• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
SimpliFaster

SimpliFaster

cart

Top Header Element

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Login
  • cartCart
  • (925) 461-5990
  • Shop
  • Request a Quote
  • Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcast
  • Job Board
    • Candidate
    • Employer
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

High-Volume Endurance Training: Risk vs. Benefit

Blog| ByDominique Stasulli

ShareTweetLinkedInEmail

Endurance Athlete

There has been a long-standing debate on whether higher volumes of endurance training equate to elite caliber athletic performances. While it is true that many elite athletes train with much higher volume and intensity than recreational athletes, this certainly hasn’t been shown to be a necessary requirement to compete on this level.

With an increasing volume of training comes a heightened risk of injury, a potentially weakened immunity, and a greater chance of overtraining and burnout. Each athlete is individually capable of handling a given workload and, until the body adapts, this volume should only increase slightly, with caution taken so as not to shock the body into a fatigue- or injury-ridden state. Over time, as more training experience is acquired, this volume can gradually drift upward into the 60-, 70-, and 80-mile, and even 100+ mile weeks.

By no means should an inexperienced runner jump into a 120-mile week training plan and expect to escape unscathed; in fact, some of the highest caliber elite athletes operate at half that volume, under a specific, periodized program designed to substitute quality miles over a quantity of miles. However, others swear by the increases in volume as the key to taking performance to the next level. Is the reward of this high-mileage training worth the risk?

Assessing the Risk

It is well-established in research that exercise in either a high-intensity or high-volume capacity stresses the immune system, making an individual more susceptible to infection, especially immediately following a training session. Unfortunately, a wide breadth of this research involves recreational athletes and sedentary individuals (Mårtensson, Nordebo & Malm, 2014). When considering this trend in elite athletes, you must consider the impact of lifestyle, training tolerance, recovery ability, and nutritional intake, which can all greatly affect the strength and resistance of an athlete’s immune system.

In Mårtensson’s study, which involved 11 elite endurance athletes, the volume of training over several logged years was compared to the number of self-reported sick days. In one year, on average, these athletes trained 462 hours, were sick for 15 days, and were injured for 21 days. The volume of training was not correlated to the contraction of infection, although less fit individuals (those with less training years of experience) were found to be more susceptible than their more experienced counterparts. The latter information aligns with similar research of its kind.

Some studies have reported that the incidence of acquiring an infection post-marathon (or similar event) greatly increases. However, others have negated this cause-and-effect relationship, finding that pre-effort infection is the probable cause for this incidence rate, rather than post-effort sensitivity (Mårtensson et al., 2014). All in all, the physiological training adaptation that occurs in a musculoskeletal and cardiovascular sense also occurs with the immune system. In other words, as an athlete improves and stress demands increase, the immune response must also strengthen to keep from being overrun, both literally and figuratively.

With the explosion of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), it’s no wonder the benefit of high-volume endurance work is being questioned. Still, the largest majority of elite athletes performs 80% of training volume under the lactate threshold, and utilizes HIIT sparingly (Seiler & Tønnessen, 2009). Studies that incorporate a higher intensity of training into already well-trained athletes’ programming prove to be equivocal at best in regards to increasing performance.

What has been consistent and clearly established in the literature is the fact that an 80:20 ratio of low-to-high intensity training leads to excellent long-term performance results in athletes that train daily (Seiler & Tønnessen, 2009). The ability of an athlete to handle high-volume loads in training should be considered on an individual basis, but what seems to be more important is the ratio of this type of base-endurance training to that of high-intensity interval training. The right combination of the two, over time, is better correlated to success in elite athletes today, rather than loading purely for the sake of loading.

References

  • Mårtensson, S., Nordebo, K. & Malm, C. (2014). “High Training Volumes are Associated with a Low Number of Self-Reported Sick Days in Elite Endurance Athletes.” Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13(4): 929-933.
  • Seiler, S. & Tønnessen, E. (2009). “Intervals, Thresholds, and Long Slow Distance: The Role of Intensity and Duration in Endurance Training.” Sportscience, 131-27.

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask. More people are reading SimpliFaster than ever, and each week we bring you compelling content from coaches, sport scientists, and physiotherapists who are devoted to building better athletes. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — SF

ShareTweetLinkedInEmail
LoginComment
src=""

Dominique Stasulli

Dominique has an MS in Kinesiology from A.T. Still University and currently resides in Boulder, CO where she is training for National competitions in the triathlon, running, and cyclocross events. Dominique will be pursing a PhD in Neuroscience and Psychology in the near future.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Laura

    March 18, 2021 at 10:14 am

    Hello Dominque,
    Thank you for your insightful article. I’m coaching track and field at a middle school this spring and was wondering if you had any good suggestions for sites that have the 80:20 ratio you referenced in your article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FEATURED

  • Using Speed and Power Data to Bucket and Train Faster Athletes
  • Plyometric Training Systems: Developmental vs. Progressive
  • 9 (Fun!) Games to Develop Movement Skills and Athleticism

Latest Posts

  • 1080 Sprint: Four Essential Tips You Won’t Find in the Manual
  • Running Through Time: An Athlete’s Story of Resilience and Recovery
  • Rapid Fire—Episode #14 Featuring Rodrigo Alvira Isla: Training Smarter in the NBA and G League

Topics

  • Adult training
  • App features
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Athlete
  • Athlete performance
  • Baseball
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Career
  • Certifications
  • Changing with the Game
  • Coach
  • Coaching
  • Coaching workflows
  • Coching
  • College athlete
  • Course Reviews
  • Dasher
  • Data management
  • EMG
  • Force plates
  • Future innovations
  • Game On Series
  • Getting Started
  • Injury prevention
  • Misconceptions Series
  • Motion tracking
  • Out of My Lane Series
  • Performance technology
  • Physical education
  • Plyometric training
  • Pneumatic resistance
  • Power
  • Power development
  • Practice
  • Rapid Fire
  • Reflectorless timing system
  • Running
  • Speed
  • Sports
  • Sports technology
  • Sprinters
  • Strength and conditioning
  • Strength training
  • Summer School with Dan Mullins
  • The Croc Show
  • Track and field
  • Training
  • Training efficiency
  • Wave loading
  • What I've Added/What I've Dropped Series
  • Youth athletics
  • Youth coaching

Categories

  • Blog
  • Buyer's Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Podcasts

COMPANY

  • Contact Us
  • Write for SimpliFaster
  • Affiliate Program
  • Terms of Use
  • SimpliFaster Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Disclaimer

Coaches Resources

  • Shop Online
  • SimpliFaster Blog
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Freelap Friday Five
  • Coaches Job Listing

CONTACT INFORMATION

13100 Tech City Circle Suite 200

Alachua, FL 32615

(925) 461-5990 (office)

(925) 461-5991 (fax)

(800) 634-5990 (toll free in US)

Logo of BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative. The word Buy is yellow and shaped like a shopping cart, while Board and Purchasing Cooperative are in blue text.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

SIGNUP FOR NEWSLETTER

Loading

Copyright © 2025 SimpliFaster. All Rights Reserved.