• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
You are here: Home / Blog

Blog

Fudge

Episode 26: Steve Fudge

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Fudge

Steve Fudge is a UK Master Coach and Performance Sprints Coach for British Athletics based at the British Athletics High Performance Centre in Loughborough. Coach Fudge specializes in a holistic coaching style tailored to each individual athlete he coaches, from the psychology of motivation to nutrition, physiology, neurology, mechanics, pedagogy, strength, and therapy. He has coached and trained a stable of high-level sprinters and worked with professional athletes and teams on speed development.

Coach Fudge has a bachelor’s degree in sports science from the University of Edinburgh. He began his career at the University of Washington in Seattle as an unpaid intern before taking his skills to the South Australian Institute of Sport in Adelaide, Australia. While in Australia, Fudge also worked with the Brisbane Lions Australian Football Club and the Queensland Reds Rugby Union team. He has been working in the field since 2003.

Steve discusses his multidisciplinary background filtered down into simple, practical, and effective answers. He dives into how to coach your athletes to run faster, jump higher, and move better. He lets us know how his background in strength and conditioning influences his unique coaching style with his sprinters.

In this podcast, Coach Steve Fudge discusses with Joel:

    • How the weight room fits into his sprinting program.

 

    • Why he believes in bilateral squats for his sprint athletes.

 

    • Developing a program for reduction of hamstring injury.

 

    • Hormonal adaptations resulting from weight room sessions.

 

  • Uses of specific exercises in the weight room for sprinters.

Steve’s website can be found here.

Podcast total run time is 46:18.

Keywords: sprinting, bilateral squats, weight room for sprinters, injury reduction

Martinez

Episode 25: Daniel Martinez

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Martinez

Daniel Martinez is the Head Strength & Conditioning Coach and Coordinator of the Patrick Stumberg Sports Performance Center, a role he has held since 2017. He is also the Founder and Lead Sports Performance Coach for Entheos Athletics in San Antonio, TX. Additionally, Martinez consults for ForceDecks, which works collaboratively with strength & conditioning and sport science departments in the NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, and NCAA.

Coach Martinez earned a bachelor’s degree in exercise and sport science with a minor in sport psychology from Texas State University in 2010. He received a master’s degree in strength and conditioning from Edith Cowan University, located in Perth, Australia, in 2016. He is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist with the NSCA, a certified sports performance coach with USA Weightlifting, and a Level 2 Certified Coach with the Australian Strength and Conditioning Association.

Martinez goes into detail on utilizing technology to assess vertical jump ability, relative to your sporting needs. He also talks about various jumping topics in-depth, as well as the use of the weight room to increase those abilities.

In this podcast, Coach Daniel Martinez discusses with Joel:

  • Jump profiling for better performance.
  • The relationship between tissue and foot/ankle training.
  • Research into loaded and unloaded jumping.
  • Programming jump variety into your workouts.
  • Ideas on maximal strength work and vertical jump relationships.

Coach Martinez has written multiple pieces for SimpliFaster: Click here to read them.

Podcast total run time is 52:19.

Keywords: volleyball, jump testing, vertical jump, jump mechanics

Meier Weight Room

Spearheading a High School Performance Program with Scott Meier

Freelap Friday Five| ByScott Meier

Meier Weight Room

Freelap Friday Five with Scott Meier

Scott Meier is currently in his 21st year at Farmington High School (MN) where he is the Strength and Conditioning Coach. He is also a physical education teacher at FHS and teaches Weight Training, Human Performance, and ninth-grade Fitness for Life classes. He coached Farmington’s competitive weightlifting for nine years, and in that time the Tigers earned four state team titles, more than 40 individual state champions, and multiple state records. Prior to that he was the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach at Lakeville (MN) High School and worked as a personal trainer for six years.

Coach Meier continues to compete in track and field at the master’s level, where he is a nationally ranked sprinter and holds several state age-group records. He is the current Minnesota State Director of the National High School Strength Coaches Association.

Freelap USA: The idea of having a high school strength coach is gaining momentum. Can you share the benefits of having a faculty-style coach rather than a sports coach as a strength professional?

Scott Meier: Continuity between strength and conditioning and the physical education department is key for any high school program. What happens during the school day and what happens before and after school with athletes should mirror each other. When the two are separated and don’t support each other, students often get mixed messages about training, which only causes problems. Having strength coaches who are also P.E. teachers with weight training classes during the day ensures everything is seamless.

Continuity between strength & conditioning and the physical education department is key for any high school program, says @FarmingtonPower. Share on X

Our classes are open to all students, so they are a mix of athletes and non-athletes, but a lot of our coaches push for their athletes to register for a lifting class during the day. That way the coaches don’t have to take practice time or extend practice in order to get into the weight room and lift, and their players get longer workout times and more lifting days if they take a class as well.

For P.E. teachers, that benefits us because the enrollment in our classes stays high. Our weight rooms are busy all day long during the school day. And, for S&C coaches, it helps to alleviate the number of athletes who lift after school, so it’s a win-win. With that continuity, the transition from one sport season to the next, one class to the next, or any crossover between sport and class, is extremely easy. The only thing that changes is the time of day that the individual students train.

There are a couple of issues that I have seen with sport coaches running the strength program. One is the question of who runs the strength program when that coach is in-season. You can’t do both at the same time. That might leave somebody who isn’t qualified in charge of the weight room for a full season.

Second, there can be the perception—especially if it happens to be football—that the coach only cares about their own team and focuses on them more than the other teams. Good coaches know that’s not the case, but that’s how the myth that the weight room is just for football still lingers.

And lastly, and I really feel this is true for both S&C coaches and sport coaches, is that it is really important to be a teacher and be in the same building during the day as your athletes. Coaches who are not teachers don’t really understand how schools work, and they don’t have a feel for the school dynamic when they just come in outside of the school day. I’ve been on both sides of this and being a coach who is also a teacher has a tremendous upside. You gain a lot by being in your school all day, for both teaching and coaching.

Freelap USA: Winters get ugly up north, and you do a lot of training in the weight room and gym. With not much space for movement, how do you periodize athletic development based on the season?

Scott Meier: Weather is a huge limiting factor for us in Minnesota. It’s a given in the winter, but it also determines how late in the fall we can continue training and when we can start in the spring. It’s kind of crazy, but schools in the upper Midwest don’t have turfed indoor practice facilities like they do in the South, so we are stuck trying to use what little space is available.

A lot of times that ends up being hallways for speed and agility training, if you can call it that. We try to get into one of our gyms on days that there are basketball games, before they need to start setting up. That’s a little better, but not like being outside on a field or the track. In general, and I know most schools up here are in the same boat, you just have to be creative and try to make the best use out of whatever space you happen to have.

I really look at the winter as a reset time and the time for quality, focused work in the weight room to prepare us for the rest of the year and what lies ahead, says @FarmingtonPower. Share on X

So, because of the limitations we have for quality athletic development in the winter, strength has really become our primary focus that time of year. Winter also happens to be the longest sports season, so for our off-season lifters it is a good length of time to really develop that base of strength, getting both high volumes early and high intensities later, which sets us up to shift over to more power-based training in the spring and speed-focused training in the summer. I really look at the winter as the reset time and the time for quality, focused work in the weight room to prepare us for the rest of the year and what lies ahead.

Freelap USA: You train a huge number of athletes, as you run classes all day. How do you plan training without spending all day on a laptop? Coaches want to write better workouts but only have so much time. What is your secret?

Scott Meier: One of the first big mistakes I made as a coach was writing separate programs for each sport. My first real experience in the field was as an intern at the University of Minnesota, and every sport there had its own programs, so I brought that with me to my first high school job. Huge mistake! Besides all the time it took to write these programs, it was just chaos in the room. I was constantly explaining things and teaching new lifts.

Keeping track of what exercises everyone was supposed to be doing—much less the sets, reps, and intensities—was pretty much impossible because they were all doing different things. So, when I started here at Farmington a few years later, I switched to a unified approach to programming. All high school athletes, regardless of sport, basically need the same things in the weight room: improved strength, improved power, and improved movement technique and efficiency. If we all need the same things, we can all train the same way.

Therefore, in the off-season all athletes do our off-season program, and they do the same lifts on the same day. This is basically the same program that my P.E. classes also use. I do make different programs for in-season teams because their lifting and game schedules are all different, I try to keep them as similar as possible, at least on a weekly basis, but I usually plan to have teams that lift on the same day do the same workout. From a programming point of view, that has simplified things for me and made it much more manageable.

For me as a coach, though, the biggest timesaver has been TrainHeroic. Once I have my workouts programmed in it, it’s really easy to copy individual workouts or entire programs to different teams, classes, or groups. A full training cycle for us is about 12 weeks, and every workout is different. I always tweak things for the next cycle, so it’s possible our athletes will never do the same exact workout twice.

TrainHeroic makes it incredibly simple to make those adjustments and apply them for the next time around. I can also change things for different teams or individual athletes. This technology has probably saved me a couple hundred hours of computer work in the four years we’ve used it. And it’s certainly better for my athletes as well, compared to my old printed Excel sheets or whiteboard workouts.

Freelap USA: You are a big fan of Gopher Performance and use their equipment religiously. With coaches having limited budgets, can you explain why high school coaches need to balance price and product quality carefully when shopping? Many coaches tend to buy based on price and get burned later when they have to replace equipment.

Scott Meier: I’m going through that price versus quality situation with our bumper plates right now. We had to get 10 sets a few years ago, and because of the quantity, I went with the cheapest “high quality” ones I could find that were from a well-known brand. Big mistake. We had numerous issues just within the first year, and I regret the decision to go with the cheapest. We should have waited a little longer and gotten something that I knew would last for the long-term.

When purchasing new equipment, you really have to consider how it will be used and how much use it will get. There is a lot of wear and tear in a high school setting, and high school coaches don’t have the budgets that big colleges and pro teams have. With important equipment that gets used all the time, it really is better to spend a little more money upfront because it will save you money in the long run not having to replace it as often.

With important equipment that you use all the time, it really is better to spend a little more money upfront because it saves you money in the long run not having to replace it as often. Share on X

Quality does matter. That’s why we decided to go with Gopher Performance for the equipment in our new room. They provide a great balance between high quality and price. And they have been an outstanding company to work with. I think it’s important to develop a relationship with equipment companies that you can trust and who will stand behind their equipment so that you don’t get burned later.

Freelap USA: You are a veteran coach and are entering another year of coaching. What stokes your passion and keeps you excited to train? How can a young coach learn to sustain excellence while trying to get better every day? What is a good way to coach hard without burning out?

Scott Meier: I’m a competitive person, and while injury has kept me from racing on the track the past few seasons, I find other ways to compete against myself and still really enjoy pushing myself. As I get older, though, I find myself competing against Father Time a little more, and the health benefits of regular exercise have become a little more important. I am also kind of a self-experimenter and don’t mind trying some different or even crazy things from an exercise standpoint, and I always like to try new things before I prescribe them to my students and athletes. I think it’s very hard to teach or coach a new exercise if you don’t truly know what it feels like yourself.

My very first coaching job was coaching sprints and relays at a local high school my final year in college, and one thing that has always stuck with me was how the head coach constantly looked for anything he could do that would make a difference in performance. This included any little thing that could possibly shave .01 off a time or add .5” to a jump or throw, because you never know when that could affect an outcome. That’s something that I’ve continued to do my whole career, constantly searching for any extra edge.

The internet has really helped in that quest and so has social media, even more so. The networking and sharing of information between coaches and sports scientists now is outstanding, and it is incredibly beneficial. There’s no excuse not to keep evolving as a coach. It’s that quest for any new little training edge that’s exciting for me.

That being said, the demands of the job can be, and usually are, very high. Work days are long, and it can be hard to draw the line at what is just too much. To prevent burnout, there has to be a balance between family and work. As teachers and coaches, I think it’s in our nature to always want to do what we can to help other people, but you have to come to the realization that it’s okay to say “no.” Failure to achieve that manageable balance between work and home life will not work out very well for either your coaching career or your family.

As teachers and coaches, I think it’s in our nature to always want to do what we can to help other people, but you have to realize that it’s okay to say “no,” says @FarmingtonPower. Share on X

The one thing that I really enjoy the most, and that helps keep me going, is seeing the big improvements that high school kids can make. Seeing what seniors can accomplish by the time they leave after four years of training is very rewarding. And every fall we get a new batch of incoming ninth graders with untapped potential who we get to help take on the high school athletic journey and see how far they can get. Every year is different from the last and, while there are always ups and downs, being a high school strength coach is a pretty awesome gig.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Nelson

Episode 24: Dr. Mike T. Nelson

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Nelson

Dr. Mike T. Nelson is a researcher, exercise physiologist, trainer, speaker, and expert on the human body. Dr. Nelson specializes in metabolic flexibility, heart rate variability, and overall human performance. He is a faculty member for the Carrick Institute of Functional Neurology and an adjunct professor and member of the American College of Sports Medicine.

Dr. Nelson has a Ph.D. in Exercise Physiology from the University of Minnesota, an M.S. in Biomechanics from Michigan Technical University, and a B.A. in Natural Science from St. Scholastica. He is also a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist through the NSCA and holds multiple sports performance-related professional certifications.

Dr. Nelson discusses nutrition, basic physiology, recovery, and psychology in relation to improving sports performance. He shares his thoughts on the role of various hormones in athletic performance and how those can be utilized.

In this podcast, Dr. Mike T. Nelson discusses with Joel:

  • The roles of lactate, cortisol, and growth hormone on the athlete.
  • Seeking performance not fatigue.
  • The use of breathing techniques.
  • The effectiveness of nutrient timing on hypertrophy.
  • The role of leucine in protein absorption.
  • Ketosis and its role for speed and power athletes.

Dr. Nelson’s website can be found here.

Podcast total run time is 59:14.

Keywords: nutrition, hormones, belly breathing, nutrient timing

Hansen

Episode 23: Derek Hansen

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Hansen

Derek Hansen is a recognized expert in high-performance speed development training. Coach Hansen began working with track and field athletes in 1988 and has since expanded his internationally renowned consultation services to include athletes in all sports. He has trained top performers in the world, including Olympic medalists, world record holders, Canadian National team athletes, and professional athletes from the NFL, NBA, MLS, and NHL.

Hansen currently holds the position of Neuromuscular Training and Return-to-Play Coordinator for Performax Health Group in Burnaby, BC, Canada. He is a NSCA Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist and was the NSCA Provincial Director for British Columbia from 2006 to 2010. He is also an NCCP Level 3 Track and Field Coach – Sprints and Hurdles Emphasis and a NCCP Level 2 Olympic Weightlifting Coach.

Coach Hansen discusses some highly advanced principles of sports performance but successfully breaks them down into simple and effective principles for the listener. He talks about his philosophy and process of application in linear speed testing, sprint drills, general vs. specific strength, and bar speed monitoring.

In this podcast, Coach Derek Hansen discusses with Joel:

  • The value and application process of linear speed testing.
  • Commonalities between performance testing and what sport coaches are looking for on the field from their athletes.
  • The use of active and reactive speed drills.
  • Monitoring athletes to prevent training from negatively affecting performance in sport.
  • Using velocity-based training in the weight room and how it applies to sport.
  • Ideas on specific vs. general strength training for building speed and power.

Derek Hansen can be found at SprintCoach.com. You can also find him at SimpliFaster.

Podcast total run time is 55:23.

Keywords: linear speed, monitoring, track and field, speed testing

Taylor

Episode 22: Matt Van Dyke

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Taylor

Matt Van Dyke is the Associate Director of Applied Sports Science at the University of Texas, Austin. Matt works directly with the Longhorn Football Program and is responsible for the management of training loads and recovery modalities implemented for each individual athlete in order to maximize performance and readiness to compete. Before coming to the UT, Van Dyke was the Associate Director of Sports Performance at the University of Denver. There, he was responsible for sports performance programming and implementation for men’s lacrosse, alpine ski, volleyball, tennis, and swimming.

Coach Van Dyke was a member of the Iowa State football team for four years as a wide receiver, where he earned Big XII Second Team Academic Honors for the 2011 and 2012 seasons. Matt is certified by the Collegiate Strength and Conditioning Coaches Association (SCCC). He earned his bachelor’s degree in exercise science from Iowa State University in December 2012.

Matt shares his hierarchy model for training for proper glute function. He also gives us his insight into the Triphasic Training Program he learned while coaching and interning at the University of Minnesota under Cal Dietz.

In this podcast, Coach Matt Van Dyke discusses with Joel:

  • His thoughts on Olympic lifting for power development.
  • The causes of compensation patterns in athletes.
  • The importance of belly breathing.
  • His glute layering progression for addressing athlete compensation patterns.
  • Injury prevention and preparation of athletes for their sport.
  • Using the French Contrast Method.

Matt’s website can be found here.

Podcast total run time is 1:16:46.

Keywords: triphasic training, compensation patterns, athlete readiness, glute activation

Soccer Skill Training

Should Ball Skills Be Combined with Performance Training?

Blog| ByErica Suter

Soccer Skill Training

The social media landscape today is crowded with a bevy of accounts that complicate youth development and training. Whether their young clients are on the pitch, on the rink, in the outfield, on the court, or on the course, their skill work is far from simple. Youth soccer players tap their feet through ladders while dribbling the ball. Youth lacrosse players juke through agility rings while tied to a resisted cable. Embellished with fancy equipment, an assembly of cones, ladders, hurdles, and bands, and hype music as the backdrop, the content makes followers “ooh” and “ahh.”

Gone are the days when we see a trainer break down the intricacies of pitching form over and over again, so a young athlete truly learns the motor skills behind it. Gone are the days when we see a trainer break down soccer shooting technique with repetitions on both the dominant and non-dominant foot. Gone are the days when people are out there in the trenches, coaching their tails off and being instructors of skills. While there are many coaches who still do this, we simply do not see it. What we see is a circus, and instead of making kids players of their sports, people are making them puppets of social media.

The beautiful simplicity of sports is waning, the good old-fashioned art of coaching is being lost, and the craft of teaching is becoming the art of marketing. While everyone provides an exuberant and electric atmosphere in their training sessions, they fail to develop the physical and technical piece for their players. Kids are becoming worse at their sport and more susceptible to overuse and compensatory movement patterns due to social media sensationalism.

For youth development and training on social media, I do not want to see something sensational—I want to see something applicable, says @fitsoccerqueen. Share on X

To that end, I do not want to see something sensational. I want to see something applicable. I urge people to sit back and observe, to ask questions, and to inquire why kids are being put through certain drills. This is not to say that everything you see on social media is “wrong,” but it is fair to ask what the purpose of a training session is, and what skill is being taught to a child athlete.

Suter Train
Image 1. Acceleration and speed are both skills that performance coaches needs to teach with attention to detail—posture, contralateral coordination, knee flexion, and hip extension.

None of this is to say that complex skills training is not valuable. To progress athletes, skills training does have to be done in a spontaneous and uncertain environment, especially under defensive pressure. When kids progress to higher levels, fancy, creative, and sharp moves become paramount, but we need to allow kids to focus on just the skill first so their nervous system learns it, can apply it, and can execute it in a game setting. This means the added noise of the gym equipment has to go.

Alas, coaches and parents who truly want their kids to learn the game, and optimize the physical and technical pieces, should know that it is critical to separate the two. Truly, the physical component is also a skill, and it takes a trainer to break it down with painstaking detail in a separate gym environment.

What does physical training encompass?

  • Speed
  • Acceleration and deceleration
  • Change of direction
  • Strength
  • Power
  • Mobility
  • Stability
  • Flexibility

More often than not, the physical components happen off the ball, and these are some of the most magical moments of sports. This could be making a diagonal run onto a through ball, jumping for a header and scoring off of a corner kick, transitioning up the court as fast as possible, performing a rapid cut to get open for a teammate, or making a fast crossover step to steal a base.

Even when the ball, puck, bat, or club are involved, the technical skills are not optimized unless the athlete has the strength and power beneath them. Not only does this allow for a cleaner and smoother execution of the skill, but also a more powerful and explosive one.

Shooting in soccer, for example, is part technique, part leg power and strength. If the athlete cannot use the hip flexor muscles through their full range of motion, stabilize their core, extend their posterior chain, or balance the plant foot, then technique will suffer. It does not matter how many shooting clinics a young athlete signs up for, how many repetitions they do on their net in the front yard, or whether they have the best shooting trainer in their area, they need the strength to give all of this a boost.

Having a strong follow-through for a shot in lacrosse is similar. Without the chest and shoulder strength, the shot won’t be the strongest it can be, and if the hips are not tied together with the anterior core and upper body, a lacrosse player does a disservice to their technical follow-through on the shot.

Pitching in baseball is another one for which people exclaim, “You just need more pitching training!” While we cannot discount pitching technique, as it is one of the most meticulous skills that needs coaching, we have to remember that pitching speed does not increase from constant wear and tear due to endless repetitions. Rather, the speed is a result of shoulder mobility, arm strength, and rotational power through the core.


Video 1. Rather than athletes repeatedly practicing sport-specific skills, they benefit from strength work such as these med ball slams, which help develop rotational power through the core.

Too many are still not convinced and will say that athletes need to load their sport-specific skills to a faster pitch, a stronger shot, or a more powerful swing. Whether this is tying a resistance band to a pitcher, giving a soccer player a weighted soccer ball, or making a tennis player play with a heavier racket, this all becomes problematic for motor learning.

The issue with adding load to skill-specific work is it trains the neuromuscular system to not go through full range of motion and technique, and it can cause the compensatory movement patterns that lead to the overuse injuries in young athletes today.

Adding load to skill-specific work trains the neuromuscular system to not go through full range of motion and can cause the compensatory movement patterns that lead to overuse injuries. Share on X

Please spare the kids the resisted shooting drills and get them in the gym to work on strength, power, balance, and mobility as a separate piece. For starters, exercises like single leg deadlifts, Pallof presses, medicine ball throws, and split squats will ensure kids develop their kicking power, and polish technique as a nice by-product.


Video 2. Exercises such as the goblet split squat help athletes develop their kicking power, and they also help polish technique.


Video 3. For a skill like lateral power, athletes need to develop the foundation of frontal plane strength with proper posture, core stability, and hip mobility in the gym.

An athlete can’t home in on any of this if the ball or skill work are in the picture. Truly, strength and power training are pieces that must be hammered home with attention to detail and form. Once gym work is done, over time the skill piece organically becomes more robust.


Video 4. This is an example of how lateral strength and power contribute to the soccer-specific skill of 1v1 jukes and fake

Building strength requires loading the body over time and progressing under a plan that tweaks sets and reps each week, so kids raise the intensity over time. To that end, a youth athlete can only perform lateral plyometrics over and over again until the volume is too much wear and tear on their body. A young athlete can only perform ladder drills over and over again until the repetitive movement of small steps is not enough to really teach acceleration and sprinting mechanics.

Taking the conversation further, what about skills like speed and acceleration? People are right when they say kids must learn these with sports skills because these do happen with the ball, and this is something we should be cognizant of when programming training sessions. Even beyond speed and acceleration, game-specific conditioning is important if we want to add the cognitive piece to training. This can be done through the programming of small-sided and large-sided games, various pitch dimensions, and work-to-rest ratios to elicit a game-like conditioning effect.

People are right when they say kids must learn speed and acceleration with sports skills because they do happen with the ball, says @fitsoccerqueen. Share on X

However, speed and acceleration without the ball are totally separate skills than with the ball, and we must be aware of this, too. In team sports, players do work both on and off the ball, so we have to address both separately.

For something like acceleration, without the ball, players drive their knees up higher for a more explosive “first step,” extend their rear leg further for aggressive steps, and throw their arms back aggressively for optimal acceleration to occur. If you are still skeptical, Video 5 showcases the vast difference between acceleration with and without the ball:


Video 5. Acceleration with and without a ball are two totally separate skills for an athlete to learn.

My guess is that coaches of team sports want their players to move fast off the ball, too. In soccer, players have the ball at their feet for a major percentage of the game, so it is these moments we want to prepare our athlete for. Wins are decided by these dynamic actions, and these are the plays off the ball that make team sports so exciting.

A skill like acceleration can only be optimized if worked on as its own piece—from the technique to posture, arm action to foot placement, total body strength to force production.

Take one of my middle school athletes on her first day of training, for example. She had never been in a physical training environment in her life. For her first session, we went through a detailed session on acceleration form, and I had to break down all facets of the skills. All I accomplished with her that day was teaching her how to coordinate her body properly. If I had thrown her into a multitude of fancy drills with extra balls and equipment, it would have been a disservice to what I was trying to teach, and it would have elicited an awkward neuromuscular response from her with ipsilateral movement patterns.


Video 6. This middle school athlete’s first day of training focused solely on acceleration form so she could learn proper body coordination. I did not confuse her by adding in balls or extra equipment, or even by introducing technique and posture.

Expounding further, we did not even get to the acceleration technique and things like posture, knee drive, or rear leg position. If this does not show how detailed coaching this skill must be, I do not know what does. Throwing the ball in a session like this would have taken away from truly teaching her contralateral coordination, arm position, and how to move her body in a smooth manner.

Eventually, for a skill as meticulous as acceleration, I would take it further once coordination is mastered, and begin to work on posture, ball-of-the-feet loading, and arm placement. And of course, underneath all of the acceleration technique is a strength training program that progresses posterior chain strength in the hamstrings and gluteals.

It is important for coaches to be clear about the purpose of their sessions, what skill they are training, and what type. Is it physical or technical? Is it fast dribbling? Is it first touch? Is it shooting? Is it throwing? If physical, is it strength? Is it linear change of direction? Is it acceleration? Is it athletic stance and change of direction?

Simply telling an athlete how to get into athletic stance will not necessarily fix the skill if they do not have the strength to move into the position, says @fitsoccerqueen. Share on X

Athletic stance is another physical component that, once nailed down, only boosts sport-specific skills, like cutting, jumping, and landing. Alas, just like the other physical parts, it needs to be taught with painstaking cues, and built in the gym with quadriceps, gluteal, hamstring, and transverse abdominus strengthening movements. Simply telling an athlete how to get into athletic stance will not necessarily fix the skill if they do not have the strength to move into the position. As an example, a teenage female athlete with “knock knees” will need to strengthen her gluteus medius, hamstring, and quadricep muscles to get into a better ankle, knee, and hip position.


Video 7. Players can translate an athletic stance within their sport to be able to absorb force (for injury reduction) and produce force (for speed and acceleration production).

Once athletic stance is taught, athletes can learn the “hip turn” for better retreating and changing of direction to recover from a play. Learning dissociation of the hips is a complex skill that requires full attention and focus from the athlete—awareness of their body, their directional step, and their stance and posture to produce an efficient and fast outcome. Adding on, it requires separate gym training to build their core stability so that their hips have more mobility. Defenders especially benefit from learning a skill like this because they do not have the ball on them, and they need to learn how to retreat as fast as possible when someone blows by them.

Another skill to teach with the underpinnings of athletic stance is lateral acceleration and deceleration—skills that, if not taught properly, can increase the risk factor for an ACL tear. To ensure athletes have stability in their knee, are coaches breaking down form so the ankle, knee and hip joint are together? Are they loading and recruiting the posterior chain enough? And please get rid of the skill work, the added equipment and bells and whistles, so you can address all this with painstaking observation and instruction.


Video 8. Shuffling is a fundamental skill that translates to lateral acceleration and deceleration in team sports.

Coming back to acceleration, doing this in a totally separate session not only allows for the proper breakdown of the skill, but also the proper dynamic warm-up and enhancement of the athlete’s movement quality during the session. This requires an extensive, yet quality, session, instead of a tossed-together session with no purpose.

I urge players, parents, and coaches to continue to ask questions when it comes to player development and to question the idea of “sport-specific” skills training.

The best way for players to get better at their skills is to play more of their sport, spend more time with just the ball and some pressure, focus in on skill work and master it with repetition, and have a coach who breaks down technique into detail.

True mastery comes from tuning into the skill, owning it, and avoiding the distractions. This is possible with an instructor who says no to the social media flash and glitter and simply coaches because they know that is why they are there. Good old-fashioned coaching is one of the best ways to provide our young athletes with the development they need in the technical and physical aspects of a sport.

It is worth reiterating that these are optimized if done separately and, truthfully, by coaches in their respected areas of expertise. Dribbling at speed with the ball is a totally different skill to be taught by the team or technical coach. On the other hand, sprinting at maximal speed on the balls of the feet, knee drive, and fast ground contact are to be taught by the strength and conditioning professional. In order for kids to acquire a skill, specialty teaching is critical, as well as repetition. Sessions do not need to be all over the place for the sake of variety and novelty.

It serves us well to ask these questions if we truly want to work on physical development and skill development:

  • What is the purpose of the training?
  • What skill am I teaching?
  • What is the best drill to accomplish all of this?
  • What is the best progression to this drill once my player masters this skill?
  • What does my young athlete need?

The last question is an important one because, at the end of the day, we have to give our young athletes what they need—not what the social media world needs nor what our followers need, but what the kid needs to be their most robust and resilient self.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF


Taylor

Episode 21: Curtis Taylor

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Taylor

Curtis Taylor is the Associate Head Coach for the University of Oregon Track and Field program. He specializes in coaching sprints, relays, and hurdles. Coach Taylor has helped produce six individual NCAA titles, 14 individual Pac-12 Conference championships, and 49 All-American selections since joining the Ducks’ coaching staff in 2014. He was named the USTFCCA West Region Assistant Coach of the Year for the 2015 indoor and outdoor seasons.

Prior to his current position, Coach Taylor spent eight years as a highly successful junior college coach at Laney College in Northern California. He began his coaching career at Bishop O’Dowd High School in Oakland, California, in 1988. Following his tenure at BOHS, he spent six years as the Head Track and Field Coach at Skyline High School, also in Oakland.

Taylor presents his coaching philosophies and reviews what he believes to be the key to his success as a coach. He shares with listeners ways to implement an effective plyometric training program for sprinters. He also discusses his approach to the weight room in relation to the sprinters he works with.

In this podcast, Coach Curtis Taylor discusses with Joel:

  • Upper body training for sprinters.
  • The use of overspeed training in training for speed.
  • The amount of high-intensity lifting he programs in his sprinters’ yearly plan.
  • Programming deloading weeks for his athletes.
  • Over distance and tempo training.
  • His favorite drills for sprinters.

Podcast total run time is 50:40.

Keywords: overspeed, sprinting, track and field, deloading

Plyometric Bounds

Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive

Blog| ByMatt McInnes Watson

Plyometric Bounds

When tasked with delivering a plyometric plan for athletes, it can be easy for us to slip into a progressive way of programming. The desire today for bigger, better, and more extreme movements in dynamic training is leading us down the route toward a constant need for some sort of statistical progression. Whether that’s the height of a box, hurdle, or jump, we now yearn to continually raise the bar in jumps training (pun 100% intended).

Movements that lack an instant measure of progression often get pushed aside in favor of exercises that are pleasing to the eye and more likely to get engagement on Instagram. Coaches who understand the intricacies of performance in sport know that progression and the constant need for it can have a detrimental effect on athletes.

Movements that lack an instant measure of progression often get pushed aside in favor of exercises that are pleasing to the eye and more likely to get engagement on Instagram. Share on X

Whether your athletes compete in track and field or team sports, you know that a developmental program that spans the playing/competing year can set up an athlete for success. If we enter the year with certain movements and continually progress them until the competitive season, the likelihood is that injury risks will increase, and adaptations will hit a plateau. So why do we repeatedly see plyometrics on this progressive continuum of athletes trying to leap 3 1/2-foot hurdles? In my opinion, this is all due to a misinterpretation of Verkhoshansky and Siff’s Supertraining and a lack of education around locomotive plyometrics.

The Truth About Plyometrics

The name “plyometrics” has always had a slight folklore to it, with rumors about a background in Russian-style shock methods with 3-meter depth jumps and hundreds of meters of hopping and bounding. But from day 1, Verkhoshansky’s “Fundamental Theory of Plyometrics” followed five simple phases that determined an athlete has to land to then take off for the movement to be considered plyometric.

  1. Initial Momentum Phase: The body moves due to the kinetic energy produced from a preceding action.
  2. Electromechanical Delay Phase: Coined to mean the start of the electrical signal to the start of the mechanical contraction in a muscle. Some may define this phase to include the lengthening of the series elastic component (SEC) of the muscle complex.
  3. Amortization Phase: When kinetic energy produces a powerful myotatic stretch reflex. This phase bridges the eccentric and concentric phases of a landing and takeoff.
  4. Rebound Phase: This phase marks the release of elastic energy from the SEC, together with the involuntary concentric muscle contraction.
  5. Final Momentum Phase: When the concentric contraction is complete, and the body continues to move by means of kinetic energy from the Rebound Phase. This phase will then restart the cycle in preparation for the next movement.

Despite this, there is a lingering fear and assumption that we require a stimulus (i.e., a hurdle) or a selected height to fall from (i.e., a box) to stimulate tissue for an adaptation. Or an altogether incorrect format of jumping—learning how to lift your knees—with static box jumping.

As a high jumper, I spent at least 3–4 years doing plyometrics and never needed a hurdle or platform to create the violent eccentric lengthening that comes with this form of training. Yet, at a similar time during my undergrad, lecturers and coaches were telling me that youngsters weren’t allowed to do any plyos until they reached a certain age due to high injury risks and dangers. Since then, I have always countered this with what I term “locomotive plyometrics” (meaning, any form of dynamic movement that cycles through a landing to takeoff action in under 0.25 seconds).

Locomotive plyometrics allow for an infinite number of movements that create adaptations for the KPIs needed in dynamic sport, says @mcinneswatson. Share on X

I took the term “locomotive plyometrics” from my old coach and mentor, Erik Little, who devised this developmental system for plyometrics over the past 40 years. The system allows for an infinite number of movements that create adaptations for the KPIs needed in dynamic sport, including movements that teach athletes how to deal with overload, velocity, stability, and even mobility. Little designed original categories for plyometrics, and I have developed upon them. These tiers of locomotive plyometrics, along with categories of slower jumping methods, support the adaptational growth between the murky grounds of weightlifting and high-speed training.

Looking back at equipment, I’d be wrong to totally condemn the use of hurdles and boxes for plyometrics. There is a time and place for these types of movements, and it’s at the more elite level. (Although, do not assume that any elite sportsperson can depth jump or leap hurdles, because there is a very small minority that can execute these well.) Our typical human inclination to copy the elite often leaves athletes making many mistakes.

Some common problems are:

  1. When trying to leap hurdles, priority #1 is usually to clear the obstacle. In my opinion, landing mechanics should always be your #1 concern, and if you wish to elicit a certain type of landing, then cue it.
  2. If you’re going to use hurdles, mini hurdles, or boxes, then create a system that spaces them accurately. Again, this is a huge issue with destroying any specific cue you may want as a coach. Using numerical sequences like the Fibonacci sequence can help to space things with a natural growth of distance. (Note: Use your feet to pigeon-step out obstacles.) Nine times out of 10, obstacles are spaced in such a way that they destroy landing mechanics.

Remedies for issues:

  1. Removing obstacles allows much more freedom for movement. This form of training is to teach athletes to move with grace, and gracefulness doesn’t flow in a constraint-based environment.
  2. Doing simple things, like asking your athletes to lift their knees as if to leap through hurdles, takes away the dangers of using obstacles, but at the same time can create the potential dynamic landings you may get from hurdle leaps.
  3. Finally, the beauty of locomotion-based plyometrics is that they allow athletes to self-select their falling heights—i.e., if I am to leap roughly 30 centimeters into the air, my next landing will have roughly the eccentric landing forces of a 30-centimeter depth jump. This takes away the fear of the unknown and uses a much more natural muscular sequence.

Plyo Language
Table 1. Language Clarification Key by J. Erik Little. Clarifying language as a coach is essential. Try using this system, and you should find that your athlete’s understanding of what’s required improves immediately.

Developmental Tiers of Plyometrics

As mentioned before, the idea that plyos have to be shock-based is a myth. The use of submaximal and lighter versions allows for a greater scope of variation to help with accommodating the diverse needs of multiple sports.

The idea that plyometrics have to be shock-based is a myth. Submaximal and lighter versions allow for greater variation to help with the diverse needs of multiple sports, says @mcinneswatson. Share on X

Categorizing plyos over my years as both an athlete and a coach has allowed me to organize movements into more of a hierarchy for developmental learning. Much like Bondarchuk’s periodization principles, there are foundational general prep movements that realistically never leave your program. The competitive year is then focused on becoming more specific toward the sport—in this case, the specificity from the plyos is the velocity and force of the movements.

Reasoning Behind the Tiers

Note: Using locomotive plyometrics and leg dynamics as part of your programming is a great way to teach athletes how to move, deal with overload, stabilize, and continue the direction of kinetic energy and velocity with grace.

Each tier can range from 1–10 movements (it could even be 50 if you had the reasoning), depending on the level, experience, and phase of the year. These can be a mixture of any of the plyometric movements listed in the key. Think about varying a hop (unilateral—one-legged to the same leg) followed by a leap (two-legged to two-legged) to perhaps give the legs a slight rest and bring variation to the tier. You can determine all variables based on the athlete’s needs, but I note suggested distances to cover below.

Disclaimer: The distances suggested are just recommendations, and coaches are responsible for athlete prescription. You should monitor the volume and intensity of movements for each athlete. As soon as landings become heavy and flat, it’s a case of diminishing returns, and injury risks will start to increase exponentially.

Footwork/Light Tier: 5–15m distance, due to the high number of small landings.

The lighter tiers (or, as I call them, “footwork” movements) are a great starter and introduction to load. They aim to keep GCT short and joints relatively stiff, and the eccentric loading remains low due to them not being maximal. The idea is to create a nice compliant bounce to the movements to enable strong neuromuscular learning to take place. You can prescribe this tier in high volumes, due to its reduced loading. You can also use it as a tool to increase joint stiffness of the lower extremities when the volume of landings is high.


Video 1. Leg Exchanges Plyo. This light tier of “footwork” plyometrics is perfect as a starter to activate for further dynamic work and a great reintroduction to landings when returning from injury. They’re also valuable for learning neural patterns of movements—try these barefoot on grass or on mats to get a good feel.

Keys: Short GCT, low GRF, neuromuscular control, rhythmical landing-takeoff patterns. Stiff joint, little compression, light sensational landing.

Medium Tier: 10–40m, greater distances for bigger movements like hopping and bounding

If anything, our medium tier is the bread and butter of locomotive plyometrics. Although not necessarily maximal, medium tier plyos are still violent due to the velocity of active limb striking. Eccentric GRFs are within the range of hitting over 4–5x BW, while GCT remains very fast.

With the locomotive properties of medium tier plyos, there should be a natural flow and relaxed state to airborne movement, covering ground gracefully. High loading and fast GCT mean that volumes can’t be too high, but they have a place year-round in a program and should be a staple part of keeping general prep fitness up. This tier is a good teacher of typically cyclical movements, with loading and unloading patterns that utilize the SSC.


Video 2. Med Bounds Plyo. Depending on the phase, athletes can perform the medium tier plyometrics on hard tracks/courts or soft grass and mats. If the movement doesn’t flow well, take a step back and slow down the traveling velocity of the movement.

Keys: High speed = short GCT, submaximal GRF, cyclical rhythm. Athletes should seek to cover ground efficiently.

Dynamic/Ping: 5–20m, shorter distances due to fewer landings

The phrase “Ping” is part of the cued terminology used for locomotive plyometrics. It asks for exactly that—a movement where you ping off the floor, being highly reactive and dynamic. You could relate Ping movements with depth jump landings. They are maximal, shock-based, fast GCT, high GRF, and as stiff as possible.

Due to high intensity levels, the volume of Ping work can’t be too high, but a small number of landings can produce good adaptations. When cued for, coaches can ask for maximal heights, distances, and speeds. (Note: This should only be done if the athlete’s landings remain within the Ping parameters. If the GCT is too long or the joint stiffness is decreasing, then regress as necessary.)


Video 3. Ping Leaps Plyo. Use only hard surfaces for this type of work to keep GCT down. Even if jump height and/or distance aren’t great, make sure the emphasis is on being as dynamic as possible (minimal joint distortion—reactive pop to the action).

Keys: High speed = short GCT, high GRF, as reactive and dynamic as possible.

Supporting Methods

Deep: 5–20m, often shorter distances, due to slower-moving velocities.

The Deep tier is exactly as it sounds—movements are much deeper in ROM and joints absorb and flex much more. This is not to say that eccentric GRF can’t be high, but GCTs are likely to be outside of what’s seen as the plyometric realms of less than 0.25 seconds. With this, the coupling of the eccentric and concentric phases is somewhat less effective, and there is an obvious isometric period to deep movements. The series elastic component is not utilized, as is seen in true plyometrics, so the movements become more muscular-focused and the concentric phase is a more obvious push. High levels of stability, through greater ROM, are needed to control posture and alignment when absorbing force in deep movements.


Video 4. Deep Leg Exchange Plyo. This tier is a great tool for recognizing imbalance and a lack of range at a joint. Having an athlete do deep leaps will straightaway test the positive shin angle and mobility around the ankle. This sort of information can collectively help remedy issues that may arise at much faster speeds.

Keys: More shock-absorbing = longer GCT, high stability, greater mobility = deeper ROM, greater postural control.

Locomotive plyometrics can help build a more dynamic and athletic individual and enable coaches to develop a more holistic program, says @mcinneswatson. Share on X

Develop a More Complete Athlete, and Program

This system of tiers for plyometrics has enabled me, as a coach, to employ these types of dynamic movements for all levels and types of athletes. The use of a developmental system provides a platform for athletes to grow year on year and avoid plateaus at certain stages. The capacity for locomotive plyometrics to build an overall more dynamic and athletic individual enables you to develop a more holistic program that hits critical KPIs for dynamic sports.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF



Kraaijenhof

Episode 20: Henk Kraaijenhof

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Kraaijenhof

Henk Kraaijenhof has been in the world of sports performance since 1975, and he is considered one of the world’s leading experts in the areas of speed and power development. Before he became an advisor to some of the world’s top athletes and teams, Henk was an accomplished coach in the sport of track and field. Coach Kraaijenhof specializes in the study and research of the effect/management of stress and fatigue on athletic performance. He is the founder and director of VortX, a company specializing in the evaluation, prevention, and treatment of mental and physical stress-related issues.

Kraaijenhof is a former track athlete from the Netherlands. He has coached world-class athletes from the Olympic to professional levels, including multiple World Champions and former world record holders in track and field. He has a wide variety of experience outside of track and field, including professional soccer, the NHL, Olympic field hockey, and Olympic volleyball. Coach Kraaijenhof currently works as a mentor for Olympic athletes and coaches in Holland.

Kraaijenhof converses on a wide variety of topics, from the use of plyometrics with 100m sprinters to an in-depth discussion of cueing athletes based on the athlete being left or right brain dominant. Henk gives his thoughts on coaching the mental aspect of athletic development.

In this podcast, Coach Henk Kraaijenhof discusses with Joel:

  • Key performance indicators for maximum speed and endurance athletes.
  • Why some athletes respond to specific types of cueing and others do not.
  • Balancing athlete monitoring with traditional coaching intuition.
  • How fast- and slow-twitch athletes should differentiate their training.
  • The use of bounding to improve speed.
  • Training various types of athletes from a mental perspective.

Henk’s blog can be found here.

Podcast total run time is 46:32.

Keywords: speed development, mental, cueing, monitoring

Fischer

Episode 19: Jeremy Fischer

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Fischer

Jeremy Fischer has been the Head Coach of Track and Field at the Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista, California, since 2012. He also serves as Lead Jumps Instructor for USATF Southern California, having been in that role since 2011. Coach Fischer brings a wealth of experience from coaching athletes in both the college and professional track and field ranks. He has also worked with both MLB and NFL athletes on speed and power development.

Fischer has a master’s degree in exercise science and kinesiology from California State University-Northridge as well as a bachelor’s degree in molecular biology and nutrition from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. As a competitive college and professional athlete, Jeremy was a Top 20 World Track Athlete, U.S. Indoor Runner-Up, NCAA All-American, and Big Ten All-Conference.

Coach Fischer discusses ideas on speed and power training in general as well as preparing jumpers for track and field competition. He goes in-depth into his methods of preparing athletes for maximum explosive power. This includes his thoughts on training strength and power for jumpers in a weight room setting.

In this podcast, Coach Jeremy Fischer discusses with Joel:

  • What he considers to be the most important key performance indicators for jumpers.
  • What testing he uses for his athletes and why.
  • The protocols he uses outside of typical power training to create a well-balanced and fit athlete.
  • Keys to training athletes as they age.
  • The use of what he calls “the two-minute drill” in training all his jumpers.
  • His thoughts on complex training and potentiation in the course of building power.

Jeremy Fischer’s website  can be found at Maximum Velocity Athletics.

Podcast total run time is 52:44. 

Keywords: jumping, power development, track and field, potentiation

Robinson

Episode 18: Keenan Robinson

Joel Smith: Just Fly Performance Podcast, Podcast| ByMark Hoover

Robinson

Keenan Robinson is the Director of Sports Medicine and Science at USA Swimming. He is responsible for evaluating injury, identifying risk factors, and streamlining medical care for Team USA swim team members. Prior to serving with Team USA, he was the head of high-performance services for aquatic sports at Arizona State University.

Coach Robinson is a 2002 graduate of Adrian College in Michigan and a 2005 graduate of the Arizona School of Health Sciences. He is both a certified athletic trainer (NATABOC) and a certified strength and conditioning specialist (NSCA). Robinson served as Head Athletic Trainer with both the 2012 and 2016 USA Swimming teams.

Here, Keenan discusses his process of bringing together the worlds of strength and conditioning and sports medicine to maximize swim performance. He explains his process of learning what makes aquatic athletes fast from a functional, dryland perspective.

In this podcast, Coach Robinson discusses with Joel:

  • Dry land strength and performance, and how he uses it with swimmers.
  • Any key performance indicators in the weight room that can project success in an aquatic athlete’s performance in the water.
  • His take on swim-specific movements in the weight room.
  • Injury prevention and shoulder stability in swimmers.
  • Desirable strength levels for swimmers in various events.
  • How much stretching he believes aquatic athletes need.

Podcast total run time is 41:10.

Keywords: aquatic athlete, swim, aquatic sports performance

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 99
  • Page 100
  • Page 101
  • Page 102
  • Page 103
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 164
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

FEATURED

  • Using Speed and Power Data to Bucket and Train Faster Athletes
  • Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive
  • 9 (Fun!) Games to Develop Movement Skills and Athleticism

Latest Posts

  • Running Through Time: An Athlete’s Story of Resilience and Recovery
  • Rapid Fire—Episode #14 Featuring Rodrigo Alvira Isla: Training Smarter in the NBA and G League
  • Maximizing Success in the Weight Room: A College Strength Coach’s Playbook

Topics

  • Adult training
  • App features
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Athlete
  • Athlete performance
  • Baseball
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Career
  • Certifications
  • Changing with the Game
  • Coach
  • Coaching
  • Coaching workflows
  • Coching
  • College athlete
  • Course Reviews
  • Dasher
  • Data management
  • EMG
  • Force plates
  • Future innovations
  • Game On Series
  • Getting Started
  • Injury prevention
  • Misconceptions Series
  • Motion tracking
  • Out of My Lane Series
  • Performance technology
  • Physical education
  • Plyometric training
  • Pneumatic resistance
  • Power
  • Power development
  • Practice
  • Rapid Fire
  • Reflectorless timing system
  • Running
  • Speed
  • Sports
  • Sports technology
  • Sprinters
  • Strength and conditioning
  • Strength training
  • Summer School with Dan Mullins
  • The Croc Show
  • Track and field
  • Training
  • Training efficiency
  • Wave loading
  • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series
  • Youth athletics
  • Youth coaching

Categories

  • Blog
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcasts

COMPANY

  • Contact Us
  • Write for SimpliFaster
  • Affiliate Program
  • Terms of Use
  • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Disclaimer

Coaches Resources

  • Shop Online
  • SimpliFaster Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Coaches Job Listing

CONTACT INFORMATION

13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

Alachua, FL 32615

(925) 461-5990 (office)

(925) 461-5991 (fax)

(800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

Loading

Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.