync multiple Bluetooth chest straps, but only for short ranges. We see million-dollar athletes using the same technology anybody can access from a local sporting goods store, which is another example of the way technology is improving and becoming less expensive at the same time.

Polar Heart Rate Graph
Image 2. The key to software is ensuring that coaches can customize their settings and be able to automate charts and reports. Typical TRIMP and load metrics are common in the industry.

 

Next are the added-value services or proprietary analysis applications like iTrimp and the countless endurance market tools. Also included in this category are athlete management systems that either allow for customized dashboards and reporting or provide a suite of tools to apply smarter decisions. As the additional data streams increase, expect the heart rate monitor companies to minimize their software to the essentials, and focus on their ability to share data with platforms that can analyze the data as well as fuse multiple data sets.

Very little progress or innovation occurred in the last decade regarding heart rate monitoring due to the interest in GPS player tracking, but there is promising evolution in some circles. Many coaches who use heart rate monitoring in isolation are trying to calculate load instead of the response to load, which is a fair approach but far less valuable. The current trend is to use very high level statistical analysis of all of the data to detect patterns of fatigue in advance of injury. As early detection improves, so does the opportunity for better planning. This way you can avoid unnecessary resting due to poor sequencing when the weekly total load may be appropriate.

TRIMP, a measure of estimated physiological load, can be done with nearly every system. Besides that metric, there is very little other heart rate driven scoring of note. One clever way to maximize the usefulness of heart rate monitoring is to use HRV indices with standardized recovery runs and warm-ups. Linear running provides more precision than chaotic environments because you can compare it week to week. Other than regeneration and preparation sessions, combining workload responses of other sensors is the typical approach to modern training.

Essential Differences Between Team and Individual Systems

While stereotyped as dated, products used radio in the past to send heartbeat signals from chest bands to a unit that could then pass it to a digital option like a computer. Later, infrared transfer to a USB dongle was the standard, but now local area networks are using other wireless options. Team systems differ from individual systems because they relay connect every athlete to one device instead of one sensor to one smartphone or watch.

All of this may sound like minor or unnecessary details, but the vital challenge is making practices run smoothly with technology, not have coaching chores interfere with instruction or supervision. Some team systems have been known to work intermittently because teams are a small part of company profits and resources are usually spent on the consumer market. Even today, some systems fail from time to time because of firmware updates or interference, but in general there is higher stability.

The challenge is having practices run smoothly with technology, and not interfere with coaching. Share on X

Consumer products are fine for endurance athletes, because most distance runners, cyclists, and triathletes are disciplined to collect their own data and push it to the cloud, or similar. Team sports need team solutions not because of the differences between activities, but the differences in personalities. Many small groups with engaged athletes that work with their private coaches are willing participants in the data collection because they selected the coach in the first place, but teams are drafted and not voluntary, so the contribution of the athletes is minimal, for the most part. The more advanced the athlete, specifically in team sport, the less likely they are driven to do much of the leg work in getting data to central repositories like AMS options.

A very common and important question is about the difference between managing a group of individuals and guiding a team. The technology used, as well as the type of sport and environment, can be the difference between spending a small amount of money and having to fork over much more capital. When you buy an enterprise team product, you buy convenience with passive data aggregation instead of expecting an active or permission-based data process.

You should ponder, and answer, these four vital questions before spending a single dollar on a heart rate monitoring system. The answers will help determine what you should invest in.

  1. Am I trying to manage a sport team in real time or do I need the information later?
  2. Does the athlete train on their own and are they used to uploading their own data?
  3. Am I by myself managing this, or do I have help from other coaches and/or a sport scientist?
  4. Do I plan to use the company software or do I have an athlete management system?

Those four questions are imperative for deciding if you need to spend money on the more costly but powerful team options. Team pricing is not about bulk rates or getting a heart rate sensor for each athlete—it requires a lot of support expenses that are beyond the budgets of some colleges and most high schools. What is not included are policies and logistical areas such as cleaning shared straps or replacing batteries. Any data collection process must be a well-oiled machine to work sustainably.

Any data collection process must be a well-oiled machine to work sustainably. Share on X

The Top Options for Heart Rate Monitoring in Sport

For the purposes of clarity, we have divided the listed companies into two groups: enterprise and individualized consumer products. Individualized systems can be scaled with the right software, and this is why coaching products like TrainingPeaks are so popular in the endurance market. Health and fitness platforms are also banking on the BYOD or bring your own device environment, where an API allows for heart rate data to be sent and shared to the cloud.

Cardio Sport RT
Image 3. The increase in quality of consumer products makes business models harder at the elite level. The gap between pro and consumer products is now smaller than ever.

 

Regardless of what you use, make sure you know that the true limit is not the technology but the participation attitude of the athlete. It’s possible to use consumer products and create a near enterprise environment, but the convenience of doing so is not ideal and some logistical juggling is necessary.

Team Enterprise Solutions

Polar Pro: Perhaps the leader in team heart rate products, Polar has had a lot to do with improving the market size of the heart rate products from their commercial systems with endurance in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Many research studies looking at HRV and other serious indices have used the Polar heart rate straps to collect data, and their products are considered research-grade for heart rate monitoring. Now the Polar company has entered the smart textile market with a shirt similar to Hexoskin. Polar is similar to Garmin, but instead of adding heart rate to GPS devices, they took their team heart rate products and added GPS data to them. 

FirstBeat: Like Polar, FirstBeat is from Northern Europe and really understands the sports market. They provide both passive physiological monitoring with group HRV testing and active heart rate monitoring. The strength of FirstBeat has to be their software, as they have excellent reporting and data visualization.

FirstBeat gained a lot of momentum when they showed up on the Jumbotron player data with the Buffalo Sabers years ago, and this was a key example for literally understanding the big picture. FirstBeat is always cutting-edge with both science and technology, and they’re hugely popular in both Europe and North America. FirstBeat is expanding to wellness and fitness, as they specialize in stress management, not just conditioning. 

Zephyr: Made famous from the Chilean mine disaster, Zephyr is a team product with an open form of data transmission. Zephyr is stronger on the hardware than the software side, as their products are really a hardware play. Omnisense is their software, and it’s solid, but it’s likely better for real-time management with a large sport science team than a fitness coach alone.

Developers embraced their product because they offered an SDK and API (software programming tools), but as a consumer product they didn’t have enough market share to gain traction. Zephyr worked with other companies as a white-label solution, but the heart rate and accelerometer data for team sport is very limited, especially for combines that are speed- and power-oriented. 

Hexoskin: Hexoskin made their debut earlier with our apparel review, and they are the only true breathing rate data available. Other sensors are on the shirt—typical ones like accelerometers for activity—but the conductive fabric provides quality data appropriate for HRV measures. Many different sports teams and space, military, and research organizations use Hexoskin. Like many smart fabrics, the amount of washing is limited, but because of their comfort many coaches use them for pilot studies to deep-dive into more surveillance-type investigations like stress during a day, similar to the First Beat offerings.

Other systems like Activo are available, but due to the adoption pattern, they didn’t make the list. We can classify Hexoskin as an enterprise solution because of their experience with military and professional teams, but they are more of a scale-friendly system than a team system.

Individual Consumer Products

Here are three companies that provide high-quality products that you can find at the local sports department store or running shop. All of the products connect directly to a smartphone for live feedback or to upload data to the cloud. 

Suunto Ambit Series: The Suunto Ambit3 delivers a very sophisticated and rich experience, and is one of the top sport watches for any athlete, regardless of sport. One of the key benefits, besides connecting to a comprehensive web portal, is the ability to program the watch using their online software. You can literally form apps that are custom to the needs of the athlete and the data now connects with TrainingPeaks.

The heart rate strap is soft and comfortable, and this greatly improves the user experience for the athletes. Additionally, the system now connects to a smartphone app for those wanting simple fitness requirements, and the company provides other peripheral devices that can enrich the data capture process, like foot pods similar to the Runscribe. 

Wahoo Fitness TICKRx: Unlike the other two companies, the TICKRx is a smart heart rate strap, providing additional sensors to detect motions and other metrics like stride and cycling information. The strongest part of Wahoo is that it connects with many different apps and their own smartphone program is excellent. The app includes nearly any exercise routine for general fitness and work capacity, such as cycling and running, and all the data can be exported via .csv. The Wahoo user experience is perhaps the best in the business, because they understand the needs of the average Joe who just wants to get the nuts and bolts, not excessive features that only confuse the athlete or coach.

Garmin Sport: Garmin is more known for their GPS systems, but they smartly decided to enter the sports market. The company TomTom quickly followed suit a few years later with their own product that is also solid, but due to their short history, we do not include them in this review. Fitbit and other commercial products are more fitness-oriented and inappropriate for serious athletes, but Garmin’s history and ability to execute are the reasons we included them. Their heart rate component is a strong-enough feature to warrant their inclusion on this list, since most athletes just want to relay the measurements to a software platform or app, and the market fuels the value of the heart rate data.

Most athletes just want to relay biometric measurements to a software platform or app. Share on X

The classification of the product does not affect the quality of the data, meaning that difference isn’t there between a professional and off-the-shelf product. What is there is the ability to collect all of the data at once to one location rather than each athlete using a watch or connecting to a smartphone. Also consider having two systems if you have a large budget, as some athletes who are engaged in training may want to use something during the off-season.

Investing in the Future

Heart rate monitoring isn’t going anywhere soon, so don’t underestimate its value now and in the future. Heart rate is likely to be standardized as part of the wearable space, as the cost of sensor hardware and the ability to transmit the data is very inexpensive. It’s hard to predict the future of heart rate monitoring because the battle between smart textiles and second skin patches is going to grow, with nobody likely capturing the whole market. The current options are more than sufficient to deliver a good user experience as well as actionable data, so getting involved with heart rate monitoring is a wise venture.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

 

Game Day Performance

How to Enhance Performance on Competition Day

Blog| ByCraig Pickering

 

Game Day Performance

As athletes and coaches, we spend all of our time preparing to perform at the highest possible level in competitions. But what if we’re leaving some of our training-derived improvements on the table? That was the question posed by two leading sports performance researchers, Dr. Liam Kilduff and Dr. Christian Cook at a recent symposium I attended.

The key problem, as presented by Dr. Kilduff, is that athletes often prepare inadequately at competitions. The idea of the warm-up is to enhance subsequent performance, and there are many mechanisms that achieve this. One is the increase in muscle temperature that improves nerve conduction velocity, which boosts force production.

And yet, quite often after completing the warm-up at many high-level competitions, the athlete undergoes a long perod of inactivity in the call room. At the Olympic Games, I was called up roughly 60 minutes before my races. At the World Youth Championships, I had an even longer 75-minute call room period. Given that this can reduce body temperature (both core and muscular) and that for every 1 degree Celsius reduction in muscular temperature there is a concurrent 3% reduction in the amount of force produced by the leg muscles, it’s clear that an extended cooling period can seriously hamper performance.

During the symposium, Dr. Kilduff presented data from elite team sport players showing that the lowest distances covered by these players occurred within the first 10 minutes of each half. This is puzzling because, at this point, they should be at their freshest. Yet they are underperforming relative to later in the game.

It’s criminal to prepare an athlete for competition, only to waste the last 1%-2% of potential performance on competition day. Following these excellent presentations, I decided to look at the referenced studies, do some of my own research, and put together a guide on how best to enhance performance on the day that it matters most—competition day—through various priming activities. None of these represent an increase in physical capacity; the athlete already gained those improvements through training. All these do is allow the athlete to perform to their potential.

Step 1. Lay the Foundations

Competition represents the ultimate test for athletes, especially high-level competitions. They provide the opportunity to excel but also to fail—in many cases very publically—so athletes are often very nervous before competition. This often harms their sleep the night before. Poor sleep has the potential to negatively influence cognitive, motor, and physiological performance, which is less than ideal for competing.

Sleep

Indeed, the research indicates that athletes often get less sleep prior to competition, a finding which is often replicated. Note that many of the papers exploring sleep and performance study subjects that are sleep deprived, meaning they haven’t slept at all. This doesn’t necessarily mirror what happens in athletes pre-competition—many get at least some sleep, and some suffer no problems at all—but it does represent the worst case scenario.

I’ve written about sleep numerous times, including sleep and athletes and sleep science. Athletes should already have good sleep hygiene habits in place, meaning this should be a relatively easy box to tick. Also, the first night in a new sleeping environment is often restless, negatively impacting sleep. For big competitions, it might be better to arrive a few days early to reduce the impact.

Caffeine

Some good news in this area comes from caffeine. In athletes who were acutely sleep deprived, both low (1mg/kg) and moderate (5mg/kg) doses of caffeine lessened the loss of skilled performance and physical performance. Caffeine can also enhance mood in sleep-deprived athletes, which in turn may affect motivation. This means that we want to consider using caffeine on competition day, not just for its positive effects on sleep loss but also for its other ergogenic properties. I’ve written extensively about caffeine including its effect on performance and how it does so as well as a journal review on the subject.

To summarize, caffeine enhances performance through a variety of mechanisms. For most people, 3-6mg/kg of body weight of caffeine (for example, 210mg-420mg of caffeine for a 70kg male) consumed roughly one hour before competition is a good starting point. There is significant individual variation for each person’s optimal caffeine strategy, however. To determine what’s best for an athlete, use caffeine in training and lower level competitions and experiment with the dose and timing until you find a strategy that works.

Testosterone

Next, consider priming the athlete’s anabolic hormones, especially testosterone. While many of us typically think of testosterone’s large role in muscle hypertrophy, it’s also acutely linked to motivation. A 2013 study found that there was a strong link between pre-workout testosterone levels and the workloads voluntarily selected by the athletes in their next training session. The athletes with high testosterone levels worked harder, indicating they were more motivated. Increased testosterone levels also increased the chances of a rugby team winning a match.

While optimizing testosterone levels tends to occur in a chronic, long-term setting, there are some things we can do during the pre-competition window to further enhance it. For example, use short video clips. A 2012 study showed different types of videos to a group of male athletes before a squat-based training session. After watching aggressive, motivational, and erotic videos, the athletes’ testosterone levels increased, correlating with an enhanced 3RM in the next squat session. Using aggressive and motivational videos represents a potential method to explore. Before my competitions, I listened to a Vince Lombardi speech, which motivates me even now.

Step 2. Prime Performance With Pre-Performance

Testosterone levels tend to drop during the afternoon and into the evening under normal circadian conditions. The bad news is that most competitions take place during this time. So, what can we do? It turns out that resistance training raises testosterone levels acutely, and levels remain elevated for hours. Could this positively impact performance?

A 2013 study put this to the test. A group of researchers put 14 well-trained throwers, both male and female, through a morning resistance training session to see what effect it would have on an evening power test. The session included 4 sets of 6 reps on the power clean at 35% 1RM, followed by 2 sets of 6 reps of the back squat, one set at 50% 1RM and the other at 85%, all of which counted as a warm-up. Following this, the athletes underwent a protocol of back squats to fatigue and sets of 4 reps on the power clean exercise, with a focus on moving the bar at high speed.

Four to six hours later, the throwers tested their backward overhead shot throws and vertical jumps. Compared to the control group, which did not exercise in the morning, the athletes threw the shot significantly further after their morning resistance training session. This concept was also tested in elite rugby union players with a morning session of 3RM bench presses and squats, which enhanced power and speed performance tests.

Of course, undertaking a morning resistance training bout is not always practical as it requires access to a weight room nor is it necessarily palatable to athletes and coaches, who may well be concerned about excessive fatigue pre-competition. A 2016 study examined the impact of different morning exercise regimes on subsequent afternoon performance. The different interventions were: control with no training; weights with 5 x 10 reps on the bench press at 75% 1RM and 90 seconds recovery; cycling with 6-second maximum sprints followed by 54 seconds recovery, and running 6 x 40m sprints with a full 180-degree turn halfway and 20-second recoveries after each sprint.

Morning sprints can enhance sport performance later in the day, says @craig100m. Share on X

The sprinting trial enhanced subsequent sprint and vertical jump performance to the greatest extent and had the greatest effect on testosterone. The bench press protocol had similar but smaller results while the cycling protocol only enhanced vertical jump performance. The good news is that in team sport athletes at least, a morning exercise bout of sprinting can enhance later performance without needing access to a weight room.

Step 3. Warm Up Properly

While we all think we know how to warm up, research has consistently found that warm-ups need to have periods of high-intensity exercise to enhance subsequent performance. This concept was tested in Olympic level standard bob-skeleton athletes in a study published in 2013. The athletes did their normal warm-up or a more intense version of their warm-up with more emphasis on sprint drills, sprints, and shorter rest periods. The more intense trials enhanced the athletes’ performance during testing. These athletes won the last three Winter Olympic titles in the women’s events, which shows how important research like this can be.

Intensity can also enhance endurance performance. Another 2013 study recruited 11 well-trained middle distance runners and had them undertake an 800m time trial following two different warm-up protocols. In the first, the runners undertook 6 x 50m strides. In the second, they undertook 2 x 50m strides and a single 200m high-intensity run. Following the 200m sprint, the athletes were approximately 1% faster than the 800m time trial, representing an important marginal gain.

Step 4. Protect What You’ve Got

Once an athlete has warmed up, the key is to maintain these improvements while waiting for the competition to start. The majority of research in this area focuses on maintaining the increased temperature that results from the warm-up. This is important. Research suggests that one can lose two degrees Celsius of heat after 20 minutes of passive rest following the warm-up, which is enough to harm competition performance significantly.

So what can we do to keep what we’ve got? Over the past decade, a lot of research has looked into passive heat maintenance and its effectiveness at maintaining body temperature. If we go back to the bob-skeleton study, the most effective strategy was to have an intense warm-up followed by wearing a jacket lined with a survival blanket (the foil-looking blankets). This approach is also effective for team sport athletes.

After the warm-up, put on clothing that will maintain your body heat until you compete, says @craig100m. Share on X

The key take home is that, just because you feel warm after the warm-up, does not mean you’ll still be warm when you compete. It’s far easier to keep the heat you have than try to warm yourself up again. After the warm-up is complete, put on clothing that will maintain your body heat.

Keep in mind that in some environments, it’s important that you’re not too hot, especially in prolonged endurance races.

When I competed in bobsleigh (bobsled), my heat maintenance strategy was very different from my strategy when competing in track and field. Even while I was still sprinting, however, it was rare that I was too hot. Most races were in the evening when it’s cooler and, as a result, I tended to overdress for the call room. Usually that meant three t-shirts and tracksuit top along with Lycra tights and jogging bottoms over my race kit. My goal was to continue to sweat throughout.

Step 5. Use PAP

Post-activation potentiation (PAP) acutely enhances a muscle group’s performance following contraction. Most commonly, this is achieved by heavy weight training. It’s perhaps best known from the myth that Ben Johnson warmed up for a World Record 100m run with sets of maximal squats just before his race.

The key to properly harnessing PAP’s performance-enhancing capabilities is ensuring there is enough time for the muscle groups to recover from the activating exercise and not to lose that effect by having too much time pass. In a 2008 study conducted with professional rugby players, researchers lead by Liam Kilduff tested the effect of different recovery periods following a PAP protocol on subsequent countermovement jump height and power. The PAP protocol was 3 x 3 back squats at 87% 1RM.

Unsurprisingly, after a 15-second recovery, vertical jump performance decreased and then recovered significantly by the 8-minute mark. At this point, the players’ vertical jump increased by almost 5%. This improvement wasn’t as prevalent at the 4- and 12-minute marks and almost entirely disappeared by the 16-minute mark, suggesting that the effects of PAP are short-lived. Similar results were reported in elite swimmers.

These findings, however, are likely specific to the subjects and protocols, as other studies have reported different optimal time frames. For example, Gilbert and colleagues used 5 x 1 at 100% 1RM back squats and found that it took 15 minutes before the rate of force development (RFD) was enhanced. Until the 15-minute mark was reached, RFD was actually harmed. Conversely, Gullich and Schmidtbleicher used an isometric leg press as a PAP stimulus, finding that RFD was enhanced after 3 minutes.

Just how practical is all of this? We run into the same problems seen with morning priming sessions—it can be impractical to carry out heavy back squats very close to a race, especially 8 minutes before the race. And I’ve never been in a call room that had a squat rack. The good news is that it doesn’t have to be a heavy resistance exercise. A plyometric stimulus (3 x 10 alternate leg bounds) was effective compared to no PAP stimulus after 4 minutes, although this effect was lost by the 8-minute point.

The effects of PAP can be transient and difficult to judge correctly, which means they can negatively impact performance. Many methods are also impractical. Anecdotally, however, I know a lot of sprinters who do some explosive jumping activity in the call room. I also know that many bobsleigh athletes use band-resisted vertical jumps before competition. Whether these exercises have any physiological effect, or whether it’s psychological, is open to speculation. There is perhaps enough research to suggest trying out some form of plyometrics during training to see if it affects sprint performance before attempting it during competition.

The Role of the Coach

Many of the recommendations I’ve made in this article address the athletes because after all, they are the ones who have to go out and perform. However, the behavior of the coach and the setting of the environment in which athletes find themselves can also impact competition performance.

Returning briefly to testosterone, you’ll recall that watching motivational video clips can increase testosterone and hence performance. The environment in which an athlete views these clips can also impact the testosterone response. If positive coach feedback follows the clips, the hormonal response is more favorable than when the coach gives negative feedback (or when athletes motivate themselves).

Positive feedback enhances #testosterone far greater than negative feedback, says @craig100m. Share on X

This is also true for post-game coach feedback, which can set the hormonal scene for subsequent competition performance. Again, positive feedback enhances testosterone to a far greater extent than negative feedback as does watching post-match videos with friends as opposed to strangers. I suggest the athletes feel less threatened in these situations.

Unanswered Questions

While the advantages of pre-competition priming, heat maintenance, and PAP are well established and replicated, some unanswered questions remain. For individual, short-duration sport athletes whose competition is often continuous, the effects are clear and obvious—a loss of heat in the period between warm-up and competition can harm physical and hence competition performance. The steps outlined in this article will doubtlessly be beneficial.

When it comes to intermittent team sport activities, however, or more prolonged activities, the impact is less clear. Although elite team sport players may exhibit reduced workloads in the first 10 minutes of each half of a match, it isn’t clear what effect offsetting this reduction would have. For example, if priming and heat maintenance enhances player performance in the first 10 minutes of the match, what is the subsequent cost? Does the player use more energy and fatigue quicker, and does this reduce total distance covered later in the match? Or do priming and heat maintenance enhance match performance in the first 10 minutes without any subsequent loss of performance?

We just don’t know, but it’s important to consider. We don’t necessarily want to put a lot of effort into enhancing performance early in the match if it harms performance later in the match. If subsequent performance reduction does occur, coaches could plan for it. They might select the three players who they plan on substituting within the match and prime them pre-match, so their subsequent workload is higher, allowing them to “leave more on the pitch.”

Pulling This All Together

The key takeaway from all of this research is that we can enhance our performance on competition day by making small changes. It’s also important to be highly pragmatic in these circumstances. For example, if an athlete gets stressed out because they are unable to find facilities to do their morning priming session, the overall effect is negative. That said, we can make some suggestions for competition day that may well enhance performance:

  1. About 6 hours before the competition, consider undertaking some form of priming exercise. For throwers and team sport, some heavy resistance training may be appropriate if facilities are available. For sprinters and runners, a warm-up that includes some form of intense exercise should work. Be sure to practice this outside of the big competitions before you use it.
  2. Roughly 2-3 hours before competition, have the athletes watch a motivational video. If they load this on a portable device like a smartphone, it can be watched immediately before entering the call room.
  3. If the athlete hasn’t slept well (and even if they have), consider using caffeine. For most people, a dose of caffeine 60 minutes before the competition starts is ideal, although there will be considerable individual variation. For prolonged events, take the caffeine dose closer to or during the competition.
  4. Make sure your warm-up follows a progressive intensity model, and include some very high-intensity efforts at the end.
  5. Use passive heat maintenance techniques to maintain muscle temperature between the end of the warm-up and the start of the competition.
  6. Consider utilizing PAP as a sharpener very close (~10 minutes) to competition. For athletes in a call room, this may be a series of vertical jumps. Don’t do this too close to the race, and experiment in training first.

By heeding this advice, athletes hopefully will be able to unlock the final 1-2% of their performance that’s often left on the table following an inadequate pre-race preparation. As always, experiment, find out what works for you, and then unleash it on the world.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

 

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 132
  • Page 133
  • Page 134
  • Page 135
  • Page 136
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 164
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

FEATURED

  • Using Speed and Power Data to Bucket and Train Faster Athletes
  • Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive
  • 9 (Fun!) Games to Develop Movement Skills and Athleticism

Latest Posts

  • Rapid Fire—Episode #16 Featuring George Green: Holistic Athlete Management
  • Rapid Fire—Episode #15 Featuring Kyle Brown: What is Universal Speed Rating (USR)?
  • Why We Don’t Perform Hang Cleans

Topics

  • Adult training
  • App features
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Athlete
  • Athlete performance
  • Baseball
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Career
  • Certifications
  • Changing with the Game
  • Coach
  • Coaching
  • Coaching workflows
  • Coching
  • College athlete
  • Course Reviews
  • Dasher
  • Data management
  • EMG
  • Force plates
  • Future innovations
  • Game On Series
  • Getting Started
  • Injury prevention
  • Misconceptions Series
  • Motion tracking
  • Out of My Lane Series
  • Performance technology
  • Physical education
  • Plyometric training
  • Pneumatic resistance
  • Power
  • Power development
  • Practice
  • Rapid Fire
  • Reflectorless timing system
  • Running
  • Speed
  • Sports
  • Sports technology
  • Sprinters
  • Strength and conditioning
  • Strength training
  • Summer School with Dan Mullins
  • The Croc Show
  • Track and field
  • Training
  • Training efficiency
  • Wave loading
  • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series
  • Youth athletics
  • Youth coaching

Categories

  • Blog
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcasts

COMPANY

  • Contact Us
  • Write for SimpliFaster
  • Affiliate Program
  • Terms of Use
  • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Disclaimer

Coaches Resources

  • Shop Online
  • SimpliFaster Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Coaches Job Listing

CONTACT INFORMATION

13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

Alachua, FL 32615

(925) 461-5990 (office)

(925) 461-5991 (fax)

(800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

Loading

Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.