• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
You are here: Home / Blog

Blog

Salwasser

Episode 69: Scott Salwasser

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Salwasser

Scott Salwasser is the Assistant Director of Strength and Conditioning for Football at the University of South Carolina (an update from his position when he recorded the Episode 1 podcast). He came to South Carolina from Texas State, where he was the Head of Strength and Conditioning for Football.  Before that, Salwasser had a successful run as the Director of Speed and Power at Texas Tech University. He also served as an assistant strength and conditioning coach at UC Berkeley in Santa Clara CA.

Coach Salwasser completed an M.S. in Kinesiology at UC-Sacramento in 2006. He has an extensive background of success in the area of speed and energy system development for American football athletes. Salwasser holds certifications in Strength & Conditioning from the National Strength and Conditioning Association (CSCS) and from the Collegiate Strength and Conditioning Coaches Association (CSCCa).

Scott breaks down his philosophies on force and what that means in the sport of American football. He discusses his utilization of heavy sled training and force-velocity profiling. He explains how to create training that yields better transfer to the field of play by using open-ended versus canned drills.

In this podcast, Coach Scott Salwasser and Joel discuss:

  • Scott’s most recent revelations on speed performance.
  • Training strength without compromising the athlete’s movement patterns.
  • The use of force-velocity profiling and weight room applications.
  • The use of heavy sled training in-season.
  • Creation of open-chain patterns to improve in-game abilities.
  • Individualizing training using positional specific demands.

Podcast total run time is 1:07:37.

Keywords: force, force-velocity profile, football speed, sled pulling

Night Sprinter

Developing Rhythm in Sprinters and Speed Athletes

Blog| ByGraham Eaton

Night Sprinter


The best sprinters in the world apply large amounts of force in short periods of time at maximum velocity. I believe it is the ALTIS program that has said, “Apply force in the right way, at the right time.” I have come to love this quote because the subtext here is that there is more to it than simply mashing the ground with reckless abandon. Speed and rhythm are not mutually exclusive terms. In this article, I cover how we develop the sometimes-vague ability to hold and create rhythm with drills and cues.

Getting Started with Rhythm

Instead of getting wordy with long-winded origin stories or rationale for rhythm work, let’s get started. Here’s a video of one of our former standouts, Diego Fernandez. I love this video because, although he has gone sub 1.00 in the 10m fly (22.5 mph,) he looks effortless and at peace here. He has attained maximum velocity and then he maintains a rhythm. His chest is projected slightly forward, his pelvis is neutral, and he is upright without being too tall, which can make the ground reactive force low. His arms are free of tension, while his legs look ready to strike. Because of his posture, limb timing, and rhythm, he is ready for the ground before he even gets there. He will not be as compliant in the lower limbs at touchdown. Posture. Rhythm. Timing.


Video 1. Mike Young has stated that when posture is correct, movement of the limbs is often correct. I agree, and you can see how lower body mechanics fall into place when the pelvis is square. 

If I had four sprinters this talented who put the time in on this, we would win a state championship every year. We start early in the year with acceleration complexes and begin timing flys in some capacity shortly thereafter. We don’t do flys with full run-in until a base of accelerations has been laid. I think patience is important because I am not coaching elite sprinters.

I am not just interested in an athlete’s improvement from week 1 to week 2. They could improve their top speed just because they were more motivated or timed their acceleration better. We will celebrate it, of course, but I’ve had some athletes run solid fly times gritting their teeth with red faces. Fast, but not sustainable or extendable.

Three-Bucket Position Iso Hold and Captain Morgan Hops 

I love wickets. Most of my sprinters are really bad at wickets, at least for a while. Running over wickets requires that you run fast enough, with good enough posture—and therefore, good lower limb stiffness—to have enough vertical displacement to switch thighs with terrific timing. It is the speed that creates the short ground contacts, not actively trying to achieve short contacts.

It is the speed that creates the short ground contacts, not actively trying to achieve short contacts, says @grahamsprints. Share on X

I will do wickets, but not in the first few weeks, and even then, probably not with the JV group. If it is rhythm with ground reactive force we are trying to develop, then I think we need to check some other boxes first before my beautiful wicket garden ends up trampled to bits. If I provide context with some other items first, I usually find wickets come more naturally.

I sometimes use cones or chalk lines, but athletes are often still unable to self-organize and harmonize stride length and frequency. Wickets are a force application tool, not a means to artificially increase stride length. Getting athletes to understand that they shouldn’t tiptoe or mash the ground takes time. Apply force in the right way, at the right time.

First, up is the three-bucket position iso hold popularized by Dr. Ken Clark. It is pretty simple.

  • Imagine a bucket of water on your head.
  • Imagine a bucket of water on your knee
  • Imagine a bucket handle around your foot.

This gets them into a pretty decent starting position.

  • Neutral head and “cheetah eyes.” (I stole this cue from Coach DJ Brock of Acton-Boxborough H.S.)
  • Thigh parallel to floor.
  • Ankle cocked ready for the ground, toe slightly behind knee.
  • Think about the stance leg glute and foot being connected and wired together and try not to be too tall.

If athletes cannot hold this isometric position for a decent amount of time (say 30 seconds), and they start shaking uncontrollably, they are not ready to do wickets well. You cannot have rhythm, timing, and thigh switching in the midst of weakness and dysfunction. I encounter MANY athletes who cannot hold this position without shaking after five seconds. I suppose, over time, there would be marginal improvements if they just keep hitting the wickets, but I prefer to get out in front of things rather than work from behind after doing things poorly. Let them have some success first. If nothing else, this becomes a reference point or teaching tool when they do dynamic drills.

For a little twist on this, you can progress to Captain Morgan hops. I prefer hands on hips so they can feel their pelvic positioning. I have heard the cue somewhere to think about the pelvis itself as a bowl full of water. This variation begins the process of acquiring rhythm. The athlete should take remedial baby hops forward, without being too “toe-y.” Again, they should be actively trying to feel the glute working with the foot on the ground. This allows them to stay upright without being too tall. I usually like them to do a few reps about 10 yards in length on each leg.

The glute medius in the stance leg usually gets a nice little workout in addition to our weight room work. The glute med is responsible for stabilizing the hip joint and helps alignment of the pelvis and knee. The glutes are really active on the ground during sprinting, and weak glutes can cause back pain and knee issues.


Video 2. Isometric three-bucket holds and Captain Morgan hops are great entry-level items, as well as ways to screen for weak athletes. The hops begin the process of developing rhythm and add a dynamic twist to an isometric hold. Same goal, different task.

You can actually see the athlete in the first clip self-organize and reposition the toe under the knee. This allowed her to feel a little more stability in her stance leg and keep her foot in the raised leg more ready for the ground. 

The Captain Morgan Hop and Switch

This will be the first drill that requires the athlete to switch their thighs with correct timing. The athlete should assume the same position as the previous drill. I now ask them to hop-hop-hop and switch. I often give them a rhythm to follow to aid in the patterning and timing of this switch.

The execution of this drill seems simple, but it sets up some of the items I will get to later. It is important to note that the stance leg is actually going to be the trigger that cues the swing leg to strike. I find when the stance leg heel lifts, if the swing leg begins to strike simultaneously, the thigh switch is clean and forceful. If this is mistimed, the switch becomes stompy and some postural deviations and compensations occur.


Video 3. The athlete, while rhythmically hopping, is able to crisply and forcefully switch her thighs. Note that the stance leg cues the swing leg to strike, not the other way around.

This is a very general drill. Before I lose you because you think I am giving some gimmicky drills, understand that the end goal is to dribble and use wickets effectively, do a great block start, and run at top speed efficiently. To do all of these, timing and switching of legs takes place. I am willing to dive in at the athlete’s entry point, but most high school athletes need progressions to this by making their body care.

We still sprint weekly, but if I place these items near the main session, perhaps my point is a bit clearer without major fatigue. Remember: The goal is to have short ground contacts that don’t lack force. Punch the ground with the sweet spot of your foot.

A-Switches for All Speed Athletes

These can be done with mini hurdles or without; my preference is without. The advantage of the mini hurdles is that they provide a visual cue for when to self-organize and punch the ground. The athlete is also required to hold the isometric position while hopping dynamically. Ideally, the stance leg hops should be small and as close to midfoot as possible.

A couple drawbacks I have noted are that athletes sometimes move away from neutral head position and look at the wickets. They also extend at the knee slightly more and deliver a strike that is “toe-y.” Spacing ranges from 4–6 feet, depending on how long an athlete can stay in the three-bucket position.

I prefer regular A-switches for this reason. It’s not about just adding chaos for the sake of chaos, but when an athlete is ready for more. The wicket variation may look more appealing, but keep an eye on its execution. It is merely a thing to help upright running mechanics or to at least understand them.

To me, the A-switch is the first item that really starts the journey of dynamically progressing to wickets and dribbles. The execution has a double tap between switches. This allows my athletes to really lock into a rhythm. Once an athlete can do this, it becomes pretty easy to progress them to stepover runs (dribbles) or boom-booms.

To me, the A-switch is the first item that really starts the journey of dynamically progressing to wickets and dribbles, says @grahamsprints. Share on X

I have had success teaching athletes dribbles out of an A-switch because their slack is already reduced, instead of loosely cycling their legs on their tiptoes. I have had lots of athletes do mistimed boom-booms, which gives them less time to prepare for the ground, and thus, less stiffness and bad posture. I am all for learning and self-organization, but I want to put them in a position to succeed.


Video 4. If an athlete can do an A-switch with good rhythm, they can probably do stepover runs. Note the timing of the limbs and that the swing leg is not moving first.

If you still want to add another level of chaos, I have experimented with 1-2-3-3s. These are an A-switch variation. They’re the same thing, but they look different and are fun. Fun can be a goal. I have also called the boom-boom the left-left, boom-boom-right-rights. Often, athletes have trouble with the rhythm right away. To this, I say good! This isn’t an early-season task, but we will give it a go eventually.

Basic Jog Dribbles and Stepover Runs

For all of the reading and video-watching I have done, the best technical advice on the execution of a dribble came from a 10-year-old student of mine. He saw me watching a wicket video during snack time and asked me what I was watching. I replied that it was a sprint drill. He said, “It looks like they are riding a bike with their toes up.”

When you think about how your legs are ready for the next push on the pedals on a bike, and how your feet switch but still stay in rhythm, it makes sense.

Of course, at recess I asked him to show me. You can learn from anyone. He was instantly better at it than most of my high school athletes.


Video 5. As a progression from A-switches, stepover runs or dribbles put the emphasis on frontside mechanics but allow enough backside to set up the front. There is a nice concentric circle motion visible.

Note the heel-to-toe action upon strike. This allows the athlete to punch the ground and roll through the whole foot without being too stompy. A dorsiflexed ankle keeps them ready for the ground once again. I see a lot of these done on tiptoes. The goal is still to apply force with an appropriately fast ground contact time as a result of the speed and rhythm. Think of it as purposely stunted sprinting.

There are several benefits to these.

  • Easier than setting up wickets.
  • Can be done at ankle, calf, or knee heights or as bleeds from ankle up to knee. This is a great screening tool or plan B for an injured or tight athlete. It gives both of us great feedback on how we may have to alter the plan.
  • Great meet day warm-up tool in a bind. Cut the fluff and get to the meat if the officials are rushing the athletes.

Here are a few videos of my athletes trying some different variations. One of the athletes in the video mildly strained his hamstring after competing in four meets in two weeks. I primarily used dribbling to progress him back to higher intensities and he still ran a school record in the 400m. He was able to stay in control and regain confidence at different heights. We did rhythm dribbles first, focusing on the switch, and then added speed progressively from calf to knee.

Dribbles


Video 6. You can do dribbles for rhythm or speed, with full arms or hands at waist. Either way, the athlete needs to be ready for the next footstrike, so cue them to eliminate slack. Dribbles are an excellent way to learn proper frontside action without being too long on the backside.

I only utilize low calf up to the knee dribbles and not ankles. I get strange outcomes when coaching ankle dribbles, so I need to get better here. It is harder to see the switch, but it would be a perfect addition to setup or recovery days. Again, think about them as a tool. It is a drill to run well at different amplitudes and partial ranges of motion.

Just like when you are goblet squatting, at some point if you want to barbell back squat, you have to do it, even if it is a partial range of motion. We still routinely sprint fast, so you can do both. I love using A-switches and bleeding them into dribbles. Again, the tasks are different, but the intent is the same.

Med Ball Unfolding Jumps for Fluid Coordination

I have to thank Carl Valle and Blaine Kinsley (Director of Baseball Strength and Conditioning, Arkansas Razorbacks) for showing this exercise on Twitter. When I first viewed it, I could see a lot of similarities to acceleration and block starts. This has a lot of potential as a useful item on days I teach acceleration concepts. I love using exercises like this, not just to potentiate the CNS, but to also provide a reference point in close proximity to the main session. Feel, then do.

Rhythm isn’t just a max velocity concept; it is also critical during acceleration. There is more to it than projecting maximally with violence, although saying it this way can help.

Rhythm isn’t just a max velocity concept; it’s also critical during acceleration. There’s more to it than projecting maximally with violence, although saying it this way can help. Share on X

Everything is general work to a track and field coach except the actual track workouts. Although I don’t experiment in the weight room with Bosch concepts, Frans Bosch has influenced some of this experimentation with movement drills and sprints.

I am not a world-leading biomechanist, but I understand that by making general work harder, the specific work may become less daunting. Antifragile pertains to the mind as well. Failure is a good thing, especially if athletes are close, and they are motivated to hit a position.

I had both of the athletes in the video below start overhead and then do a quick eccentric hinge action. They both retained excellent posture and began the jump by leading with their chest. The first athlete started from a kneeling position to further push his comfort level. He responded quite well. In super slow motion, I see several key performance indicators that later translated to an improved block start.

Athlete #1:

  • Excellent posture.
  • Torso and shins drop together. Note the positive shin angle.
  • He looks like a mousetrap, loaded from glute to feet and ready to go.
  • Lower limb stiffness is excellent, and he pronates and finishes through the big toe. I see an athlete getting to the most advantageous part of his foot at the right time.

This athlete spent a lot of time in the weight room before coming to me, and his block start is rapidly improving, as you will see later. Half of this is getting him confident enough to have his legs behind his center of mass and knowing when it is time to “go.” This exercise is great because, if they time it wrong, they get the sense that it felt off. It slows down acceleration, but not as much as a sled pull. While we still work toward top speed goals, he is able to accelerate effectively with rhythm that will pay dividends as his training age increases.

The female athlete did not start kneeling. This was her first time doing this exercise, and she volunteered to be filmed for the sake of this article. She is very strong and has run over 19 mph on our Freelap timing system. She is not a great accelerator. What I see in this slow-motion video aligns with that.

Athlete #2

  • Great posture and hinge. It’s no surprise, as she has a very strong upper body and lifting experience.
  • Leads more with hips than chest.
  • Doesn’t get as deep of a shin angle and doesn’t take advantage of being patient to get to the ball of foot and pronate (sneakers an issue?). Arms are mistimed as a result.

However, for her first time doing it, I was pleased she got out of her comfort zone. She would absolutely get a benefit out of continuing items like this or even a basic broad jump in an acceleration complex. Timing it better would yield more power output in the jump itself. Oftentimes with plyos, jumps, and med ball work, I’m not worried about the so-called “transfer.” Just getting a kid comfortable with generally expressing more power is the first step before I worry about specifics and drawing parallels to acceleration. Working through being uncomfortable here will allow her to have a better block start.

Just getting a kid comfortable with generally expressing more power is the first step before I worry about specifics and drawing parallels to acceleration, says @grahamsprints. Share on X

This is pretty advanced, so take your time getting there. As an analogy, there’s no need to rush to a weighted Bulgarian split jump if their Bulgarian split squats need work. Both of these athletes progressed to these exercises and did so safely.


Video 7. Unfolding med ball jumps are a great way to teach patience in acceleration. Letting them feel when to “go” in a fun manner can allow them to practice acceleration KPIs in pieces with more confidence.

Skip and Switch Buildup Flys for Connected Speed

I rarely do my fly work from a static start. In top speed work, I want them to focus on their speed, posture, and rhythm and not worry about overcoming inertia. It’s safer for the muscles and easier to progress to max speed with a skip or lead-in start.

A new favorite of mine lately has been the skip and switch fly. To me, it is an early prerequisite for sprint-float-sprint work. An athlete builds into a maximal skip for distance without rocking or changing their sprint posture. The key is MAXIMAL so that there is enough vertical displacement to seamlessly transition into a rhythmic buildup or eventually a fly. I sometimes call out, “Boom, boom, boom, pow!” The “pow” is the moment when they time the step and continue to a sprint without dropping velocity.

I rarely do my fly work from a static start. In top speed work, I want athletes to focus on their speed, posture, and rhythm and not worry about overcoming inertia, says @grahamsprints. Share on X

Sometimes I just take a visual cue like a chalk line or wicket and put it in their hands. I can tell them what to do, but they have to figure out when and how to do it. If they are not projecting peacefully and maximally off the inside edge of the foot, they will feel it, and you will see it. A lot of times, high school kids are uncomfortable or shy doing things maximally. Some of the athletes below could benefit from just skipping for distance as far as possible first, which I often include on acceleration-themed days.

Skip and switch


Video 8. Speed and rhythm don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Skip and switch flys help athletes set up a peaceful and powerful entry into a maximum effort sprint without straining and gritting their teeth, which can make fly sprints a nightmare from the start.

Here’s an exchange with one of my athletes after her skip and switch fly:

Athlete: That felt weird.

Me: It looked weird.

Athlete: I’ll fix it.

Any chance I have to remove myself from cueing, I take. Again, they have to figure out when to go because it feels right. Once they race, they are on their own anyway. Opportunities to fly solo aren’t the worst thing in the world.

Rhythm Can Be General

You can start the process of this when the athletes are young. I have had the opportunity to work with athletes ages 6–30. I don’t teach 10-year-olds everything that a high school senior does, but we skip and hop in different rhythms. Unless I think a young athlete is ready and understands that they are not just a green obstacle course, I will probably leave the wickets in the trunk of my car.

Sometimes a song comes on and the music is perfect for them to do the exercise to. As long as it is age-appropriate, laying a nice base of general movement skills can pay off in the long term.


Video 9. Hopping, skipping, and bound work have endless applications, including some Fortnight dance moves. Calibration is half the battle, so meet the athletes at their level and progress from there.

The older athlete in the video improved in bounding in one session. When strength isn’t the issue, I am going to go out on a limb (pun always intended) and say most people just don’t know how to time their limb movement correctly. I had him time the foot strike with the arm swing flapping back, then coming in closer into the ribs while just marching and walking. Then we progressed to baby vertical bounds the same way, again trying to let his arms contribute. The “use it or lose it” and “it’s been a while” refrains hold true here.

Other simple tasks to do include crawling and jumping jacks. There are a lot of variations of jumping jacks, such as seal jacks, front jacks, rotational jacks, and Highland flings. These don’t make someone into an elite sprinter, but any good athlete can start here.

I remember being at the Weston Twilight meet and seeing some fast sprinters do some crazy dance moves like the BlocBoy shoot in the above video. Perhaps they can do it because they already have stiffness and rhythm. If I have a chance to do exercises like this and single leg skips with my athletes, I will. It isn’t immediately transferrable, but it is at least an indicator of talent. Making someone more athletic is always a useful thing.

Rhythm Is Universal – Apply the Methods Selectively

All of these words and items just to say that rhythm is teachable and important. Rhythm and timing are applicable to all sports. No matter what type of training beliefs you ascribe to, there is value in this.

Eliud Kipchoge displays rhythm when he runs a marathon. Usain Bolt and Antonio Brown look rhythmic at sub-max speeds in their warm-ups. Go on YouTube and watch them.

You can run any rep distance with appropriate rhythm. Here are videos of two of my athletes running with appropriate rhythm and speed for their individual workouts.

The first athlete is running split 300s at roughly 80%. He has a history of stress fractures in his feet, so I prefer the split rep and turf. He is finally getting comfortable with running.


Video 10. Regardless of rep distance, athletes can display appropriate rhythm for the task. Submaximal work doesn’t have to be junk reps. Learning this can help mechanics at max effort.

The second athlete is running 200s at race pace, fast and relaxed (25 seconds).


Video 11. Rhythm isn’t about slogging through repetitions just to say you did it. No matter the type of workout, it can be appropriately rhythmic.

Tempo running by nature is about rhythm, hence the word “tempo.” Especially when you think about the 200m and 400m, there needs to be some attention to rhythm in training, so sprinters arrive at the 150-meter and 300-meter marks relatively unfatigued. But I am not saying run 350, 450, or any rep distance just for the sake of doing it. If you believe in it, then get there first and with the appropriate athletes, but it can be run well with technique close to race level.

Again, the overarching goal is still to run as fast as we can and extend a high percentage of that maximum effort for longer.

Our goal is to look for things that can help athletes understand that there is nothing beyond top speed except losing their rhythm, says @grahamsprints. Share on X

Our goal is to look for things that can help athletes understand that there is nothing beyond top speed except losing their rhythm. We can’t only sprint, but we can’t do so much other work that our track work is watered down.


Video 12. An athlete’s timing and rhythm are set up from the moment the gun goes off. Even though acceleration phases are short, getting to that second step ready and in an advantageous position with good stiffness is key for a great transition to upright running.

This runner does a great job of switching thighs and staying relatively stiff by letting his shins drop and not exhibiting a lot of compliance. He pushes hard away from the ground without over-pushing, and there is triple extension without making it seem jumpy or artificial. If you take a picture of someone doing a block start, most know what the post-up position looks like (line from heel to shoulder and head), but it also depends what they did to get there and what comes afterward if it was useful or not. His low heel recovery and glute pushing is looking better. I haven’t coached him into or out of anything.

We have also done a few short hill run sessions, which force stiffer low limbs since the ground comes more quickly under the center of mass than if it was flat. Now that this is in place, we can begin adding blocks while adding new challenging things, but always working on our speed.

After all of this, perhaps wickets are an option. If you think about the progressive spacing of wickets from short to longer, the concentric circles move from low calf up to full knee. Dribbles are just wicketless wickets with a slightly different footstrike.

I am much better at coaching small groups or one-on-one in a focused setting than big groups during track season. It’s hard measuring wickets for so many abilities and deciding who does or doesn’t do them. In the past, I have done wickets in the first week. This was a big mistake. The idea of something being useful is not always reality in your reality.

If you coach high school track, your job is hard just because of the logistics of multiple events, space constraints, equipment, and abilities. It will probably be a better experience for you and your athletes if you keep things simple and decide on a logical place to start.

Likewise, you may find that certain things I have mentioned in the scope of this article are beyond or unnecessary for your athletes, and that’s fine too. No need to do iso holds all the time if your athletes are healthy and strong. I always experiment and add accordingly.

Once I see something has run its course, I eliminate it during the season as well. Come championship season, we may stop doing a lot of this because the athletes are already great at it. My job out in Byfield, Massachusetts, is to coach what I see and make athletes who sometimes have no business running into state qualifiers and into adults who love fitness.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Bourke

Episode 68: Robbie Bourke

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Bourke

Robbie Bourke is a highly experienced strength and conditioning coach, physical therapist, nutritionist, and educator with more than 10 years in the field. Robbie is the host of the “All Things Strength and Wellness” podcast. He is based in Glasnevin, Dublin. Robbie specializes in movement quality, linear and multidirectional speed development, power development, strength training, energy system development, body composition, corrective exercise, and rehabilitation.

Coach Bourke interned with both Mike Boyle Strength and Conditioning in Boston, MA, and at ALTIS Sports in Phoenix, AZ. Robbie completed his Higher Diploma in Neuromuscular and Physical Therapy at the National Training Centre (NTC), Dublin, in 2011. He earned a master’s degree in strength and conditioning from St. Mary’s University-Twickenham in 2019. Bourke holds several certifications, including NSCA-CPT, PICP Strength & Conditioning Specialist Level 2, and IYCA Level 1.

Robbie takes listeners through his most recent journey into the world of isometrics. He discusses his thoughts on the use of this modality, as well as the extensive use of isometric exercises in the early days of strength performance. He talks about ways to combine new uses of isometrics with the classic strength ideologies. Additionally, Robbie covers ideas on high-low, or the “barbell method” of training (Taleb), individualizing factors in training, training the nervous system, and periodization and training residuals.

In this podcast, Coach Robbie Bourke and Joel discuss:

  • The general to specific training spectrum.
  • Individualizing training to maximize performance.
  • Neural components in increasing strength.
  • Using a sequential order in your periodization planning.
  • Having a comprehensive but emphasis-based program.
  • The brain’s role in force production.

Podcast total run time is 1:04:12.

Keywords: isometrics, neural training, central nervous system, residual training effect

5 Point Guide

A Five-Point Guide to Sprint Dosage

Blog| ByRob Assise

5 Point Guide


The content found in “The Dosage Debate: Maximum Velocity Sprint Training,” the precursor to this article, was the result of a thought experiment. Besides taking myself through a thinking exercise, one of the goals was to generate dialogue in the coaching community. I have received a substantial amount of feedback and questions since its release, and I feel that explaining my thought process and giving some additional information will help tie up some loose ends and lead to additional dialogue.

First, that article does not really showcase my beliefs one way or another. It is no secret that I am a huge proponent of training that has an athlete attain maximum velocity, but how a coach implements its use within their programming can have quite a bit of variance based on the constraints of their situation. Also, it is important to keep in mind that since I was having the thought experiment with myself, it referred mostly to the clientele I deal with: high school males who participate in track and field. Part of the intent with this article is to broaden the scope to any population.

What ignited the thought experiment was the idea of flipping programming design. In discussion with numerous colleagues, I have found the most common approach is to:

  • Create the workout and approximate recovery.
  • Administer the workout.
  • Adjust recovery as needed.

The approach I took considered recovery on the front end. You can trace most of what follows here back to this quote, posed to me by an anonymous source with credit to Jay Schroeder:

“Only train athletes to a level from which they can recover.”

One way to view this is if I know exactly how an athlete will recover from sprint training, what would be the best way to train the athlete to become a faster sprinter? Here are considerations a coach at any level should think about when programming sprint dosage.

Consideration #1 – The Athlete’s Nervous System

Although a common topic in sprint training is which supplemental exercises to use to train the muscles involved, the reality is any movement starts with the nervous system. Many people consider sprinting to be the most intense human activity, and the corollary to this is it places the greatest demand on the nervous system. I often view sprinting through the lens of the amount of electrical current flowing through a person’s body.

It is hypothesized that children are less able to recruit/use fast-twitch (type II) motor units than adults. This makes sense. My 5-year-old is capable of sprinting every day because there are low levels of current flowing. An elite sprinter would obviously lie on the other end of this spectrum. It is like the shock of one of those old trick slices of gum versus a bolt of lightning. A person can handle the trick slice of gum multiple times a day, every day. Getting struck by lightning may have a person sidelined for a prolonged period of time.

It is not just the ability to produce more power, it also comes down to the efficiency of the pathways that the power can flow through, says @HFJumps. Share on X

In addition, it is not all about the raw power that is produced. When people perform a new skill, it rarely looks fluid. As the person continually undergoes the activity, the body figures out a more efficient way to carry it out. This is the nervous system eliminating the neural pathways that do not assist with the activity and deepening the pathways that allow for the best current solution. So, it is not just the ability to produce more power, it also comes down to the efficiency of the pathways that the power can flow through. Eliminating and solidifying neural pathways takes time, and can only be accomplished when the opportunity is provided, but how often is appropriate?

Consideration #2 – Frequency

I recently spoke with a college strength coach who said he had his pre-teen son sprint every day over the summer, and he continually improved his speed. As Boo Schexnayder stated in his recent article, “The Syndrome”:

“The younger athletes, because of their lower levels of power output, do very little internal damage to their bodies as they practice, train, and compete. They don’t possess the high levels of athleticism needed to hurt themselves. Thus, they require little recovery time.”

If we view this looking at a high school athlete over the course of their four-year career, we would conclude that the density of high-intensity training sessions would decrease as the athlete is able to produce more powerful outputs. I have heard from numerous coaches of elite athletes at the collegiate level and beyond that athletes can only attain maximum outputs in training once a week or less. Schexnayder continues:

“The more developed athletes are victims of the tools they possess. Their high power output levels produce more internal stress and damage. They require more recovery time.”

The following diagrams give a visual representation of these concepts:

RA Chart 1
Figure 1. A theoretical model of power produced while sprinting, as an athlete ages.


RA Chart 2
Figure 2. As power capabilities increase, the dose should decrease. You can view the dose as the volume within a session and/or the time between sessions (density). Lower density is more time between sessions. Once the power capabilities begin to decline, the dosage can begin to build back up. 


Reality does not produce smooth curves, but an overlay of the two graphs gives a good theoretical starting point in designing sprint dosage for all ages. I have a theory that sprinting is the Fountain of Youth. As people age, a common approach to training is to decrease the intensity of activity. While this makes sense on the surface, I also think it is a self-imposed ceiling on one’s capabilities. In other words, if I am always capable of performing what is regarded as the most intense human activity (sprinting), shouldn’t I be capable of adapting to activities that are less intense?

I have a theory that sprinting is the Fountain of Youth, says @HFJumps. Share on X

RA Chart 3
Figure 3. A theoretical starting point for designing sprint training based on athlete age.


Consideration #3 – The Athlete’s Insulation

When I played youth football, just about everyone played both ways, and no one thought twice about it. By the time high school football came around, however, this was very rare. Our best players may have played a few series on their nondominant side of the ball during a game. (Note: I attended a high school with 2,000 students, so ironman football was not a necessity.)

This pattern is logical. Most high school males are in the heart of puberty, and becoming a man creates the ability to produce more power. However, the body’s ability to recover from the increased power it can produce does not seem to come along for the ride. Therefore, it makes sense for coaches to utilize a two-platoon system.

This takes us to the conversation about an athlete’s “insulation.” In sticking with the electricity analogy, insulators serve as protectors from the dangers of electrical current. My corresponding thought to this is, “Can we enhance the ‘insulators’ in the body so an athlete is better able to recover from the ability to produce higher levels of power?” I believe we can by exposing prepubescent athletes to sprinting on a regular basis.

I have been part of and have observed a large number of sport practices ranging from youth to college. One commonality among them is that the opportunities to produce the highest levels of power possible are few and far between. I played multiple sports from age 4 through 21. My first true speed session was when I was 18.

A large number of sport practices, ranging from youth to college levels, don’t give athletes many opportunities to produce the highest levels of power possible, says @HFJumps. Share on X

Thanks to the efforts of many coaches and organizations, this is becoming less common, but it still exists. I currently live near a youth soccer field. Most of the practices there involve kids standing around and going through a drill where the power levels are low. I have yet to see them spend any time performing true sprints (giving the athletes time to recover fully so they produce their best output).

A common complaint by numerous groups about today’s youth is their lack of free play and activity. It seems the days of eating breakfast at home, heading out to play with the crew, and returning home when the street lights went on for dinner are long gone. During that time outside of the house, one skill that I developed was the ability to sprint. It is amazing how I can look back at my summers as a youth and see how each day represented multiple sessions of a sprint practice.

A simple game of tag at a park consisted of short bursts of maximum effort followed by recovery. Riding a bike to a friend’s house to play Wiffle ball was recovery. Running the bases and playing the field in Wiffle ball had moments of maximum effort, and the rest of the game allowed for recovery. Lunch, wherever we could get it, was downtime. The football or basketball we played afterward also followed the same pattern. All of these activities provided opportunities to chase and elude, which are excellent drivers of intent. Timing and racing are two more.

I say all this because if our youth are not getting exposed to these types of activities, we have two choices: continue to complain about it or provide them with opportunities to express maximum power. If they are not getting it in their own free time, devoting some time to it in your sport practice seems like an easy fit. Not only will they reap the rewards of developing more effective neural pathways, but their ability to recover from the higher level of power outputs may come along for the ride.

Consideration #4 – Outliers

A trend we have noticed with the freshmen in our program over the past few years is approximately 10% have had nagging hip flexor issues. Our sprint program would be classified as low volume by most, and we design everything around improving acceleration and maximum velocity. By the time they are sophomores, those issues go away, but we would prefer for this trend to not be present. We have two hypotheses that are not mutually exclusive to one another:

  1. The athletes undergo a tremendous amount of change due to puberty.
  2. The athletes have not experienced operating at maximum velocity, possibly due to a combination of a sedentary childhood and exposure to sports in which bouts of maximum velocity are few and far between. While incredibly intense, basketball, football, and soccer do not allow exposure to true maximum velocity (as found spiked up on a track) due to factors such as fatigue, equipment, surface, and court dimensions.

Our belief is that it is probably a hybrid of the two. The growth, coupled with their bodies being shocked into operating at an intensity they haven’t dealt with, leads to issues. We feel 10% is too high of a percentage, and we are toying with ideas from Sam Portland (speed gate golf) and Ross Jeffs (racers versus trainers) to help combat this issue.

Consideration #5 – The Load of Curvilinear Sprints

Any track coach whose athletes have performed regular training or competition on a 160-meter indoor track are well aware of the mechanical damage that moving at high velocity on a tight curve can cause. The previous article outlined the advantage of curvilinear sprints as a way to protect the nervous system because they involve the athletes moving at a velocity lower than what is found in linear sprinting. That being said, a coach must be aware of the forces placed on the musculoskeletal system when sprinting on a bend. The resultant force vector changes when an athlete is on a curve because a significant lateral component is required to stay on the curve.

Curved Running Chart
Figure 4. Ground reaction resultant forces in linear and curved sprinting. Keep in mind, 2D drawings do not tell the whole story, as we move in a 3D world. There would be a ground reaction force directed forward (horizontal) to assist with forward propulsion. (Inspired by “Limitations to Maximum Running Speed on Flat Curves,” by Chang and Kram, 2007.)


The following equation gives the net force on an object moving in a circle (centripetal force). The force is based on the radius of the curve as well as the mass and velocity of the object.
Formula 1
Although the exact physics involved in running on a curve are quite complicated, we can use this formula to have a fundamental understanding of the impact velocity and radius have on centripetal force.

First, there is a good chance an athlete’s mass won’t change much during the course of a training session, so we will assume it is constant. With mass out of the way, we can focus on velocity. Imagine an athlete jogs on a curve at a velocity of 5 m/s. Then, on the next repetition, the athlete doubles the velocity to 10 m/s. The force required to move twice as fast and continue the motion on the curve would be four times as much because the velocity is squared. The example below shows this comparison, ignoring units for simplicity. The hypothetical mass used was 100, velocity of 5 (left example) and 10 (right example), and radius of 10 (denominator).
Formula 2
The next example shows the impact of the radius on force by leaving the mass (100) and velocity (10) constant in both. We can see that decreasing the radius from 10 to 5 (values in the denominator) causes the force to double.
Force Formula
With these examples in mind, we can use the following assumptions moving forward:

  1. Force vectors are different on a bend, which places a different demand on the musculoskeletal system (when compared to linear sprinting).
  2. If an athlete begins to move at a higher velocity on a bend, greater force is present.
  3. If the radius is tightened, and the athlete is able to move at the same speed, greater force is present.

We can now carry these into training implications:

  1. Identify the demands of the sport and design curvilinear training accordingly.
  2. If you introduce curvilinear work, err on the side of caution. Like any form of training, damage can result from an improper dose, but this may be even more true with this modality because it may be foreign to a high percentage of athletes. Stimulate the musculoskeletal system—do not destroy it.
  3. Do not be afraid to experiment with different radii and speeds. When operating at high speeds with sprinters, use large radii (such as the example provided in the precursor to this article). These types of sprints can help prep athletes for the nasty curves they face during indoor competitions. When operating at lower speeds, such as submaximal curve runs with high jumpers, you can tighten the radii.
  4. Trust your eyes! If the athletes look fluid, your setup is probably safe. If they don’t, you may need to make adjustments. Being able to make this determination requires you to watch your athlete’s reps!
  5. Even if a track athlete is only a sagittal specialist (short sprints/hurdles, long jump, triple jump), bend work still carries weight as a valuable tool in developing a robust athlete because of the variation in the force vectors placed on the body. Field and court sport coaches should also thank you for your efforts of having them spend some time outside of the sagittal plane.
    • An additional force we should consider besides centripetal force is one we should never forget because it always wins: the force of gravity. According to Mike Kennedy, accomplished physics teacher and track/cross country coach at Neuqua Valley High School, “If you assume gravity acts at the runner’s belly button, the torque from the ground force and the force of gravity will put a great deal of stress on the hip, leading to injury if the athlete is not prepared for such stresses. It is essentially a class 1 lever with the hip as the fulcrum.” Athletes can perform simple serpentine runs with large radii at various speeds on a track, court, field, or hallway during a warm-up or cooldown or in the heart of the workout.
  • Even if a track athlete is only a sagittal specialist, bend work is a valuable tool for developing a robust athlete due to the variation in the force vectors placed on the body, says @HFJumps. Share on X

    Where Does This Leave Us?

    On one hand, I think designing sprint training is simple. Tony Holler and I co-authored an article that was prompted by his tweet:  “Speed training is really pretty simple. Why is there so much confusion?” If we are patient and willing to accept small gains, programming can be basic at the novice level, and the baseline will rise for all. It is hard to go wrong with having an athlete sprint 2–3 times per week if the dose is appropriate and the recovery is sufficient.

    If we are patient and willing to accept small gains, programming at the novice level can be basic, and the baseline will rise for all. However, we will miss what is optimal for some. Share on X

    On the other hand, as a coach who has worked with groups of up to 60, I know I am missing what would be optimal for some. Trying to address their individual needs makes designing and managing sprint training quite complicated.

    As a teacher, one of my primary goals is to get people to think, so I will leave you with four thoughts to ponder in regard to sprint dosage:

    • When do your athletes need to be recovered from a sprint dose?
    • How long do you think it will take your athletes to recover from your prescribed dose?
    • Do you have contingency plans in place?
    • If you had to sprint every single day or die, how would you adapt?

    Special thanks to Jake Cohen of the University of Illinois for providing feedback on the original article, which helped create this. Also thanks to Mike Kennedy of Neuqua Valley High School for his review and input for this article.

    Since you’re here…
    …we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


    Xie

    Episode 67: Chong Xie

    Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

    Xie

    Chong Xie is an author and inventor dedicated to understanding the foot and its role in sports performance. He wrote the book Secret of Athleticism and developed the Hyperarch Fascia Training System. Xie founded secret-of-athleticism.com, a website and discussion group dedicated to educating coaches and athletes about the foot, its relationship to athleticism, and best training practices.

    Chong holds a computer science degree and has been working as a technical analyst in the software industry for more than 10 years. His interest in the topic began after he observed a large discrepancy in athletic performance among athletes, which he believed was directly related to the feet. Chong Xie practiced Wushu as a child in Beijing Sport University and is an avid researcher and student of Tai Chi. He holds a bachelor’s degree in science from Binghamton University. His work is endorsed by athletes such as Kadour Ziani and Marquise Goodwin.

    Chong discusses the importance of maximizing ground contact stiffness, fascial tensioning, and upstream muscle activation of the foot. He gives insight into factors that many strength coaches don’t delve deeply enough into to make the biggest difference in performance. He also talks about his overall program, which has proven to increase vertical jump height in athletes.

    In this podcast, Chong Xie and Joel discuss:

    • Common features all feet have that can be developed to maximize performance.
    • Weightlifting and its relationship to well-developed foot strength.
    • The importance of a maximum facia-focused warm-up.
    • Looking at training the body from a holistic approach, instead of a segmented one.
    • Developing toe stiffness.
    • The foot to glute connection and its importance in speed.

    Podcast total run time is 59:32.

    Keywords: fascia, vertical jump, foot training, holistic training

    Jones

    Episode 66: Steffan Jones

    Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

    Jones

    Steffan Jones is a sports performance coach and former professional cricket and rugby player, and he is one of the leading fast bowler development coaches in England. He is considered a master integrative trainer for fast-bowlers (“pitching” at up to 100 mph in cricket). He is the last athlete in England to play professionally in both cricket and rugby. Steffan is the owner of cricketstrength.com.

    Coach Jones is the “go to” coach in England when it comes to his specialty of bowling. He is one of a small number of people who hold an ECB Level 3 qualification, and he also holds a UKSCA certification in strength and conditioning. Jones earned a sports science degree from Loughborough University and a postgraduate certification in physical education from Cambridge University

    Jones discusses his use of isometric strength training for potentiation and skill development. He gives us his thoughts on integrating all forms of training into a singular model, general versus specific strength, the role of ankle stiffness in fast bowling (and as a universal model), and cueing. Many of the topics he discusses have a direct correlation to the javelin throw in track and field.

    In this podcast, Coach Steffan Jones and Joel discuss:

    • His beliefs on early specialization in sports.
    • His process of combining strength and skill work for his athletes.
    • Sport-specific energy training in his sport.
    • Strength versus elastic and reactive abilities.
    • The use of cluster training.
    • Aspects of sport-specific training for the fast-bowling athlete.

    Podcast total run time is 1:30:55.

    Jones can be found at his Pacelab Academy. 

    Keywords: cricket, isometrics, general strength, cluster

    Boyle

    Episode 65: Mike Boyle

    Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

    Boyle

    Mike Boyle is one of the foremost experts in the fields of strength and conditioning, functional training, and general fitness. Mike co-founded Mike Boyle Strength & Conditioning in 1996, a facility offering comprehensive performance enhancement training and personal training to all ranges of clients. He served as the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach at Boston University for 15 years, as well as 25 years as the Strength and Conditioning Coach for Men’s Ice Hockey there. Boyle earned a ring with the Boston Red Sox as the team’s strength and conditioning in 2013. From 1991–1999 he served as the Strength and Conditioning Coach for the Boston Bruins.

    Mike began his journey while studying to be an athletic trainer at Springfield College, which happened to be a hotbed of strength and conditioning at the time. While at Springfield, an interest in strength and conditioning developed when he volunteered for three years at Boston University working primarily with the football team. It was the start of his 25+ year career at BU. Boyle was named to the 2004 and 2005 Men’s Journal list of the top 100 trainers in the United States. Boyle founded the Certified Functional Strength Coach program in 2013 to provide education and certification to coaches around the world.

    In this episode, Coach Boyle takes us through his reasoning for discontinuing the use of bilateral squats in his programming. He shares his thoughts on how to truly evaluate every aspect of your program and be in constant search for ways to improve. Mike shares the journey that resulted in his current philosophies and the in-depth “why” on his current programming. He discusses how the athletes that he trains have had such incredible results in the vertical jump without heavy barbell back squats.

    In this podcast, Coach Mike Boyle and Joel discuss:

    • The neurological inefficiency of bilateral movements and concepts in bilateral deficiency.
    • How he gets results in speed and power development without use of heavy bilateral movements.
    • How back pain should not be a natural result from training.
    • The process of being married to best practices, not concepts.
    • What the concept of functional training really is for him.
    • Why he prefers the deadlift over the back squat.

    Mike also talked to SimpliFaster about functional athletic performance training.

    Podcast total run time is 1:17:13.

    Keywords: functional fitness, unilateral squats, deadlift, vertical jump

    Bedroom Soccer Skills

    Yes, Informed Continuity: A 3-Phase Plan for Coaching Through Cancellations

    Blog| ByNathan Huffstutter

    Bedroom Soccer Skills


    Coaching youth sports, I operate with a handful of “All the Time” principles: have fun, never quit, and do no harm. These principles apply whether I’m coaching teenage girls in a competitive soccer match or managing elementary schoolers in a recreational softball game. They apply during the most unpleasant weather, during early morning games at faraway fields, and even during times of great stress and uncertainty.

    Over the past week, my email inbox has gone from trickle to flood with announcements of precautionary measures, postponements, and cancellations, as schools, sports leagues, and local attractions first labored to find the best course of action amid the pandemic and inevitably then opted to shut down. Within this necessary abundance of caution, the missing piece in the last wave of cancellation messages has been proposed alternatives.

    And for those in leadership positions, that’s the responsibility—to assess a given situation and say “Okay, here’s what’s next.”

    Among other teams, I currently coach the Girls 2009 Flex soccer team for the DMCV Sharks soccer club in San Diego. We have 14 multisport athletes on this team, girls who also play softball, baseball (you got that right), basketball, flag football (damn straight), and even one starting to run cross country. For this group of high-energy girls, cancel everything means an awful lot of cancelling.

    To stem the tide of shutdown and postponements, I’m launching a YES, Informed Continuity program to keep the team active, motivated, connected, and, above-all, safe, explains @CoachsVision. Share on X

    To stem the tide of shutdowns and postponements, I chose this team to launch a YES IC (Yes, Informed Continuity) program to keep the girls active, motivated, engaged, connected, and, above-all, safe during the coming weeks and/or months. It follows a simple progression:

    1. Active Anywhere (home-based independent activities)
    2. Own the Game (structured, partner-based games and challenges)
    3. Different Formation, Same Team (small group sessions)

    This program is a road map for what coaches are tasked to do in the first place: provide structure and strategy where there was none. As the managing editor for the blog here at SimpliFaster, I’m hoping we can use our platform and community as a hub for coaches to inspire one another to continue leading our athletes through this major disruption in play.

    Yes, Informed Continuity

    With young athletes, one of the simplest coaching tools is teaching them to change self-talk from what they did wrong (or didn’t do at all) into what they will do right the next time. It is a 180-degree shift in mindset and intent, changing “I pulled my head on that swing” or “I turned toward pressure with the ball” into “I will keep my nose on the ball” or “I will play the way I’m facing.”

    In a wave of cancellations and NO’S, this program starts with a YES. It starts with declaring what you can and will do. You don’t suddenly need to be an online coaching expert, says @CoachsVision. Share on X

    Importantly, in a wave of cancellations and NO’S, this program starts with a YES. It starts with declaring what you can and will do. You don’t suddenly need to be an online coaching expert or pretend to be that which you are not. Follow the simple principles: have fun, never quit, do no harm.

    Phase 1 – Active Anywhere

    During this initial period of nebulous, near-quarantine for my team, I promised to provide at least two structured weekly activities that the players can do at home (or anywhere). Are we looking for amazing individual athletic gains? No—we are simply adding something where suddenly there was nothing.

    Continuity. Kids need it—when you’re small, continuity is what gives the world shape.

    Like most teams, we have a team scheduling app with a calendar, messaging, and player availability features. Rather than using the “Availability” tab to confirm the intent to attend a team activity, for my ’09 Flex team we will begin using our Team Snap account to show that they have independently completed our planned team activity. The “Yes” tab becomes “I have done it.”

    In addition to marking completion via our scheduling app, I will encourage my players to connect with their teammates via FaceTime, text, or any medium of their choosing before and after each planned activity. This is crucial. Practice, games, and tournaments may be stricken from the calendar, but the team and LTAD carry on. Never quit.

    What does this look like? Again, you don’t need to become an online coaching savant. For the 9- and 10-year-old girls on my soccer team, here’s what we’ll be doing this coming week in our two planned sessions:

    Session 1: Movement Basics

    WARM-UP (Standing or Walking):

    • 10 x Frankenstein Toe Touches
    • 5 x each leg RDL Toe Touches 
    • 10 x Knee-to-Chest Hugs
    • 10 x Open & Close the Gate
    • 10 x Flamingo Lunges
    • 10 x Grass/Carpet Pickers (or substitute “Runners” Wall Stretch)
    • 10 x Side Lunges

    LEGS & JUMPS

    • 2 x 10 Walking or Standing Lunges (BONUS: add ~3 lb. barbells in each hand)
    • 3 x 20 Jumping Jacks
    • 2 x 10 Tuck Jumps
    • 3 x 10 Bodyweight Squats
    • 2 x 10 Star Jumps
    • 2 x 5 Squats holding to a count of 10 at the bottom range of each
    • 2 x 10 Skater Jumps

    ARMS & CORE

    • 5 x 2 Push-Ups (quality over quantity!)
    • 3 x 30-second Planks
    • 3 x 30-second “Farmer’s Carry”  (For this they can use light dumbbells, 5 lb. bags of flour in grocery bags, books in handled bags… Just keep each side relatively equal.)
    • 2 x 10 Reverse Crunches 
    • 2 x 20-second Single-Leg Planks (each leg)

    BONUS CHALLENGE

    • 5 Stick and Land Stair Jumps (Jump from stair to wide landing with safe two-leg landing)
    • Banded Shuffles (If you have resistance bands. If not, regular shuffling can substitute.)
    • Standing Broad Jumps (three jumps out, three jumps back, space providing)
    • Pull-Ups or Chin-Ups
    • Flour Sacks Carry
      Image 2. Your players will all have unique features in their homes. For young athletes, challenge them to be creative with stairs, light weights (here, two grocery sacks with 5 lb bags of flour), or other opportunities their homes present. Less for specific results and more to connect their creativity with the physical side.

    Session 2: Individual Ball Skills

    WARM-UP (same)

    BASIC SKILLS & FITNESS

    • 3 x 25 Toe Taps
    • 3 x 25 Bells
    • 3 x 25 Sole Rollovers
    • 3 x 10 Squats holding ball overhead
    • 2 x 10 Hand Walks
    • 3 x 10 Star Jumps

    ADVANCED SKILLS (Watch full three-minute demo by Yael Averbuch first. Then, replay going through each skill individually, pausing the clip and executing for two minutes before moving forward to the next skill.)

    • Single Foot Cuts
    • Roll to Cut
    • 2-Footed Cuts
    • Tap-Tap Roll
    • 4-Touch “Tab Ramos” Combo
    • “Pulling” Sole-V Inside
    • “Pulling” Sole-V Outside
    • “Pulling” Sole-V Behind the Back
    • Scissor
    • Step-Over

    CHALLENGE

    • Not-A-Soccer-Ball-Juggling. Using a tennis ball, racquet ball, whiffle ball, or any ball of choice, set a baseline number in your first three juggling attempts and then continue juggling until you beat that number by three.
    Ideally, Phase 1 will be one of weeks and not months, but plan in a way that is sustainable, says @CoachsVision. Share on X

    These Phase 1 activities are the types of things I forward to my players during rainy weeks or stretches when field access is limited. Ideally, this initial phase will be one of weeks and not months, but plan in a way that is sustainable and be prepared to move directly to Phase 2 as soon as doing so falls within your club/league/community guidelines.

    Phase 2 – Own the Game

    At this point, we begin regaining control of what has been taken away and move out of solo, home-based activities and into sessions that can be conducted with a teammate, sibling, or friend. For my soccer players, this will take the form of planned wall skills and games they can play on school/park handball walls, soccer “tennis” volleying games on grass or blacktop, and non-contact shooting games on local fields.

    Because kids have opportunities to play year-round, they’ve had fewer opportunities to adapt the game on their own, so in this phase they will need explicit instructions in order for these sessions to resemble a true team activity and not a playdate. (This is not to denigrate pick-up games and informal, sports-based play—those are vital and necessary for kids, but simply fall into a different category.)

    For these sessions, I’ll be sending the partner-based activity to my team with a warm-up, progression, rules, and approximate times so there is a plan to follow.

    Session 1: Soccer H-O-R-S-E

    WARM-UP (10 minutes)

    • Team Dynamic Stretching Routine (3 minutes)
    • Mobility Warm-Up. Mark ~20 linear yards for: Skips, Carioca Runs, Side Shuffles, Backpedal, 3 Steps-Forward 2 Steps-Back, Full Sprint (5 minutes)

    SKILL (20 minutes)

    • Dribble Vectors. Begin at middle of marked 20 yards and dribble for 6–7 touches in any direction, then perform one of the 10 Advanced Skills. Continue pattern without expanding beyond a reasonable diameter of space (2 minutes on, 30 seconds off, for 10 minutes total).
    • Partner Passing. Two-touch passing, either foot. Two-touch passing, same foot (do right, then left). One-touch passing. Throw-in, trap, return pass. (2 minutes each, 10 minutes total).

    PLAY: Soccer H-O-R-S-E (30 minutes)

    • There are nine “Zones” the players can shoot for: Lower Left, Middle Left, Upper Left, Lower Center, Mid-Center, Upper Center, Lower Right, Middle Right, Upper Right.
    • Player #1 selects the spot they will be shooting from and announces the target zone they will be shooting for. If their shot hits that zone, Player #2 must execute the same shot. If Player #2 fails to execute the made shot, they have the letter “H.” If Player #1 does not make their initial shot, Player #2 can then select any spot to shoot from and any target zone for their own shot.
    • If Player #1 makes their shot and Player #2 also makes the shot, Player #1 selects a new spot to shoot from and a new target zone. Players cannot repeat a made shot during the same game.
    • Alternate in this manner until a player has the letters H-O-R-S-E. Try to complete three full games in 30 minutes.

    CHALLENGE (10–15 minutes)

    • Alphabet Juggling: Juggle ball with partner announcing a letter (A, B, C, D) for each successful exchange from partner to partner in the air. See how far in the alphabet you and your partner can go without the ball hitting the ground.

    Phase 3 – Different Formation, Same Team

    Whatever the timeline presented as each community moves through the crisis, this final stage is a transition toward the resumption of regular team activities. Each step represents defined progress, which is again key when coaching young athletes—they respond to forward movement and understand where they’re going based on where they’ve been.

    Defined progress is key when coaching young athletes—they respond to forward movement and understand where they’re going based on where they’ve been, says @CoachsVision. Share on X

    So, when circumstances safely allow it, I’ll resume modified in-person coaching for my Flex team and plan small group and non-contact team activities, such as a range of fitness-based activities (beach, trail, and hill runs) to accompany partial or full groups for skills, drills, and games. Whether this phase is four weeks or four months out, it is difficult to be predictive in terms of what “best practices” for one of these sessions might look like…. Are small-sided games advisable or inadvisable? Should a team of 14 come out as a full group, two groups of 7, or three groups of 5-5-4? Those are specific details every coach can adjust to within the phase—the important thing is having the confidence and a plan to get here.

    On this path, assign your athletes an activity journal to keep them motivated, competitive, and accountable within the team. Many SimpliFaster followers have adopted Tony Holler’s “Record, Rank, Publish” ethos for speed and weight room training, and the same simple concept applies even in uncommon circumstances. For years, I’ve used the sheet below for my multisport athletes to track their activities and track/reward their efforts across a range of fields. We hold occasional one- or two-week competitions with prizes, while also encouraging the kids to consistently track their progress in a self-directed manner.

    Flex YES IC
    Image 2. Coaches can create a simple weekly tracking system for players to score points with a range of activities for a range of qualities.

    #YesIC

    As you’ve been reading this, hopefully you’ve come up with better ideas than these for remote sessions; or perhaps you already had those better ideas but didn’t have the platform to send them.

    This program is a simple outline, waiting to be filled in. We’ll be following and sharing #YesIC on our social media pages, where coaches can ideally offer their own ideas for workouts, team communication strategies, and safe best practices—providing the Informed element of Informed Continuity that SimpliFaster’s community of coaches and performance professionals is uniquely able to contribute. The floor is open. You can  also send ideas, workout plans, and video clips to me via email: [email protected] and we will make every effort to continue supporting coaches and athletes regardless of the challenges our current moment in time presents.

    You got this. Remember: have fun, never quit, and do no harm.

    Since you’re here…
    …we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


    Adarian Barr

    Episode 64: Adarian Barr

    Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

    Adarian Barr

    Adarian Barr is a Track and Field Coach and Owner of Barrunning, a company based out of Woodland, California, that teaches athletes the fundamentals of balance and the role of the foot in human performance. His collegiate track and field coaching stops have included UW-Superior, Indiana State, and UNC Pembroke. Adarian has invented nine devices, from footwear to sleds to exercise devices.

    Coach Barr earned a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from California State University in 1996 and a Master of Arts in Health, Physical Education and Fitness from Cal State-Chico in 2000. He is a USATF Level II coach in the sprints, jumps, hurdles, and relays. His work on speed and biomechanics is being adapted by many coaches who want a deeper understanding into the innate function of the body.

    Adarian gives us insight into his ideas on sprinting, timing, and why a variety of modern coaching cues and ideas on sprinting don’t work. He talks about when and when not to cue, sprint posture and breathing, foot strike, and other areas of his unique coaching style.

    In this podcast, Coach Adarian Barr and Joel discuss:

    • His unique style of coaching.
    • His philosophies on sprinting and timing.
    • Correct posture, breathing, and arm positioning for sprinting.
    • Proper lower limb mechanics.
    • Creating vertical lift with the arms.
    • Creating torque to apply force.

    Podcast total run time is 1:03:41.

    Keywords: track and field, sprinting, sprint mechanics, timing

    Jovanovic Review

    Strength Training Manual: The Agile Periodization Approach Book Review

    Blog, Book Reviews| ByChris Gallagher

    Jovanovic Review


    Mladen Jovanovic’s Strength Training Manual: The Agile Periodization Approach is an unconventional and creative perspective on planning and organizing strength training. This first book represents Volumes 1 and 2 of the full work and is, by the author’s admission, more theory-based. (He plans for Volume 3 to have a more practical application.) The evolution in the author’s writing, from his early articles to this latest text, is readily apparent.

    Mladen is far more widely read and researched on topics such as statistics and philosophy than I am, but his articles, his social media, and this book make these topics and concepts more accessible to me and other strength coaches. As much as I believe I am knowledgeable in coaching athletes, training, and physiology, Mladen’s writing highlights how much more I have to learn in some (surprisingly?) related areas. This reinforces the messages of coaches like Stuart McMillan and authors like David Epstein who contend generalists will triumph in a specialized world. The author draws on many areas to inform and instruct his ideas and his approach to training, including philosophy, mathematics and statistics, business, and IT and the software industry.

    No matter how smart or experienced we are as coaches, our mental processes will sometimes be wrong. “Agile periodization” is the concept of minimizing the downside. Share on X

    All coaches utilize various heuristics, rules of thumb, or assumptions. However, no matter how smart or experienced we are, by their very nature these mental processes will be wrong from time to time. The major theme of “agile periodization,” introduced early in the manual, is the concept of minimizing the downside.

    In statistical terms, we want these errors to be type I (underestimating) rather than type II (overestimating). At its worst, a type II error may be catastrophic (injury). A type I error may mean the athlete is undercooked from a training point of view, but they will live to fight another day. This a central tenet of agile periodization: the analogy of slow cooking the athlete with respect to strength training.

    Risk Figure
    Figure 1. Illustration of the Barbell Strategy, an important concept underlying agile periodization. Protect from the downside by putting more emphasis on low risk/low reward training strategies while investing a smaller amount of your resources into higher risk activities or overemphasizing individual qualities.


    I have to be honest in that I personally found some of the first chapter dry and hard-going, but it is important to understand the thought processes and perspective of the author for the rest of the book. (Mladen admits “he is pretty sure going through this chapter was painful” for the reader.) I found myself re-reading several sentences or paragraphs to fully digest the meaning. The author provides examples of how this scientific, statistical, philosophical knowledge impacts his approach to planning and coaching, so it is valuable, and it is only one section of the book that helps set the scene for what follows in the three volumes.

    Mladen’s personality comes through in the writing, which ensures some of the drier scientific text is more reader-friendly. The use of personal anecdotes, everyman language and stories, and self-deprecating humor makes for a more engaging read, which is essential for such a thick and concept-dense textbook. A picture speaks a thousand words. Although the book is thick and contains a lot of info, the text is regularly broken up with graphs and charts that succinctly illustrate the meaning of the associated text and make the information easier on the eye.

    The Strength Training Manual provides novel takes on classical training theory. For example, it introduced me to Mladen’s adaptation of Dan John’s system of classifying strength training. (Check out the book for yourself if you, too, are unfamiliar with this.) Looking at existing problems from new perspectives can only be of benefit to us all and perhaps allows us to see new and alternative solutions to age-old questions and problems.

    “One cannot jump phases,

    the simplicity of an expert can be seen as the ignorance of the beginner.”

    At a superficial level the book is a basic training manual: how to program training, how to select exercises, how to tackle important qualities. At a deeper level it gets you to think more intently about your training philosophies; what you believe is important and why. And, more importantly, to realize that while you have some guiding principles, you need to have an appropriate amount of flexibility in these principles to adapt to new situations and environments. Or at least to consider if your existing training mantra is robust enough to apply in situations and environments other than the one in which you presently operate.

    This book makes you consider whether your existing training mantra is robust enough to apply in situations and environments other than the one in which you presently operate. Share on X

    This is not to say you must go out and apply any of Mladen’s categorization methods. (The author himself cautions against doing this blindly; instead exhorting you to decide what is important for you in your situation.) It is merely a question to ask if you need to reconsider how you think about training programming and theory beyond the entrenched training lore.

    The Strength Training Manual gives you an insight into the psyche of a practitioner who clearly thinks deeply about his craft and researches strength training and many related (some loosely, some more directly) fields. It is a great opportunity to peer into the mind of a creative and unorthodox thinker. For example, an important concept Mladen touches on is whether to employ a bottom-up or top-down approach to training. There are compelling arguments on either side of that debate. Purchase the book to read a comprehensive, reasoned analysis of this question from Mladen.

    Volumes 1 and 2 are, again by the author’s admission, heavy on the theory side. But there are nuggets of wisdom from a practical perspective. For example, organizing training when equipment is limited and/or athlete capability or proficiency is mixed, or, for example, running multiple stations with varying dependency on coaching input.

    Training Dose
    Figure 2. Seemingly basic training constructs may in fact be far more complex than they initially appear. For example, training dose is not as simple as intensity and volume.


    There may be a dichotomy between the seemingly “optimal” program and the robustness of the program in a real-world applied setting (i.e., what happens when someone misses one of the optimal sessions?).

    In the middle chapters the book perhaps dives down a few mathematical and statistical rabbit holes. Mladen introduces many novel ways of analyzing, interpreting, or classifying training methods. This can be daunting and confusing for the reader. But it can also be seen as a window into the complex and interconnected way he looks at physiological and training concepts—the plurality of the many small-world models, as Mladen likes to refer to it.

    We must be cautious in applying small-world, scientific, optimal “truths” to the real world of athlete development. Share on X

    As Mladen frequently points out, laboratory-based, scientifically “proven” constructs depend upon simplification of the real world into “small world” models that permit scientific rigor and validity. But it is for these very reasons that we must be cautious in applying small-world, scientific, optimal “truths” to the real world of athlete development. That is not to say this scientific data is not useful, but a reminder that it is only one piece of evidence-based practice rather than the whole story.

    Agile Periodization
    Figure 3. Agile periodization is founded upon the concept of progressing training through iterations. Each training cycle provides an opportunity to analyze the athlete’s response to the latest n=1 training study and inform future iterations.


    Agile periodization is characterized by the concept of “estimation through iteration,” and I see instances of this in my own coaching and programming methodology. An example of this may be the use of embedded testing to inform and guide subsequent training cycle loading. (Perhaps embedded testing is an intuitive deduction of experienced coaches?)

    If you take even just one new idea away from a book, it has been worth the time invested. One such example here was introducing me to Paul Carter’s concept of pre-work sets. I have used some of these ideas in a small way before; for example, walking out and holding an even heavier weight before attempting a heavy squat. But I didn’t have a name for these methods and the “pre-work” sets described in this book encompass this and other ideas with which I haven’t yet experimented.

    The final chapters present a comprehensive catalog of planning and programming routines alongside an equally exhaustive list of regulating systems (e.g., APRE) This could be both a strength and weakness of the text with the volume and detail of information perhaps overwhelming for some. This exposes the reader to a smorgasbord of options for organizing training sessions and cycles. But it could also lead to paralysis by analysis or variety for its own sake if they don’t have a strongly grounded training philosophy. (This supports Mladen’s own assertion within the text that it is perhaps more suitable for more experienced coaches who have a greater wealth of coaching experience to draw on when deciding what tools or methods to employ).

    Contemporary vs Agile
    Figure 4. Illustration of the differences between “contemporary” periodization and annual planning and Mladen’s agile periodization.


    Toward the end of the text, Mladen provides the example in figure 4 of how agile periodization compares and contrasts with traditional periodization and annual planning. The overarching philosophy is to know where we are heading with respect to the ultimate training goal and destination, but to only plan one or two cycles into the future. Here I see strong parallels with Stuart McMillan’s “micro dictates the macro” ideology. (When several intelligent people say similar things, there’s a good chance they are onto something!)

    Not Easy, but Worth It

    I am paraphrasing here, but a simple synopsis of the content and message of the manual could be as follows: rather than trying to write the optimal program, try to find the most robust solution that will satisfy your aims when assumptions are proven wrong.

    To paraphrase, rather than try to write the optimal program, try to find the most robust solution that will satisfy your aims when assumptions are proven wrong. Share on X

    Don’t expect an easy read with Strength Training Manual: The Agile Periodization Approach. As with most things in life, you only get out of it what you put in. Invest some time reading the book and ruminating on the information it contains. You are sure to be rewarded with new insights and invaluable training knowledge and personal reflections.

    This first book, consisting of Volumes 1 and 2, contains a fairly comprehensive collection of training planning and progression strategies. If nothing else, it may serve as an extensive reference resource for creating your own training templates. Mladen promises more to come in Volume 3.

    Since you’re here…
    …we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


    Josse 2

    Episode 63: Cameron Josse

    Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

    Josse 2

    Cameron Josse is the Athletic Performance Coach for Indiana University’s football program. Before that, he served as the Associate Director of Football Performance for the University of Charlotte, and prior to that position he was the Director of Sports Performance for DeFranco’s Training Systems in New Jersey. He also has spent time at The University of South Carolina as a sports performance intern working with football, men’s soccer, and track and field.

    Josse is a 2013 graduate of the University of Rhode Island, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in kinesiology. While at Rhode Island Josse played defensive back for the Ram’s football team. He earned his master’s degree in exercise science from William Paterson University of Jersey. Coach Josse is certified through the NSCA as a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS) and also holds certifications as a Certified Physical Preparation Specialist (CPPS) and a Functional Range Conditioning Mobility Specialist.

    Cameron gives us his speed-building ideology, along with lessons he has learned from Joe DeFranco’s legendary training templates. He covers insights he has gained from his heavy-resisted sled training cycles, special strength for speed, top exercises for speed specific to acceleration with technical considerations of common football sprint patterning, and lifting progressions for athletes from all levels.

    In this podcast, Coach Cameron Josse discusses with Joel:

    • Rationale for the use of his heavy sled protocols.
    • Lessons learned and adjustments he will make after his latest heavy sled training cycle.
    • Using special strength exercises to improve sprint performance.
    • Creating a self-corrective training environment.
    • Max speed differences between football players and track athletes.
    • Sprint mechanics.

    Coach Josse can be found at SimpliFaster, where he has written about power and speed training for American football players, change of direction drills, and more.

    Podcast total run time is 1:03:17.

    Keywords: sled training, sprinting, top end speed, combine training

    Stretch Anatomy

    Combining Movement Quality and Muscle Power with Nicole Foley

    Freelap Friday Five| ByNicole Foley

    Stretch Anatomy


    Nicole Foley is an assistant coach of East Coast Gold Weightlifting, one of the most decorated and renowned national teams in the country. Inside of ECG headquarters, she has developed and grown a youth/junior weightlifting program, and she is the Events Coordinator and Meet Director. Coach Foley is also the Co-Founder of Rude-Rock Strength and Conditioning and works as an independent contractor out of the Iron Asylum (Virginia Beach, VA), where she is a strength coach and the resident Olympic Weightlifting coach. Nicole is the Social Media/Marketing Coordinator for East Coast Gold Weightlifting and several other exercise-based companies.

    Nicole received her BA in Dance and Corporate Communications from James Madison University and her MS Ed. in Sport Management from Old Dominion University. From 2015–2019 she was the Head Coach of the Old Dominion University Dynasty Dance Team, capping off a 15-year career as a dance coach and instructor. She is recognized through the NSCA as a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist. Through USA Weightlifting she has received her Advanced Sport Performance certification and has coached athletes at the national level.

    Freelap USA: You have a solid background in weightlifting and coach those lifts with some of your clients. Due to your passion for the sport, how do you manage your natural bias (the one we all have as humans)? Do coaches sometimes overcompensate and not use the lifts at all for fear they will appear biased?

    Nicole Foley: Splitting my time as an Olympic weightlifting coach, a strength and conditioning coach, and a personal trainer comes with its obstacles; however, it also comes with some great rewards. As an independent contractor at the Iron Asylum, I have a wide variety of clients: from general population weight loss clients to Olympic weightlifters with aspirations of competing, and everything in between. I always let the athlete’s goals and needs dictate the programming direction. After a thorough assessment of the athlete, I decide whether weightlifting is the best tool to use with them or not.

    I always let the athlete’s goals & needs dictate the programming direction. After a thorough assessment of the athlete, I decide if weightlifting is the best tool to use with them, says @nicc__marie. Share on X

    If an athlete wants to be more explosive and has the movement capability to perform the Olympic lifts, then I will 1000% incorporate some variations of the lifts and their respective accessories. That doesn’t mean I will build the entire program around Olympic weightlifting. On the other end, if a person seems apprehensive about the lifts and coaching the lifts wouldn’t be any more beneficial to their program goals than any other movement, then why force something on someone? In my experience, the more I work with a person and they see my training or some of the weightlifters I work with, their curiosity begins to grow.

    About a year and a half ago, I had a runner come to me wanting to improve her mile times and training splits. She didn’t know much about Olympic weightlifting aside from what she saw through CrossFit but knew that she needed strength training in order to help improve her sport. As we progressed, she began to enjoy the feeling and intensity of lifting heavy weight more than her weekly 8+ milers and training split protocols. She grew curious in the gym and began asking about Olympic weightlifting and if I thought it would be something she could try. After working together for several months, I knew it was time to feed her curiosity, so I began incorporating clean pulls and power cleans into her programming.

    Eventually, she found herself more excited to come to the gym to train than to lace up her sneakers and hit the road. One day she came to my wide-eyed and said, “I don’t want to run anymore. I want to weightlift, and maybe one day compete at a local meet.” From that day forward we made the transition, and now her training program is reflective of a true Olympic weightlifting program: incorporating the main lifts, weightlifting accessories such as pulls or snatch balances, strength lifts, mobility work, and general accessories.

    Freelap USA: Weightlifting is a sport and can benefit from the strength and conditioning coaches who understand the needs of preparation. Can you share how you may do things differently than other weightlifting coaches?

    Nicole Foley: In traditional sports, athletes have strength and conditioning and then sport-specific practice. For a weightlifter, our sport-specific practice is in the weight room. That doesn’t mean that the only thing we should be focused on are the Olympic lifts. Just like any other athlete, weightlifters need to have strength and conditioning and sport-specific practice.

    Now, this is obviously not going to be an S&C program in the traditional sense because we do not want to burn out the athlete to the point that their training suffers. However, it is imperative that weightlifters understand how to move and train to be well-rounded. Weightlifting exists predominantly in the sagittal plane; however, there is more going on than meets the eye. For instance, the rotational mechanics of the glenohumeral joint during a snatch or clean and the accompanying internal rotation torque at the hip during deep flexion are two examples of this.

    Moreover, some of the more glaring (and common) non-sagittal movement deviations that we’ve all seen include lateral shifting in the bottom of the squat, torso rotation in the overhead position of the snatch, lateral shifts in jerk recovery, and excessive dynamic valgus knee collapse, to name a few. As coaches, it is our responsibility to correct these deficiencies, but on the platform that athlete is going to do whatever it takes to save a lift. So, it is also our job as coaches to make sure their bodies are prepared for anything.

    On the platform the athlete will do whatever it takes to save a lift, so it is our job as coaches to make sure their bodies are prepared for anything, says @nicc__marie. Share on X

    At East Coast Gold Weightlifting, I have the good fortune of training and working under my mentor, Phil Sabatini. Phil has an extensive background in the sport of weightlifting and is a former collegiate strength coach and exercise science professor. He taught me how to look at training and coaching weightlifting as more than just the snatch and clean and jerk. As I learned how to dissect the lifts, we spoke about the kinematics and biomechanics of the movements and the muscle actions of the body that can affect various points of the lift. This elucidated more discussion of general strength and conditioning and how we can use that to build a stronger and more sustainable weightlifter.

    Every program I write prescribes an appropriate warm-up targeting mobility and/or stability (athlete dependent), along with accessory work to be completed after their main lifts. One thing I have noticed is that old-school coaches provide online programs that only include the Olympic lifts and main strength lifts; warm-up consists of an empty bar, load it and go. However, that could be a disservice to those athletes because not every weightlifter has an athletic background or foundation built to handle such repetitive movement. Even those with a solid strength foundation still need variety in their movement patterns to continue preventing injury and creating resilience.

    Freelap USA: How have you changed your mind on exercise selection over the years in training the team sport athlete? Have you replaced any movement or dropped an exercise altogether?

    Nicole Foley: My exercise selection hasn’t changed much over the years. It’s Olympic weightlifting: we snatch and clean and jerk, squat, pull, and press. What has evolved are the variations, technical drills, movement explanations, and cueing of the lifts.

    These lifts are the most technical movements an athlete can perform. I have grown to recognize which variations I should incorporate more with certain athletes versus others. If I have an athlete who has a low back injury, then I am strategic about how often we pull from the floor and use more block work to provide the necessary training volume without compromising the athlete.

    When it comes to coaching, your ability to provide context and general understanding is crucial. It can be difficult to explain to someone how to pull themselves under a bar, but one of the best analogies I’ve ever heard (and “stole”) was from my fellow coach, Brenden McDaniel. He described the timing of using the elbows to pull your hips down like pulling yourself down a waterslide. Never has anything so complex made so much sense.

    Being able to improve on how you go about coaching and explaining the lifts is more valuable and practical than simply removing an exercise. There are progressions and regressions that you can utilize based on an athlete’s abilities. It is the instruction that is ever-changing in this sport because, as people change how they communicate with one another and learn from one another, a coach should adapt how they teach.

    Freelap USA: Your dance background is a massive advantage for you, as you coached it for years. Can you explain the unique benefit dance has given you for teaching and observing the athlete?

    Nicole Foley: Dance and weightlifting in the same sentence is not something you hear often, but the reality is that they are much more linked than you might realize. The goal of a dancer is to be strong, explosive, and able to accelerate and decelerate, move at different tempos, and change direction quickly, all while looking graceful and effortless in their performance. Weightlifting also checks all those boxes. There is a grace and fluidity to the Olympic lifts that only comes with true proficiency.

    Dancers spend hours and hours of rehearsal time going through the same movements and movement phrases to perfect every last detail. It is a tireless but necessary process in order to perfect their craft. As a dance coach, you require the ability to look at the same eight-count phrase 20 or more times in search of any discrepancies between dancers to ensure the synchronicity of their body placement, technique, and timing. It is tedious for a coach to clean each movement to perfection, and there are times you will spend an entire rehearsal on one section of a piece and not even look at anything else until the dancers have it just right. The ability to go through this process and not get bored or aggravated with looking at the same thing over and over again is a skill in and of itself.

    Weightlifting works in the same manner. You have to be able to look at a lift over and over and over again to see what is happening with the athlete in each individual rep. Then you need the knowledge and understanding of how to correct it. A lot of people look at a clean and see that they made the lift, or they missed the lift. But a coach understands that every make as much as every miss can have some sort of improvement. I spent my entire life looking at the same performances and dissecting them down to the one dancer’s arm being a degree or two out of a position in comparison to the others around them. In weightlifting, it isn’t about the synchronicity of the other lifters around them, but the synchronicity of the athlete and the barbell. Where is the athlete’s weight being distributed as they move through the lift, what is the timing of transitioning under the bar, are they pulling too early, etc.?

    In order to perfect the minute details of these highly technical lifts, you have to break down and dissect what the body does as it moves through the positions, says @nicc__marie. Share on X

    In order to perfect the minute details of these highly technical lifts, you have to break down and dissect what the body does as it moves through the positions. You need a sharp eye that can navigate through the technique in real time. It can be difficult to watch the same thing over and over again and not get bored, but whether it is my type A personality or my years of coaching dance, I find a calmness to breaking down the movement and enjoy the tedious process of fine-tuning the technique. Either way, I know I wouldn’t have the eye for this if it wasn’t for the endless hours spent cleaning choreography and training my eye to find the slightest changes or differences in movement, and I owe all of that to my first love, dance.

    Freelap USA: Strength and conditioning is a very complicated process at times, but it’s often that coaches overthink it. How has your evolution as a coach improved your programming and design of workouts?

    Nicole Foley: Confidence, plain and simple. In the beginning, I felt the need to prove how much I knew. I tried to incorporate as many exercises and movements as possible to keep clients from getting bored and to show how smart I was. Up to this point, my subject matter education was an ACE textbook, and I knew I had a lot of work to do.

    After meeting my now-husband, Danny Foley, I began to see the opportunities in this field and the importance of understanding the basics. It doesn’t have to be complicated in order to be successful. We spent a lot of long nights studying, and he helped break down academic principles into real-world application. I stopped looking at programming as the Mount Everest of training and started looking at the body, how it moved, and how things felt when moving in a certain pattern. Being able to apply this gave my programming better structure by incorporating exactly what the athlete needed—no more and no less. With this newfound knowledge, my confidence grew, and my programming evolved naturally.

    Whereas I used to switch up exercises too quickly in an effort to keep the athlete engaged, I began to understand that this was not an optimal way to develop proficiency and see true progression—especially in weightlifting. Depending on the training age of the athlete and the goal of the program, we spend 3–4 weeks on the same movement variations and provide variety in the accessory movements. It is a lot more difficult to understand and improve a technical deficiency in the lift if you only see that variation once every two months. When I reinforce a movement position or variation for several weeks, the athlete can see their progression and direct their training focus to what their specific lift variation tries to emphasize. Then I use the accessory lifts to progress and challenge the athlete while breaking up some of the monotony of training.

    My programming is still evolving as I learn and progress forward in the field, but at the end of the day, consistency is key. Without that consistency, true technical knowledge of the lifts will never develop.

    Since you’re here…
    …we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


    • « Go to Previous Page
    • Page 1
    • Interim pages omitted …
    • Page 93
    • Page 94
    • Page 95
    • Page 96
    • Page 97
    • Interim pages omitted …
    • Page 164
    • Go to Next Page »

    Primary Sidebar

    Latest Posts

    • Building a Better High Jump: A Review of Stride Patterns
    • How We Got Our First Sprint Relays to State in Program History
    • Science, Dogma, and Effective Practice in S&C

    Topics

    • Changing with the Game
    • Game On Series
    • Getting Started
    • high jump
    • Misconceptions Series
    • Out of My Lane Series
    • Rapid Fire
    • Summer School with Dan Mullins
    • The Croc Show
    • track and field
    • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series

    Categories

    • Blog
    • Buyer's Guide
    • Freelap Friday Five
    • Podcasts

    COMPANY

    • Contact Us
    • Write for SimpliFaster
    • Affiliate Program
    • Terms of Use
    • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
    • DMCA Policy
    • Return and Refund Policy
    • Disclaimer

    Coaches Resources

    • Shop Online
    • SimpliFaster Blog
    • Buyer’s Guide
    • Freelap Friday Five
    • Coaches Job Listing

    CONTACT INFORMATION

    13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

    Alachua, FL 32615

    (925) 461-5990 (office)

    (925) 461-5991 (fax)

    (800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

    Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

    Loading

    Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.